AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionsNCT05709860

An Electronic Health Record-based Approach to Increase PrEP Knowledge and Uptake: the EMC2 PrEP Strategy

A study testing EMC2 PrEP Educational Tool and Discrete Scheduling of a Dedicated PrEP Visit in people with HIV Infections and Electronic Health Record, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is being conducted to investigate a strategy that may improve knowledge and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP) among cisgender women in primary care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
EMC2 PrEP Educational Tool and Discrete Scheduling of a Dedicated PrEP Visit
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
29 Nov 2023to 29 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • female
  • HIV negative
  • have received 2 or more tests in the past 12 months for chlamydia, gonorrhea and/or syphilis
  • and/or have received a positive diagnosis for at least one of those sexually transmitted infections in the past 6 months
  • currently engaged in primary care
  • not currently using PrEP

Who cannot join

  • severe, uncorrectable visual, hearing or cognitive impairments that would preclude study consent or participation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Adaptation and Pilot Test of an Electronic Health Record-based Approach to Increase PrEP Knowledge and Uptake: the EMC2 PrEP Strategy

This study is being conducted to investigate a strategy that may improve knowledge and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP) among cisgender women in primary care.

Read the detailed description

Members of the study team previously developed and evaluated the Electronic health record Medication Complete Communication (EMC2) strategy to 'hardwire' provider/patient communication \& surveillance of select prescription (Rx) medications. EMC2 PrEP will adapt from the previous strategy to

  • educate cisgender women in primary care who have increased vulnerability to HIV about PrEP using an interactive, health literacy-appropriate educational tool securely delivered via the patient portal
  • facilitate, for those who express interest, the rapid and discrete scheduling of a dedicated PrEP clinic visit with a primary care clinician trained in PrEP delivery

The current study aims are to:

Aim 1: Refine and implement an electronic health record (EHR)-based strategy as a potential quality improvement activity that supports informed decision-making and PrEP uptake among women with increased HIV vulnerability in primary care (the EMC2 PrEP strategy).

Aim 2: Pilot-test the EMC2 PrEP strategy in primary care to determine its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy among women with increased vulnerability to HIV.

Aim 3: Develop a standard operating protocol (SOP) for disseminating the EMC2 PrEP strategy to a national network of federally qualified health centers.

Being tested
EMC2 PrEP Educational Tool, Discrete Scheduling of a Dedicated PrEP Visit
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EMC2 PrEP Educational ToolBehavioural

    Patients will receive an interactive PrEP Educational Tool. This interactive tool will be securely sent via the patient portal. After logging into their portal, patients will have the opportunity to review the information on their own time.

  • Discrete Scheduling of a Dedicated PrEP VisitBehavioural

    Within the interactive PrEP Educational Tool, patients who choose to will have the opportunity to discretely schedule a dedicated PrEP visit with a primary care clinician trained on PrEP delivery. The clinician will have time reserved to allow for 'rapid' scheduling.

Study groups in NCT05709860
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual CareNo interventionUsual care includes: 1) no specific materials to promote PrEP knowledge or uptake among women in primary care, and 2) variable physician counseling on PrEP among women with increased vulnerability to HIV.
The EMC2 PrEP StrategyActive comparatorThe EMC2 PrEP Strategy will utilize health information and consumer technologies to automatically deposit an interactive PrEP educational material into the patient portal of women with clinically indicated increased vulnerability to HIV. The material will: 1) promote PrEP knowledge, and 2) prompt discrete scheduling of a dedicated PrEP visit among those interested.
Receives: Behavioral: EMC2 PrEP Educational Tool; Behavioral: Discrete Scheduling of a Dedicated PrEP Visit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PrEP Uptake (Use)

    PrEP uptake will be measured during the intervention period between study arms to investigate the effects of the EMC2 PrEP strategy.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. PrEP Knowledge

    A 10-item questionnaire, developed by the study team and the scientific literature, will be used to evaluate knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis among study participants. Correctly answered questions will be summed (0 to 10) for a total score. Higher scores will indicate greater PrEP knowledge.

    Measured: 2-6 weeks

  2. Perceived Risk of HIV

    The 8-item Perceived Risk of HIV scale is used to assess how vulnerable an individual feels to HIV. The scale was developed in the United States and attention was paid to health literacy. Response options vary for each item, though they are measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Total score of 8 items is calculated and range from 10 to 40. Higher scores mean higher perceived risk of HIV.

    Measured: 2-6 weeks

  3. PrEP Attitudes

    A PrEP Attitudes 5-items scale (Walsh, 2019) is used to assess attitudes toward PrEP, each item is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). A total score is calculated and range from 5 to 25. Higher scores mean more stigma towards PrEP use.

    Measured: 2-6 weeks

  4. Health Literacy

    CHEW health literacy is used to assess participant's health literacy level. Participants were asked three questions about difficulty in understanding medical materials and information, the options range from all of the time to none of the time. The responses of the three questions are then categorized into limited and adequate health literacy level. We used CHEW health literacy because the measure can be conducted over phone calls.

    Measured: 2-6 weeks

  5. Health Activation

    A modified version of our team's 10-item Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI) is used to assess participant's engagement in healthcare. Response options are a Likert scale; linear transformation is used to put total scores onto a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater activation. The total scores are then categorized into 3 categories: Low (0-79), Moderate (80-94), and High (>94).

    Measured: 2-6 weeks

  6. Process Measure

    The participants in the intervention group were asked two questions about 1) whether they received a PrEP decision guide, and 2) did they read or review it, to assess the acceptability of the intervention material.

    Measured: 2-6 weeks

  7. Acceptability of the Strategy

    Using 10-point Likert scale response options (1=very unsatisfied to 10=very satisfied), participants in the intervention group are asked to rate their satisfaction with the materials.

    Measured: 2-6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2023
  2. Study start29 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion29 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05709860
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00217596
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
17 Jan 2023
Last updated
30 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Pack A, O'Conor R, Vasiloff R, Liebovitz D, Masters MC, Alcantara K, Smith R, Wismer G, Tatz R, Yeh F, Curtis LM, Hur S, Bailey SC. An electronic health record-based strategy to increase PrEP decision-making among cisgender women in primary care: results of a randomized pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12745-2.

    PubMed 40269861

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EMC2 PrEP Educational Tool and Discrete Scheduling of a Dedicated PrEP Visit in people with HIV Infections and Electronic Health Record, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PrEP Uptake (Use) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05709860, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT05709860 | AzTrials