AzTrials
AzTrials

Pediatric CancerNCT05704790

Feasibility and Acceptability of Brief, Telehealth Cognitive Compensatory Training for Pediatric Cancer Patients

A study testing Cognitive Compensatory Training in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study will be a prospective, single arm study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, telehealth, cognitive compensatory training intervention for children with a history of pediatric cancer at the University of Michigan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Pediatric Cancer
What is being tested?
Cognitive Compensatory Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Feb 2023to 25 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient between the ages of 8 and 18
  • Patient has a history of pediatric cancer
  • Patient is at least 6 months posttreatment completion
  • Patient and caregiver are fluent in English, as intervention materials are only available in English at this time.
  • Patient demonstrates deficits in attention and/or executive functioning as evidenced by either (a) performance below one standard deviation on at least one cognitive measure of attention or executive functioning, such as on the Conners Continuous Performance Test (CPT-3), Trail making Test A \& B, Children's Category Test (CCT), and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and/or (b) executive functioning and attention problems are identified during screening with the research assistant.

Who cannot join

  • Patient has a history of treatment for a pediatric brain tumor
  • Patient has a history of traumatic brain injury or seizures
  • Patient has a history of a developmental disorder (i.e., autism, intellectual disability), behavioral disorder (i.e., oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder), or mood disorder (i.e., disruptive mood dysregulation disorder) that would negatively interfere with patient's participation in the intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Acceptability of Brief, Telehealth Cognitive Compensatory Training for Children Treated for Pediatric Cancer

This pilot study will be a prospective, single arm study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, telehealth, cognitive compensatory training intervention for children with a history of pediatric cancer at the University of Michigan. Study aims to enroll 10 children with a history of treatment for pediatric cancer, along with their caregiver.

Being tested
Cognitive Compensatory Training
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive Compensatory TrainingOther

    The intervention will include 5 weekly sessions (60-90 minutes each) of cognitive compensatory training (CCT) delivered virtually by a pediatric neuropsychologist.

Study groups in NCT05704790
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalThe intervention will include 5 weekly sessions (60-90 minutes each) of cognitive compensatory training (CCT) delivered virtually by a pediatric neuropsychologist.
Receives: Other: Cognitive Compensatory Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determining satisfaction and perceived benefit from study intervention based off of change in results from the BRIEF-2 questionnaire from baseline to 6 weeks post trial entry

    Completion of Study Questionnaire, BRIEF-2, at time of enrollment at after intervention completion.

    Measured: 6 weeks from trial entry

  2. Determining satisfaction and perceived benefit from study intervention based off of change in results from the Conners 3 questionnaire from baseline to 6 weeks post trial entry

    Completion of Study Questionnaire, Conners 3, at time of enrollment at after intervention completion.

    Measured: 6 weeks from trial entry

  3. Determining satisfaction and perceived benefit from study intervention based off of change in results from the SMALSI-2 questionnaire from baseline to 6 weeks post trial entry

    Completion of Study Questionnaire, SMALSI-2, at time of enrollment at after intervention completion.

    Measured: 6 weeks from trial entry

  4. Determining satisfaction and perceived benefit from study intervention based off of change in results from the SPSI-R questionnaire from baseline to 6 weeks post trial entry

    Completion of Study Questionnaires, SPSI-R , at time of enrollment at after intervention completion.

    Measured: 6 weeks from trial entry

  5. Determining satisfaction and perceived benefit from study intervention based off of change in results from the PKEQ questionnaire from baseline to 6 weeks post trial entry

    Completion of Study Questionnaires, PKEQ, at time of enrollment at after intervention completion.

    Measured: 6 weeks from trial entry

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2023
  2. Study start17 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion23 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion25 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05704790
Sponsor's protocol ID
UMCC 2022.068
Other IDs
HUM00218780
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
9 Jan 2023
Last updated
3 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: PI does not plan to share IPD

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive Compensatory Training in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determining satisfaction and perceived benefit from study intervention based off of change in results from the BRIEF-2 questionnaire from baseline to 6 weeks post trial entry (time frame: 6 weeks from trial entry). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in