Renal StoneNCT05697250
High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy
A study testing Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser) in people with Renal Stone, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Stone
- What is being tested?
- Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 23 Jan 2023to 3 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients ≥ 18 years scheduled for URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital
Who cannot join
- Concomitant ureteral stone
- Urinary diversion
- Active infection
- Untreated cancer in the upper urinary tract
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy - a Prospective, Randomised Clinical Trial
The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings.
Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Read more
Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic.
Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND: The Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) has been considered the gold-standard laser for ureteroscopy (URS) because of its versatility, with the ability to break all kinds of stones in the urinary tract as well as tumor- and soft tissue ablation. Recently, a new Thulium fiber laser (TFL) has been introduced, with more favourable basic physical characteristics. Previous pre-clinical studies have predicted TFL lithotripsy to be up to four times faster than Ho:YAG lithotripsy using the same power settings. Earlier this year the present investigators published the first clinical randomised trial comparing the outcomes after ureteroscopic lithotripsy using TFL and Ho:YAG. The study demonstrated that the TFL gained superior stone free rate (SFR) compared to Ho:YAG, in addition to lower complication rate and shorter operative times. Due to the study, the investigators believe the TFL is emerging as the laser of choice. In the study very low laser settings were shown to be highly efficient using TFL during URS lithotripsy. However, no consensus exists on the preferred laser settings for the TFL during this procedure, and a variety of different settings have been suggested included high power settings as high as 45 Watts (W).
To date, there are no clinical randomised trials comparing different laser settings for TFL to determine what is optimal regarding the clinical outcomes.
AIMS OF THE STUDY: The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following URS lithotripsy for renal stones with TFL using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of SFR, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
STUDY DESIGN: The study is planned as a prospective randomized trial. All patients ≥ 18 years scheduled to URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital (HUH) are invited to be enrolled in the study. After written informed consent, patients are randomized to URS TFL lithotripsy with either low or high power laser settings.
LASER SETTINGS: The laser settings in the two study groups are standardized and need to be maintained throughout the procedure.
Group 1 - low power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.6 Joules (J) at 10 Herz (Hz) Group 2 - high power (16-18W), short pulse: 0.4 J / 40 Hz 0.6 J / 30 Hz 0.8 J / 20 Hz
Standard start-up settings in Group 1 (low power) is 0.4J / 10Hz (4W) and in Group 2 (high power) 0.4J / 40Hz (16W).
THE URS PROCEDURE: The URS procedure is performed in general anaesthesia and prophylactic antibiotics prior to surgery start will be administered according to the department's guidelines, either according to urine culture or current local regime.
The procedure starts with a cystoscopy followed by semirigid URS when considered appropriate. A safety guide wire and an access sheath can be used at the surgeon's discretion but is routinely omitted during URS at HUH. Balloon dilatation is performed on demand. Both semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes can be used for the endoscopy. Room-tempered, gravitational irrigation fluid at 60 cm height is used throughout the procedure. When reaching the stone, the envelope revealing the result of randomization for either high or low laser settings is opened. A 150μm laser fiber can be used for stone disintegration. The stone is disintegrated using TFL with predefined settings as described below and according to the randomization group. To make the procedures as similar as possible, the stone should be dusted/disintegrated to as small particles as possible rather than fragmented and retrieved. Only residual particles not suitable for further disintegration can be retrieved at the end of the procedure to render the patient stone free.
A double J-stent can be placed after the procedure if deemed necessary, and if so, this is removed according to standard routine after 1-2 weeks in the outpatient clinic.
FOLLOW-UP: Follow-up with computed tomography (CT) is performed at 3 months post endoscopically for all patients to assess stone free status and exclude a ureteral stricture in addition to a clinical consultation.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND APPROVALS: All patients eligible for inclusion in the study will receive oral and written information. Participation in the study is voluntarily, and the patient can choose to withdraw at any point during the study process. Inclusion in the study will only be done after the consent form is signed.
The study is approved by The National Committees for Research Ethics in Norway (REK: 550740). In addition, application for approval by The Data Protection Authorities at Haukeland University Hospital has been sent.
- Conditions
- Renal Stone
- Being tested
- Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)
- Medical subject headings
- Nephrolithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)Other
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using low power laser settings (0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz corresponding to 2.4 - 6.0 Watts) or high power laser settings (0.4 J at 40 Hz, 0.6 J at 30 Hz or 0.8 J at 20 Hz corresponding to 16 - 18 Watts).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 - low power laser settings | Experimental | 4-6 Watts, short pulse mode. 0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz. Receives: Other: Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser) |
| Group 2 - high power laser settings | Experimental | 16-18 Watts, short pulse mode. 0.4 J / 40 Hz, 0.6 J / 30 Hz or 0.8 J / 20 Hz. Receives: Other: Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Operative Time
Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the cystoscope until emptying the bladder in the end.
Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Stone Free Rate
Assessment of stone free status (or the presence of residual fragments) on low dose CT 3 months post endoscopically.
Measured: 3 months post endoscopically
Laser Activation Patterns - Duration
Duration of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy in minutes
Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Laser Activation Patterns - Number
Number of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy
Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Intraoperative Complications
Complications occurred during the endoscopic procedure (bleeding, perforation, avulsion, mucosal abrasion, blurred vision)
Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Post Operative Complications
Complications occurred after the endoscopic procedure (up to 3 months post endoscopically).
Measured: After surgery until 3 months post endoscopically.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2023
- Study start23 Jan 2023
- Primary completion3 Sep 2025
- Study completion3 Sep 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Renal StoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The patients are randomised to ureteroscopic stone treatment with Thulium Fiber Laser with either low or high laser settings. The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in a standardised manner irrespective of the laser settings, and follow-up is similar in both groups.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Haukeland University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Øyvind Ulvik, Assoc Prof, Principal investigator, Haukeland University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05697250
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 550740
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy - a Prospective, Randomised Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05697250
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 550740
- Conditions
- Renal Stone
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Haukeland University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Sep 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Oct 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings.
Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic.
Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: The Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) has been considered the gold-standard laser for ureteroscopy (URS) because of its versatility, with the ability to break all kinds of stones in the urinary tract as well as tumor- and soft tissue ablation. Recently, a new Thulium fiber laser (TFL) has been introduced, with more favourable basic physical characteristics. Previous pre-clinical studies have predicted TFL lithotripsy to be up to four times faster than Ho:YAG lithotripsy using the same power settings. Earlier this year the present investigators published the first clinical randomised trial comparing the outcomes after ureteroscopic lithotripsy using TFL and Ho:YAG. The study demonstrated that the TFL gained superior stone free rate (SFR) compared to Ho:YAG, in addition to lower complication rate and shorter operative times. Due to the study, the investigators believe the TFL is emerging as the laser of choice. In the study very low laser settings were shown to be highly efficient using TFL during URS lithotripsy. However, no consensus exists on the preferred laser settings for the TFL during this procedure, and a variety of different settings have been suggested included high power settings as high as 45 Watts (W).
To date, there are no clinical randomised trials comparing different laser settings for TFL to determine what is optimal regarding the clinical outcomes.
AIMS OF THE STUDY: The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following URS lithotripsy for renal stones with TFL using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of SFR, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
STUDY DESIGN: The study is planned as a prospective randomized trial. All patients ≥ 18 years scheduled to URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital (HUH) are invited to be enrolled in the study. After written informed consent, patients are randomized to URS TFL lithotripsy with either low or high power laser settings.
LASER SETTINGS: The laser settings in the two study groups are standardized and need to be maintained throughout the procedure.
Group 1 - low power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.6 Joules (J) at 10 Herz (Hz) Group 2 - high power (16-18W), short pulse: 0.4 J / 40 Hz 0.6 J / 30 Hz 0.8 J / 20 Hz
Standard start-up settings in Group 1 (low power) is 0.4J / 10Hz (4W) and in Group 2 (high power) 0.4J / 40Hz (16W).
THE URS PROCEDURE: The URS procedure is performed in general anaesthesia and prophylactic antibiotics prior to surgery start will be administered according to the department's guidelines, either according to urine culture or current local regime.
The procedure starts with a cystoscopy followed by semirigid URS when considered appropriate. A safety guide wire and an access sheath can be used at the surgeon's discretion but is routinely omitted during URS at HUH. Balloon dilatation is performed on demand. Both semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes can be used for the endoscopy. Room-tempered, gravitational irrigation fluid at 60 cm height is used throughout the procedure. When reaching the stone, the envelope revealing the result of randomization for either high or low laser settings is opened. A 150μm laser fiber can be used for stone disintegration. The stone is disintegrated using TFL with predefined settings as described below and according to the randomization group. To make the procedures as similar as possible, the stone should be dusted/disintegrated to as small particles as possible rather than fragmented and retrieved. Only residual particles not suitable for further disintegration can be retrieved at the end of the procedure to render the patient stone free.
A double J-stent can be placed after the procedure if deemed necessary, and if so, this is removed according to standard routine after 1-2 weeks in the outpatient clinic.
FOLLOW-UP: Follow-up with computed tomography (CT) is performed at 3 months post endoscopically for all patients to assess stone free status and exclude a ureteral stricture in addition to a clinical consultation.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND APPROVALS: All patients eligible for inclusion in the study will receive oral and written information. Participation in the study is voluntarily, and the patient can choose to withdraw at any point during the study process. Inclusion in the study will only be done after the consent form is signed.
The study is approved by The National Committees for Research Ethics in Norway (REK: 550740). In addition, application for approval by The Data Protection Authorities at Haukeland University Hospital has been sent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The patients are randomised to ureteroscopic stone treatment with Thulium Fiber Laser with either low or high laser settings. The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in a standardised manner irrespective of the laser settings, and follow-up is similar in both groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 - low power laser settings | Experimental | Other: Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)4-6 Watts, short pulse mode. 0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz. |
| Group 2 - high power laser settings | Experimental | Other: Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)16-18 Watts, short pulse mode. 0.4 J / 40 Hz, 0.6 J / 30 Hz or 0.8 J / 20 Hz. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients ≥ 18 years scheduled for URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Concomitant ureteral stone
- Urinary diversion
- Active infection
- Untreated cancer in the upper urinary tract
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using low power laser settings (0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz corresponding to 2.4 - 6.0 Watts) or high power laser settings (0.4 J at 40 Hz, 0.6 J at 30 Hz or 0.8 J at 20 Hz corresponding to 16 - 18 Watts). | Other | Group 1 - low power laser settings, Group 2 - high power laser settings |
Primary outcome
Operative Time
Time frame: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the cystoscope until emptying the bladder in the end.
5 secondary outcomes
Stone Free Rate
Time frame: 3 months post endoscopically
Laser Activation Patterns - Duration
Time frame: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Laser Activation Patterns - Number
Time frame: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Intraoperative Complications
Time frame: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
Post Operative Complications
Time frame: After surgery until 3 months post endoscopically.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Renal Stone
Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheaths Versus Conventional Sheaths for Treatment of Nephrolithiasis
Kidney Stone
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Novel Antimicrobial Solution to Prevent Infections
Kidney Stone, Infection
Not yet recruiting
DISS vs FANS in Suction-Assisted RIRS for Medium-Sized Renal Stones
Kidney Stones, Nephrolithiasis
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial to Assess the Efficacy of EMPAgliflozin and Personalized Dietary Counseling for Kidney STONE Prevention
Kidney Stone, Nephrolithiasis
RecruitingObservational study
Renal Stone Treatment Global Registry
Urolithiasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Øyvind Ulvik, Assoc Prof principal investigator
Haukeland University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser) in people with Renal Stone, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Operative Time (time frame: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.