Shoulder DislocationSTABLE-2NCT05705479
Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation - STABLE Definitive Trial
A study testing Bankart + Remplissage Procedure and Latarjet Procedure in people with Shoulder Dislocation and Sport Injuries, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the functional shoulder recovery of patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations at 24 months when treated with either arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart Procedure +/- Remplissage) or coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Dislocation, Sport Injuries, Anterior Dislocation
- What is being tested?
- Bankart + Remplissage Procedure and Latarjet Procedure
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2023to 1 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults ages 18-50 years;
- Diagnosis of post-traumatic recurrent anterior dislocation. This will require a minimum of 2 episodes of documented dislocations either by radiographic evidence or documented reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation as well as physical examination eliciting unwanted glenohumeral translation with reproduction of symptoms;
- Subcritical glenoid bone loss as defined on CT by standardized and reproducible best-fit circle technique (>10% but <20%);
- Provision of informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with concomitant injuries of the index shoulder (cuff tear, greater tuberosity fracture);
- Previous shoulder surgery;
- Patients that will likely have problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up;
- Epilepsy/seizure disorder;
- Patients who are currently incarcerated;
- Diagnosis of multidirectional instability;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Cases involving litigation or workplace insurance claims (e.g. WSIB);
- Confirmed connective tissue disorder (Ehlers-Danlos, Marfans) or Beighton hypermobility score > 6.
- Pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the functional shoulder recovery of patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations at 24 months when treated with either arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart Procedure +/- Remplissage) or coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure).
Read the detailed description
Background:
Shoulder is a highly mobile joint with the most directional range of movement compared to other joints in the body. Thus, the surrounding supporting structures of the shoulder joint compromise on the stability of the joint, in order to accomplish this wide range of motion.
Anterior dislocations, the most common type of shoulder dislocation, are often complicated by instability, and repeated dislocations. Shoulder instability results in pain and negatively impacts quality of life. Several long-term studies have demonstrated a relationship between the repeated dislocations and the risk of arthritis.
Surgical stabilization of the shoulder improves function and may reduce the risk of developing degenerative arthritis. Two procedures are commonly performed in patients with repeated dislocations: a bony transfer procedure (Latarjet) or a soft tissue procedure (Bankart + Remplissage). The Latarjet procedure involves transferring bone to the front of the shoulder. The Bankart + Remplissage procedure involves tightening the soft tissues at the front of the shoulder joint.
Although retrospective clinical studies have suggested a reduced recurrence rate with the Latarjet procedure, there is a higher reported complication rate and potential morbidity associated with the open procedure. Several case series from high-volume surgeons in Europe have suggested the Latarjet repair to be an acceptable and potentially favorable surgical approach for all cases of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, even in the primary setting and in the absence of significant glenoid cup bone loss. Retrospective analysis of soft tissue repair in comparison to open coracoid (Latarjet) procedure found at 10-year follow up, redislocation rates were 13% (36) of 271 shoulders with a Bankart repair and 1% (1) of the 93 shoulders with a Latarjet repair.
Need for a Pilot Study Prior to a Large Trial:
No comparative randomized control trial has been completed evaluating Bankart repair in comparison to Latarjet procedure in the setting of mild to moderate bone loss. Thus, surgeons face uncertainty regarding which procedure to perform. The Latarjet is more invasive (larger incision) and some research suggests it may be more effective at treating instability. The Bankart procedure, while minimally invasive (smaller incision), may result in higher rates of instability after surgery.
Study Aims and Objectives:
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the functional shoulder recovery of patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations at 24 months when treated with either arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart Procedure +/- Remplissage) or coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure).
Our trial will compare arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair vs. coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure) on:
- Rates of recurrent shoulder dislocations and symptoms of instability up to 24 months' post- surgery;
- Clinical outcomes measured by American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, Shoulder Activity Scale and EQ-5D and Patient Satisfaction Scale;
- Physical examination: range of motion, strength, stability;
- Return to previous level of activity;
- Rate of shoulder-related complications and serious adverse events.
Study Design:
The investigators propose a multi-center pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of 126 patients across Canada, United States, Chile and Europe to compare the effect of capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart + Remplissage procedure) and coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure) in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior dislocation. Eligible and consenting participants will be followed-up by the site for 24 months. Outcomes will be assessed at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of two treatment groups:
Arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart + Remplissage Procedure) Open or Arthroscopic coracoid transfer (Latarjet Procedure) Once participants have provided informed consent, baseline demographics, relevant medical history, and details regarding their diagnosis will be collected from the participant, the attending surgeon, their medical record and through physical examination. Participants will also complete The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and he American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire (ASES) at the time of enrolment.
After surgery, surgical and peri-operative details will be collected from the attending surgeon and the participant's medical records. Adverse events occurring during the surgical procedure or perioperative period will also be documented.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Dislocation, Sport Injuries, Anterior Dislocation
- Being tested
- Bankart + Remplissage Procedure, Latarjet Procedure
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Dislocation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bankart + Remplissage ProcedureProcedure or surgery
Participants will undergo arthroscopic stabilization.
Latarjet ProcedureProcedure or surgery
Participants will undergo open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bankart + Remplissage Procedure | Experimental | Bankart Procedure: the participant will be placed in the lateral decubitus or beach chair position. Standard diagnostic arthroscopy will be performed. The anterior capsulolabral complex will be freed from the anterior aspect of the scapular neck. The anterior aspect of the scapular neck will be decorticated using a motorized burr. A capsuloligamentous repair will be performed with the capsule shifted from inferior to superior and repaired on the glenoid face. The number of anchors used for the repair will be left to the discretion of the surgeon. Patients will be given a sling for 4 weeks, and participation in sports will not be allowed for 6 months. Receives: Procedure: Bankart + Remplissage Procedure |
| Latarjet Procedure | Experimental | Open or Arthroscopic coracoid transfer (Latarjet Procedure): This procedure may be performed through small incisions (minimally invasive) but may require a larger incision in some cases. It involves the transfer of a nearby bony structure (the coracoid process) to the front of the shoulder joint (glenoid). This bone will then provide support to prevent the shoulder joint from dislocating. Receives: Procedure: Latarjet Procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Outcome - Shoulder function
The change from baseline to 24 months post-intervention difference in Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores between patients with recurrent dislocations treated with Bankart Procedure + Remplissage versus Latarjet procedure.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Rate of Recurrence
Rate of recurrent dislocation and symptomatic instability between patients randomized to (capsuloligamentous repair + remplissage) and those receiving open Latarjet procedure.
Measured: 2 years
Clinical Outcome
Measured by ASES questionnaire (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons)
Measured: 2 years
Clinical Outcome - Quality of Life
Measured by EQ-5D
Measured: 2 years
Clinical Outcome - Shoulder activity
Measured by Shoulder Activity Scale
Measured: 2 years
Rate of participants with anterior shoulder instability
Measured by apprehension-relocation physical examination maneuver
Measured: 2 years
Rate of participants with full range of motion
Assessed in forward flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation.
Measured: 2 years
Rate of participants that return to previous level of activity
Return to previous level of activity and sport (self reported)
Measured: 2 years
Rate of major and minor shoulder-related complications and serious adverse events
Adverse events
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2023
- Study start17 Oct 2023
- Primary completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shoulder DislocationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Moin Khan, McMaster University
- Investigators
- Moin Khan, MD, Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05705479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STABLE-2
- Acronym
- STABLE-2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Khan M, Bedi A, Degen R, Warner J, Bhandari M; STABLE Investigators. Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Bankart repair with remplissage and Latarjet procedure in shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e089831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089831.
PubMed 39542469
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Shoulder Instability Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Stabilization Benefits Compared With Latarjet Procedure Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05705479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STABLE-2 / STABLE-2
- Conditions
- Shoulder Dislocation, Sport Injuries, Anterior Dislocation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the functional shoulder recovery of patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations at 24 months when treated with either arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart Procedure +/- Remplissage) or coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure).
Detailed description
Background:
Shoulder is a highly mobile joint with the most directional range of movement compared to other joints in the body. Thus, the surrounding supporting structures of the shoulder joint compromise on the stability of the joint, in order to accomplish this wide range of motion.
Anterior dislocations, the most common type of shoulder dislocation, are often complicated by instability, and repeated dislocations. Shoulder instability results in pain and negatively impacts quality of life. Several long-term studies have demonstrated a relationship between the repeated dislocations and the risk of arthritis.
Surgical stabilization of the shoulder improves function and may reduce the risk of developing degenerative arthritis. Two procedures are commonly performed in patients with repeated dislocations: a bony transfer procedure (Latarjet) or a soft tissue procedure (Bankart + Remplissage). The Latarjet procedure involves transferring bone to the front of the shoulder. The Bankart + Remplissage procedure involves tightening the soft tissues at the front of the shoulder joint.
Although retrospective clinical studies have suggested a reduced recurrence rate with the Latarjet procedure, there is a higher reported complication rate and potential morbidity associated with the open procedure. Several case series from high-volume surgeons in Europe have suggested the Latarjet repair to be an acceptable and potentially favorable surgical approach for all cases of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, even in the primary setting and in the absence of significant glenoid cup bone loss. Retrospective analysis of soft tissue repair in comparison to open coracoid (Latarjet) procedure found at 10-year follow up, redislocation rates were 13% (36) of 271 shoulders with a Bankart repair and 1% (1) of the 93 shoulders with a Latarjet repair.
Need for a Pilot Study Prior to a Large Trial:
No comparative randomized control trial has been completed evaluating Bankart repair in comparison to Latarjet procedure in the setting of mild to moderate bone loss. Thus, surgeons face uncertainty regarding which procedure to perform. The Latarjet is more invasive (larger incision) and some research suggests it may be more effective at treating instability. The Bankart procedure, while minimally invasive (smaller incision), may result in higher rates of instability after surgery.
Study Aims and Objectives:
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the functional shoulder recovery of patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations at 24 months when treated with either arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart Procedure +/- Remplissage) or coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure).
Our trial will compare arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair vs. coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure) on:
- Rates of recurrent shoulder dislocations and symptoms of instability up to 24 months' post- surgery;
- Clinical outcomes measured by American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, Shoulder Activity Scale and EQ-5D and Patient Satisfaction Scale;
- Physical examination: range of motion, strength, stability;
- Return to previous level of activity;
- Rate of shoulder-related complications and serious adverse events.
Study Design:
The investigators propose a multi-center pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of 126 patients across Canada, United States, Chile and Europe to compare the effect of capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart + Remplissage procedure) and coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure) in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior dislocation. Eligible and consenting participants will be followed-up by the site for 24 months. Outcomes will be assessed at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of two treatment groups:
Arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart + Remplissage Procedure) Open or Arthroscopic coracoid transfer (Latarjet Procedure) Once participants have provided informed consent, baseline demographics, relevant medical history, and details regarding their diagnosis will be collected from the participant, the attending surgeon, their medical record and through physical examination. Participants will also complete The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and he American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire (ASES) at the time of enrolment.
After surgery, surgical and peri-operative details will be collected from the attending surgeon and the participant's medical records. Adverse events occurring during the surgical procedure or perioperative period will also be documented.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bankart + Remplissage Procedure | Experimental | Procedure: Bankart + Remplissage ProcedureBankart Procedure: the participant will be placed in the lateral decubitus or beach chair position. Standard diagnostic arthroscopy will be performed. The anterior capsulolabral complex will be freed from the anterior aspect of the scapular neck. The anterior aspect of the scapular neck will be decorticated using a motorized burr. A capsuloligamentous repair will be performed with the capsule shifted from inferior to superior and repaired on the glenoid face. The number of anchors used for the repair will be left to the discretion of the surgeon. Patients will be given a sling for 4 weeks, and participation in sports will not be allowed for 6 months. |
| Latarjet Procedure | Experimental | Procedure: Latarjet ProcedureOpen or Arthroscopic coracoid transfer (Latarjet Procedure): This procedure may be performed through small incisions (minimally invasive) but may require a larger incision in some cases. It involves the transfer of a nearby bony structure (the coracoid process) to the front of the shoulder joint (glenoid). This bone will then provide support to prevent the shoulder joint from dislocating. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults ages 18-50 years;
- Diagnosis of post-traumatic recurrent anterior dislocation. This will require a minimum of 2 episodes of documented dislocations either by radiographic evidence or documented reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation as well as physical examination eliciting unwanted glenohumeral translation with reproduction of symptoms;
- Subcritical glenoid bone loss as defined on CT by standardized and reproducible best-fit circle technique (>10% but <20%);
- Provision of informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with concomitant injuries of the index shoulder (cuff tear, greater tuberosity fracture);
- Previous shoulder surgery;
- Patients that will likely have problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up;
- Epilepsy/seizure disorder;
- Patients who are currently incarcerated;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bankart + Remplissage ProcedureParticipants will undergo arthroscopic stabilization. | Procedure or surgery | Bankart + Remplissage Procedure |
| Latarjet ProcedureParticipants will undergo open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. | Procedure or surgery | Latarjet Procedure |
Primary outcome
Clinical Outcome - Shoulder function
Time frame: 2 years
The change from baseline to 24 months post-intervention difference in Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores between patients with recurrent dislocations treated with Bankart Procedure + Remplissage versus Latarjet procedure.
8 secondary outcomes
Rate of Recurrence
Time frame: 2 years
Clinical Outcome
Time frame: 2 years
Clinical Outcome - Quality of Life
Time frame: 2 years
Clinical Outcome - Shoulder activity
Time frame: 2 years
Rate of participants with anterior shoulder instability
Time frame: 2 years
Rate of participants with full range of motion
Time frame: 2 years
Rate of participants that return to previous level of activity
Time frame: 2 years
Rate of major and minor shoulder-related complications and serious adverse events
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39542469Khan M, Bedi A, Degen R, Warner J, Bhandari M; STABLE Investigators. Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Bankart repair with remplissage and Latarjet procedure in shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e089831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089831.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Shoulder Dislocation
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Descriptive Study of Injuries Associated to Anterior Shoulder Dislocations in Patients Over 40 Years
Anterior Glenohumeral Dislocations
Not yet recruiting
Early arthroscoPic Stabilization veRsus rehabilitatiOn of the Shoulder in Adolescents With a trauMatic First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ePisode.
Shoulder Dislocation
Recruiting
Validation of an Upper Extremity Physical Performance Test Battery in Patients After Shoulder Dislocation
Return to Sport, Shoulder Dislocation or Subluxation
RecruitingObservational study
Exactech Proximal Humerus Fracture Plate System Post Market Clinical Follow-up
Proximal Humeral Fracture, Fracture Dislocation
Recruiting
FARES Versus Traction-Countertraction for Acute Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
Acute Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Moin Khan, MD principal investigator
McMaster University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bankart + Remplissage Procedure and Latarjet Procedure in people with Shoulder Dislocation and Sport Injuries, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Outcome - Shoulder function (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05705479, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2025.