AzTrials
AzTrials

the Methodology of the Balance TestNCT05703594

Analyzing of the Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness Levels of Performance Tests

A study testing performance based balance test in people with the Methodology of the Balance Test, run by Dokuz Eylul University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose: To examine the validity, reliability and responsiveness of three performance tests evaluating fall risk and balance in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Method: At least 50 patients with TKA will be included in the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
the Methodology of the Balance Test
What is being tested?
performance based balance test
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Feb 2023to 1 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Having primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis
  • Having completed at least 6 months after primary TKA
  • Being able to stand and walk without the need for any assistive device
  • Being able to understand written or spoken commands
  • Having grade 3-4 radiological knee osteoarthritis

Who cannot join

  • Other existing pain problem or central or peripheral nervous system condition causing sensory dysfunction (eg stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord disorders or peripheral nerve lesion)
  • Different lower extremity surgeries before or after primary TKA
  • Neurological or orthopedic disorder that may affect gait and balance
  • Other unstable diseases (eg cancer, acute trauma or infection)
  • Presence of inflammatory arthritis or other systemic connective tissue disease
  • Those who have lost their walking function
  • Body mass index > 40 (morbidly obese)

About this study

Official title: Analyzing of the Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness Levels of Performance Tests Assessing Fall Risk and Balance in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose: To examine the validity, reliability and responsiveness of three performance tests evaluating fall risk and balance in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Method: At least 50 patients with TKA will be included in the study. Participants will be voluntary individuals who meet the inclusion criteria. Within the scope of the evaluations, the duration of the patients to perform the 360° Turn Test (360°TT), Alternative Step Test (AST), and Pen Pickup Test (PPT) will be measured. These tests will be repeated after the patients rest for 1 hour. Hospital For Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score to determine the functional level of patients, Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) to determine fall risk and balance status, 5-Repeat Stand Up and Sit Test (5RSST) and 10-meter Walk Test (10MWT) will be used. In addition, the fall history of the patients will be questioned. For the construct validity of the 360°TT, AST and PPT tests, it will be investigated whether at least 75% of the predetermined hypotheses are met. For the discriminative validity of the 360°TT, AST and PPT tests, the values in the homogeneous demographic patient population with grade 3-4 knee osteoarthritis and the patient population undergoing knee arthroplasty will be compared and cut-off values will be calculated. In addition, sensitivity and specificity values will be calculated. In addition, test values will be compared and cut-off values will be calculated in patients who have undergone knee arthroplasty with and without a history of falling. In addition, sensitivity and specificity values will be calculated. Reliability will be examined by examining the test-retest intra-class correlation. In addition, in order to examine the responsiveness of the tests, patients will be taught lower extremity strengthening exercises and balance exercises in the form of a home program after the initial assessment. The second evaluation will be repeated between 6-8 weeks following the first evaluation, and the responsiveness of the tests will be determined according to the average change in the outcome measurements and the fulfillment of the hypotheses.

Read the detailed description

Hospital For Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Scoring This scoring includes the parameters of pain (30 points), function (22 points), range of motion (18 points), muscle strength (10 points), knee joint flexion deformity (10 points), instability (10 points) and a total of 100 points. The HSS score is obtained by subtracting up to 3 points for walking aids, up to 5 points for loss of extension, and 1 point for each 5 degree varus/valgus angle from the total score. The score ranges obtained are classified as excellent for 85-100 points, good for 70-84 points, moderate for 60-69 points, and bad for less than 60 points.

360° Turn Test In this test, which is used to measure dynamic balance, the participant rotates 360° all round. The time the participant completes the turn and the number of steps are recorded. If the cut-off value is > 3.8 seconds in the elderly population, there is a risk of falling.

Alternative Step Test It is a test used to test body weight transfer and lateral stability. The participant -height 18 cm, width 60 cm, width 40 cm- comes into contact with the sole of the foot in rows of right and left. A total of 8 step times, 4 right and 4 left, are recorded in seconds.

Pen Pickup Test In this test, in which mobility, flexibility and dynamic balance are evaluated, the participant bends down and picks up a pencil 30 cm from the tip of the foot while standing and comes back to the upright position. The duration of the movement is recorded in seconds.

Timed Get Up and Go Test It is a physical performance test often used to assess fall risk and balance. The participant gets up from a standard-height chair without support, returns after walking 3 meters, and sits down again without support. The time is saved. A value > 14 sec is considered a fall risk. Its validity and reliability have been demonstrated in different populations.

5 Repetitive Stand Up and Sit Test (5RSST) It is a performance test in which the dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the performance of people getting up and sitting in a standard chair 5 times in a series of time.

10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) It is a performance test in which dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the 10-meter walking performance of individuals in terms of time.

Being tested
performance based balance test
Keywords
balance, total knee arthroplasty, test, reliability, validity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • performance based balance testDiagnostic test

    Also called lower extremity strengthening exercises, balance exercises

    Performance based balance test; 360° Turn Test, Alternative Step Test, Pen Pickup Test,5 Repetitive Stand Up and Sit Test, 10 Meter Walk Test Lower extremity strengthening exercises; Quadriceps femoris strengthening exercise Hamstring strengthening exercise Gluteus medius muscle strengthening exercise Strengthening exercise for hip adductor muscles Balance exercises; Standing tandem walk Standing side walks Standing cross walks Standing back walking

Study groups in NCT05703594
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dokuz Eylul UniversityOtherDokuz Eylul University Clinic
Receives: Diagnostic Test: performance based balance test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 360° Turn Test

    In this test, which is used to measure dynamic balance, the participant rotates 360° all round. The time the participant completes the turn and the number of steps are recorded. If the cut-off value is > 3.8 seconds in the elderly population, there is a risk of falling.

    Measured: up to 2 months

  2. Alternative Step Test

    It is a test used to test body weight transfer and lateral stability. The participant -height 18 cm, width 60 cm, width 40 cm- comes into contact with the sole of the foot in rows of right and left. A total of 8 step times, 4 right and 4 left, are recorded in seconds.

    Measured: up to 2 months

  3. Pen Pickup Test

    In this test, in which mobility, flexibility and dynamic balance are evaluated, the participant bends down and picks up a pencil 30 cm from the tip of the foot while standing and comes back to the upright position. The duration of the movement is recorded in seconds.

    Measured: up to 2 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Timed Up and Go Test

    It is a physical performance test often used to assess fall risk and balance. The participant gets up from a standard-height chair without support, returns after walking 3 meters, and sits down again without support. The time is saved. A value > 14 sec is considered a fall risk. Its validity and reliability have been demonstrated in different populations.

    Measured: up to 2 months

  2. 5 Repetitive Stand Up and Sit Test

    It is a performance test in which the dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the performance of people getting up and sitting in a standard chair 5 times in a series of time.

    Measured: up to 2 months

  3. 10 Meter Walk Test

    It is a performance test in which dynamic balance is evaluated by recording the 10-meter walking performance of individuals in terms of time.

    Measured: up to 2 months

  4. Hospital For Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Scoring

    This scoring includes the parameters of pain (30 points), function (22 points), range of motion (18 points), muscle strength (10 points), knee joint flexion deformity (10 points), instability (10 points) and a total of 100 points. The HSS score is obtained by subtracting up to 3 points for walking aids, up to 5 points for loss of extension, and 1 point for each 5 degree varus/valgus angle from the total score. The score ranges obtained are classified as excellent for 85-100 points, good for 70-84 points, moderate for 60-69 points, and bad for less than 60 points.

    Measured: up to 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2023
  2. Study start1 Feb 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
prospective methodological study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05703594
Sponsor's protocol ID
0000-0003-2719-3255
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
29 Dec 2022
Last updated
30 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: We do not consider data sharing

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing performance based balance test in people with the Methodology of the Balance Test, run by Dokuz Eylul University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

360° Turn Test (time frame: up to 2 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in