Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT05690074
Epidural Stimulation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients
A study testing Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University Hospital, Motol at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
Investigators propose to demonstrate that epidural stimulation (ES) can be used to recover significant levels of autonomic control of cardiovascular, urinary and sexual function as well as the ability to voluntarily control leg movements below the injury level. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 30 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- non-progressive SCI with complete motor paralysis below T1; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A or B
- 18 - 60 years of age;
- longer than 2 years post injury;
- stable medical condition
- unable to voluntarily move all single joints of the legs;
- spinal cort lesion between C7 and Th10
Who cannot join
- ventilator dependent;
- painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, contracture, or pressure sore that might interfere with training;
- clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse;
- cardiovascular, respiratory, bladder, or renal disease unrelated to SCI;
- severe anemia (Hgb<8 g/dl) or hypovolemia; and HIV or AIDS related illness.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
UH Motol
Prague, 15000
Vojtech Rybka, Dr., +420224439253, vojtech.rybka@fnmotol.cz
About this study
Official title: Monitoring the Effect of Epidural Stimulation on Sensorimotor and Autonomic Functions in Chronic Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Investigators propose to demonstrate that epidural stimulation (ES) can be used to recover significant levels of autonomic control of cardiovascular, urinary and sexual function as well as the ability to voluntarily control leg movements below the injury level. This intervention would provide an immediate therapeutic alternative to individuals who now have no recourse for treatment. In addition investigators suggest to prove on functional magnetic resonance imaging if there are some significant changes before and after the stimulation.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, spinal cord stimulation, volitional movement, functional magnetic resonance imaging, autonomic nervous system
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator SystemDevice
Device: 5-6-5 Specify electrode Device: Restore Advance Pulse Generator
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with chronic spinal cord injury | Experimental | 80 sessions each of epidural spinal cord stimulation for 1) autonomic functions 2) voluntary movement; and 3) standing Receives: Device: Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brain functional connectivity
Researchers want to describe if there are some changes on functional MRI of the spinal cord and brain before and after stimulation. With functional MRI in rest and task condition, the functional connectivity (FC) is examined.
Measured: 1 year after implantation
Change from baseline of lower extremity independence time during after 1 year of stimulation
Researchers will measure the amount of time individuals are able to stand without manual assistance (independently).
Measured: 1 year after stimulation (360 training sessions)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in trunk stability restoration
Trunk control stability test in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI)
Measured: 6 month and 1 year after implantation
Neurogenic bladder symptoms will be measured using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS).
Assessment of neurogenic bladder symptoms will be performed to assess the impact of long term eSCS on this measure. The score measures bladder symptoms across 3 different domains: incontinence (scored 0-29), storage and voiding (scored 0-22), and consequences (scored 0-23), with higher scores representing worse symptoms.
Measured: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Sexual function as measured by the Sexual Function Questionnaire
The Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ) is a self-report outcome measure of sexual function.
Measured: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Change in sense of wellbeing as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire
The WHOQOL-BREF assesses quality of life (QOL) within the context of an individual's culture, value systems, personal goals, standards and concerns. The higher score in the questionnaire means better quality of life for patient.
Measured: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Symptoms of spasticity will be measured by Modified Ashworth spasticity test
The modified Ashworth scale is the most universally accepted clinical tool used to measure the increase of muscle tone.
Measured: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Neurogenic bowel symptoms will be measured using the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score.
Assessment of neurogenic bowel symptoms will be performed to assess the impact of long term eSCS on this measure. Scores can range from 0-47, with a higher score representing more severe dysfunction.
Measured: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Reduction of neuropathic pain
We will measure neuropathic pain by the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ)
Measured: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Change in BP during the head up tilt test (HUTT)
During HUTT, participants will be passively moved to approximately 60° upright stand position by the investigators using the tilt table. Using epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) to activate spinal sympathetic circuitry and mitigate low resting BP and orthostatic hypotension (OH) and continuous beat-by beat BP monitoring via finger photoplethysmography.
Measured: 6 month -1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Motol
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vojtech Rybka, MD, University Hospital, Motol
- Investigators
- Jiri Kriz, MD, PhD, Study chair, UH Motol - spinal cord unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05690074
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EK-1302/21
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
PubMed 24713270Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.
PubMed 21601270Gerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, Morikawa E, Haakana P, Ferguson AR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1968-80. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4008. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
PubMed 26077679Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PubMed 30382197Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhou K, Wei W, Liu Y. Restoring Sensorimotor Function Through Neuromodulation After Spinal Cord Injury: Progress and Remaining Challenges. Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 14;15:749465. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.749465. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34720867Choi EH, Gattas S, Brown NJ, Hong JD, Limbo JN, Chan AY, Oh MY. Epidural electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2021 Dec;16(12):2367-2375. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.313017.
PubMed 33907008Pena Pino I, Hoover C, Venkatesh S, Ahmadi A, Sturtevant D, Patrick N, Freeman D, Parr A, Samadani U, Balser D, Krassioukov A, Phillips A, Netoff TI, Darrow D. Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jun 30;14:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00035. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32714156
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Monitoring the Effect of Epidural Stimulation on Sensorimotor and Autonomic Functions in Chronic Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05690074
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EK-1302/21
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, spinal cord stimulation, volitional movement, functional magnetic resonance imaging, autonomic nervous system
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MotolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigators propose to demonstrate that epidural stimulation (ES) can be used to recover significant levels of autonomic control of cardiovascular, urinary and sexual function as well as the ability to voluntarily control leg movements below the injury level. This intervention would provide an immediate therapeutic alternative to individuals who now have no recourse for treatment. In addition investigators suggest to prove on functional magnetic resonance imaging if there are some significant changes before and after the stimulation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with chronic spinal cord injury | Experimental | Device: Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System80 sessions each of epidural spinal cord stimulation for 1) autonomic functions 2) voluntary movement; and 3) standing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- non-progressive SCI with complete motor paralysis below T1; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A or B
- 18 - 60 years of age;
- longer than 2 years post injury;
- stable medical condition
- unable to voluntarily move all single joints of the legs;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ventilator dependent;
- painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, contracture, or pressure sore that might interfere with training;
- clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse;
- cardiovascular, respiratory, bladder, or renal disease unrelated to SCI;
- severe anemia (Hgb<8 g/dl) or hypovolemia; and HIV or AIDS related illness.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator SystemDevice: 5-6-5 Specify electrode Device: Restore Advance Pulse Generator | Device | Patients with chronic spinal cord injury |
Primary outcome
Brain functional connectivity
Time frame: 1 year after implantation
Researchers want to describe if there are some changes on functional MRI of the spinal cord and brain before and after stimulation. With functional MRI in rest and task condition, the functional connectivity (FC) is examined.
Change from baseline of lower extremity independence time during after 1 year of stimulation
Time frame: 1 year after stimulation (360 training sessions)
Researchers will measure the amount of time individuals are able to stand without manual assistance (independently).
8 secondary outcomes
Change in trunk stability restoration
Time frame: 6 month and 1 year after implantation
Neurogenic bladder symptoms will be measured using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS).
Time frame: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Sexual function as measured by the Sexual Function Questionnaire
Time frame: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Change in sense of wellbeing as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire
Time frame: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Symptoms of spasticity will be measured by Modified Ashworth spasticity test
Time frame: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Neurogenic bowel symptoms will be measured using the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score.
Time frame: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Reduction of neuropathic pain
Time frame: 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Change in BP during the head up tilt test (HUTT)
Time frame: 6 month -1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 24713270Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 21601270Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 26077679Gerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, Morikawa E, Haakana P, Ferguson AR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1968-80. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4008. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 30382197Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 34720867Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhou K, Wei W, Liu Y. Restoring Sensorimotor Function Through Neuromodulation After Spinal Cord Injury: Progress and Remaining Challenges. Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 14;15:749465. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.749465. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 33907008Choi EH, Gattas S, Brown NJ, Hong JD, Limbo JN, Chan AY, Oh MY. Epidural electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2021 Dec;16(12):2367-2375. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.313017.
- Background: PubMed 32714156Pena Pino I, Hoover C, Venkatesh S, Ahmadi A, Sturtevant D, Patrick N, Freeman D, Parr A, Samadani U, Balser D, Krassioukov A, Phillips A, Netoff TI, Darrow D. Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jun 30;14:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00035. eCollection 2020.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jiri Kriz, MD, PhD study chair
UH Motol - spinal cord unit
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spectra Wave Writer™ Spinal Cord Stimulator System in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University Hospital, Motol at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vojtech Rybka, Dr. (+420224439253, vojtech.rybka@fnmotol.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brain functional connectivity (time frame: 1 year after implantation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05690074, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2023.