AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal StoneNCT05697250

High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy

A study testing Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser) in people with Renal Stone, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Renal Stone
What is being tested?
Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
23 Jan 2023to 3 Sep 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥ 18 years scheduled for URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Concomitant ureteral stone
  • Urinary diversion
  • Active infection
  • Untreated cancer in the upper urinary tract

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Haukeland University Hospital

    Bergen, Vestland, 5021

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy - a Prospective, Randomised Clinical Trial

The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings.

Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Read more

Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic.

Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND: The Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) has been considered the gold-standard laser for ureteroscopy (URS) because of its versatility, with the ability to break all kinds of stones in the urinary tract as well as tumor- and soft tissue ablation. Recently, a new Thulium fiber laser (TFL) has been introduced, with more favourable basic physical characteristics. Previous pre-clinical studies have predicted TFL lithotripsy to be up to four times faster than Ho:YAG lithotripsy using the same power settings. Earlier this year the present investigators published the first clinical randomised trial comparing the outcomes after ureteroscopic lithotripsy using TFL and Ho:YAG. The study demonstrated that the TFL gained superior stone free rate (SFR) compared to Ho:YAG, in addition to lower complication rate and shorter operative times. Due to the study, the investigators believe the TFL is emerging as the laser of choice. In the study very low laser settings were shown to be highly efficient using TFL during URS lithotripsy. However, no consensus exists on the preferred laser settings for the TFL during this procedure, and a variety of different settings have been suggested included high power settings as high as 45 Watts (W).

To date, there are no clinical randomised trials comparing different laser settings for TFL to determine what is optimal regarding the clinical outcomes.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following URS lithotripsy for renal stones with TFL using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of SFR, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.

STUDY DESIGN: The study is planned as a prospective randomized trial. All patients ≥ 18 years scheduled to URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital (HUH) are invited to be enrolled in the study. After written informed consent, patients are randomized to URS TFL lithotripsy with either low or high power laser settings.

LASER SETTINGS: The laser settings in the two study groups are standardized and need to be maintained throughout the procedure.

Group 1 - low power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.6 Joules (J) at 10 Herz (Hz) Group 2 - high power (16-18W), short pulse: 0.4 J / 40 Hz 0.6 J / 30 Hz 0.8 J / 20 Hz

Standard start-up settings in Group 1 (low power) is 0.4J / 10Hz (4W) and in Group 2 (high power) 0.4J / 40Hz (16W).

THE URS PROCEDURE: The URS procedure is performed in general anaesthesia and prophylactic antibiotics prior to surgery start will be administered according to the department's guidelines, either according to urine culture or current local regime.

The procedure starts with a cystoscopy followed by semirigid URS when considered appropriate. A safety guide wire and an access sheath can be used at the surgeon's discretion but is routinely omitted during URS at HUH. Balloon dilatation is performed on demand. Both semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes can be used for the endoscopy. Room-tempered, gravitational irrigation fluid at 60 cm height is used throughout the procedure. When reaching the stone, the envelope revealing the result of randomization for either high or low laser settings is opened. A 150μm laser fiber can be used for stone disintegration. The stone is disintegrated using TFL with predefined settings as described below and according to the randomization group. To make the procedures as similar as possible, the stone should be dusted/disintegrated to as small particles as possible rather than fragmented and retrieved. Only residual particles not suitable for further disintegration can be retrieved at the end of the procedure to render the patient stone free.

A double J-stent can be placed after the procedure if deemed necessary, and if so, this is removed according to standard routine after 1-2 weeks in the outpatient clinic.

FOLLOW-UP: Follow-up with computed tomography (CT) is performed at 3 months post endoscopically for all patients to assess stone free status and exclude a ureteral stricture in addition to a clinical consultation.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND APPROVALS: All patients eligible for inclusion in the study will receive oral and written information. Participation in the study is voluntarily, and the patient can choose to withdraw at any point during the study process. Inclusion in the study will only be done after the consent form is signed.

The study is approved by The National Committees for Research Ethics in Norway (REK: 550740). In addition, application for approval by The Data Protection Authorities at Haukeland University Hospital has been sent.

Conditions
Renal Stone
Being tested
Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)
Medical subject headings
Nephrolithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)Other

    Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using low power laser settings (0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz corresponding to 2.4 - 6.0 Watts) or high power laser settings (0.4 J at 40 Hz, 0.6 J at 30 Hz or 0.8 J at 20 Hz corresponding to 16 - 18 Watts).

Study groups in NCT05697250
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1 - low power laser settingsExperimental4-6 Watts, short pulse mode. 0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz.
Receives: Other: Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)
Group 2 - high power laser settingsExperimental16-18 Watts, short pulse mode. 0.4 J / 40 Hz, 0.6 J / 30 Hz or 0.8 J / 20 Hz.
Receives: Other: Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative Time

    Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the cystoscope until emptying the bladder in the end.

    Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Stone Free Rate

    Assessment of stone free status (or the presence of residual fragments) on low dose CT 3 months post endoscopically.

    Measured: 3 months post endoscopically

  2. Laser Activation Patterns - Duration

    Duration of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy in minutes

    Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery

  3. Laser Activation Patterns - Number

    Number of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy

    Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery

  4. Intraoperative Complications

    Complications occurred during the endoscopic procedure (bleeding, perforation, avulsion, mucosal abrasion, blurred vision)

    Measured: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery

  5. Post Operative Complications

    Complications occurred after the endoscopic procedure (up to 3 months post endoscopically).

    Measured: After surgery until 3 months post endoscopically.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jan 2023
  2. Study start23 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion3 Sep 2025
  4. Study completion3 Sep 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The patients are randomised to ureteroscopic stone treatment with Thulium Fiber Laser with either low or high laser settings. The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in a standardised manner irrespective of the laser settings, and follow-up is similar in both groups.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05697250
Sponsor's protocol ID
550740
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
29 Dec 2022
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser) in people with Renal Stone, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operative Time (time frame: During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in