High-Frequency VentilationSighCO2NCT05682937
HFOV With Intermittent Sigh Breaths in Neonate: Carbon Dioxide Level
A study testing HFOV-sigh in people with High-Frequency Ventilation, run by Prince of Songkla University at 1 site in Thailand.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to the short-term effects of sigh breaths during High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in neonate undergoing mechanical ventilation. From meta-analysis, It revealed HFOV in neonates could reduce chronic lung disease or death rather than conventional ventilation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 28 days
- Conditions the study is for
- High-Frequency Ventilation
- What is being tested?
- HFOV-sigh
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThailand
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2023to 31 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 28 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Preterm and term neonate (gestational age 24-41 weeks) with postnatal age less than 28 days
- Already ventilated with high frequency ventilation at least 1 hours
- An umbilical or peripheral arterial catheterization was available
Who cannot join
- Previous or current pulmonary air leaks (pulmonary interstitial emphysema, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium)
- Heterogeneous lung disease including MAS, congenital diaphragmatic hernia
- Suspected lung hypoplasia
- Suspected or confirmed intraventricular hemorrhage grade III-IV
- Suspected or confirmed hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy or 5-min Apgar score less than 3
- Hemodynamic instability despite using inotrope(s)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Arterial pCO2 level less than 45 mm Hg or more than 70 mm Hg before intervention
- Need a new arterial puncture for samples both before and after interventions
- Moribund status
- Parents' decision not to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Thailand1 site
Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110
About this study
Official title: High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Combined With Intermittent Sigh Breaths in Neonate: Effect on Carbon Dioxide Level
The goal of this clinical trial is to the short-term effects of sigh breaths during High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in neonate undergoing mechanical ventilation. From meta-analysis, It revealed HFOV in neonates could reduce chronic lung disease or death rather than conventional ventilation.
The main question it aims to answer is: Do sigh breaths augment restoring lung volume and ventilation (CO2 level) in intubated neonate with HFOV? Participants will be applied sigh breaths (HFOV-sigh) during on HFOV. Researchers will compare HFOV-sigh mode to see if CO2 level (before-after intervention).
Read the detailed description
Sample size calculation (before and after intervention: two dependent mean)
- alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.2,
- Delta = 1.9, SD. = 4.35
- Calculated sample size = 42
- increase sample size if loss follow up 20%
- Final sample size (n) = 50
Subgroup analysis for
- preterm neonates
- very preterm or very low birth weight neonates
- extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight neonates
- Conditions
- High-Frequency Ventilation
- Being tested
- HFOV-sigh
- Keywords
- Carbon Dioxide, High-Frequency Ventilation, Sigh Breath, Newborn
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HFOV-sighDevice
Also called HFOV-sigh application from both brands of ventilator (SLE6000 and Drager Babylog VN500)
HFOV-sigh setting both SLE6000 and Drager Babylog VN500: setting (Hz, MAP, delta pressure) same as HFOV, set sigh RR 3 breath/min, Sigh Ti = 1 sec, Sigh PIP = (MAP+5, maximum 30) cm H2O, Slope sigh 0.5.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HFOV-sigh mode | Experimental | HFOV-sigh setting both brands of ventilator (SLE6000 and Drager Babylog VN500): setting (frequency [Hz], mean airway pressure [MAP], delta pressure [dP]) same as HFOV, set sigh RR 3 breath/min, Sigh inspiratory time [Ti] = 1 sec, Sigh peak inspiratory pressure [PIP] = (MAP+5, maximum 30) cm H2O, Slope sigh 0.5. Receives: Device: HFOV-sigh |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Arterial pCO2 Level
ABL800 BASIC (Radiometer Medical ApS™, Denmark) analyzed all blood gas samples within 1 min after collection. The blood gas machine was auto-calibrated every 4 h by trained specialists every day.
Measured: before sigh (baseline) and after sigh (2 hours)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Oxygenation
oxygen index (oxygen index = mean airway pressure x FiO2 / PaO2), higher scores mean a worse outcome, no unit of scale.
Measured: before sigh (baseline) and after sigh (2 hours)
Mean Airway Pressure
Mean Airway Pressure (MAP), cmH2O
Measured: 2 hours after sigh breaths
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2023
- Study start12 Jan 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion31 Mar 2024
Why it stopped: The duration of study was planned only 1 year owing to time constraints. Although the targeted sample size was not achieved, but the results showed significant difference between two interventions.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for High-Frequency VentilationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Prince of Songkla University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anucha Thatrimontrichai, Prince of Songkla University
- Investigators
- Anucha Thatrimontrichai, MD, Principal investigator, Prince of Songkla University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05682937
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SighPSU
- Acronym
- SighCO2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cools F, Askie LM, Offringa M, Asselin JM, Calvert SA, Courtney SE, Dani C, Durand DJ, Gerstmann DR, Henderson-Smart DJ, Marlow N, Peacock JL, Pillow JJ, Soll RF, Thome UH, Truffert P, Schreiber MD, Van Reempts P, Vendettuoli V, Vento G; PreVILIG collaboration. Elective high-frequency oscillatory versus conventional ventilation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patients' data. Lancet. 2010 Jun 12;375(9731):2082-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60278-4.
PubMed 20552718Cools F, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;2015(3):CD000104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub4.
PubMed 25785789Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM, Hudak ML, Aschner JL, Shoemaker CT; Neonatal Ventilation Study Group. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):643-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012750.
PubMed 12200551Hoch B, Bernhard M, Hinsch A. Different patterns of sighs in neonates and young infants. Biol Neonate. 1998;74(1):16-21. doi: 10.1159/000014006.
PubMed 9657665Jost K, Latzin P, Fouzas S, Proietti E, Delgado-Eckert EW, Frey U, Schulzke SM. Sigh-induced changes of breathing pattern in preterm infants. Physiol Rep. 2015 Nov;3(11):e12613. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12613.
PubMed 26564066Davis GM, Moscato J. Changes in lung mechanics following sighs in premature newborns without lung disease. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994 Jan;17(1):26-30. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950170106.
PubMed 8108173Qureshi M, Khalil M, Kwiatkowski K, Alvaro RE. Morphology of sighs and their role in the control of breathing in preterm infants, term infants and adults. Neonatology. 2009;96(1):43-9. doi: 10.1159/000201738. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
PubMed 19204409Patroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B, Maggioni E, Bigatello LM, Cereda M, Pesenti A. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00004.
PubMed 11964584Mauri T, Eronia N, Abbruzzese C, Marcolin R, Coppadoro A, Spadaro S, Patroniti N, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Effects of Sigh on Regional Lung Strain and Ventilation Heterogeneity in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients Undergoing Assisted Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1823-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001083.
PubMed 25985386Massaro GD, Massaro D. Morphologic evidence that large inflations of the lung stimulate secretion of surfactant. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Feb;127(2):235-6. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.2.235.
PubMed 6687518Nacoti M, Spagnolli E, Bonanomi E, Barbanti C, Cereda M, Fumagalli R. Sigh improves gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in children undergoing pressure support after major surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Aug;78(8):920-9. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
PubMed 22531559Bonacina D, Bronco A, Nacoti M, Ferrari F, Fazzi F, Bonanomi E, Bellani G. Pressure support ventilation, sigh adjunct to pressure support ventilation, and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in infants after cardiac surgery: A physiologic crossover randomized study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Jul;54(7):1078-1086. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24335. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
PubMed 31004420Poets CF, Rau GA, Neuber K, Gappa M, Seidenberg J. Determinants of lung volume in spontaneously breathing preterm infants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb;155(2):649-53. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032208.
PubMed 9032208Sindelar R, Nakanishi H, Stanford AH, Colaizy TT, Klein JM. Respiratory management for extremely premature infants born at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation in proactive centers in Sweden, Japan, and USA. Semin Perinatol. 2022 Feb;46(1):151540. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151540. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
PubMed 34872750
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Combined With Intermittent Sigh Breaths in Neonate: Effect on Carbon Dioxide Level
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05682937
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SighCO2 / SighPSU
- Conditions
- High-Frequency Ventilation
- Keywords
- Carbon Dioxide, High-Frequency Ventilation, Sigh Breath, Newborn
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The duration of study was planned only 1 year owing to time constraints. Although the targeted sample size was not achieved, but the results showed significant difference between two interventions.
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Prince of Songkla UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jan 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to the short-term effects of sigh breaths during High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in neonate undergoing mechanical ventilation. From meta-analysis, It revealed HFOV in neonates could reduce chronic lung disease or death rather than conventional ventilation.
The main question it aims to answer is: Do sigh breaths augment restoring lung volume and ventilation (CO2 level) in intubated neonate with HFOV? Participants will be applied sigh breaths (HFOV-sigh) during on HFOV. Researchers will compare HFOV-sigh mode to see if CO2 level (before-after intervention).
Detailed description
Sample size calculation (before and after intervention: two dependent mean)
- alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.2,
- Delta = 1.9, SD. = 4.35
- Calculated sample size = 42
- increase sample size if loss follow up 20%
- Final sample size (n) = 50
Subgroup analysis for
- preterm neonates
- very preterm or very low birth weight neonates
- extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight neonates
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HFOV-sigh mode | Experimental | Device: HFOV-sighHFOV-sigh setting both brands of ventilator (SLE6000 and Drager Babylog VN500): setting (frequency [Hz], mean airway pressure [MAP], delta pressure [dP]) same as HFOV, set sigh RR 3 breath/min, Sigh inspiratory time [Ti] = 1 sec, Sigh peak inspiratory pressure [PIP] = (MAP+5, maximum 30) cm H2O, Slope sigh 0.5. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 28 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Preterm and term neonate (gestational age 24-41 weeks) with postnatal age less than 28 days
- Already ventilated with high frequency ventilation at least 1 hours
- An umbilical or peripheral arterial catheterization was available
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Previous or current pulmonary air leaks (pulmonary interstitial emphysema, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium)
- Heterogeneous lung disease including MAS, congenital diaphragmatic hernia
- Suspected lung hypoplasia
- Suspected or confirmed intraventricular hemorrhage grade III-IV
- Suspected or confirmed hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy or 5-min Apgar score less than 3
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HFOV-sighAlso: HFOV-sigh application from both brands of ventilator (SLE6000 and Drager Babylog VN500)HFOV-sigh setting both SLE6000 and Drager Babylog VN500: setting (Hz, MAP, delta pressure) same as HFOV, set sigh RR 3 breath/min, Sigh Ti = 1 sec, Sigh PIP = (MAP+5, maximum 30) cm H2O, Slope sigh 0.5. | Device | HFOV-sigh mode |
Primary outcome
Arterial pCO2 Level
Time frame: before sigh (baseline) and after sigh (2 hours)
ABL800 BASIC (Radiometer Medical ApS™, Denmark) analyzed all blood gas samples within 1 min after collection. The blood gas machine was auto-calibrated every 4 h by trained specialists every day.
2 secondary outcomes
Oxygenation
Time frame: before sigh (baseline) and after sigh (2 hours)
Mean Airway Pressure
Time frame: 2 hours after sigh breaths
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 20552718Cools F, Askie LM, Offringa M, Asselin JM, Calvert SA, Courtney SE, Dani C, Durand DJ, Gerstmann DR, Henderson-Smart DJ, Marlow N, Peacock JL, Pillow JJ, Soll RF, Thome UH, Truffert P, Schreiber MD, Van Reempts P, Vendettuoli V, Vento G; PreVILIG collaboration. Elective high-frequency oscillatory versus conventional ventilation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patients' data. Lancet. 2010 Jun 12;375(9731):2082-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60278-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 25785789Cools F, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;2015(3):CD000104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub4.
- Results publication: PubMed 12200551Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM, Hudak ML, Aschner JL, Shoemaker CT; Neonatal Ventilation Study Group. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):643-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012750.
- Results publication: PubMed 9657665Hoch B, Bernhard M, Hinsch A. Different patterns of sighs in neonates and young infants. Biol Neonate. 1998;74(1):16-21. doi: 10.1159/000014006.
- Results publication: PubMed 26564066Jost K, Latzin P, Fouzas S, Proietti E, Delgado-Eckert EW, Frey U, Schulzke SM. Sigh-induced changes of breathing pattern in preterm infants. Physiol Rep. 2015 Nov;3(11):e12613. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12613.
- Results publication: PubMed 8108173Davis GM, Moscato J. Changes in lung mechanics following sighs in premature newborns without lung disease. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994 Jan;17(1):26-30. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950170106.
- Results publication: PubMed 19204409Qureshi M, Khalil M, Kwiatkowski K, Alvaro RE. Morphology of sighs and their role in the control of breathing in preterm infants, term infants and adults. Neonatology. 2009;96(1):43-9. doi: 10.1159/000201738. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 11964584Patroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B, Maggioni E, Bigatello LM, Cereda M, Pesenti A. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00004.
- Results publication: PubMed 25985386Mauri T, Eronia N, Abbruzzese C, Marcolin R, Coppadoro A, Spadaro S, Patroniti N, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Effects of Sigh on Regional Lung Strain and Ventilation Heterogeneity in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients Undergoing Assisted Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1823-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001083.
- Results publication: PubMed 6687518Massaro GD, Massaro D. Morphologic evidence that large inflations of the lung stimulate secretion of surfactant. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Feb;127(2):235-6. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.2.235.
- Results publication: PubMed 22531559Nacoti M, Spagnolli E, Bonanomi E, Barbanti C, Cereda M, Fumagalli R. Sigh improves gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in children undergoing pressure support after major surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Aug;78(8):920-9. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 31004420Bonacina D, Bronco A, Nacoti M, Ferrari F, Fazzi F, Bonanomi E, Bellani G. Pressure support ventilation, sigh adjunct to pressure support ventilation, and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in infants after cardiac surgery: A physiologic crossover randomized study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Jul;54(7):1078-1086. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24335. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for High-Frequency Ventilation
Not yet recruiting
The Hemodynamic Impact of High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Periodic Sighs in Preterm Infants
Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Recruiting
Effect of a Driving Pressure Adjustment Procedure for High-Frequency Jet Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Tumor Thermal Ablation in Interventional Radiology
Solid Tumor (Excluding CNS)
Not yet recruiting
Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Newborn
Not yet recruiting
Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation After Extubation in Neonates
Extubation Failure in Neonates
Not yet recruiting
SuprAglottic Jet Ventilation vs High-flow Nasal Oxygen in Tubeless Laryngotracheal Surgery
Airway Managment, Laryngotracheal Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anucha Thatrimontrichai, MD principal investigator
Prince of Songkla University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HFOV-sigh in people with High-Frequency Ventilation, run by Prince of Songkla University at 1 site in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jan 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Arterial pCO2 Level (time frame: before sigh (baseline) and after sigh (2 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05682937, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2025.