DepressionNCT05674591
Cognitive Processing Therapy in Syrian Women Exposed to IPV
A study testing Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in people with Depression and Anxiety, run by British University In Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study aims to explore the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in treating depression, anxiety, PTSD, and difficulties with emotion regulation in Syrian females who have suffered intimate partner violence (IPV). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression, Anxiety, PTSD
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2021to 1 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- being a Syrian female who currently exposes to intimate partner violence,
- lives in Egypt
- has a good knowledge of English language because all assessments and therapy materials are in English.
Who cannot join
- cognitive difficulties
- schizophrenia (or any other psychotic disorders).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cognitive Processing Therapy for the Treatment of Depression, Anxiety, PTSD, and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation in Syrian Females Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence
This study aims to explore the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in treating depression, anxiety, PTSD, and difficulties with emotion regulation in Syrian females who have suffered intimate partner violence (IPV). Clinicians will conduct interviews with women and request that they complete the CAPS, Beck Depression Inventory II, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and DERS during pretreatment, posttreatment, and at the 12-month follow-up
Read the detailed description
This study aims to explore the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in treating depression, anxiety, PTSD, and difficulties with emotion regulation in Syrian females who have suffered intimate partner violence (IPV). Clinicians will conduct interviews with women and request that they complete the CAPS, Beck Depression Inventory II, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and DERS during pretreatment, posttreatment, and at the 12-month follow-up. Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) may have a substantial therapeutic benefit in the treatment of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and difficulties in emotion regulation among Syrian females who have suffered intimate partner violence.
- Conditions
- Depression, Anxiety, PTSD
- Being tested
- Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
- Keywords
- Cognitive Processing Therapy, Syrian women, Mental health
- Medical subject headings
- Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Behavioural
Also called CPT
The CPT therapist will teach the patient about PTSD, depression, and anxiety, and outline the treatment regimen and rationale for its effectiveness. In the initial sessions, women will be asked to express their impact statements on the intimate partner violence to which they had been subjected. Women will be taught how to differentiate between events, thoughts, and emotions, as well as their interrelationships. Thoughts of self-blame and other misconceptions of the situation will be addressed using Socratic questioning. Women will be instructed on how to detect and counteract negative thoughts, as well as how to communicate more effectively. Women will be encouraged to evaluate negative thinking relating to five themes: safety, trust, power/control, self-esteem, and intimacy. During the final sessions, their impact statements on the violence to which they had been subjected will be altered to include emotional and cognitive insights obtained during the CPT.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Processing Therapy | Experimental | Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) is a manual-guided therapy that incorporates cognitive processing techniques to relieve PTSD symptoms (Resick et al., 2016). Each group session will be 90 to 120 minutes long and will be occur once each week for 12 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women questionnaire
Version 11 of the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women questionnaire (WHO, 2005). This instrument comprises of an informed consent form, a household questionnaire, and a 1-item questionnaire regarding the circumstances of women. The WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence assesses whether women have been subjected to any kind of intimate partner violence throughout their lives. The four components of intimate partner violence are physical, sexual, emotional, and controlling violence. Indicators were dichotomous, with 1 indicating whether or not the individual was a victim of IPV (1 = "Yes", 0 = "No"). Women were asked a number of questions on whether they had ever encountered a variety of behaviours belonging to one of the four groups. For each act of violence, participants will be required to identify whether it had occurred in their lives and how frequently it had occurred
Measured: At first interview, pretreatment
Change from Baseline on Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale at 3 months and at 12 months
Currently, the CAPS-5 (Weathers et al., 2015) is the global standard for PTSD evaluation and is used to evaluate PTSD symptoms. This 30-item structured interview was created by the National Centre for PTSD of the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Generally, the interview may be conducted in 45 to 60 minutes. Each CAPS-5 question addresses both the frequency and severity of each PTSD symptom. These questions have been categorized. Each criteria comprises many questions, and at the end, the points for each criterion are totaled together. CAPS-5 total symptom severity score is calculated by summing severity scores for the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms. The cutoff score for CAPS-5 is 45. Higher scores on CAPS mean a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a 5 point reduction in the overall CAPS-5 scores. Remission was defined as loss of diagnosis and no longer having any PTSD symptoms according to minimum severity scores on CAPS-5 (< 12)
Measured: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
Change from Baseline on Beck Depression Inventory II scores at 3 months and at 12 months
BDI-II measured depression symptoms. BDI-II is a 21-item self-report assessment measuring depressive attitudes and symptoms (Beck et al., 1996). BDI-II takes 10 minutes. Minimal range=0-13, mild depression=14-19, moderate depression=20-28, and severe depression=29-63. BDI-II is reliable and valid (Beck et al., 1996)
Measured: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
Change from Baseline on Beck Anxiety Inventory scores at 3 months and at 12 months
BAI measures somatic anxiety symptoms as anxiousness, dizziness, and inability to relax (Beck et al., 1988). It takes 10 to 15 minutes to finish 21 items. Four-point Likert scale answers vary from zero to three (severely). The total score for all 21 symptoms ranges from 0 to 63 points.
A score of 0-7 indicates "little" anxiety, 8-15 "mild," 16-25 "moderate," and 26-63 "severe" (Beck \& Steer 1990)
Measured: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
Change from Baseline on Difficulties Emotion Regulation scale scores at 3 months and at 12 months
The DERS was created by Gratz and Roemer (2004) and consists of a 36-item self-report questionnaire that evaluates the difficulty in regulating emotions. Bjureberg et al. (2016) created a 16-item abbreviated version of the DERS later on. There are three items about nonacceptance, three items regarding difficulties participating in goal-directed actions, three things regarding impulsivity, five items regarding trouble utilizing emotion regulation strategies, and two items regarding emotional clarity Items are rated on a scale of 1 ("almost never [0-10%]") to 5 ("almost always [91-100%]"). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in emotion regulation. Higher scores on DERS mean a worse outcome
Measured: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2023
- Study start5 Jan 2021
- Primary completion1 Dec 2022
- Study completion1 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The current study is a clinical trial, including the repeated assessments of a single sample of Syrian women. Pre-treatment, posttreatment and 12-month posttreatment assessments were conducted on participants. PTSD severity, depression, anxiety and difficulties in emotion regulation will be assessed as outcomes.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- British University In Egypt
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amani Elbarazi, PhD, Principal investigator, British University In Egypt
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05674591
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CL-2021
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Processing Therapy for the Treatment of Depression, Anxiety, PTSD, and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation in Syrian Females Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05674591
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CL-2021
- Conditions
- Depression, Anxiety, PTSD
- Keywords
- Cognitive Processing Therapy, Syrian women, Mental health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- British University In EgyptUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to explore the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in treating depression, anxiety, PTSD, and difficulties with emotion regulation in Syrian females who have suffered intimate partner violence (IPV). Clinicians will conduct interviews with women and request that they complete the CAPS, Beck Depression Inventory II, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and DERS during pretreatment, posttreatment, and at the 12-month follow-up
Detailed description
This study aims to explore the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in treating depression, anxiety, PTSD, and difficulties with emotion regulation in Syrian females who have suffered intimate partner violence (IPV). Clinicians will conduct interviews with women and request that they complete the CAPS, Beck Depression Inventory II, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and DERS during pretreatment, posttreatment, and at the 12-month follow-up. Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) may have a substantial therapeutic benefit in the treatment of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and difficulties in emotion regulation among Syrian females who have suffered intimate partner violence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The current study is a clinical trial, including the repeated assessments of a single sample of Syrian women. Pre-treatment, posttreatment and 12-month posttreatment assessments were conducted on participants. PTSD severity, depression, anxiety and difficulties in emotion regulation will be assessed as outcomes.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Processing Therapy | Experimental | Behavioral: Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) is a manual-guided therapy that incorporates cognitive processing techniques to relieve PTSD symptoms (Resick et al., 2016). Each group session will be 90 to 120 minutes long and will be occur once each week for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- being a Syrian female who currently exposes to intimate partner violence,
- lives in Egypt
- has a good knowledge of English language because all assessments and therapy materials are in English.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- cognitive difficulties
- schizophrenia (or any other psychotic disorders).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Also: CPTThe CPT therapist will teach the patient about PTSD, depression, and anxiety, and outline the treatment regimen and rationale for its effectiveness. In the initial sessions, women will be asked to express their impact statements on the intimate partner violence to which they had been subjected. Women will be taught how to differentiate between events, thoughts, and emotions, as well as their interrelationships. Thoughts of self-blame and other misconceptions of the situation will be addressed using Socratic questioning. Women will be instructed on how to detect and counteract negative thoughts, as well as how to communicate more effectively. Women will be encouraged to evaluate negative thinking relating to five themes: safety, trust, power/control, self-esteem, and intimacy. During the final sessions, their impact statements on the violence to which they had been subjected will be altered to include emotional and cognitive insights obtained during the CPT. | Behavioural | Cognitive Processing Therapy |
Primary outcome
Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women questionnaire
Time frame: At first interview, pretreatment
Version 11 of the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women questionnaire (WHO, 2005). This instrument comprises of an informed consent form, a household questionnaire, and a 1-item questionnaire regarding the circumstances of women. The WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence assesses whether women have been subjected to any kind of intimate partner violence throughout their lives. The four components of intimate partner violence are physical, sexual, emotional, and controlling violence. Indicators were dichotomous, with 1 indicating whether or not the individual was a victim of IPV (1 = "Yes", 0 = "No"). Women were asked a number of questions on whether they had ever encountered a variety of behaviours belonging to one of the four groups. For each act of violence, participants will be required to identify whether it had occurred in their lives and how frequently it had occurred
Change from Baseline on Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale at 3 months and at 12 months
Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
Currently, the CAPS-5 (Weathers et al., 2015) is the global standard for PTSD evaluation and is used to evaluate PTSD symptoms. This 30-item structured interview was created by the National Centre for PTSD of the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Generally, the interview may be conducted in 45 to 60 minutes. Each CAPS-5 question addresses both the frequency and severity of each PTSD symptom. These questions have been categorized. Each criteria comprises many questions, and at the end, the points for each criterion are totaled together. CAPS-5 total symptom severity score is calculated by summing severity scores for the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms. The cutoff score for CAPS-5 is 45. Higher scores on CAPS mean a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a 5 point reduction in the overall CAPS-5 scores. Remission was defined as loss of diagnosis and no longer having any PTSD symptoms according to minimum severity scores on CAPS-5 (< 12)
Change from Baseline on Beck Depression Inventory II scores at 3 months and at 12 months
Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
BDI-II measured depression symptoms. BDI-II is a 21-item self-report assessment measuring depressive attitudes and symptoms (Beck et al., 1996). BDI-II takes 10 minutes. Minimal range=0-13, mild depression=14-19, moderate depression=20-28, and severe depression=29-63. BDI-II is reliable and valid (Beck et al., 1996)
Change from Baseline on Beck Anxiety Inventory scores at 3 months and at 12 months
Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
BAI measures somatic anxiety symptoms as anxiousness, dizziness, and inability to relax (Beck et al., 1988). It takes 10 to 15 minutes to finish 21 items. Four-point Likert scale answers vary from zero to three (severely). The total score for all 21 symptoms ranges from 0 to 63 points. A score of 0-7 indicates "little" anxiety, 8-15 "mild," 16-25 "moderate," and 26-63 "severe" (Beck \& Steer 1990)
Change from Baseline on Difficulties Emotion Regulation scale scores at 3 months and at 12 months
Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), posttreatment (immediately after the intervention, an average of 3 months), 12-months after the intervention
The DERS was created by Gratz and Roemer (2004) and consists of a 36-item self-report questionnaire that evaluates the difficulty in regulating emotions. Bjureberg et al. (2016) created a 16-item abbreviated version of the DERS later on. There are three items about nonacceptance, three items regarding difficulties participating in goal-directed actions, three things regarding impulsivity, five items regarding trouble utilizing emotion regulation strategies, and two items regarding emotional clarity Items are rated on a scale of 1 ("almost never [0-10%]") to 5 ("almost always [91-100%]"). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in emotion regulation. Higher scores on DERS mean a worse outcome
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2023.
Related trials for Depression
Not yet recruiting
Mandala Coloring in Late Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Anxiety
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ecological Momentary Assessment of State-Dependent Decision-Making and Metacognition Across a Psychopathology Continuum
Depression, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Adapting the ESTEEM Intervention to Improve Mental Health and PrEP Uptake Among Men at Risk of HIV
PrEP Use
Recruiting
Cancer Pain Management Using a Web-based Intervention
Cancer of Breast, Depressive Symptoms
Active, not recruiting
Improving Student Mental Health Through a Universal Trauma-Informed Intervention
Anxiety Symptoms, Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amani Elbarazi, PhD principal investigator
British University In Egypt
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in people with Depression and Anxiety, run by British University In Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women questionnaire (time frame: At first interview, pretreatment). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2023.