Long COVIDSTAR-C3NCT05676047
Cognitive Rehabilitation for Long COVID
A study testing Cognitive Rehabilitation and Education in people with Long COVID, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The investigators are comparing two different methods for helping adults with Long Coronavirus (COVID) also known as Post-Coronavirus Syndrome or Post-Coronavirus Condition manage everyday cognitive challenges. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Long COVID
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Rehabilitation and Education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 May 2023to 21 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Is a community-dwelling adults
- Is age 18 years or older
- Self-identifies as a fluent English speaker
- Have a history of COVID symptoms as listed on the Government of Canada COVID information website, a positive antigen or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, or both
- Have cognitive symptoms that have persisted a minimum of 12 weeks after contracting COVID
- Have cognitive symptoms attributable to COVID and not to other intervening diagnoses associated with cognitive dysfunction (e.g., psychosis, concussion), or medications with negative effects on cognitive function
Show all 10Show fewer
- Have no previous history of a diagnosis of a neurological disorder affecting thinking (e.g., dementia)
- Are able to participate in 3 one-hour sessions per week for 4-6 weeks
- Are not in active behavioural treatment for a substance-use or mental-health disorder, or in cognitive rehabilitation provided by a registered health professional (e.g., speech-language pathologist or occupational therapist)
- Can access an electronic device with internet access and capability for Zoom videoconferencing
Who cannot join
- A score of less than 20 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which indicates a risk for dementia.
- Cannot identify at least 3 problems on the Common Cognitive Complaints after Concussion Questionnaire (C4), as there would be insufficient areas for intervention.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Symptom-Targeted Rehabilitation for Cognitive Complaints in Long COVID (STAR-C3)
The investigators are comparing two different methods for helping adults with Long Coronavirus (COVID) also known as Post-Coronavirus Syndrome or Post-Coronavirus Condition manage everyday cognitive challenges. Cognitive rehabilitation is a type of therapy that helps people who have challenges with everyday thinking because of a brain injury. One of the investigators on this project along with colleagues in the United States (US) have developed a streamlined version of cognitive rehabilitation therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) that can be completed in person or virtually and takes place over a 3-week period. The therapy was originally designed for adults with mTBI. The investigators want to know if it can also be used to treat people with cognitive complaints from Long COVID. The investigators will provide education materials only to one group and individual cognitive rehabilitation delivered by a trained Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) or Occupational Therapist (OT) to the other group. The investigators want to find out whether the individual therapy is as feasible and accessible than the usual educational material. What the investigators learn in this study may help treat day-to-day thinking challenges in Long COVID.
Read the detailed description
Cognitive complaints are one of the most common, pervasive, and debilitating outcomes for adults with Long COVID. In a study of 3762 adults from 56 countries who were 7 months post-diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS Coronavirus 2, referred to here as COVID) 85% reported cognitive problems, including brain fog, word-finding problems, difficulty communicating their thoughts, and a reduced ability to solve serious problems. In the Great British Intelligence Test, an online study of 81,337 individuals the subgroup of 12,689 who reported having had COVID had significantly lower cognitive test scores than those who had not, providing objective support for the symptoms that adults with Long COVID are reporting. These persistent cognitive symptoms, which the investigators refer to as Post-COVID Cognitive Symptoms (PCCS), do not appear to spontaneously resolve, with many patients in Canada and worldwide reporting cognitive impairments more than 1 year after infection. PCCS can have severe effects on usual functioning, particularly given that most survivors are working age. Two large studies estimated that at 7-9 months post-infection, between 40-75% of adults either could not work at all or were working fewer hours than they did pre-COVID. Although emerging data indicate that PCCS may be less common after infection with the Omicron variant, there continues to be concern about future "super-variants" that may have more virulent effects. Even if infection rates stabilize, i.e., COVID becomes endemic, the disease does not become harmless.
Usual care for those with PCCS is, at best, providing information about how to manage symptoms (e.g., this handout from the Public Health Authority of British Columbia). The literature on treatment of cognitive problems in other patient groups, however, shows that providing general information alone does not "fix" cognitive impairments. To improve cognitive function in everyday life, intervention must be individualized and provide opportunities for high-dose practice of target behaviours. The investigators do not, however, have interventions like this with demonstrated effectiveness for PCCS. The literature related to cognitive rehabilitation after COVID includes three types of papers: 1) studies of COVID effects on people who had cognitive diagnoses pre-COVID (e.g., how lack of services has affected patients with Alzheimer's Disease) 2) a small number of case reports of rehabilitation for COVID patients, in which cognitive rehabilitation is mentioned in general terms (e.g., patient received "skill training for basic activities of living" and "evaluation of adaptive devices", and 3) urgent calls for cognitive rehabilitation of adults with PCCS (e.g., 13-15). To the investigators knowledge, there are no published controlled studies of cognitive rehabilitation methods for adults with PCCS. One of the investigators recently completed a pilot pre-post study with 34 adults with Long COVID to examine if physical therapy for physical symptoms and occupational therapy for cognitive symptoms was safe and feasible (protocol completed, under analysis). The cognitive intervention was 6 hours of combined individual and group cognitive rehabilitation over 12 weeks, including education about managing cognitive challenges. The pilot data showed a reduction in intensity and frequency of cognitive symptoms, but no effect on everyday functioning. The study investigators concluded that to improve everyday function, therapy must be targeted at individual complaints, and it is this type of intervention that the investigators propose for a randomized control trial (RCT).
A recent paper in Science 16 called for cognitive rehabilitation to be part of the health system response to Long COVID, but rehabilitation was not included in the category of research needs - i.e., the paper implied that investigators already know how to treat patients with PCCS, and that investigators just need to increase access to therapy. However, it is unclear if standard cognitive rehabilitation methods used for other patient groups are effective for people with PCCS. One source of guidance for PCCS rehabilitation methods is the literature on cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially patients with mild TBI (aka concussion). Adults with mild TBI (mTBI) have symptoms that are commonly reported by adults with PCCS, such as word-finding problems, slow thinking, "brain fog", trouble following instructions, forgetting medications, difficulty in conversations, complaints about mental fatigue, and difficulty making decisions. There also is anecdotal evidence from clinicians who have overseen treatment of more than 3400 adults with Long COVID - that PCCS characteristics are very similar to patients with mild TBI. COVID and TBI share pathophysiological features such as inflammation, hypoxia, microvascular lesions and disruption of the blood-brain barrier, cortical thinning, and diffuse white-matter damage, particularly in anterior cortical regions. Best practices in cognitive rehabilitation also should be similar in both groups: treatments must be tailored to the patients needs, focused on solving everyday thinking challenges rather than 'fixing' deficits, and given in a relatively high dose.
In summary, PCCS is prevalent, debilitating, and persistent, and there is a lack of evidence-based methods to treat adults with these problems. TBI and COVID share pathophysiological features, survivors report similar cognitive symptoms, and best practices apply to both populations, thus the investigators predict that cognitive rehabilitation methods developed for adults with mTBI will also be effective for adults with PCCS.
Study design will follow recommendations in the CONSORT extension for randomized pilot and feasibility trials, so that data from the Vanguard study can be used in the main trial analysis. Results of the main study will significantly advance the investigators understanding of health consequences of COVID-19, delivery of health care, and health outcomes for adults with Long COVID. It is interdisciplinary research by a Canadian-led research team representing speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, healthcare administration, and stakeholders with lived experience; and includes US collaborators representing the largest national company providing a cognitive rehabilitation program developed specifically for adults with Long COVID. The investigators collaboration with US partners is a step toward globalization of the rehabilitation methods.
The investigators propose to complete a Vanguard two-arm RCT of STAR-C3 with 100 adults randomized to either Therapy (n=50) or Education (n=50) groups. The study aims to demonstrate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of STAR-C3 as judged by clinicians and participants with PCCS. Therapy will be delivered by an Occupational Therapist (OT) or Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP).
- Conditions
- Long COVID
- Being tested
- Cognitive Rehabilitation, Education
- Keywords
- Cognitive Rehabilitation, Cognitive Functioning
- Medical subject headings
- Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive RehabilitationBehavioural
A strategy-focused intervention aimed at improving everyday cognitive function, structured to maximize treatment dose over a short time period. The shorter time period of the treatment therapy is relative to the one and only current randomized controlled trial of cognitive rehabilitation for military mTBI, the Study of Cognitive Rehabilitation Effectiveness (SCORE).
EducationOther
The Education group will receive information about self-management of cognitive symptoms at the time of randomization, a common alternative for adults with Long COVID cognitive symptoms who do not receive Individual Therapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Therapy Group | Experimental | The Therapy Group will receive 6-10 individual sessions of 30-60 minutes each, delivered by a trained Occupational Therapist or Speech-Language Pathologist. The therapy will be delivered over a 4-week timeframe, with the total number of sessions per participant depending on the number of sessions needed to achieve their treatment targets. Each participant in the Therapy Group will identify three cognitive targets for treatment. Progress in reaching those targets will be documented using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Rehabilitation |
| Educational Group | Active comparator | The Education group will receive information about self-management of cognitive symptoms at the time of randomization, a common alternative for adults with Long COVID cognitive symptoms who do not receive Individual Therapy. Receives: Other: Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment Rate
The primary outcome is the rate of recruitment, average 5 per month. The primary outcome is the rate of recruitment and retention rate reported as the total number of participants recruited and retained.
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Acceptability of the Intervention
The acceptability will be assessed by clinicians and participants. At least three quarters of participants and clinicians will provide a rating of 4 on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM).
Measured: Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment.
Acceptability of the Appropriateness
The acceptability will be assessed by clinicians and participants. At least three quarters of participants and clinicians will provide a rating of 4 on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM).
Measured: Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment.
Acceptability of the Feasibility
The acceptability will be assessed by clinicians and participants. At least three quarters of participants and clinicians will provide a rating of 4 on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM).
Measured: Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2023
- Study start1 May 2023
- Primary completion21 Jan 2025
- Study completion21 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (40)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Long COVIDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to either the Therapy (n=50) or Education Group (n=50). At the conclusion of therapy (for the Therapy Group) or after three weeks (for the Education Group), participants will be re-administered the outcome measures. The outcome measures using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) will then be compared during data analysis between the two groups.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jackie Bosch, PhD, Principal investigator, McMaster University School of Rehabilitation ScienceLyn Turkstra, PhD, Principal investigator, McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05676047
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15621
- Acronym
- STAR-C3
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re'em Y, Redfield S, Austin JP, Akrami A. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug;38:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
PubMed 34308300Hampshire A, Trender W, Chamberlain SR, Jolly AE, Grant JE, Patrick F, Mazibuko N, Williams SC, Barnby JM, Hellyer P, Mehta MA. Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep;39:101044. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101044. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
PubMed 34316551Liu YH, Chen Y, Wang QH, Wang LR, Jiang L, Yang Y, Chen X, Li Y, Cen Y, Xu C, Zhu J, Li W, Wang YR, Zhang LL, Liu J, Xu ZQ, Wang YJ. One-Year Trajectory of Cognitive Changes in Older Survivors of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. JAMA Neurol. 2022 May 1;79(5):509-517. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0461.
PubMed 35258587Carazo S, Skowronski DM, Laforce R Jr, Talbot D, Falcone EL, Laliberte D, Denis G, Deshaies P, Hegg-Deloye S, De Serres G. Physical, Psychological, and Cognitive Profile of Post-COVID Conditions in Healthcare Workers, Quebec, Canada. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 1;9(8):ofac386. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac386. eCollection 2022 Aug.
PubMed 35983264Ziauddeen N, Gurdasani D, O'Hara ME, Hastie C, Roderick P, Yao G, Alwan NA. Characteristics and impact of Long Covid: Findings from an online survey. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 8;17(3):e0264331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264331. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35259179Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, Rosenbaum A, Wethe JV, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Kingsley K, Nagele D, Trexler L, Fraas M, Bogdanova Y, Harley JP. Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1515-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
PubMed 30926291Wang C, Han J. Will the COVID-19 pandemic end with the Delta and Omicron variants? Environ Chem Lett. 2022;20(4):2215-2225. doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01369-7. Epub 2022 Jan 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 35069059Katzourakis A. COVID-19: endemic doesn't mean harmless. Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7894):485. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00155-x. No abstract available.
PubMed 35075305Gosse PJ, Kassardjian CD, Masellis M, Mitchell SB. Virtual care for patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias during the COVID-19 era and beyond. CMAJ. 2021 Mar 15;193(11):E371-E377. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201938. No abstract available.
PubMed 33722828Chuang HJ, Hsiao MY, Wang TG, Liang HW. A multi-disciplinary rehabilitation approach for people surviving severe COVID-19-a case series and literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Dec;121(12):2408-2415. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
PubMed 35216882Wise J. Long covid: WHO calls on countries to offer patients more rehabilitation. BMJ. 2021 Feb 10;372:n405. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n405. No abstract available.
PubMed 33568362Carson G; Long Covid Forum Group. Research priorities for Long Covid: refined through an international multi-stakeholder forum. BMC Med. 2021 Mar 31;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01947-0. No abstract available.
PubMed 33785027Ramage AE. Potential for Cognitive Communication Impairment in COVID-19 Survivors: A Call to Action for Speech-Language Pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Nov 12;29(4):1821-1832. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00147. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
PubMed 32946270Alwan NA. The road to addressing Long Covid. Science. 2021 Jul 30;373(6554):491-493. doi: 10.1126/science.abg7113. No abstract available.
PubMed 34326224Soble JR, Silva MA, Vanderploeg RD, Curtiss G, Belanger HG, Donnell AJ, Scott SG. Normative Data for the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) and post-concussion symptom profiles among TBI, PTSD, and nonclinical samples. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(4):614-32. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.894576. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
PubMed 24625213
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Symptom-Targeted Rehabilitation for Cognitive Complaints in Long COVID (STAR-C3)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05676047
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STAR-C3 / 15621
- Conditions
- Long COVID
- Keywords
- Cognitive Rehabilitation, Cognitive Functioning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators are comparing two different methods for helping adults with Long Coronavirus (COVID) also known as Post-Coronavirus Syndrome or Post-Coronavirus Condition manage everyday cognitive challenges. Cognitive rehabilitation is a type of therapy that helps people who have challenges with everyday thinking because of a brain injury. One of the investigators on this project along with colleagues in the United States (US) have developed a streamlined version of cognitive rehabilitation therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) that can be completed in person or virtually and takes place over a 3-week period. The therapy was originally designed for adults with mTBI. The investigators want to know if it can also be used to treat people with cognitive complaints from Long COVID. The investigators will provide education materials only to one group and individual cognitive rehabilitation delivered by a trained Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) or Occupational Therapist (OT) to the other group. The investigators want to find out whether the individual therapy is as feasible and accessible than the usual educational material. What the investigators learn in this study may help treat day-to-day thinking challenges in Long COVID.
Detailed description
Cognitive complaints are one of the most common, pervasive, and debilitating outcomes for adults with Long COVID. In a study of 3762 adults from 56 countries who were 7 months post-diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS Coronavirus 2, referred to here as COVID) 85% reported cognitive problems, including brain fog, word-finding problems, difficulty communicating their thoughts, and a reduced ability to solve serious problems. In the Great British Intelligence Test, an online study of 81,337 individuals the subgroup of 12,689 who reported having had COVID had significantly lower cognitive test scores than those who had not, providing objective support for the symptoms that adults with Long COVID are reporting. These persistent cognitive symptoms, which the investigators refer to as Post-COVID Cognitive Symptoms (PCCS), do not appear to spontaneously resolve, with many patients in Canada and worldwide reporting cognitive impairments more than 1 year after infection. PCCS can have severe effects on usual functioning, particularly given that most survivors are working age. Two large studies estimated that at 7-9 months post-infection, between 40-75% of adults either could not work at all or were working fewer hours than they did pre-COVID. Although emerging data indicate that PCCS may be less common after infection with the Omicron variant, there continues to be concern about future "super-variants" that may have more virulent effects. Even if infection rates stabilize, i.e., COVID becomes endemic, the disease does not become harmless.
Usual care for those with PCCS is, at best, providing information about how to manage symptoms (e.g., this handout from the Public Health Authority of British Columbia). The literature on treatment of cognitive problems in other patient groups, however, shows that providing general information alone does not "fix" cognitive impairments. To improve cognitive function in everyday life, intervention must be individualized and provide opportunities for high-dose practice of target behaviours. The investigators do not, however, have interventions like this with demonstrated effectiveness for PCCS. The literature related to cognitive rehabilitation after COVID includes three types of papers: 1) studies of COVID effects on people who had cognitive diagnoses pre-COVID (e.g., how lack of services has affected patients with Alzheimer's Disease) 2) a small number of case reports of rehabilitation for COVID patients, in which cognitive rehabilitation is mentioned in general terms (e.g., patient received "skill training for basic activities of living" and "evaluation of adaptive devices", and 3) urgent calls for cognitive rehabilitation of adults with PCCS (e.g., 13-15). To the investigators knowledge, there are no published controlled studies of cognitive rehabilitation methods for adults with PCCS. One of the investigators recently completed a pilot pre-post study with 34 adults with Long COVID to examine if physical therapy for physical symptoms and occupational therapy for cognitive symptoms was safe and feasible (protocol completed, under analysis). The cognitive intervention was 6 hours of combined individual and group cognitive rehabilitation over 12 weeks, including education about managing cognitive challenges. The pilot data showed a reduction in intensity and frequency of cognitive symptoms, but no effect on everyday functioning. The study investigators concluded that to improve everyday function, therapy must be targeted at individual complaints, and it is this type of intervention that the investigators propose for a randomized control trial (RCT).
A recent paper in Science 16 called for cognitive rehabilitation to be part of the health system response to Long COVID, but rehabilitation was not included in the category of research needs - i.e., the paper implied that investigators already know how to treat patients with PCCS, and that investigators just need to increase access to therapy. However, it is unclear if standard cognitive rehabilitation methods used for other patient groups are effective for people with PCCS. One source of guidance for PCCS rehabilitation methods is the literature on cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially patients with mild TBI (aka concussion). Adults with mild TBI (mTBI) have symptoms that are commonly reported by adults with PCCS, such as word-finding problems, slow thinking, "brain fog", trouble following instructions, forgetting medications, difficulty in conversations, complaints about mental fatigue, and difficulty making decisions. There also is anecdotal evidence from clinicians who have overseen treatment of more than 3400 adults with Long COVID - that PCCS characteristics are very similar to patients with mild TBI. COVID and TBI share pathophysiological features such as inflammation, hypoxia, microvascular lesions and disruption of the blood-brain barrier, cortical thinning, and diffuse white-matter damage, particularly in anterior cortical regions. Best practices in cognitive rehabilitation also should be similar in both groups: treatments must be tailored to the patients needs, focused on solving everyday thinking challenges rather than 'fixing' deficits, and given in a relatively high dose.
In summary, PCCS is prevalent, debilitating, and persistent, and there is a lack of evidence-based methods to treat adults with these problems. TBI and COVID share pathophysiological features, survivors report similar cognitive symptoms, and best practices apply to both populations, thus the investigators predict that cognitive rehabilitation methods developed for adults with mTBI will also be effective for adults with PCCS.
Study design will follow recommendations in the CONSORT extension for randomized pilot and feasibility trials, so that data from the Vanguard study can be used in the main trial analysis. Results of the main study will significantly advance the investigators understanding of health consequences of COVID-19, delivery of health care, and health outcomes for adults with Long COVID. It is interdisciplinary research by a Canadian-led research team representing speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, healthcare administration, and stakeholders with lived experience; and includes US collaborators representing the largest national company providing a cognitive rehabilitation program developed specifically for adults with Long COVID. The investigators collaboration with US partners is a step toward globalization of the rehabilitation methods.
The investigators propose to complete a Vanguard two-arm RCT of STAR-C3 with 100 adults randomized to either Therapy (n=50) or Education (n=50) groups. The study aims to demonstrate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of STAR-C3 as judged by clinicians and participants with PCCS. Therapy will be delivered by an Occupational Therapist (OT) or Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to either the Therapy (n=50) or Education Group (n=50). At the conclusion of therapy (for the Therapy Group) or after three weeks (for the Education Group), participants will be re-administered the outcome measures. The outcome measures using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) will then be compared during data analysis between the two groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Therapy Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Cognitive RehabilitationThe Therapy Group will receive 6-10 individual sessions of 30-60 minutes each, delivered by a trained Occupational Therapist or Speech-Language Pathologist. The therapy will be delivered over a 4-week timeframe, with the total number of sessions per participant depending on the number of sessions needed to achieve their treatment targets. Each participant in the Therapy Group will identify three cognitive targets for treatment. Progress in reaching those targets will be documented using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) |
| Educational Group | Active comparator | Other: EducationThe Education group will receive information about self-management of cognitive symptoms at the time of randomization, a common alternative for adults with Long COVID cognitive symptoms who do not receive Individual Therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Is a community-dwelling adults
- Is age 18 years or older
- Self-identifies as a fluent English speaker
- Have a history of COVID symptoms as listed on the Government of Canada COVID information website, a positive antigen or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, or both
- Have cognitive symptoms that have persisted a minimum of 12 weeks after contracting COVID
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- A score of less than 20 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which indicates a risk for dementia.
- Cannot identify at least 3 problems on the Common Cognitive Complaints after Concussion Questionnaire (C4), as there would be insufficient areas for intervention.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive RehabilitationA strategy-focused intervention aimed at improving everyday cognitive function, structured to maximize treatment dose over a short time period. The shorter time period of the treatment therapy is relative to the one and only current randomized controlled trial of cognitive rehabilitation for military mTBI, the Study of Cognitive Rehabilitation Effectiveness (SCORE). | Behavioural | Therapy Group |
| EducationThe Education group will receive information about self-management of cognitive symptoms at the time of randomization, a common alternative for adults with Long COVID cognitive symptoms who do not receive Individual Therapy. | Other | Educational Group |
Primary outcome
Recruitment Rate
Time frame: 9 months
The primary outcome is the rate of recruitment, average 5 per month. The primary outcome is the rate of recruitment and retention rate reported as the total number of participants recruited and retained.
3 secondary outcomes
Acceptability of the Intervention
Time frame: Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment.
Acceptability of the Appropriateness
Time frame: Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment.
Acceptability of the Feasibility
Time frame: Measures administered during intake (baseline), immediately after one of sessions 6-10 depending on targets achieved, and 1 month post-treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 34308300Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re'em Y, Redfield S, Austin JP, Akrami A. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug;38:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
- Background: PubMed 34316551Hampshire A, Trender W, Chamberlain SR, Jolly AE, Grant JE, Patrick F, Mazibuko N, Williams SC, Barnby JM, Hellyer P, Mehta MA. Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep;39:101044. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101044. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 35258587Liu YH, Chen Y, Wang QH, Wang LR, Jiang L, Yang Y, Chen X, Li Y, Cen Y, Xu C, Zhu J, Li W, Wang YR, Zhang LL, Liu J, Xu ZQ, Wang YJ. One-Year Trajectory of Cognitive Changes in Older Survivors of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. JAMA Neurol. 2022 May 1;79(5):509-517. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0461.
- Background: PubMed 35983264Carazo S, Skowronski DM, Laforce R Jr, Talbot D, Falcone EL, Laliberte D, Denis G, Deshaies P, Hegg-Deloye S, De Serres G. Physical, Psychological, and Cognitive Profile of Post-COVID Conditions in Healthcare Workers, Quebec, Canada. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 1;9(8):ofac386. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac386. eCollection 2022 Aug.
- Background: PubMed 35259179Ziauddeen N, Gurdasani D, O'Hara ME, Hastie C, Roderick P, Yao G, Alwan NA. Characteristics and impact of Long Covid: Findings from an online survey. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 8;17(3):e0264331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264331. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 30926291Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, Rosenbaum A, Wethe JV, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Kingsley K, Nagele D, Trexler L, Fraas M, Bogdanova Y, Harley JP. Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1515-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 35069059Wang C, Han J. Will the COVID-19 pandemic end with the Delta and Omicron variants? Environ Chem Lett. 2022;20(4):2215-2225. doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01369-7. Epub 2022 Jan 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 35075305Katzourakis A. COVID-19: endemic doesn't mean harmless. Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7894):485. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00155-x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33722828Gosse PJ, Kassardjian CD, Masellis M, Mitchell SB. Virtual care for patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias during the COVID-19 era and beyond. CMAJ. 2021 Mar 15;193(11):E371-E377. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201938. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 35216882Chuang HJ, Hsiao MY, Wang TG, Liang HW. A multi-disciplinary rehabilitation approach for people surviving severe COVID-19-a case series and literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Dec;121(12):2408-2415. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 33568362Wise J. Long covid: WHO calls on countries to offer patients more rehabilitation. BMJ. 2021 Feb 10;372:n405. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n405. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33785027Carson G; Long Covid Forum Group. Research priorities for Long Covid: refined through an international multi-stakeholder forum. BMC Med. 2021 Mar 31;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01947-0. No abstract available.
- Viral Neuro Exploration (VINEx), COVID Long Haulers Support Group Canada, Neurological Health Charities Canada. Report on Long COVID Impact Survey. 2021Link provided by the sponsor.
- Office for National Statistics. Prevalence of ongoing symptoms following coronavirus (COVID-19) infection in the United KingdomLink provided by the sponsor.
- How does COVID-19 affect the brain? A troubling picture emerges.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Long COVID
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Dapagliflozin for Long COVID Syndrome
COVID - 19, Long COVID Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Long COVID Brain Fog: Cognitive Rehabilitation Trial
Long COVID, Brain Fog
RecruitingPhase 2
SARS-CoV-2 and Herpesvirus Inhibition for Ending Long COVID Dysfunction
Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Long COVID
Enrolling by invitation
Fareon Open Label Device Clinical Trial
Cognitive Dysfunction, Acquired Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jackie Bosch, PhD principal investigator
McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science
Lyn Turkstra, PhD principal investigator
McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive Rehabilitation and Education in people with Long COVID, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment Rate (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05676047, which also lists 40 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2025.