Multiple MyelomaNCT05697913
Efficacy of Response-adapted Treatment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Candidates for Bone Marrow Transplantation
A study testing Continued treatment adapted to the response in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo.
Trial summary
To assess whether continued treatment to achieve negative Minimal Residual Disease and Imaging (MRDI(-)) improves therapeutic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Continued treatment adapted to the response
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2014to 30 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Younger than 76 years
- Diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma from July 1, 2014 to May 31, 2019
- Received some of the standard authorized treatments for their therapeutic line. Patients treated in clinical trials with treatments not yet authorized, for fifth or successive therapeutic lines are admitted.
- Give informed consent
- Fit patient
Who cannot join
- Under 18 years old
- Contraindication for bone marrow auto-transplantation
- Therapeutic objective only palliative:
- Another non-treatable neoplasm
- Severe senile dementia
- Significant comorbidity limiting life expectancy to less than 6 months
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Response-adapted Treatment Guided by Negative Minimal Residual Disease and Negative Imaging (MRDI) in Fit Patients Diagnosed With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Candidates for Bone Marrow Transplantation
To assess whether continued treatment to achieve negative Minimal Residual Disease and Imaging (MRDI(-)) improves therapeutic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The safety evaluation includes the evaluation of adverse events, which are classified according to the Common Criteria for Terminology for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute, version 5.0.
Read the detailed description
Material and methods - Criteria for Enrollment Patients younger than 76 years, diagnosed with myeloma since July 1, 2014 until May 31, 2019, without a contraindication for bone marrow auto-transplantation are included in the study. Fragile patients with severe senile dementia, with another non-treatable neoplasm, or with significant comorbidity in whom the therapeutic objective was only palliative are not included in the study. The allocation to each treatment group was carried out according to the patient's preferences and his/her responsible physician, giving the patient his/her consent for treatment in all cases. In addition to other information, before patients gave their consent, patients included in the continued treatment group were clarified that it was a non-standard treatment, giving them the choice between the most common option of fixed treatment or continuous treatment up to Minimal Residual Disease and Image negative (MRDI(-)).
Material and methods - Study Design and Treatment This is a study of the patients treated in real life hematology. It is a cohort study to compare continuous treatment versus fixed-duration therapy. The study is conducted in a single hospital, including patients diagnosed from July 1, 2014 to May 31, 2019. The autotransplant is considered as a therapeutic line more, and all patients who did not receive the transplant were analyzed as if they had received it. The patients always receive some of the authorized treatments for their therapeutic line, according to the preferences of the responsible hematologist and the patient. After the induction phase, all the patients undergo stem-cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
The patients of the fixed treatment group (control group) receive up to six cycles of the consolidation treatment after transplantation if complete remission has not been achieved.
In the patients of the MRDI-driven group, patients continue treatment after transplantation to achieve complete remission with negative MRD and negative image, changing therapeutic line if not achieved with the prescribed treatment. In this group of the patients the treatment is stopped only when this degree of deep response is achieved, in whatever the treatment phase was.
Assessments The treatment response and disease progression are assessed according to the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma, except that to consider the negative Minimal Residual Disease, a sensitivity level of 10-6 is required. In addition, it is considered negative image only if a Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) body and spinal and pelvic Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), are both negative.
The work team defined an additional category of relapse: "relapse from MRDI(-)", which includes any of the relapse criteria of negative Minimal Residual Disease, and/or positive image. To evaluate the Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) the criteria of Elena Zamagni are used. In Nuclear Magnetic Resonance studies, all lesions with a size equal to or greater than 5 mm are considered positive if they are hypointense signal in T1, hyperintense in Fat Suppression (FS) T2 signal, and in the studies of diffusion hyperintense signal in b1000 with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between 0.4 and 1. In perfusion studies, type 4-curve lesions are considered positive. The adverse events are assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 of the National Cancer Institute. It is considered as an Adverse Event (AE) any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.
Among all the patients, bone marrow samples are obtained at diagnostic for cytogenetic evaluation.
Among the patients of the MRDI-driven group who are a complete response, bone marrow samples are obtained for minimal residual disease evaluation by means of seven-color flow cytometry (which has a sensitivity level of 10-6, indicating that it can detect 1 malignant plasma cell within 1,000,000 bone marrow cells). If the patient achieve a Complete Remission (CR) according to the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma, Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and imaging studies are performed before transplantation, after transplantation, and after every six cycles of treatment in cases with CR where previous MRD or imaging studies are positive.
In the control group, the MRD and imaging only occasionally is it evaluated. In all patients who achieve a negative MRD and negative image, MRD and imaging tests are performed at 6 months and annually.
The response obtained, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the incidence of adverse effects are valued.
Statistical Analysis Progression-free survival is defined as the time from start of treatment until either the first documentation of disease progression or death owing to myeloma or not. Overall survival is defined as the time from start of treatment until death from any cause.
Duration of PFS and OS is estimated by means of the test of the long rank Kaplan-Meier method with Cox analysis. Analyses are performed with the use of IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 23.0; the data cutoff date is June 30, 2024.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Continued treatment adapted to the response
- Keywords
- Minimal Residual Disease, Therapeutics, Multiple Myeloma
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasm, Residual
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continued treatment adapted to the responseOther
Instead of receiving a pre-specified number of treatment cycles, regardless of the result obtained, in the MRDI-driven treatment group patients continue receiving treatment until reaching a complete remission with negative MRD and Image, changing the therapeutic line if it is not obtained with the line current therapy. In this group of the patients the treatment was stopped only when this degree of deep response was achieved.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MRDI-driven treatment | Experimental | Patients continue treatment until complete remission with negative MRD and Image is achieved, changing the therapeutic line if this is not achieved with the prescribed treatment. In this group of patients, treatment is suspended only when this degree of profound response is reached, in any phase of treatment. Receives: Other: Continued treatment adapted to the response |
| Conventional treatment | No intervention | The patients of the conventional treatment group (control group) received six cycles of the induction traetment, bone marrow auto-transplantation, and consolidation treatment after transplantation if complete remission had not been achieved. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival
Time elapsed from start of treatment until first documentation of disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first.
Measured: Time elapsed from start of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months.
Overall Survival
Time from start of treatment to death from any cause
Measured: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months.
Proportion of patients with serious adverse effects
Number of patients with any adverse event grade 3 or higher, divided by the total number of patients in the corresponding group
Measured: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 102 months.
Average grade 3 or higher adverse events per patient
Number of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the group divided by the number of patients in the group
Measured: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months.
Annual incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse effects
Number of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the group divided by the sum of the years of observation of the group members
Measured: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 102 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Jul 2014
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, no randomized. It is a cohort study to compare MRDI(-) driven treatment adapted to the response versus fixed-duration therapy.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jose Enrique de la Puerta, MD, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
- Investigators
- Jose Enrique de la Puerta Rueda, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Cruz Roja de Bilbao
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05697913
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MRD-Image neg 01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: At this time, no plan has been developed to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.
Publications
Ludwig H, Zojer N. Fixed duration vs continuous therapy in multiple myeloma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):212-222. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.212.
PubMed 29222258Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, Jones JR, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Wilson JN, Jenner MW, Cook G, Kaiser MF, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Russell NH, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ; UK NCRI Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Response-adapted intensification with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus no intensification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Dec;6(12):e616-e629. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30167-X. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
PubMed 31624047Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, Rosinol L, Cordon L, Vidriales MB, Burgos L, Flores-Montero J, Sanoja-Flores L, Lopez-Anglada L, Maldonado R, de la Cruz J, Gutierrez NC, Calasanz MJ, Martin-Ramos ML, Garcia-Sanz R, Martinez-Lopez J, Oriol A, Blanchard MJ, Rios R, Martin J, Martinez-Martinez R, Sureda A, Hernandez MT, de la Rubia J, Krsnik I, Moraleda JM, Palomera L, Bargay J, Van Dongen JJM, Orfao A, Mateos MV, Blade J, San-Miguel JF, Lahuerta JJ; GEM (Grupo Espanol de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa Para el Estudio de la Terapeutica en Hemopatias Malignas) Cooperative Study Group. Measurable Residual Disease by Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;38(8):784-792. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01231. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
PubMed 31770060Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, Munshi N, Lonial S, Blade J, Mateos MV, Dimopoulos M, Kastritis E, Boccadoro M, Orlowski R, Goldschmidt H, Spencer A, Hou J, Chng WJ, Usmani SZ, Zamagni E, Shimizu K, Jagannath S, Johnsen HE, Terpos E, Reiman A, Kyle RA, Sonneveld P, Richardson PG, McCarthy P, Ludwig H, Chen W, Cavo M, Harousseau JL, Lentzsch S, Hillengass J, Palumbo A, Orfao A, Rajkumar SV, Miguel JS, Avet-Loiseau H. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-e346. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6.
PubMed 27511158Zamagni E, Nanni C, Mancuso K, Tacchetti P, Pezzi A, Pantani L, Zannetti B, Rambaldi I, Brioli A, Rocchi S, Terragna C, Martello M, Marzocchi G, Borsi E, Rizzello I, Fanti S, Cavo M. PET/CT Improves the Definition of Complete Response and Allows to Detect Otherwise Unidentifiable Skeletal Progression in Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4384-90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0396. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
PubMed 26078390
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Response-adapted Treatment Guided by Negative Minimal Residual Disease and Negative Imaging (MRDI) in Fit Patients Diagnosed With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Candidates for Bone Marrow Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05697913
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MRD-Image neg 01
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Minimal Residual Disease, Therapeutics, Multiple Myeloma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Galdakao-UsansoloOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To assess whether continued treatment to achieve negative Minimal Residual Disease and Imaging (MRDI(-)) improves therapeutic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The safety evaluation includes the evaluation of adverse events, which are classified according to the Common Criteria for Terminology for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute, version 5.0.
Detailed description
Material and methods - Criteria for Enrollment Patients younger than 76 years, diagnosed with myeloma since July 1, 2014 until May 31, 2019, without a contraindication for bone marrow auto-transplantation are included in the study. Fragile patients with severe senile dementia, with another non-treatable neoplasm, or with significant comorbidity in whom the therapeutic objective was only palliative are not included in the study. The allocation to each treatment group was carried out according to the patient's preferences and his/her responsible physician, giving the patient his/her consent for treatment in all cases. In addition to other information, before patients gave their consent, patients included in the continued treatment group were clarified that it was a non-standard treatment, giving them the choice between the most common option of fixed treatment or continuous treatment up to Minimal Residual Disease and Image negative (MRDI(-)).
Material and methods - Study Design and Treatment This is a study of the patients treated in real life hematology. It is a cohort study to compare continuous treatment versus fixed-duration therapy. The study is conducted in a single hospital, including patients diagnosed from July 1, 2014 to May 31, 2019. The autotransplant is considered as a therapeutic line more, and all patients who did not receive the transplant were analyzed as if they had received it. The patients always receive some of the authorized treatments for their therapeutic line, according to the preferences of the responsible hematologist and the patient. After the induction phase, all the patients undergo stem-cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
The patients of the fixed treatment group (control group) receive up to six cycles of the consolidation treatment after transplantation if complete remission has not been achieved.
In the patients of the MRDI-driven group, patients continue treatment after transplantation to achieve complete remission with negative MRD and negative image, changing therapeutic line if not achieved with the prescribed treatment. In this group of the patients the treatment is stopped only when this degree of deep response is achieved, in whatever the treatment phase was.
Assessments The treatment response and disease progression are assessed according to the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma, except that to consider the negative Minimal Residual Disease, a sensitivity level of 10-6 is required. In addition, it is considered negative image only if a Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) body and spinal and pelvic Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), are both negative.
The work team defined an additional category of relapse: "relapse from MRDI(-)", which includes any of the relapse criteria of negative Minimal Residual Disease, and/or positive image. To evaluate the Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) the criteria of Elena Zamagni are used. In Nuclear Magnetic Resonance studies, all lesions with a size equal to or greater than 5 mm are considered positive if they are hypointense signal in T1, hyperintense in Fat Suppression (FS) T2 signal, and in the studies of diffusion hyperintense signal in b1000 with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between 0.4 and 1. In perfusion studies, type 4-curve lesions are considered positive. The adverse events are assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 of the National Cancer Institute. It is considered as an Adverse Event (AE) any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.
Among all the patients, bone marrow samples are obtained at diagnostic for cytogenetic evaluation.
Among the patients of the MRDI-driven group who are a complete response, bone marrow samples are obtained for minimal residual disease evaluation by means of seven-color flow cytometry (which has a sensitivity level of 10-6, indicating that it can detect 1 malignant plasma cell within 1,000,000 bone marrow cells). If the patient achieve a Complete Remission (CR) according to the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma, Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and imaging studies are performed before transplantation, after transplantation, and after every six cycles of treatment in cases with CR where previous MRD or imaging studies are positive.
In the control group, the MRD and imaging only occasionally is it evaluated. In all patients who achieve a negative MRD and negative image, MRD and imaging tests are performed at 6 months and annually.
The response obtained, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the incidence of adverse effects are valued.
Statistical Analysis Progression-free survival is defined as the time from start of treatment until either the first documentation of disease progression or death owing to myeloma or not. Overall survival is defined as the time from start of treatment until death from any cause.
Duration of PFS and OS is estimated by means of the test of the long rank Kaplan-Meier method with Cox analysis. Analyses are performed with the use of IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 23.0; the data cutoff date is June 30, 2024.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, no randomized. It is a cohort study to compare MRDI(-) driven treatment adapted to the response versus fixed-duration therapy.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MRDI-driven treatment | Experimental | Other: Continued treatment adapted to the responsePatients continue treatment until complete remission with negative MRD and Image is achieved, changing the therapeutic line if this is not achieved with the prescribed treatment. In this group of patients, treatment is suspended only when this degree of profound response is reached, in any phase of treatment. |
| Conventional treatment | No intervention | –The patients of the conventional treatment group (control group) received six cycles of the induction traetment, bone marrow auto-transplantation, and consolidation treatment after transplantation if complete remission had not been achieved. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Younger than 76 years
- Diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma from July 1, 2014 to May 31, 2019
- Received some of the standard authorized treatments for their therapeutic line. Patients treated in clinical trials with treatments not yet authorized, for fifth or successive therapeutic lines are admitted.
- Give informed consent
- Fit patient
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Under 18 years old
- Contraindication for bone marrow auto-transplantation
- Therapeutic objective only palliative:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continued treatment adapted to the responseInstead of receiving a pre-specified number of treatment cycles, regardless of the result obtained, in the MRDI-driven treatment group patients continue receiving treatment until reaching a complete remission with negative MRD and Image, changing the therapeutic line if it is not obtained with the line current therapy. In this group of the patients the treatment was stopped only when this degree of deep response was achieved. | Other | MRDI-driven treatment |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: Time elapsed from start of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months.
Time elapsed from start of treatment until first documentation of disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first.
Overall Survival
Time frame: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months.
Time from start of treatment to death from any cause
Proportion of patients with serious adverse effects
Time frame: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 102 months.
Number of patients with any adverse event grade 3 or higher, divided by the total number of patients in the corresponding group
Average grade 3 or higher adverse events per patient
Time frame: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months.
Number of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the group divided by the number of patients in the group
Annual incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse effects
Time frame: Time elapsed from start of treatment to end of follow-up or patient death, whichever came first, assessed up to 102 months.
Number of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the group divided by the sum of the years of observation of the group members
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 29222258Ludwig H, Zojer N. Fixed duration vs continuous therapy in multiple myeloma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):212-222. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.212.
- Background: PubMed 31624047Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, Jones JR, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Wilson JN, Jenner MW, Cook G, Kaiser MF, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Russell NH, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ; UK NCRI Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Response-adapted intensification with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus no intensification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Dec;6(12):e616-e629. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30167-X. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
- Background: PubMed 31770060Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, Rosinol L, Cordon L, Vidriales MB, Burgos L, Flores-Montero J, Sanoja-Flores L, Lopez-Anglada L, Maldonado R, de la Cruz J, Gutierrez NC, Calasanz MJ, Martin-Ramos ML, Garcia-Sanz R, Martinez-Lopez J, Oriol A, Blanchard MJ, Rios R, Martin J, Martinez-Martinez R, Sureda A, Hernandez MT, de la Rubia J, Krsnik I, Moraleda JM, Palomera L, Bargay J, Van Dongen JJM, Orfao A, Mateos MV, Blade J, San-Miguel JF, Lahuerta JJ; GEM (Grupo Espanol de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa Para el Estudio de la Terapeutica en Hemopatias Malignas) Cooperative Study Group. Measurable Residual Disease by Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;38(8):784-792. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01231. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 27511158Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, Munshi N, Lonial S, Blade J, Mateos MV, Dimopoulos M, Kastritis E, Boccadoro M, Orlowski R, Goldschmidt H, Spencer A, Hou J, Chng WJ, Usmani SZ, Zamagni E, Shimizu K, Jagannath S, Johnsen HE, Terpos E, Reiman A, Kyle RA, Sonneveld P, Richardson PG, McCarthy P, Ludwig H, Chen W, Cavo M, Harousseau JL, Lentzsch S, Hillengass J, Palumbo A, Orfao A, Rajkumar SV, Miguel JS, Avet-Loiseau H. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-e346. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6.
- Background: PubMed 26078390Zamagni E, Nanni C, Mancuso K, Tacchetti P, Pezzi A, Pantani L, Zannetti B, Rambaldi I, Brioli A, Rocchi S, Terragna C, Martello M, Marzocchi G, Borsi E, Rizzello I, Fanti S, Cavo M. PET/CT Improves the Definition of Complete Response and Allows to Detect Otherwise Unidentifiable Skeletal Progression in Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4384-90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0396. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. At this time, no plan has been developed to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jose Enrique de la Puerta Rueda, MD principal investigator
Hospital Cruz Roja de Bilbao
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continued treatment adapted to the response in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (time frame: Time elapsed from start of treatment until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05697913, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2024.