Lower Urinary Tract Symptomse-BLaDRNCT05702294
Electronic Urinary Flowmeter to Improve Accuracy of Bladder Diaries .
A study testing Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume) in people with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Healthy, run by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to give an answer to the question of whether an automated calculation of voided volumes would produce a more accurate set of bladder diary data when compared to the traditional ''eye-balling'' method of estimated voided volumes of paper bladder diaries, in female adult patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Healthy, Overactive Bladder (OAB)
- What is being tested?
- Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 187 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 14 Sep 2022to 6 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Females
- 18 years of age or above
- Females presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms
- Female
- 18 years of age or above
Who cannot join
- Females who have a mental/physical disability which would make them unable to understand/comply with the requirements of the study.
- Eligibility criteria for healthy volunteers:
- Females who have a mental/physical disability which would make them unable to understand/comply with the requirements of the study.
- Female with (LUTS).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital
Birmingham, B15 2TG
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Study Looking at Improving Diagnostic Capability of Bladder Diaries by Improving Accuracy of Voided Urine Volume Measured by a Self-administered Measuring Vessel in an Ambulatory Setting in Adult Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.
The goal of this clinical trial is to give an answer to the question of whether an automated calculation of voided volumes would produce a more accurate set of bladder diary data when compared to the traditional ''eye-balling'' method of estimated voided volumes of paper bladder diaries, in female adult patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the accuracy of bladder diary data?
- Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the utility of bladder diaries?
Participants will be asked to:
- void in the disposable measuring jug and record their estimated voided volume for a total of three consecutive days in a paper diary (as per usual care).
- transfer their voided volume from the disposable jug to the automated vessel (diary pod) after each void for the same three consecutive days.
The reports generated from the paper diaries (estimated volumes) will be compared to the reports generated from the electronic automated measurement of voided volumes to understand whether there is a clinically significant difference between the two.
The investigators aim to recruit healthy female adult volunteers with no lower urinary tract symptoms to understand the normal voiding patterns and volumes of adult females using the diary pod.
The investigators will also recruit adult females with lower urinary tract symptoms and compare the two methods of capturing the voided volume
Read the detailed description
Project Summary:
This study is part of a research project looking at improving accuracy and increasing the utility of bladder diaries, which form one of the most basic first line investigations in females with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). It is a single centre, prospective, interventional study which will offer a vessel for automated measurement of voided volumes of urine. The accuracy of bladder diaries generated by the automated measurement will then be compared to the bladder diaries generated by the conventional eyeballing estimate method of measuring voided volumes.
The principal objective of this study is to give an answer to the question of whether an automated calculation of voided volumes would produce a more accurate set of data that would be inputted in the bladder diary of the patients and therefore improve the utility and diagnostic ability of this gold standard first line investigation.
Study Objectives (Aims):
This project aims to simplify both the collection and analysis; as a result, the test will become simpler to perform, more accurate and helpful to clinicians. It will lead to faster, more accurate assessment of LUTS in women, improving patient satisfaction whilst at the same time providing a cost-effective service.
Null hypothesis:
Automated measurement of voided volumes and improved accuracy of bladder diary data does not affect utility of bladder diaries.
Primary outcome of study:
Accuracy of measurement of voided volume with automated device (aim to be within 5%) as defined international standard.
Secondary outcome of study:
- Outline existing evidence and identify gaps in the knowledge
- Outline areas of future development \& user preference/experience
- Educational purposes as it is a student research project
Methods and materials:
- Study Design: This is a prospective, monocentric, open label, non-randomised, observational study in which the investigators aim to demonstrate error in "eye ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy of the automated vessel to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard.
The investigators will achieve that by:
- Perform Bench testing. In vitro assessment to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard.
- Recruiting healthy adult females with no lower urinary tract symptoms to develop more accurate nomograms of bladder function. This will require between 25-50 women of various ages. The participants will be blinded to the automatic cup measurements.
- Using the tool with women presenting to the Urogynaecology service using the conventional "eye-balling " method and automated uroflowmetry system to assess error from eye-balling and assess how the bladder diary changes comparing the two methods. The investigators would like to recruit approximately 75-100 patients with overactive bladder symptoms. The groups will be compared using a T test as data are normally distributed. The new nomograms will use ANOVA software and replicate the statistics already established for this. The participants in this group will be also blinded to the automatic cup measurements generated.
- Developing Receiver Operating characteristic (ROC) curves for potential diagnostic accuracy tests correlated with increased specificity of voided volumes for future studies.
This study design has been chosen in order to demonstrate the potential diagnostic benefits of a diary generated by an automated voiding measurement system.
Participants will be female adults who present in Urogynaecology clinics with lower urinary tract symptoms and require a bladder diary as a first line investigation tool.
Recruitment will take place in the Outpatient Urogynaecology clinic. Women presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms will be identified by the Urogynaecology team in clinic and asked to complete a 3-day paper bladder diary by voiding into the disposable paper jug (as per their usual care). For each void over the 3-day period they will be asked to transfer the voided volume from the disposable paper jug to the diary pod (automated device) which will automatically calculate the voided volume and store the result automatically to the app on their phone. The patient might choose to void first in the automated diary pod and then transfer the voided volume to the conventional paper jag. Both ways are acceptable. The participants will be blinded to those automated measurements as they will not be able to see the volume recorded on the app. All these volumes will be stored in an online electronic portal. The only person with access to the patient's portal is the clinician responsible for the research project. At the end of the 3-day period the portal will generate an automated electronic summary of the 3 day diary and this will be compared to the paper diary. The device does not require calibration as it is already pre-calibrated. A patient information leaflet will be handed out to the participants and the risks/benefits and rights to voluntarily participate and withdraw from their study explained. Informed consent will be taken in an outpatient clinic setting after the patient has read the patient information leaflet.
- Being tested
- Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume)
- Keywords
- electronic bladder diaries, paper bladder diaries, Overactive bladder, automated measurement, voided volume, urgency urinary incontinence
- Medical subject headings
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume)Device
Also called Minze diary pod
Female study participants with and without Lower Urinary tract Symptoms will be required to void in the measuring cup and write down their estimates on the paper diary and then transfer the voided volume to the diary pod provided (or vice versa).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Adult females with and without lower urinary tract symptoms will complete a 3-day paper bladder diary. After each void they will transfer their voided volume to the diary pod (vessel that calculates automatically the voided volume) for the duration of these three days.
After three days the voided volume estimates of the paper diary versus the recorded voided volumes from the electronic diary pod will be compared. Receives: Device: Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with a difference of more than 5% between the estimated recorded voided volumes in milliliters (mL) and the voided volume recorded in milliliters (mL) by the automated device.
The investigators will compare the estimated volumes documented in milliliters (mL) on the paper diary by the participant versus the volumes calculated in milliliters (mL) automatically by the electronic device for each participant. The investigators will calculate the number of participants with a difference greater than 5% between the volumes estimated in their paper bladder diary ( in mL) and the volumes measured ( in mL) automatically by their device . An error of plus or minus 5% of the voided volume in milliliters is the acceptable range as defined by the guidelines of the International Continence Society that provide a benchmark for all urodynamic equipment.
Measured: After completion of the three day bladder diary ( both paper and electronic version) of all study recruits
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2023
- Study start14 Sep 2022
- Primary completion6 Aug 2024
- Study completion6 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The investigators aim to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy of the automated vessel to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard. The investigators will achieve that by: A. Performing Bench testing. In vitro assessment to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard. B. Recruiting healthy volunteers to develop more accurate nomograms of bladder function. The healthy volunteers group will be blinded to the automatic cup measurements. C. Using the tool with women presenting to the Urogynaecology service using the conventional "eye-balling " method and automated uroflowmetry system to assess error from eye-balling and assess how the bladder diary changes comparing the two methods.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 187 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philip Toozs-Hobson, MD, Principal investigator, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation TrustILIAS LIAPIS, MD, Principal investigator, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05702294
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22/BW/GYN/NO/628
- Other IDs
- 296904, 22/EM/0152
- Acronym
- e-BLaDR
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study Looking at Improving Diagnostic Capability of Bladder Diaries by Improving Accuracy of Voided Urine Volume Measured by a Self-administered Measuring Vessel in an Ambulatory Setting in Adult Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05702294
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- e-BLaDR / 22/BW/GYN/NO/628
- Keywords
- electronic bladder diaries, paper bladder diaries, Overactive bladder, automated measurement, voided volume, urgency urinary incontinence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 187 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to give an answer to the question of whether an automated calculation of voided volumes would produce a more accurate set of bladder diary data when compared to the traditional ''eye-balling'' method of estimated voided volumes of paper bladder diaries, in female adult patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the accuracy of bladder diary data?
- Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the utility of bladder diaries?
Participants will be asked to:
- void in the disposable measuring jug and record their estimated voided volume for a total of three consecutive days in a paper diary (as per usual care).
- transfer their voided volume from the disposable jug to the automated vessel (diary pod) after each void for the same three consecutive days.
The reports generated from the paper diaries (estimated volumes) will be compared to the reports generated from the electronic automated measurement of voided volumes to understand whether there is a clinically significant difference between the two.
The investigators aim to recruit healthy female adult volunteers with no lower urinary tract symptoms to understand the normal voiding patterns and volumes of adult females using the diary pod.
The investigators will also recruit adult females with lower urinary tract symptoms and compare the two methods of capturing the voided volume
Detailed description
Project Summary:
This study is part of a research project looking at improving accuracy and increasing the utility of bladder diaries, which form one of the most basic first line investigations in females with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). It is a single centre, prospective, interventional study which will offer a vessel for automated measurement of voided volumes of urine. The accuracy of bladder diaries generated by the automated measurement will then be compared to the bladder diaries generated by the conventional eyeballing estimate method of measuring voided volumes.
The principal objective of this study is to give an answer to the question of whether an automated calculation of voided volumes would produce a more accurate set of data that would be inputted in the bladder diary of the patients and therefore improve the utility and diagnostic ability of this gold standard first line investigation.
Study Objectives (Aims):
This project aims to simplify both the collection and analysis; as a result, the test will become simpler to perform, more accurate and helpful to clinicians. It will lead to faster, more accurate assessment of LUTS in women, improving patient satisfaction whilst at the same time providing a cost-effective service.
Null hypothesis:
Automated measurement of voided volumes and improved accuracy of bladder diary data does not affect utility of bladder diaries.
Primary outcome of study:
Accuracy of measurement of voided volume with automated device (aim to be within 5%) as defined international standard.
Secondary outcome of study:
- Outline existing evidence and identify gaps in the knowledge
- Outline areas of future development \& user preference/experience
- Educational purposes as it is a student research project
Methods and materials:
- Study Design: This is a prospective, monocentric, open label, non-randomised, observational study in which the investigators aim to demonstrate error in "eye ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy of the automated vessel to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard.
The investigators will achieve that by:
- Perform Bench testing. In vitro assessment to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard.
- Recruiting healthy adult females with no lower urinary tract symptoms to develop more accurate nomograms of bladder function. This will require between 25-50 women of various ages. The participants will be blinded to the automatic cup measurements.
- Using the tool with women presenting to the Urogynaecology service using the conventional "eye-balling " method and automated uroflowmetry system to assess error from eye-balling and assess how the bladder diary changes comparing the two methods. The investigators would like to recruit approximately 75-100 patients with overactive bladder symptoms. The groups will be compared using a T test as data are normally distributed. The new nomograms will use ANOVA software and replicate the statistics already established for this. The participants in this group will be also blinded to the automatic cup measurements generated.
- Developing Receiver Operating characteristic (ROC) curves for potential diagnostic accuracy tests correlated with increased specificity of voided volumes for future studies.
This study design has been chosen in order to demonstrate the potential diagnostic benefits of a diary generated by an automated voiding measurement system.
Participants will be female adults who present in Urogynaecology clinics with lower urinary tract symptoms and require a bladder diary as a first line investigation tool.
Recruitment will take place in the Outpatient Urogynaecology clinic. Women presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms will be identified by the Urogynaecology team in clinic and asked to complete a 3-day paper bladder diary by voiding into the disposable paper jug (as per their usual care). For each void over the 3-day period they will be asked to transfer the voided volume from the disposable paper jug to the diary pod (automated device) which will automatically calculate the voided volume and store the result automatically to the app on their phone. The patient might choose to void first in the automated diary pod and then transfer the voided volume to the conventional paper jag. Both ways are acceptable. The participants will be blinded to those automated measurements as they will not be able to see the volume recorded on the app. All these volumes will be stored in an online electronic portal. The only person with access to the patient's portal is the clinician responsible for the research project. At the end of the 3-day period the portal will generate an automated electronic summary of the 3 day diary and this will be compared to the paper diary. The device does not require calibration as it is already pre-calibrated. A patient information leaflet will be handed out to the participants and the risks/benefits and rights to voluntarily participate and withdraw from their study explained. Informed consent will be taken in an outpatient clinic setting after the patient has read the patient information leaflet.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The investigators aim to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy of the automated vessel to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard. The investigators will achieve that by: A. Performing Bench testing. In vitro assessment to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard. B. Recruiting healthy volunteers to develop more accurate nomograms of bladder function. The healthy volunteers group will be blinded to the automatic cup measurements. C. Using the tool with women presenting to the Urogynaecology service using the conventional "eye-balling " method and automated uroflowmetry system to assess error from eye-balling and assess how the bladder diary changes comparing the two methods.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Device: Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume)Adult females with and without lower urinary tract symptoms will complete a 3-day paper bladder diary. After each void they will transfer their voided volume to the diary pod (vessel that calculates automatically the voided volume) for the duration of these three days. After three days the voided volume estimates of the paper diary versus the recorded voided volumes from the electronic diary pod will be compared. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Females
- 18 years of age or above
- Females presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms
- Female
- 18 years of age or above
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Females who have a mental/physical disability which would make them unable to understand/comply with the requirements of the study.
- Females who have a mental/physical disability which would make them unable to understand/comply with the requirements of the study.
- Female with (LUTS).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume)Also: Minze diary podFemale study participants with and without Lower Urinary tract Symptoms will be required to void in the measuring cup and write down their estimates on the paper diary and then transfer the voided volume to the diary pod provided (or vice versa). | Device | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with a difference of more than 5% between the estimated recorded voided volumes in milliliters (mL) and the voided volume recorded in milliliters (mL) by the automated device.
Time frame: After completion of the three day bladder diary ( both paper and electronic version) of all study recruits
The investigators will compare the estimated volumes documented in milliliters (mL) on the paper diary by the participant versus the volumes calculated in milliliters (mL) automatically by the electronic device for each participant. The investigators will calculate the number of participants with a difference greater than 5% between the volumes estimated in their paper bladder diary ( in mL) and the volumes measured ( in mL) automatically by their device . An error of plus or minus 5% of the voided volume in milliliters is the acceptable range as defined by the guidelines of the International Continence Society that provide a benchmark for all urodynamic equipment.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
RecruitingObservational study
Tensi+ European Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up
Overactive Bladder
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Two Fixed-dose Combinations in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. (BENIPRO)
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Neurogenic Overactive Bladder Symptoms Among People With Stroke
Stroke, Neurogenic Overactive Bladder
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philip Toozs-Hobson, MD principal investigator
Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust
ILIAS LIAPIS, MD principal investigator
Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume) in people with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Healthy, run by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with a difference of more than 5% between the estimated recorded voided volumes in milliliters (mL) and the voided volume recorded in milliliters (mL) by the automated device. (time frame: After completion of the three day bladder diary ( both paper and electronic version) of all study recruits). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2026.