Gastric CancerPhase 2NCT05687617
Near-infrared Imaging With Indocyanine Green for Detection of Peritoneal Metastases for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
A Phase 2 study testing Indocyanine green in people with Gastric Cancer and Gastric Adenocarcinoma, run by Laval University at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Peritoneal disease at initial presentation for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is frequent, with 15-31% of patients presenting with peritoneal metastases (PM) at surgical exploration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer, Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- What is being tested?
- Indocyanine green
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2022to 27 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma.
- Clinical stage cT2 or higher.
- No evidence of metastatic disease on preoperative imaging.
- Patient fit for surgery (ECOG 0 or 1).
Who cannot join
- Indocyanine allergy.
- Gastric cancer subtype other than gastric adenocarcinoma.
- Unconfirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma (unable to confirm diagnosis).
- Clinical stage cT1b or lower.
- Evidence of metastatic disease on preoperative imaging.
- Patient unfit for surgery (ECOG 2 or more).
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
CHU de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
About this study
Official title: Diagnostic Value of Intraoperative Near-infrared Imaging With Indocyanine Green for Detection of Peritoneal Metastases During Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: a Prospective, Multicentric Study.
Peritoneal disease at initial presentation for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is frequent, with 15-31% of patients presenting with peritoneal metastases (PM) at surgical exploration. The prognosis of patients with PM is poor, overall survival (OS) ranging from 8 to 13 months, reinforcing the importance of optimal patient selection before surgical management of GA.
Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for intraoperative detection of PM has been described in recent literature as a useful tool in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies to increase the detection of PM during surgery. However, the role of ICG for patients with GA, and its role during diagnosic laparoscopy (DL), remain unknown.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicentric, prospective study . Patients will be referred to one of seven surgeons specialized in the surgical management of gastric cancer. Patients will undergo DL, with intravenous (IV) injection of 0.25 mg/kg of free ICG at the start of the surgery. DL will be first performed without fluorescence imaging in the standard fashion, with identification of potential PM. A first peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score will be calculated. Fluorescence imaging will then be performed, and correlation with previously identified lesions will be assessed and a second PCI score (with ICG) will be calculated. Biopsies will be performed to confirm the metastatic status of the lesions. Any suspicion for additional lesions visualized only under fluorescence imaging will be biopsied as well. Peritoneal fluid cytology will be performed at the beginning of the surgery.
- Being tested
- Indocyanine green
- Keywords
- Diagnostic laparoscopy, ICG
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indocyanine greenDrug
Also called ICG
0,25mg/kg IV at the start of the surgery,
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gastric cancer with ICG | Experimental | Patient to receive IV ICG during diagnostic laparoscopy. Receives: Drug: Indocyanine green |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with additional lesions detected with ICG.
Patients with peritoneal metastases, in whom additional lesions are detected with ICG.
Measured: 18 months
Number of patients with peritoneal metastases detected only with ICG.
Patients with peritoneal metastases, in whom lesions are detected only with ICG and diagnostic laparoscopy would be negative otherwise.
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2023
- Study start15 Dec 2022
- Primary completion27 Mar 2024
- Study completion27 Mar 2024
Why it stopped: Recruitment lower than expected and negative results.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Laval UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laval University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexandre Brind'Amour, Laval University
- Investigators
- Alexandre Brind'Amour, MD, Principal investigator, Laval University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05687617
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MP-20-2023-6524
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
PubMed 33433946Ma J, Shen H, Kapesa L, Zeng S. Lauren classification and individualized chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2016 May;11(5):2959-2964. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4337. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PubMed 27123046Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Cooke D, Corvera C, Das P, Enzinger PC, Enzler T, Fanta P, Farjah F, Gerdes H, Gibson MK, Hochwald S, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Keswani RN, Kim S, Kleinberg LR, Klempner SJ, Lacy J, Ly QP, Matkowskyj KA, McNamara M, Mulcahy MF, Outlaw D, Park H, Perry KA, Pimiento J, Poultsides GA, Reznik S, Roses RE, Strong VE, Su S, Wang HL, Wiesner G, Willett CG, Yakoub D, Yoon H, McMillian N, Pluchino LA. Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Feb;20(2):167-192. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0008.
PubMed 35130500Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S, Kopp HG, Mayer F, Haag GM, Luley K, Lindig U, Schmiegel W, Pohl M, Stoehlmacher J, Folprecht G, Probst S, Prasnikar N, Fischbach W, Mahlberg R, Trojan J, Koenigsmann M, Martens UM, Thuss-Patience P, Egger M, Block A, Heinemann V, Illerhaus G, Moehler M, Schenk M, Kullmann F, Behringer DM, Heike M, Pink D, Teschendorf C, Lohr C, Bernhard H, Schuch G, Rethwisch V, von Weikersthal LF, Hartmann JT, Kneba M, Daum S, Schulmann K, Weniger J, Belle S, Gaiser T, Oduncu FS, Guntner M, Hozaeel W, Reichart A, Jager E, Kraus T, Monig S, Bechstein WO, Schuler M, Schmalenberg H, Hofheinz RD; FLOT4-AIO Investigators. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1948-1957. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
PubMed 30982686Granieri S, Bonomi A, Frassini S, Chierici AP, Bruno F, Paleino S, Kusamura S, Germini A, Facciorusso A, Deraco M, Cotsoglou C. Prognostic impact of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2757-2767. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 11.
PubMed 34001385Sarela AI, Lefkowitz R, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS. Selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for laparoscopic staging. Am J Surg. 2006 Jan;191(1):134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.015.
PubMed 16399124Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Probst S, Schmalenberg H, Hollerbach S, Hofheinz R, Rethwisch V, Seipelt G, Homann N, Wilhelm G, Schuch G, Stoehlmacher J, Derigs HG, Hegewisch-Becker S, Grossmann J, Pauligk C, Atmaca A, Bokemeyer C, Knuth A, Jager E; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20;26(9):1435-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9378.
PubMed 18349393Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PubMed 20728210Abdalla EK, Pisters PW. Staging and preoperative evaluation of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2004 Aug;31(4):513-29. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.04.014.
PubMed 15297943Mezhir JJ, Shah MA, Jacks LM, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec;17(12):3173-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1183-0. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
PubMed 20585870De Andrade JP, Mezhir JJ. The critical role of peritoneal cytology in the staging of gastric cancer: an evidence-based review. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;110(3):291-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.23632. Epub 2014 May 22.
PubMed 24850538Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, Squires MH, Poultsides GA, Fields RC, Schmidt C, Weber SM, Votanopoulos K, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Rates and patterns of recurrence after curative intent resection for gastric cancer: a United States multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Oct;219(4):664-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.062. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
PubMed 25154671Bonnot PE, Lintis A, Mercier F, Benzerdjeb N, Passot G, Pocard M, Meunier B, Bereder JM, Abboud K, Marchal F, Quenet F, Goere D, Msika S, Arvieux C, Pirro N, Wernert R, Rat P, Gagniere J, Lefevre JH, Courvoisier T, Kianmanesh R, Vaudoyer D, Rivoire M, Meeus P, Villeneuve L, Piessen G, Glehen O; FREGAT and BIG-RENAPE Networks. Prognosis of poorly cohesive gastric cancer after complete cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CYTO-CHIP study). Br J Surg. 2021 Oct 23;108(10):1225-1235. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab200.
PubMed 34498666Brandl A, Yonemura Y, Glehen O, Sugarbaker P, Rau B. Long term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasised gastric cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: A multi-institutional cohort from PSOGI. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;47(1):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
PubMed 33071173Baiocchi GL, Gheza F, Molfino S, Arru L, Vaira M, Giacopuzzi S. Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided intraoperative detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review. BMC Surg. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00821-9.
PubMed 32680492
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostic Value of Intraoperative Near-infrared Imaging With Indocyanine Green for Detection of Peritoneal Metastases During Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: a Prospective, Multicentric Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05687617
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MP-20-2023-6524
- Keywords
- Diagnostic laparoscopy, ICG
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recruitment lower than expected and negative results.
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Laval UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Peritoneal disease at initial presentation for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is frequent, with 15-31% of patients presenting with peritoneal metastases (PM) at surgical exploration. The prognosis of patients with PM is poor, overall survival (OS) ranging from 8 to 13 months, reinforcing the importance of optimal patient selection before surgical management of GA.
Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for intraoperative detection of PM has been described in recent literature as a useful tool in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies to increase the detection of PM during surgery. However, the role of ICG for patients with GA, and its role during diagnosic laparoscopy (DL), remain unknown.
Detailed description
This is a multicentric, prospective study . Patients will be referred to one of seven surgeons specialized in the surgical management of gastric cancer. Patients will undergo DL, with intravenous (IV) injection of 0.25 mg/kg of free ICG at the start of the surgery. DL will be first performed without fluorescence imaging in the standard fashion, with identification of potential PM. A first peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score will be calculated. Fluorescence imaging will then be performed, and correlation with previously identified lesions will be assessed and a second PCI score (with ICG) will be calculated. Biopsies will be performed to confirm the metastatic status of the lesions. Any suspicion for additional lesions visualized only under fluorescence imaging will be biopsied as well. Peritoneal fluid cytology will be performed at the beginning of the surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gastric cancer with ICG | Experimental | Drug: Indocyanine greenPatient to receive IV ICG during diagnostic laparoscopy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma.
- Clinical stage cT2 or higher.
- No evidence of metastatic disease on preoperative imaging.
- Patient fit for surgery (ECOG 0 or 1).
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Indocyanine allergy.
- Gastric cancer subtype other than gastric adenocarcinoma.
- Unconfirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma (unable to confirm diagnosis).
- Clinical stage cT1b or lower.
- Evidence of metastatic disease on preoperative imaging.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indocyanine greenAlso: ICG0,25mg/kg IV at the start of the surgery, | Drug | Gastric cancer with ICG |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with additional lesions detected with ICG.
Time frame: 18 months
Patients with peritoneal metastases, in whom additional lesions are detected with ICG.
Number of patients with peritoneal metastases detected only with ICG.
Time frame: 18 months
Patients with peritoneal metastases, in whom lesions are detected only with ICG and diagnostic laparoscopy would be negative otherwise.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment lower than expected and negative results.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2024.
- Background: PubMed 33433946Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 27123046Ma J, Shen H, Kapesa L, Zeng S. Lauren classification and individualized chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2016 May;11(5):2959-2964. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4337. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 35130500Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Cooke D, Corvera C, Das P, Enzinger PC, Enzler T, Fanta P, Farjah F, Gerdes H, Gibson MK, Hochwald S, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Keswani RN, Kim S, Kleinberg LR, Klempner SJ, Lacy J, Ly QP, Matkowskyj KA, McNamara M, Mulcahy MF, Outlaw D, Park H, Perry KA, Pimiento J, Poultsides GA, Reznik S, Roses RE, Strong VE, Su S, Wang HL, Wiesner G, Willett CG, Yakoub D, Yoon H, McMillian N, Pluchino LA. Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Feb;20(2):167-192. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0008.
- Background: PubMed 30982686Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S, Kopp HG, Mayer F, Haag GM, Luley K, Lindig U, Schmiegel W, Pohl M, Stoehlmacher J, Folprecht G, Probst S, Prasnikar N, Fischbach W, Mahlberg R, Trojan J, Koenigsmann M, Martens UM, Thuss-Patience P, Egger M, Block A, Heinemann V, Illerhaus G, Moehler M, Schenk M, Kullmann F, Behringer DM, Heike M, Pink D, Teschendorf C, Lohr C, Bernhard H, Schuch G, Rethwisch V, von Weikersthal LF, Hartmann JT, Kneba M, Daum S, Schulmann K, Weniger J, Belle S, Gaiser T, Oduncu FS, Guntner M, Hozaeel W, Reichart A, Jager E, Kraus T, Monig S, Bechstein WO, Schuler M, Schmalenberg H, Hofheinz RD; FLOT4-AIO Investigators. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1948-1957. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
- Background: PubMed 34001385Granieri S, Bonomi A, Frassini S, Chierici AP, Bruno F, Paleino S, Kusamura S, Germini A, Facciorusso A, Deraco M, Cotsoglou C. Prognostic impact of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2757-2767. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 16399124Sarela AI, Lefkowitz R, Brennan MF, Karpeh MS. Selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for laparoscopic staging. Am J Surg. 2006 Jan;191(1):134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.015.
- Background: PubMed 18349393Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Probst S, Schmalenberg H, Hollerbach S, Hofheinz R, Rethwisch V, Seipelt G, Homann N, Wilhelm G, Schuch G, Stoehlmacher J, Derigs HG, Hegewisch-Becker S, Grossmann J, Pauligk C, Atmaca A, Bokemeyer C, Knuth A, Jager E; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20;26(9):1435-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9378.
- Background: PubMed 20728210Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 15297943Abdalla EK, Pisters PW. Staging and preoperative evaluation of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2004 Aug;31(4):513-29. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.04.014.
- Background: PubMed 20585870Mezhir JJ, Shah MA, Jacks LM, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec;17(12):3173-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1183-0. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
- Background: PubMed 24850538De Andrade JP, Mezhir JJ. The critical role of peritoneal cytology in the staging of gastric cancer: an evidence-based review. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;110(3):291-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.23632. Epub 2014 May 22.
- Background: PubMed 25154671Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, Squires MH, Poultsides GA, Fields RC, Schmidt C, Weber SM, Votanopoulos K, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Rates and patterns of recurrence after curative intent resection for gastric cancer: a United States multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Oct;219(4):664-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.062. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexandre Brind'Amour, MD principal investigator
Laval University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Indocyanine green in people with Gastric Cancer and Gastric Adenocarcinoma, run by Laval University at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment lower than expected and negative results.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with additional lesions detected with ICG. (time frame: 18 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05687617, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2024.