AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityniPGTANCT05685147

An Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial of niPGT-A in Women With RPL

A study testing Non-invasive Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy status in people with Infertility, run by Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objectives: To compare the efficacy in embryo selection based on morphology alone compared to morphology and non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 39 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
Non-invasive Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy status
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
152 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Jul 2023to 27 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 39 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged less than 40 years at the time of ovarian stimulation and
  • >=two spontaneous miscarriages in the first trimester
  • Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss after standard investigation
  • At least one blastocyst available on day 5 or 6 after the retrieval.

Who cannot join

  • Women undergoing PGT for monogenic diseases or structural rearrangement of chromosomes;
  • Use of donor oocytes;
  • Hydrosalpinx shown on pelvic scanning and not surgically treated
  • Uterine anomalies distorting the uterine cavity in three dimensional ultrasound
  • No usable blastocysts on day 5 or 6 after the retrieval

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Heidi Cheng, MBBS contact

852-22553657

chy610a@ha.org.hk

Hong Kong1 site
  • The University of Hong Kong

    Hong Kong

    Heidi Cheng, MBBS, 852-22553657

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial of Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Objectives: To compare the efficacy in embryo selection based on morphology alone compared to morphology and non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Hypothesis to be tested: The embryo selection based on morphology and niPGT-A results in a lower miscarriage rate and a higher live birth rate in IVF as compared with that based on morphology alone.

Read more

Design and subjects: Randomized double-blind randomized controlled trial. Women with RPL undergoing IVF will be enrolled.

Interventions: Spent culture medium (SCM) of each blastocyst will be frozen individually. They will be randomly allocated into two groups: (1) the intervention group based on morphology and niPGT-A and (2) the control group based on morphology alone.

In the control group, blastocysts with the best quality morphology will be replaced first. In the intervention group, blastocysts with the best morphology and euploid result of SCM will be replaced first.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is the miscarriage rate per the first embryo transfer.

Data analysis: Comparison of quantitative variables will be performed using Student's t, while categorical variables will be compared using a Chi-square analysis. All statistical analyses will be performed with the intention to treat and per protocol, and a p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Expected outcome results: The embryo selection based on morphology and niPGT-A results in a lower miscarriage rate and a higher live birth rate in IVF as compared with the control group based on morphology alone.

Read the detailed description

Trial Objectives and Purpose The primary objective of this randomized double blind controlled trial is to compare the efficacy in embryo selection based on morphology alone versus morphology and niPGT-A in women with RPL undergoing the first frozen embryo transfer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of eNK cells on the miscarriage and live birth rates and the prediction of live birth using spheroid/BAP-EB attachment assay.

Main hypotheses to be tested:

  1. The embryo selection based on morphology and niPGT-A for aneuploidy results in a higher live birth rate of IVF in women with RPL as compared with the control group based on morphology alone.
  2. The embryo selection based on morphology and niPGT-A for aneuploidy results in a lower miscarriage rate following IVF in women with RPL as compared with the control group based on morphology alone.
  3. Trial Design This is a randomized double blind controlled trial. Eligible women will be recruited for the study and informed written consent will be obtained after counseling.

Endometrial assessment All women will have an endometrial biopsy using a Pipelle sampler 7 days after luteinizing hormone surge (LH+7) prior to the month of having IVF. Part of the endometrial samples will be fixed in paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemical staining of endometrial uNK cells with CD56 antibody [26,27]. The other part of the endometrial samples will be used for epithelial and stromal cell isolation for spheroid/BAP-EB attachment assay [28], to predict the embryo attachment rate in a laboratory setting. Due to ethical issues and practical difficulty, the use of human embryos for endometrial assessment is not feasible. BAP-EB model [28] will be used as the embryo (blastocyst) surrogate in this study. BAP-EB spheroid model are differentiated from human embryonic stem cells. The BAP-EB after 72h of differentiation (BAP-EB-72h) have molecular signature of Day 7 trophectoderm cells of blastocysts [28]. In this study, BAP-EB will be co-cultured with primary endometrial epithelial cells and the attachment rate will be determined according to our established protocol.

IVF protocol Women will undergo IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as indicated. The women will receive ovarian stimulation using the progestin-primed protocol [29] or the antagonist protocol. Ultrasound scanning will be arranged on day 2-3 of menses for the antral follicle counts and to exclude the presence of ovarian cyst. Serum oestradiol and progesterone concentration will be checked and if they are basal, ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin injections (225-300 IU daily depending on the antral follicle count) for 10-12 day is given. Provera 10mg daily will be given from day 2-3 to day of trigger in the progestin-primed protocol to prevent premature LH surge while GnRH antagonist will be started on day 6 of ovarian stimulation to day of trigger. Regular ultrasound monitoring will be performed to monitor the growth of follicles. Adjustment of the gonadotropin dosage is corresponding to the number and size of follicles. When three follicles reach >17 mm in diameter, GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl 0.3mg) or human chorionic gonadotrophin (Ovidrel 0.25mg) will be administered. Oocyte retrieval will be scheduled 34-36 hours after the HCG or agonist trigger under transvaginal ultrasound guidance.

Normal fertilization will be assessed and confirmed by the presence of two pronuclei at 16-18 h after insemination. All cleavage stage embryos will be grown individually to the blastocyst stage, usually day 5 or 6 after oocyte retrieval, in a monophasic medium. On Day 3, the culture medium will be replenished, and culture will be continued at 37oC and 6% CO2 in reduced oxygen tension (5%). No fresh transfer of blastocysts will be performed in the stimulated cycle.

Grading of blastocyst by morphology

Blastocysts are graded according to Gardner's classification (29). The blastocyst grading system assigns 3 separate quality scores to each blastocyst embryo, based on the followings:

  1. Blastocyst development stage: expansion and hatching status
  2. Inner cell mass score
  3. Trophectoderm score

Expansion grade Blastocyst development and stage status

  1. Blastocoel cavity less than half the volume of the embryo
  2. Blastocoel cavity more than half the volume of the embryo
  3. Full blastocyst, cavity completely filling the embryo
  4. Expanded blastocyst, cavity larger than the embryo, with thinning of the zona pellucida
  5. Hatching out of the zona pellucida
  6. Hatched out of the zona pellucida

Inner cell mass grade Inner cell mass quality A Many cells, tightly packed B Several cells, loosely grouped C Very few cells

Trophectoderm grade Trophectoderm quality A Many cells, forming a cohesive layer B Few cells, forming a loose epithelium C Very few large cells

Blastocysts are cryopreserved at developmental stage with expansion score 3 or above. If a blastocyst does not reach expansion stage 3 on day 5, it will be assessed on day 6 whether it is suitable for cryopreservation. Blastocysts with either inner cell mass or trophectoderm scored as B or above are regarded as utilizable blastocysts.

Each blastocyst will be frozen by vitrification individually and its SCM (~8 µl) will be frozen at -800C separately and individually. The embryologist will prepare a sequence of blastocyst transfer based on the best morphology by Gardner's criteria.

Then, on the day of blastocyst freezing, women will then be randomly assigned into two groups in 1:1 ratio using a randomization program by the laboratory staff in the PGT laboratory.

  1. the intervention group using morphology and niPGT-A and
  2. the control group based on morphology alone.

The women and clinicians will be blinded to the treatment groups they are assigned. Only the laboratory staff in the PGT laboratory will be aware of the group assignment.

niPGT-A of spent culture medium (SCM) In the intervention group, comprehensive chromosome screening using NGS will be performed according to the recommendations of the company in all SCM samples. In the control group, the measurement will be done retrospectively in those SCM samples of blastocysts that are replaced in the first transfer. All SCM samples will be saved for possible future research.

A commercially available NI-PGT kit (PG-Seq Rapid Non-Invasive PGT kit, PerkinElmer) will be used to analyse SCM samples. The protocol has been previously optimized with non-invasive samples from 15 laboratories around the world. The kit follows a single tube workflow, two-steps PCR to whole genome amplify the DNA in SCM and then attaches indexes and sequence-specific adapters to template DNA, resulting in sequencing ready samples.

After purification, concentration of each sample is adjusted into equal molar, pooled (96 samples) and then sequenced on a MiSeq system (Illumina) at 1x75 bp read length. On-board secondary analysis was performed automatically by the MiSeq Reporter (Illumina) followed by PG-Find Software (v 1.0, PerkinElmer). Reads aligning to anomalous, unstructured and highly repetitive sequences are filtered from the analysis. A target bin size of 1,000 kb is used, giving a minimum resolution of 10Mb. All genomic positions refer to the human genome build NCBI 37.

According to the default setting of PG-Find software, classification of aneuploidy is determined by CNV (copy umber variation) value. CNV value >2.7 is considered as gain while CNV value <1.3 is considered as loss. Sample will be concluded as non-euploid when one or more of the chromosomes shows gain/loss.

The niPGT-A report of the SCM sample can be euploid, non-euploid and non-informative. It is used only to prioritize the sequence of embryo transfer. Blastocysts with non-euploid result in the niPGT-A report will not be discarded.

Blinding The embryologist will grade the morphology of blastocysts according to Gardner's criteria stated above and enter the grading of blastocysts into an online database, which will be managed by an IT technician. The laboratory staff in the PGT laboratory will enter the PGT result into a local database when the NIPGT results are available. The IT technician will collect the database from the PGT laboratory and enter it into the online software to compile the sequence of embryo transfer according to a pre-determined algorithm which depends on the day of blastocyst development (day 5 better than day 6), blastocyst morphology and niPGT-A result. The IT technician will issue the sequence of embryo transfer which does not contain information on the grading of the blastocyst and the NIPGT result to the embryologists in the IVF laboratory. Therefore, the subjects recruited, the clinicians and the embryologists will be blinded to the group allocation.

Our preliminary results of niPGT-A Preliminary results of the ongoing NIPGT-A trial involved 1168 SCM. Media cultured in parallel but without contact with embryos were collected as controls (n=238). Amplification was successful in 1158 SCM (99.1%, 1158/1168) and 1141 SCM resulted in conclusive result (97.6%, 1141/1168). All controls showed no amplification.

Frozen embryo transfer (FET) Blastocysts can be replaced in the subsequent natural, letrozole or hormonal replacement cycles, depending on whether the women have regular menstrual cycles or not. Only one blastocyst will be transferred each time. In the control group, blastocysts with the best quality morphology will be replaced first and the sequence of blastocyst transfer is decided prior to randomization. In the intervention group, blastocysts with the best morphology and euploid result will be replaced first as the sequence of blastocyst transfer will be modified after the niPGT-A reports are available.

Pregnancy A urine pregnancy test will be performed 14 days after the transfer. If the pregnancy test is positive, transvaginal ultrasound will be performed two weeks later to locate the pregnancy and confirm foetal viability and the number of fetuses. Subsequent management will be the same as other women with early pregnancy. They will be referred for antenatal care when the ongoing pregnancy is 8-10 weeks.

Follow-up Written consent regarding retrieval of pregnancy and delivery data will be sought from the women at the time of study as in all patients coming for IVF for infertility. The women will be contacted after delivery by phone to retrieve the information of the pregnancy outcomes as a routine after IVF pregnancy. The outcome of the pregnancy (delivery, miscarriage), number of babies born, birth weights and obstetrics complications will be recorded.

Women who fail to get pregnant in the first FET will be unblinded and an euploid embryo will be replaced if available. If no euploid embryo, the women can opt to undergo the second IVF cycle.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
Non-invasive Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy status
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non-invasive Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy statusGenetic

    In the intervention group, comprehensive chromosome screening using NGS will be performed according to the recommendations of the company in all SCM samples. Sequence of replacement shall be altered by the NiPGT result after morpholgy.

Study groups in NCT05685147
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalthe intervention group using morphology and niPGT-A
Receives: Genetic: Non-invasive Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy status
Control groupNo interventionthe control group based on morphology alone.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Miscarriage rate

    Miscarriage rate in the first FET and is defined as a clinically recognized pregnancy loss before the 22 weeks of pregnancy and whose denominator is the clinical pregnancy.

    • Miscarriage rate in the first FET and is defined as a clinically recognized pregnancy loss before the 22 weeks of pregnancy and whose denominator is the clinical pregnancy.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Live birth

    delivery beyond 22 weeks of gestation per the first FET

    Measured: 1 year

  2. positive urine pregnancy test

    positive urine pregnancy test

    Measured: at 2 weeks after embryo tranfer

  3. Clinical pregnancy

    presence of intrauterine gestational sac on scanning at gestational week 6

    Measured: 6 weeks

  4. Ongoing pregnancy

    presence of a fetal pole with pulsation at 8-10 weeks of gestation

    Measured: 10 weeks

  5. Multiple pregnancy

    presence of more than one intrauterine sac at 6 weeks of gestation

    Measured: more than one intrauterine sac at 6-8 weeks

  6. Ectopic pregnancy

    Pregnancy not in the uterus

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. Number of CD56 cells

    no. of CD 56 cells per 10 h.p.f from each biopsy

    Measured: one month before start of IVF

  8. Spheroid attachment rate

    Attachment rate by co-culture assay

    Measured: one month before start of IVF

  9. Preterm delivery

    delivery before 37 weeks of gestation

    Measured: 2 years

  10. Gestational hypertension

    development of newly-onset hypertension (blood pressure persistently >=140/90mmHg on two occasions at least 4 hours apart during pregnancy after 20 weeks gestation, labour or the puerperium in a previously normotensive non-proteinuric women

    Measured: 2 year

  11. Pre-eclampsia

    gestation hypertension with proteinuria

    Measured: 2 year

  12. Gestational proteinuria

    spot urine for initial estimation of total protein excretion of 300mg or more/24 hours

    Measured: 2 year

  13. Gestational diabetes

    Using a 75 g 2-hour OGTT, any of the fasting glucose ≥ 5.1mmol/l, 1 hour plasma glucose ≥ 10 mmol/l or 2 hour plasma glucose ≥ 8.5 mmol/l would be diagnostic

    Measured: 2 year

  14. Antepartum haemorrhage

    any vaginal bleeding during pregnancy from the 24 weeks to term

    Measured: 2 year

  15. Congenital anomaly

    Any congenital anomalies upon ultrasound or delivery

    Measured: 2 years

  16. Perinatal mortality

    Stillbirth or death within 1 week of delivery

    Measured: 2 year

  17. Birthweight of newborn

    Birthweight of new-born at delivery

    Measured: 2 year

  18. Placental weight

    Placental weight at delivery

    Measured: 2 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jan 2023
  2. Study start1 Jul 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion27 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion27 Feb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
152 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05685147
Sponsor's protocol ID
niPGTAinRPL
Acronym
niPGTA
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
2 Jan 2023
Last updated
3 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • van den Berg MM, van Maarle MC, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec;1822(12):1951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

    PubMed 22796359
  • Spandorfer SD, Davis OK, Barmat LI, Chung PH, Rosenwaks Z. Relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy in in vitro fertilization pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2004 May;81(5):1265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.057.

    PubMed 15136087
  • Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, Castillon G, Guillen A, Vidal C, Giles J, Ferrando M, Cabanillas S, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017 May;107(5):1122-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

    PubMed 28433371
  • Lee E, Illingworth P, Wilton L, Chambers GM. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):473-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu303. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

    PubMed 25432917
  • Munne S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, Silverberg K, Kalista T, Handyside AH, Katz-Jaffe M, Wells D, Gordon T, Stock-Myer S, Willman S; STAR Study Group. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019 Dec;112(6):1071-1079.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346. Epub 2019 Sep 21.

    PubMed 31551155
  • Assou S, Ait-Ahmed O, El Messaoudi S, Thierry AR, Hamamah S. Non-invasive pre-implantation genetic diagnosis of X-linked disorders. Med Hypotheses. 2014 Oct;83(4):506-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

    PubMed 25182520
  • Xu J, Fang R, Chen L, Chen D, Xiao JP, Yang W, Wang H, Song X, Ma T, Bo S, Shi C, Ren J, Huang L, Cai LY, Yao B, Xie XS, Lu S. Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 18;113(42):11907-11912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613294113. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

    PubMed 27688762
  • Shamonki MI, Jin H, Haimowitz Z, Liu L. Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media. Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1312-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1112. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

    PubMed 27565258
  • Feichtinger M, Vaccari E, Carli L, Wallner E, Madel U, Figl K, Palini S, Feichtinger W. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jun;34(6):583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

    PubMed 28416168
  • Ho JR, Arrach N, Rhodes-Long K, Ahmady A, Ingles S, Chung K, Bendikson KA, Paulson RJ, McGinnis LK. Pushing the limits of detection: investigation of cell-free DNA for aneuploidy screening in embryos. Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):467-475.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.036. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

    PubMed 29960707
  • Capalbo A, Romanelli V, Patassini C, Poli M, Girardi L, Giancani A, Stoppa M, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Diagnostic efficacy of blastocoel fluid and spent media as sources of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing in standard clinical conditions. Fertil Steril. 2018 Oct;110(5):870-879.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.031.

    PubMed 30316433
  • Hiby SE, Regan L, Lo W, Farrell L, Carrington M, Moffett A. Association of maternal killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors and parental HLA-C genotypes with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2008 Apr;23(4):972-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den011. Epub 2008 Feb 8.

    PubMed 18263639

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Non-invasive Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy status in people with Infertility, run by Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Heidi Cheng, MBBS (852-22553657, chy610a@ha.org.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Miscarriage rate (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05685147, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in