AzTrials
AzTrials

Waterpipe SizeNCT05705375

Effect of Waterpipe Size on Smoking Behavior and Exposures

A study testing Waterpipe size in people with Waterpipe Size, run by The University of Texas at Arlington at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how waterpipe (WP) size affects smoking behavior, toxicant exposure, and subjective experiences in young adult WP smokers (ages 21-39). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 39 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Waterpipe Size
What is being tested?
Waterpipe size
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Apr 2022to 30 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 39 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • regular waterpipe smokers (smoking at least once a week for the past 6 months)
  • generally healthy and
  • able to provide written informed consent; and willing to attend the 3 lab sessions

Who cannot join

  • history of chronic diseases such as diabetes, high blood cholesterol, hepatic disease
  • respiratory chronic diseases
  • cardiovascular diseases including low or high blood pressure (BP)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Texas at Arlington

    Arlington, Texas, 76019

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Understanding the Effect of Waterpipe Size on Smoking Behavior, Toxicant Exposures and Subjective Experiences

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how waterpipe (WP) size affects smoking behavior, toxicant exposure, and subjective experiences in young adult WP smokers (ages 21-39). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does WP size change puffing behavior?
  • Does WP size change exposure to nicotine and carbon monoxide?
  • Does WP size change perceptions of harm, satisfaction, craving, or withdrawal?

Participants will smoke small, medium, and large WPs in separate sessions. Researchers will measure puffing behavior, saliva nicotine, exhaled carbon monoxide, and survey responses before and after each session.

Read the detailed description

This study will examine the effect of waterpipe (WP) size manipulation on smoking behavior, toxicant exposure, and subjective experiences among young adult WP smokers. A total of 40 participants ages 21-39 will complete a 2x3 crossover design, where the within-subject factors are time (pre vs. post WP smoking) and study condition (small vs. medium vs. large). Each participant will attend three 45-minute laboratory sessions, each using a different WP size.

Aim 1: To examine the effect of WP size on puffing behavior and toxicant exposure. Puff topography parameters (puff number, duration, average puff volume, total inhaled volume, and inter-puff interval) will be measured during smoking. Exhaled CO and saliva nicotine concentrations will be measured pre- and post-session.

Aim 2: To examine the effect of WP size on harm perception and subjective experiences. Outcomes include harm perception, WP Evaluation Scale, Duke Sensory Questionnaire, Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (brief), and Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale.

This project will generate novel evidence on how WP size influences smoking behavior, exposure to nicotine and CO, and user perceptions. Findings will inform the FDA on the potential impact of WP size regulation and help guide the development of size-specific standards to protect public health.

Conditions
Waterpipe Size
Being tested
Waterpipe size

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Waterpipe sizeOther

    Participants will have 3 lab visits where they are allocated (random order) to smoke a small waterpipe in one visit, smoke a medium waterpipe in a second visit and smoke a large waterpipe in a third visit.

Study groups in NCT05705375
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
waterpipe regular smokersExperimentalwaterpipe regular smokers will be invited for 3 lab visits where they are allocated (random order) to smoke 3 waterpipe different sizes.
Receives: Other: Waterpipe size

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Waterpipe Evaluation Scale

    An 11-item questionnaire assessing participants' subjective experience of smoking waterpipe (WP) tobacco. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all" to 7 = "extremely"). For analysis, item scores were averaged across the 11 items to produce a mean WES score for each WP size, with higher scores indicating a more satisfactory smoking experience. The scale captures aspects such as satisfaction, taste, cravings, and sensory enjoyment in the throat and chest.

    Measured: Immediately after the exposure (smoking)

  2. Duke Sensory Questionnaire

    A 9-item questionnaire assessing participants' sensory experience of smoking waterpipe (WP) tobacco. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all" to 7 = "extremely"). Item scores were averaged across the 9 items to produce a mean DSQ score for each WP size, with higher scores indicating a more positive sensory experience (e.g., satisfaction, perceived nicotine strength, and puff intensity).

    Measured: Immediately after the exposure (smoking)

  3. Harm Perception Questionnaire

    This is a 3-item scale assessing participants' perception of the harmfulness of waterpipe (WP) tobacco smoking. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "a lot less harmful" to 7 = "a lot more harmful." Item scores were averaged across the 3 items to produce a mean harm perception score for each WP size, with higher scores indicating greater perceived harm.

    Measured: Immediately after the exposure (smoking)

  4. Saliva Nicotine

    How participants' nicotine concentrations change based on the different smoked waterpipe sizes

    Measured: Immediately after the exposure (smoking)

  5. Puff Topography: Smoking Time

    The total time spent smoking during a single WP session, measured in minutes. Longer times indicate greater duration of smoking across WP sizes.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

  6. Puff Topography: Cumulative Puff Time

    The total time spent actively inhaling smoke across all puffs in a WP session, measured in minutes using a puff topography device. Higher values indicate more total inhalation time.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

  7. Puff Topography: Puff Duration

    The average length of each puff in seconds, measured using a puff topography device in the WP hose. Longer puff duration indicates deeper inhalation per puff.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

  8. Puff Topography: Average Flow Rate

    The average rate of smoke inhaled per second during puffing, measured in liters per minute with a puff topography device. Higher flow rates indicate faster inhalation.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

  9. Puff Topography: Number of Puffs

    The total number of puffs taken during a WP session, measured using a puff topography device. Higher counts indicate more frequent puffing.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

  10. Puff Topography: Total Smoke Volume Inhaled

    Total smoke inhaled during a single WP session, measured in liters using a puff topography device in the WP hose. Higher values indicate greater smoke intake across WP sizes.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

  11. Puff Topography: Puff Volume Average

    Mean volume of each puff during a WP session, measured in liters using a puff topography device in the WP hose. Higher values indicate larger puff sizes across WP sizes.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

  12. Puff Topography: Maximum Puff Volume

    The largest single puff volume inhaled during a WP session, measured in liters using a puff topography device. Higher values indicate the strongest inhalation effort across puffs.

    Measured: During the exposure (smoking), up to 45 mins

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2023
  2. Study start22 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2024
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05705375
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-0458
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
22 Dec 2022
Last updated
5 Nov 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Waterpipe size in people with Waterpipe Size, run by The University of Texas at Arlington at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Waterpipe Evaluation Scale (time frame: Immediately after the exposure (smoking)). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in