Gastric PolypPhase 4NCT05688020
Tranexamic Acid During Upper GI Endoscopic Resection Procedures
A Phase 4 study testing Tranexamic acid and Epinephrine injection in people with Gastric Polyp and Gastric Neoplasm, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions may prevent cancer. However, resection is associated with adverse events such as bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic derivative of lysine that exerts antifibrinolytic effects and may prevent bleeding. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Polyp, Gastric Neoplasm, Duodenal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic acid and Epinephrine injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2023to Feb 2026
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients referred for endoscopic resection of a non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions in the upper GI presenting to our tertiary academic center.
- Age > 18 years
Who cannot join
- patients with histories of allergic reactions to TXA
- history of seizures
- pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sergei Vosko, MD contact
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Shamir Medical Center
Be’er Ya‘aqov, 70300
Anton Bermont, MD
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Epinephrine Versus Tranexamic Acid Usage During Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Endoscopic Resection Procedures for the Reduction of Intraprocedural and Postprocedural Bleeding
Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions may prevent cancer. However, resection is associated with adverse events such as bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic derivative of lysine that exerts antifibrinolytic effects and may prevent bleeding. The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of local TXA on preventing intraprocedural and postprocedural bleeding in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of upper gastrointestinal lesions.
Read the detailed description
Endoscopic resection (ER) is an endoscopic technique used for the removal of sessile or flat neoplasms confined to the superficial layers (mucosa and submucosa) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
This technique is not without risk, and clinically significant intraprocedural bleeding and post-ER bleeding remain the most frequently encountered serious adverse event.
The bleeding rate associated with ER varies for the different regions of the GI tract. This is most probably due to differences in the vascularity within the wall of the GI tract in each region.
Intraprocedural bleeding in the stomach and duodenum is more frequent and may be as high as 11.5% and 19.3%, respectively. Delayed bleeding has been reported at about 5% for these sites.
Management of bleeding is often resource intensive and may necessitate hospitalization, blood transfusion, and repeat intervention. Some techniques, such as soft coagulation with the tip of a snare; epinephrine injection; hemoclip placement or proton-pump inhibitor treatment, are used to decrease the risk of bleeding or treat active bleeding.
Diluted epinephrine, which causes vasoconstriction, is often added to the submucosal injection fluid because of the theoretical benefit of decreasing bleeding. However, epinephrine has a short time-of-action and for long procedures it requires multiple doses to be injected. This can result in systemic effects such as severe hypertension, ventricular tachycardia, and intestinal ischemia, and may also increase postprocedural pain and prolong patient observation after the procedure.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic derivative of lysine that exerts antifibrinolytic effects by inhibition of lysine binding sites on plasminogen molecules and therefore stabilizes the fibrin meshwork produced by secondary hemostasis. TXA was patented by Dr. S. Okamoto in 1957, and it was found to be significantly more potent than a precursor molecule known as epsilon-amino-caproic acid.
During the past few years, TXA has been 'rediscovered' and is currently used in many conditions that are associated with either overt or occult hemorrhage. It is one of the most frequently cited drugs in recent surgical publications involving nearly all surgical specialties.
After the CRASH-2 study which showed that administration of TXA to bleeding trauma patients within 3 hours of injury significantly reduced the risk of death due to bleeding and all-cause mortality without increasing the risk of vascular occlusive events, it has become an important part of trauma management.
It is also widely used in gynecological practice. Early treatment with TXA reduces death due to bleeding in women with post-partum hemorrhage, as well as total blood loss and transfusion requirements in hemorrhage after caesarean delivery. Therefore, TXA has been recommended by the WHO as part of postpartum hemorrhage management.
TXA is also commonly used in orthopedic surgery, either systemically or topically, to reduce excessive bleeding and transfusion requirements.
Other hemorrhagic conditions in which TXA has been shown effective are epistaxis, hemoptysis , endoscopic ear surgery , mastectomy, and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia with bleeding.
Topical use of TXA may be more beneficial than systemic use as it may provide a higher drug concentration on the wound surface with negligible systemic concentrations. Most publications concerning topically administered TXA come from orthopedic literature where instilling TXA as a bolus into the joint reduces bleeding. Recently, a study revealed that intradermal injections of TXA in dermatological surgery reduces bleeding, especially in those on anticoagulant medications.
While TXA is an inhibitor of fibrinolysis, and therefore might theoretically increase the risk of thrombotic vascular events, most studies show no increased risk of thromboembolism. This finding has been consistent with all routes of TXA administration including IV, topical/intra-articular, and other routes.
The most frequently described contraindications to TXA administration include patients with histories of allergic reactions to TXA, seizures, and patients with acute renal failure or chronic kidney disease.
The investigators propose that the use of TXA in the injection gel during ER procedures will be as effective as epinephrine usage in reducing intraprocedural and postprocedural bleeding, while also decreasing the incidence of side effects including abdominal pain.
- Being tested
- Tranexamic acid, Epinephrine injection
- Medical subject headings
- Polyposis, Gastric, Stomach Neoplasms, Duodenal Neoplasms, Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic acidDrug
Also called Hexakapron
Tranexamic acid will be injected as part of the injectate during endoscopic resection.
Epinephrine injectionDrug
Also called Adrenaline
Epinephrine will be injected as part of the standard injectate used during endoscopic resection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic acid | Experimental | During the ER procedure, de-identified injectate solution will be introduced. Study group: 9 ml of standart solution for injection [Consisit of: 6 ml indigo carmine + 500 ml succinylated gelatin 4% (Gelofusine; B. Braun, Crissier, Switzerland)] + 1 ml (100mg) of TXA (tranexamic acid). Receives: Drug: Tranexamic acid |
| Epinephrine | Active comparator | During the ER procedure, de-identified injectate solution will be introduced. 9 ml of standart solution for injection [Consisit of: 6 ml indigo carmine + 500 ml succinylated gelatin 4% (Gelofusine; B. Braun, Crissier, Switzerland)] + 1 ml epinephrine 1:100,000 + 1 ml saline 0.9%. Receives: Drug: Epinephrine injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraprocedural bleeding
To compare the severity of intraprocedural bleeding between those receiving TXA and those receiving epinephrine.
Measured: During procedure
Postprocedural bleeding
To compare the severity of postprocedural bleeding between those receiving TXA and those receiving epinephrine.
Measured: 2 weeks post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (1)
Side effects
To compare the number and severity of occurrences of abdominal pain, tachycardia, and hypertension between those receiving TXA and those r receiving epinephrine.
Measured: 2 weeks post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Feb 2023
- Primary completionFeb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric PolypStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is designed as a prospective, double-blinded, controlled, non-inferiority pilot study.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anton Bermont, MD, Principal investigator, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05688020
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0118-22-ASF
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
ASGE Technology Committee; Hwang JH, Konda V, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chauhan SS, Enestvedt BK, Fujii-Lau LL, Komanduri S, Maple JT, Murad FM, Pannala R, Thosani NC, Banerjee S. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):215-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
PubMed 26077453Park CH, Lee SK. Preventing and controlling bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin Endosc. 2013 Sep;46(5):456-62. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.456. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
PubMed 24143302Libanio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Complications of endoscopic resection techniques for upper GI tract lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;30(5):735-748. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
PubMed 27931633Yang Z, Wu Q, Liu Z, Wu K, Fan D. Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2-receptor antagonists for the management of iatrogenic gastric ulcer after endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Digestion. 2011;84(4):315-20. doi: 10.1159/000331138. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
PubMed 22075541Castro R, Libanio D, Pita I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Solutions for submucosal injection: What to choose and how to do it. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 21;25(7):777-788. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.777.
PubMed 30809079Watts G. Utako Okamoto. Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2286. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30697-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 27308678Montroy J, Hutton B, Moodley P, Fergusson NA, Cheng W, Tinmouth A, Lavallee LT, Fergusson DA, Breau RH. The efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Rev. 2018 Feb 19:S0887-7963(17)30151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2018.02.003. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 29567052
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Epinephrine Versus Tranexamic Acid Usage During Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Endoscopic Resection Procedures for the Reduction of Intraprocedural and Postprocedural Bleeding
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05688020
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0118-22-ASF
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions may prevent cancer. However, resection is associated with adverse events such as bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic derivative of lysine that exerts antifibrinolytic effects and may prevent bleeding. The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of local TXA on preventing intraprocedural and postprocedural bleeding in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of upper gastrointestinal lesions.
Detailed description
Endoscopic resection (ER) is an endoscopic technique used for the removal of sessile or flat neoplasms confined to the superficial layers (mucosa and submucosa) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
This technique is not without risk, and clinically significant intraprocedural bleeding and post-ER bleeding remain the most frequently encountered serious adverse event.
The bleeding rate associated with ER varies for the different regions of the GI tract. This is most probably due to differences in the vascularity within the wall of the GI tract in each region.
Intraprocedural bleeding in the stomach and duodenum is more frequent and may be as high as 11.5% and 19.3%, respectively. Delayed bleeding has been reported at about 5% for these sites.
Management of bleeding is often resource intensive and may necessitate hospitalization, blood transfusion, and repeat intervention. Some techniques, such as soft coagulation with the tip of a snare; epinephrine injection; hemoclip placement or proton-pump inhibitor treatment, are used to decrease the risk of bleeding or treat active bleeding.
Diluted epinephrine, which causes vasoconstriction, is often added to the submucosal injection fluid because of the theoretical benefit of decreasing bleeding. However, epinephrine has a short time-of-action and for long procedures it requires multiple doses to be injected. This can result in systemic effects such as severe hypertension, ventricular tachycardia, and intestinal ischemia, and may also increase postprocedural pain and prolong patient observation after the procedure.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic derivative of lysine that exerts antifibrinolytic effects by inhibition of lysine binding sites on plasminogen molecules and therefore stabilizes the fibrin meshwork produced by secondary hemostasis. TXA was patented by Dr. S. Okamoto in 1957, and it was found to be significantly more potent than a precursor molecule known as epsilon-amino-caproic acid.
During the past few years, TXA has been 'rediscovered' and is currently used in many conditions that are associated with either overt or occult hemorrhage. It is one of the most frequently cited drugs in recent surgical publications involving nearly all surgical specialties.
After the CRASH-2 study which showed that administration of TXA to bleeding trauma patients within 3 hours of injury significantly reduced the risk of death due to bleeding and all-cause mortality without increasing the risk of vascular occlusive events, it has become an important part of trauma management.
It is also widely used in gynecological practice. Early treatment with TXA reduces death due to bleeding in women with post-partum hemorrhage, as well as total blood loss and transfusion requirements in hemorrhage after caesarean delivery. Therefore, TXA has been recommended by the WHO as part of postpartum hemorrhage management.
TXA is also commonly used in orthopedic surgery, either systemically or topically, to reduce excessive bleeding and transfusion requirements.
Other hemorrhagic conditions in which TXA has been shown effective are epistaxis, hemoptysis , endoscopic ear surgery , mastectomy, and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia with bleeding.
Topical use of TXA may be more beneficial than systemic use as it may provide a higher drug concentration on the wound surface with negligible systemic concentrations. Most publications concerning topically administered TXA come from orthopedic literature where instilling TXA as a bolus into the joint reduces bleeding. Recently, a study revealed that intradermal injections of TXA in dermatological surgery reduces bleeding, especially in those on anticoagulant medications.
While TXA is an inhibitor of fibrinolysis, and therefore might theoretically increase the risk of thrombotic vascular events, most studies show no increased risk of thromboembolism. This finding has been consistent with all routes of TXA administration including IV, topical/intra-articular, and other routes.
The most frequently described contraindications to TXA administration include patients with histories of allergic reactions to TXA, seizures, and patients with acute renal failure or chronic kidney disease.
The investigators propose that the use of TXA in the injection gel during ER procedures will be as effective as epinephrine usage in reducing intraprocedural and postprocedural bleeding, while also decreasing the incidence of side effects including abdominal pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is designed as a prospective, double-blinded, controlled, non-inferiority pilot study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic acid | Experimental | Drug: Tranexamic acidDuring the ER procedure, de-identified injectate solution will be introduced. Study group: 9 ml of standart solution for injection [Consisit of: 6 ml indigo carmine + 500 ml succinylated gelatin 4% (Gelofusine; B. Braun, Crissier, Switzerland)] + 1 ml (100mg) of TXA (tranexamic acid). |
| Epinephrine | Active comparator | Drug: Epinephrine injectionDuring the ER procedure, de-identified injectate solution will be introduced. 9 ml of standart solution for injection [Consisit of: 6 ml indigo carmine + 500 ml succinylated gelatin 4% (Gelofusine; B. Braun, Crissier, Switzerland)] + 1 ml epinephrine 1:100,000 + 1 ml saline 0.9%. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients referred for endoscopic resection of a non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions in the upper GI presenting to our tertiary academic center.
- Age > 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients with histories of allergic reactions to TXA
- history of seizures
- pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic acidAlso: HexakapronTranexamic acid will be injected as part of the injectate during endoscopic resection. | Drug | Tranexamic acid |
| Epinephrine injectionAlso: AdrenalineEpinephrine will be injected as part of the standard injectate used during endoscopic resection. | Drug | Epinephrine |
Primary outcome
Intraprocedural bleeding
Time frame: During procedure
To compare the severity of intraprocedural bleeding between those receiving TXA and those receiving epinephrine.
Postprocedural bleeding
Time frame: 2 weeks post-procedure
To compare the severity of postprocedural bleeding between those receiving TXA and those receiving epinephrine.
1 secondary outcome
Side effects
Time frame: 2 weeks post-procedure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 26077453ASGE Technology Committee; Hwang JH, Konda V, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chauhan SS, Enestvedt BK, Fujii-Lau LL, Komanduri S, Maple JT, Murad FM, Pannala R, Thosani NC, Banerjee S. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):215-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 24143302Park CH, Lee SK. Preventing and controlling bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin Endosc. 2013 Sep;46(5):456-62. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.456. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 27931633Libanio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Complications of endoscopic resection techniques for upper GI tract lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;30(5):735-748. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
- Background: PubMed 22075541Yang Z, Wu Q, Liu Z, Wu K, Fan D. Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2-receptor antagonists for the management of iatrogenic gastric ulcer after endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Digestion. 2011;84(4):315-20. doi: 10.1159/000331138. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 30809079Castro R, Libanio D, Pita I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Solutions for submucosal injection: What to choose and how to do it. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 21;25(7):777-788. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.777.
- Background: PubMed 27308678Watts G. Utako Okamoto. Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2286. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30697-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 29567052Montroy J, Hutton B, Moodley P, Fergusson NA, Cheng W, Tinmouth A, Lavallee LT, Fergusson DA, Breau RH. The efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Rev. 2018 Feb 19:S0887-7963(17)30151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2018.02.003. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastric Polyp
RecruitingObservational study
New bioMarkers tO straTIfy cOlorectal caNcer Referrals
Colorectal Carcinoma, Polyp
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
UC Davis Cohort of Pre-Malignant and Malignant Gastro-Intestinal DisEases Study
Intestinal Metaplasia, Chronic Gastritis
RecruitingObservational study
Integrated Cancer Repository for Cancer Research
Pancreatic Cancer, Thyroid Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
Gastric Polyps, Intestinal Polyps
RecruitingObservational study
Gastrointestinal Biomarkers in Tissue and Biological Fluid Samples From Colorectal Cancer Patients
Colorectal Cancer, Esophageal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sergei Vosko, MD contact
Anton Bermont, MD principal investigator
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tranexamic acid and Epinephrine injection in people with Gastric Polyp and Gastric Neoplasm, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Anton Bermont, MD (972-52-6944145, bermont@doctor.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraprocedural bleeding (time frame: During procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05688020, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2023.