Aortic Valve StenosisTAVIXSNCT05672823
Upper Extremity Versus Lower Extremity Accessory Access Sites During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
A study testing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 8 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The goal of this prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach versus the standard 'lower extremity' approach for accessory access sites in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 238 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 28 Nov 2022to 15 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must be > 18 years old.
- Written informed consent is obtained from all patients.
- Planned for transfemoral TAVI procedure.
Who cannot join
- Inability to obtain informed consent.
- Contra-indication for brachial or femoral vein access (temporary pacemaker access site).
- Contra-indication for radial or femoral artery access (diagnostic access site).
- Use of a cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD) if this requires an additional (arterial) access site.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
Netherlands8 sites
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam
OLVG
Amsterdam
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven
Maastricht UMC
Maastricht
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein
Radboud university medical center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA
Isala Zwolle
Zwolle
About this study
Official title: Minimally-Invasive Upper Extremity Approach Versus Lower Extremity Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Accessory Access Sites; A Prospective, Multicenter, Investigator-Initiated, Randomized Clinical Trial
The goal of this prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach versus the standard 'lower extremity' approach for accessory access sites in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
The main questions it aims to answer are whether a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach as compared with the standard 'lower extremity' approach:
Read more
- Is associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding complications.
- Is associated with a shorter time to mobilization after TAVI.
- Is associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization.
- Has the same early safety outcomes at 30 days post-TAVI.
Participants will be subject to the usual care surrounding a TAVI procedure but will also will be asked to fill out two questionnaires before and after TAVI:
- Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH)
- Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
Researchers will compare the minimally invasive, upper extremity group with the standard lower extremity to see if there are difference regarding the posed questions.
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Being tested
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
- Keywords
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Coronary angiography, Hemorrhage, Hospitalization, Pacemaker
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve Stenosis, Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)Procedure or surgery
Comparing different accessory access sites for TAVI: the temporary pacemaker access site and the diagnostic access site.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive, upper extremity | Experimental | Radial artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the Left Ventricular (LV) stiff wire OR radial artery for pigtail catheter and brachial vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire. Receives: Procedure: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) |
| Lower extremity | Active comparator | Femoral artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the LV stiff wire OR femoral artery for pigtail catheter and femoral vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire. Receives: Procedure: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinically relevant bleeding of the randomized access site; either diagnostic or pacemaker access site, or both
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding; In case a clinically relevant bleeding occurs in both the randomized diagnostic access site and the randomized pacemaker access site, these will be combined and the highest classification of the two BARC bleedings will be scored.
BARC classification: a classification scoring bleeding complication based on the clinical actions that follow in which type 1 bleeding is not actionable and type 5 bleeding is fatal.
Measured: "Through 30 days"
Secondary outcomes (12)
Time to mobilization
Time to first mobilization in minutes after procedure; mobilization is defined as walking short distances on the patients room or on the corridor. Transfers between bed and chair are not measured as mobilization.
Measured: "during index hospitalization, approximately 3 days - often hours after TAVI procedure"
Total duration of hospitalization
Duration of index hospitalization in days.
Measured: "during index hospitalization, approximately 3 days"
Composite endpoint of all clinically relevant bleeding of the access sites; either diagnostic or pacemaker access site or primary (TAVI) access site
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding of either the diagnostic access, pacemaker access or primary (TAVI) access.
Measured: "Through 30 days"
Clinically relevant bleeding not related to the randomized access sites
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding not related to the diagnostic access or pacemaker access.
Measured: "Through 30 days"
All-cause mortality
Deaths within the first 30 days after procedure from any cause.
Measured: "30 days"
All stroke
All cerebrovascular accidents within the first 30 days after procedure.
Measured: "30 days"
Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC) type 2-4 bleeding
Bleeding criteria following the VARC-3 criteria. Type 2 bleeding is classified as bleeding requiring transfusion. Type 3 bleeding is defined as bleeding in a critical organ, causing hypovolemic shock, requiring reoperation or significant transfusion.
Type 4 bleeding is defined as overt bleeding leading to death.
Measured: "30 days"
Major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complications
Major vascular complications:
- Aortic dissection or aortic rupture.
- Vascular (arterial or venous) injury, unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention, closure device failure, distal embolization or compartment syndrome resulting in death, VARC type ≥ 2 bleeding, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible neurologic impairment.
Major access-related complications:
- Non-vascular structure, non-cardiac structure perforation, injury, or infection resulting in death, VARC type ≥ 2 bleeding, irreversible nerve injury or requiring unplanned surgery or percutaneous intervention
Major cardiac structural complications:
- Cardiac structure perforation, injury, new pericardial effusion, coronary obstruction or compromise resulting in death,VARC type ≥ 2 bleeding, haemodynamic compromise or tamponade, or requiring unplanned surgical or percutaneous intervention.
Measured: "30 days"
Acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4
All cases of acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4 within 30 days after procedure.
Measured: "30 days"
Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation
All cases of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation within 30 days after procedure.
Measured: "30 days"
New permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities
All permanent pacemaker placements in the first 30 days after procedure due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities.
Measured: "30 days"
Surgery or intervention related to the device
All cases of surgery or interventions related to the device within 30 days after procedure.
Measured: "30 days"
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jan 2023
- Study start28 Nov 2022
- Primary completion15 Dec 2023
- Study completion15 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aortic Valve StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 238 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Niels van Royen, prof. dr., Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05672823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL80895.091.22
- Acronym
- TAVIXS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Versteeg GAA, Rooijakkers MJP, Hemelrijk KI, Vlaar PJ, Overduin DC, van Wely MH, Aarts HM, van Ginkel DJ, Stens NA, van Nunen LX, van Geuns RJ, van Garsse LAFM, Geuzebroek GSC, Verkroost MWA, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Heijmen RH, Thijssen DHJ, Ten Berg JM, Tonino PAL, Delewi R, van Royen N. Extremity Function After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A TAVI XS Sub-Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Apr;107(5):1293-1302. doi: 10.1002/ccd.70470. Epub 2026 Jan 13.
PubMed 41527810Versteeg GAA, Rooijakkers MJP, Hemelrijk KI, Vlaar PJ, Overduin DC, van Wely MH, Aarts HM, van Ginkel DJ, van Nunen LX, van Geuns RJ, van Garsse LAFM, Geuzebroek GSC, Verkroost MWA, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Heijmen RH, Ten Berg JM, Tonino PAL, Delewi R, van Royen N. Upper- vs Lower-Extremity Secondary Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38578.
PubMed 39412806
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Minimally-Invasive Upper Extremity Approach Versus Lower Extremity Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Accessory Access Sites; A Prospective, Multicenter, Investigator-Initiated, Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05672823
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TAVIXS / NL80895.091.22
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Keywords
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Coronary angiography, Hemorrhage, Hospitalization, Pacemaker
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 238 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Study start
- 28 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach versus the standard 'lower extremity' approach for accessory access sites in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
The main questions it aims to answer are whether a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach as compared with the standard 'lower extremity' approach:
- Is associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding complications.
- Is associated with a shorter time to mobilization after TAVI.
- Is associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization.
- Has the same early safety outcomes at 30 days post-TAVI.
Participants will be subject to the usual care surrounding a TAVI procedure but will also will be asked to fill out two questionnaires before and after TAVI:
- Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH)
- Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
Researchers will compare the minimally invasive, upper extremity group with the standard lower extremity to see if there are difference regarding the posed questions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive, upper extremity | Experimental | Procedure: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)Radial artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the Left Ventricular (LV) stiff wire OR radial artery for pigtail catheter and brachial vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire. |
| Lower extremity | Active comparator | Procedure: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)Femoral artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the LV stiff wire OR femoral artery for pigtail catheter and femoral vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients must be > 18 years old.
- Written informed consent is obtained from all patients.
- Planned for transfemoral TAVI procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inability to obtain informed consent.
- Contra-indication for brachial or femoral vein access (temporary pacemaker access site).
- Contra-indication for radial or femoral artery access (diagnostic access site).
- Use of a cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD) if this requires an additional (arterial) access site.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)Comparing different accessory access sites for TAVI: the temporary pacemaker access site and the diagnostic access site. | Procedure or surgery | Lower extremity, Minimally invasive, upper extremity |
Primary outcome
Clinically relevant bleeding of the randomized access site; either diagnostic or pacemaker access site, or both
Time frame: "Through 30 days"
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding; In case a clinically relevant bleeding occurs in both the randomized diagnostic access site and the randomized pacemaker access site, these will be combined and the highest classification of the two BARC bleedings will be scored. BARC classification: a classification scoring bleeding complication based on the clinical actions that follow in which type 1 bleeding is not actionable and type 5 bleeding is fatal.
12 secondary outcomes
Time to mobilization
Time frame: "during index hospitalization, approximately 3 days - often hours after TAVI procedure"
Total duration of hospitalization
Time frame: "during index hospitalization, approximately 3 days"
Composite endpoint of all clinically relevant bleeding of the access sites; either diagnostic or pacemaker access site or primary (TAVI) access site
Time frame: "Through 30 days"
Clinically relevant bleeding not related to the randomized access sites
Time frame: "Through 30 days"
All-cause mortality
Time frame: "30 days"
All stroke
Time frame: "30 days"
Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC) type 2-4 bleeding
Time frame: "30 days"
Major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complications
Time frame: "30 days"
Acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4
Time frame: "30 days"
Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation
Time frame: "30 days"
New permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities
Time frame: "30 days"
Surgery or intervention related to the device
Time frame: "30 days"
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41527810Versteeg GAA, Rooijakkers MJP, Hemelrijk KI, Vlaar PJ, Overduin DC, van Wely MH, Aarts HM, van Ginkel DJ, Stens NA, van Nunen LX, van Geuns RJ, van Garsse LAFM, Geuzebroek GSC, Verkroost MWA, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Heijmen RH, Thijssen DHJ, Ten Berg JM, Tonino PAL, Delewi R, van Royen N. Extremity Function After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A TAVI XS Sub-Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Apr;107(5):1293-1302. doi: 10.1002/ccd.70470. Epub 2026 Jan 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39412806Versteeg GAA, Rooijakkers MJP, Hemelrijk KI, Vlaar PJ, Overduin DC, van Wely MH, Aarts HM, van Ginkel DJ, van Nunen LX, van Geuns RJ, van Garsse LAFM, Geuzebroek GSC, Verkroost MWA, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Heijmen RH, Ten Berg JM, Tonino PAL, Delewi R, van Royen N. Upper- vs Lower-Extremity Secondary Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38578.
Related trials for Aortic Valve Stenosis
Recruiting
SYMmetric Valve fraME Expansion To Reduce hYpoattenuated Leaflet Thickening After Balloon-expandable TAVI: the SYMMETRY Trial
Aortic Valve Stenosis and/or Insufficiency, Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening
RecruitingObservational study
Spanish Prospective Registry of Hydra THV for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis, Valvular Heart Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Korea VHD Echo Study: Surveillance of Aortic, Mitral & Tricuspid Patients - Insights From Real-world Practice
Heart Valve Diseases, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Niels van Royen, prof. dr. principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 8 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinically relevant bleeding of the randomized access site; either diagnostic or pacemaker access site, or both (time frame: "Through 30 days"). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05672823, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2024.