Cardiac ArrestNCT05706194
Early Neuroprognostication After OHCA
An observational study of Cardiac Arrest and Neurological Outcome, run by Lund University at 4 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This is a prospective observational substudy of the STEPCARE trial ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05564754) with the aim to examine whether prognostication of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest can be performed earlier than the 72 h time-point recommended by guidelines today. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Arrest, Neurological Outcome, EEG
- What is being tested?
- Early neurological prognostication with biomarkers, EEG and CT
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2023to 31 Jul 2029
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult cardiac arrest patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of any non-traumatic cause treated at hospitals recruiting patients to the STEPCARE neuroprognostication substudy
Who may be able to join
- Adult cardiac arrest patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-traumatic cause treated at hospitals recruiting patients to the STEPCARE neuroprognostication substudy. Other inclusion criteria include:
- a minimum of 20 minutes without chest compressions
- Unconsciousness defined as not being able to obey verbal commands (FOUR-score motor response of <4) or being intubated and sedated because of agitation after sustained ROSC
- Eligible for intensive care without restrictions or limitations
Who cannot join
- On ECMO prior to randomisation
- Pregnancy
- Suspected or confirmed intracranial hemorrhage
- Previously randomised in the STEPCARE trial
- Patients with limitations in level-of-care due to for example generalized malignancy
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
4 sites in 3 countries
Sweden2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Helsingborgs Hospital
Helsingborg
Niklas Nielsen, Prof
- Recruiting
Skane University Hospital
Lund
Josef Dankiewicz, MD, PhD
Finland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Helsinki Hospital
Helsinki
Markus Skrifvars, Prof
Marjaana Tiainen, MD, PhD
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Charité University Hospital
Berlin
Christoph Leithner, MD
About this study
Official title: Early Neurological Prognostication of Outcome After Out-of-hospital Cardiac arrest-a STEPCARE Prospective Substudy
This is a prospective observational substudy of the STEPCARE trial ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05564754) with the aim to examine whether prognostication of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest can be performed earlier than the 72 h time-point recommended by guidelines today.
Read the detailed description
Hypotheses
- The combination of clinical examination, the brain injury marker neurofilament light (NFL), electroencephalography (EEG), and head computed tomography (CT) predicts poor functional outcome already at 24 h post-arrest without false positive predictions.
- Any guideline recommended method (EEG/CT/SSEP/clinical examination) fulfilling criteria for a poor outcome will have highly elevated blood levels of NFL, indicating the presence of severe brain injury.
- Extensive sedation will not affect the prognostic accuracy of our prognostic methods EEG, NFL and CT.
Material and methods
The STEPCARE trial The patient population is adult patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a presumed cardiac or unknown cause of arrest randomised in the STEPCARE trial (Sedation, TEmperature and Pressure after out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest and REsuscitation, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05564754). The STEPCARE trial is an investigator initiated 2x2x2 international multicentre trial which will randomise patients to three intensive care interventions: minimal or higher levels of sedation, fever treatment versus no fever treatment and two different blood pressure targets. The aim of STEPCARE is to examine whether the interventions improves survival or functional outcome after CA. The statistical calculations indicate that 3500 patients are required to obtain sufficient power for our research questions. Patients will be recruited from more than 80 hospitals who have participated in the previous cardiac arrest trials initiated by the Lund University Center for Cardiac Arrest namely the TTM- and TTM2-trials (the to date largest published cardiac arrest trials).
The STEPCARE EARLY-NEURO substudy We will prospectively recruit participating sites who commit to follow the study protocol for participation in the biobank, and routinely examine patients' unconscious at 24 hours with EEG and CT as early as possible after 24 h. Serum and plasma blood samples will be collected prospectively at 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-randomisation, processed on site and transported to the Integrated Biobank in Luxembourg for storage. Biochemical analyses of NFL will be performed in batch after trial completion. The original EEG recordings, SSEP and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) will be collected for central blinded evaluation by study investigators. All patient data will be stored using patients study ID as identification. All patients will be treated according to the STEPCARE trial protocol according to randomisation, treatment, and follow-up. Prediction of neurological outcome performed according to the ERC/ESICM guidelines ≥72 hours post-arrest. Decisions on withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy will not be based on the early examinations alone, but must follow ERC/ESICM recommendations. Functional outcome will be assessed at a face-to-face follow up after six months and classified according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Poor functional outcome will be defined as mRS 4-6 (moderately severe disability, severe disability, or death).
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Neurological Outcome, EEG, CT, Brain Injuries, Biomarkers
- Being tested
- Early neurological prognostication with biomarkers, EEG and CT
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest, Brain Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early neurological prognostication with biomarkers, EEG and CTDiagnostic test
Biomarker samples collected at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after randomisation, CT and EEG performed as early as possible after 24 h post randomisation in patients still unconscious (defined as not awake and able to follow verbal commands)
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional outcome
Poor outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale 4-6
Measured: Six months post-randomisation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Blood levels of brain injury markers
Neurofilament light
Measured: Samples collected at 12-72 hours post-randomisation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Oct 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Lund UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lund University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Helsingborgs Hospital, University of Helsinki, Skane University Hospital, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Niklas Nielsen, MD, PhD, Study chair, Lund University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05706194
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STEPCARE EARLY-NEURO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Upon reasonable request following publication
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Neurological Prognostication of Outcome After Out-of-hospital Cardiac arrest-a STEPCARE Prospective Substudy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05706194
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STEPCARE EARLY-NEURO
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Neurological Outcome, EEG, CT, Brain Injuries, Biomarkers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Lund UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Helsingborgs Hospital, University of Helsinki, Skane University Hospital, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective observational substudy of the STEPCARE trial ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05564754) with the aim to examine whether prognostication of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest can be performed earlier than the 72 h time-point recommended by guidelines today.
Detailed description
Hypotheses
- The combination of clinical examination, the brain injury marker neurofilament light (NFL), electroencephalography (EEG), and head computed tomography (CT) predicts poor functional outcome already at 24 h post-arrest without false positive predictions.
- Any guideline recommended method (EEG/CT/SSEP/clinical examination) fulfilling criteria for a poor outcome will have highly elevated blood levels of NFL, indicating the presence of severe brain injury.
- Extensive sedation will not affect the prognostic accuracy of our prognostic methods EEG, NFL and CT.
Material and methods
The STEPCARE trial The patient population is adult patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a presumed cardiac or unknown cause of arrest randomised in the STEPCARE trial (Sedation, TEmperature and Pressure after out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest and REsuscitation, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05564754). The STEPCARE trial is an investigator initiated 2x2x2 international multicentre trial which will randomise patients to three intensive care interventions: minimal or higher levels of sedation, fever treatment versus no fever treatment and two different blood pressure targets. The aim of STEPCARE is to examine whether the interventions improves survival or functional outcome after CA. The statistical calculations indicate that 3500 patients are required to obtain sufficient power for our research questions. Patients will be recruited from more than 80 hospitals who have participated in the previous cardiac arrest trials initiated by the Lund University Center for Cardiac Arrest namely the TTM- and TTM2-trials (the to date largest published cardiac arrest trials).
The STEPCARE EARLY-NEURO substudy We will prospectively recruit participating sites who commit to follow the study protocol for participation in the biobank, and routinely examine patients' unconscious at 24 hours with EEG and CT as early as possible after 24 h. Serum and plasma blood samples will be collected prospectively at 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-randomisation, processed on site and transported to the Integrated Biobank in Luxembourg for storage. Biochemical analyses of NFL will be performed in batch after trial completion. The original EEG recordings, SSEP and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) will be collected for central blinded evaluation by study investigators. All patient data will be stored using patients study ID as identification. All patients will be treated according to the STEPCARE trial protocol according to randomisation, treatment, and follow-up. Prediction of neurological outcome performed according to the ERC/ESICM guidelines ≥72 hours post-arrest. Decisions on withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy will not be based on the early examinations alone, but must follow ERC/ESICM recommendations. Functional outcome will be assessed at a face-to-face follow up after six months and classified according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Poor functional outcome will be defined as mRS 4-6 (moderately severe disability, severe disability, or death).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult cardiac arrest patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of any non-traumatic cause treated at hospitals recruiting patients to the STEPCARE neuroprognostication substudy
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult cardiac arrest patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-traumatic cause treated at hospitals recruiting patients to the STEPCARE neuroprognostication substudy. Other inclusion criteria include:
- a minimum of 20 minutes without chest compressions
- Unconsciousness defined as not being able to obey verbal commands (FOUR-score motor response of <4) or being intubated and sedated because of agitation after sustained ROSC
- Eligible for intensive care without restrictions or limitations
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- On ECMO prior to randomisation
- Pregnancy
- Suspected or confirmed intracranial hemorrhage
- Previously randomised in the STEPCARE trial
- Patients with limitations in level-of-care due to for example generalized malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early neurological prognostication with biomarkers, EEG and CTBiomarker samples collected at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after randomisation, CT and EEG performed as early as possible after 24 h post randomisation in patients still unconscious (defined as not awake and able to follow verbal commands) | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
Functional outcome
Time frame: Six months post-randomisation
Poor outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale 4-6
1 secondary outcome
Blood levels of brain injury markers
Time frame: Samples collected at 12-72 hours post-randomisation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Upon reasonable request following publication
Related trials for Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Treatment With BTK Inhibitors or Venetoclax
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Waldenstr(SqrRoot)(Delta)m s Macroglobulinemia
Active, not recruiting
The REVIVE-PEEP Trial: Positive End-expiratory Pressure Versus Sham Valve/Zero End-expiratory Pressure in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Manual Ventilation to Improve Neurological Outcomes at Discharge in Adult Patients Suffering an Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital
RecruitingObservational study
Accuracy of Doppler Ultrasound Versus Manual Palpation of Pulse in Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
RACE-CARS - RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems
Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Therapeutic Outcomes of In-Hospital Resuscitation of Patients Admitted to the Internal Medicine Wards
Survival to Discharge With Good Neurologic Outcome Among in Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Niklas Nielsen, MD, PhD study chair
Lund University
4 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiac Arrest and Neurological Outcome, run by Lund University at 4 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Sweden, Finland, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marion Moseby-Knappe, MD, PhD (00464671000, marion.moseby_knappe@med.lu.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional outcome (time frame: Six months post-randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2024.