AzTrials
AzTrials

MCINCT05682469

Effects and Mechanism of the Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Cognitive Training Based on Leisure Activities

A study testing VR cognitive training and Traditional cognitive training in people with MCI and SCD, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to identify the effects of the immersive leisure-based VR cognitive training, and compare the intervention effects for elderly with MCI and SCD. The investigators anticipate the VR training can facilitate cognitive function, daily function, quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
MCI, SCD
What is being tested?
VR cognitive training and Traditional cognitive training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
275 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 31 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • -
  • MCI Inclusion Criteria:
  • age>=60 able to follow instruction MoCA<26 Scores on cognitive tests for individuals with MCI are 1 to 1.5 standard deviations below the mean for their age and education matched peers on culturally
  • SCD Inclusion Criteria:
  • age>=60 ECog-12 score >1 MoCA>=26; does not conform the standards of MCI and dementia

Who cannot join

  • dizziness or epilepsy history; neurological or other orthopedic diseases with neurological or other orthopedic diseases unstable physical condition of VR cognitive training Recent psychiatric diagnosis, such as depression

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: Effects and Mechanism of the Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Cognitive Training Based on Leisure Activities: Cognitive, Daily Function, Quality of Life, Metabolic Biomarkers, and Electroencephalography

The aim of this study is to identify the effects of the immersive leisure-based VR cognitive training, and compare the intervention effects for elderly with MCI and SCD. The investigators anticipate the VR training can facilitate cognitive function, daily function, quality of life. The investigators anticipated the metabolic biomarkers, mechanism, and brain activities will be found. The significance of this study is identifying the effect of immersive leisure-based VR cognitive training, and confirming the metabolic biomarkers and brain activities. It could improve the accuracy of identification, prevent the progression to dementia, and lead the field of technological assistance to new opportunities for training.

Conditions
MCI, SCD
Being tested
VR cognitive training, Traditional cognitive training
Keywords
Mild cognitive impairment, Subjective cognitive decline, Combination therapy, Virtual reality, Cognitive training, Leisure activities
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VR cognitive trainingBehavioural

    All participants will receive trainings for 60 minutes per day, two days per week for 16 sessions.

    All participants will receive one immersive leisure-based VR cognitive training for 40 minutes. VR cognitive training receives four gardening activities.

    The cognitive elements including attention, working memory, processing speed, and executive function incorporated training.

  • Traditional cognitive trainingBehavioural

    All participants will receive trainings for 60 minutes per day, two days per week for 16 sessions.

    The control group is performing traditional cognitive training program.

Study groups in NCT05682469
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VR groupExperimentalVR cognitive training receives eight gardening activities. The cognitive elements including attention, working memory, processing speed, and executive function incorporated training.
Receives: Behavioral: VR cognitive training
control groupActive comparatorThe control group is performing traditional cognitive training program.
Receives: Behavioral: Traditional cognitive training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to assess general cognitive functions. It examines several cognitive domains with a total score of 30 and higher values indicate better cognitive functions. The MoCA has been shown to be a valid and promising tool to evaluate the global cognitive function in patients with stroke. The psychometric properties of MoCA are good to excellent for patients with cerebrovascular diseases.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  2. Change scores of Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS)

    including Faces Recognition (total scale=48), Verbal Paired Associates (total scale = 32), Word Lists (total scale = 48), and Spatial Span (total scale=32) will be used to assess the immediate, delayed, and working memory tests. For each subtest, a higher number indicates better performance in memory function. The raw score of subtests will also be transferred to standardized Z scores and summed to represent an index of general memory function.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  3. Change scores of Stroop test

    The participants will be tested under congruent and incongruent conditions. In the congruent condition, the participant will name the color ink of a word which is consistent with the written color name; whereas in the incongruent condition the participant will name the color ink differs from the written color name. The time to complete the task will be calculated for each condition

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  4. Change scores of Color trials test

    For Part 1, the respondent uses a pencil to rapidly connect circles numbered 1-25 in sequence. For Part 2, the respondent rapidly connects numbered circles in sequence, but alternates between pink and yellow. The length of time to complete each trial is recorded, along with qualitative features of performance indicative of brain dysfunction, such as near-misses, prompts, number sequence errors, and color sequence errors.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  5. Change scores of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; WAIS

    The digit symbol test involves a key consisting of the numbers 1-9, each paired with a unique, easy-to-draw symbol such as a "V", "+" or ">".

    Matrix Reasoning

    This is a nonverbal reasoning task in which individuals are asked to identify patterns in designs. This subtest measures:

    • non-verbal reasoning skills
    • broad visual intelligence
    • perceptual organization skills

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  6. Change scores of the short (12-item) form of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-12)

    The short (12-item) form of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-12), which was developed as an informant-rated report of cognitively mediated functional abilities in older adults. The ECog-12 asks participants to rate their current ability to perform cognitively mediated daily tasks related to everyday memory, language, visuospatial abilities, and executive functions compared with their ability to do the same task 10 years ago. Items are rated on a scale of 1-4, with 1 = Better or no change and 4 = Consistently much worse. The global, executive, and memory ECog-12 sub-domain scores were generated by averaging over the component items (sum of items/number of items) to maintain a range of 1 to 4 (with higher scores reflecting greater self-reported SCD).

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  7. Change scores of Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of Daily Living,A-IADL

    The Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (A-IADL) is an adaptive and computerized questionnaire designed to assess impairments in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in (early) dementia. The questionnaire is completed by a caregiver, such as a relative or friend.

    Each item has a 5-point scale response option (scored 0-4). The scoring of the Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of Daily Living is calculated using item response theory .Lower scores indicating poorer performance.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  8. Change scores of Taiwan Performance-based IADL; TPIADL

    The TPIADL was designed to assess IADL ability in five domains: communication, finance, cooking, shopping and medicine use. To allow culture- and lifestyle-specific measurement, actual and simulated everyday objects were employed as stimulus materials.

    To develop more easily comprehensible stimuli materials, pictorial representations of a telephone directory and medication directions were used in the communication and medicine use tasks. Performance-based tasks were time-limited to 30 seconds, and the scoring reflected the level of efficiency in terms of the cognitive processing speed. The score for each task ranged from 1 to 3: 1 -completed without error and within 30 seconds; 2 -erroneous response within the time limit but corrected after a verbal cue; and 3 -not completed with errors within the time limit and unable to correct even following a verbal cue. The total score ranged from 5 to 15, with a higher score indicating a poorer performance in IADL.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  9. Change scores of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Old(WHOQOL-OLD) Taiwan Version

    The World Health Organization Quality of Life-Old questionnaires demonstrate acceptable psychometric performance in a convenience sample of Taiwan older people. It are valuable measures of Quality of Life-Old for use with older people.Time frame for assessment is the past two weeks.

    The items are distributed into 4 domains (physical; psychological, social and environmental health) and 25 facets.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  10. Change scores of WHOQOL-bref Taiwan Version

    As with the standard WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version was simplified from the WHOQOL long form for Taiwan. For the purpose of cross-cultural comparison, the first 26 items were the same as the standard WHOQOL-BREF, which was developed from global studies. In addition to the 26 items, we applied the psychometric criteria proposed by the WHOQOL Group to select two more items from each of the two new facets to form the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version using data from the same 1,068 subjects. The selection process used for national items is described in the Results section. Thus, the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version contains 28 items classified into the same four domains as the standard WHOQOL-BREF. The scale administration and scoring procedures are the same as for the WHOQOL long form except that the facet score is based on only one item.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  11. Change scores of Geriatric Depression Scale,GDS

    The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a screening test originally developed by J.A. Yesavage and colleagues in 1982 that is used to identify symptoms of depression in older adults. The scale is a 30-item, self-report instrument that uses a "Yes/No" format.

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

  12. Change scores of The Chinese Aging Well Profile (CAWP)

    It comprised eight open-ended questions focusing on the meaning and interpretation of 'subjective well-being', e.g., 'Can participants tell me what the important contributors to your well-being are?', 'Can participants describe the important elements in your life that make you feel happy?', 'Can participants describe the important elements in your life that participants dislike?' and 'What does well-being personally mean to participants?' To adapt the Aging Well Profile for a Chinese population in Taiwan was secured. It was agreed that the new version would be called the Chinese Aging Well Profile (CAWP).

    Measured: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
275 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05682469
Sponsor's protocol ID
202102478B0
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
24 Dec 2022
Last updated
12 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing VR cognitive training and Traditional cognitive training in people with MCI and SCD, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ching-Yi Wu, ScD (+886-3-2118800 ext. 5761, cywu@mail.cgu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). (time frame: baseline, after the intervention eight weeks, and at 3-month follow-up.). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in