Bladder CanceriBLAD-appNCT05710159
The iBlad App - a National, Exploratory Study on a Multimodality Smartphone App for Bladder Cancer Patients
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 2 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
The aims of this project are: to develop and implement a national multimodality application for patients with bladder cancer that builds upon knowledge from the iBLAD study. to investigate how the app, containing PRO questions on symptoms and QoL, information for health care providers, and peer-to-peer advice, can… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- iBLAD Application to monitor symptoms and quality of life by the use of pateint-reported outcomes
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 12 Dec 2022to 30 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with bladder cancer defined as both urothelial tract-, bladder- and urethral cancer initiating first or second-line standard therapy with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy
Who may be able to join
- Patients with bladder cancer defined as both urothelial tract-, bladder- and urethral cancer initiating first or second-line standard therapy with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy
- Age ≥ 18 years,
- Performance status ≤ 2
- Ability to read Danish
- No serious cognitive impairment
- Informed consent.
Who cannot join
- No smartphone,
- Dementia, mental alteration, or psychiatric disease that can compromise informed consent from the patient and/or adherence to the protocol and the monitoring of the trial.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Denmark2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100
Helle Pappot, Professor, helle.pappot@regionh.dk
- Recruiting
Odense University Hospital
Odense, 5000
Lærke Tolstrup, PhD, + 45 40295129, laerke.tolstrup@rsyd.dk
About this study
Official title: The iBlad App - a National, Exploratory Study on a Multimodality Smartphone App in Bladder Cancer for Better Understanding of Symptoms, Quality of Life and Need for Supportive Care
The aims of this project are:
- to develop and implement a national multimodality application for patients with bladder cancer that builds upon knowledge from the iBLAD study.
- to investigate how the app, containing PRO questions on symptoms and QoL, information for health care providers, and peer-to-peer advice, can provide more knowledge on symptoms, QoL, and the need for supportive care.
- to examine the usability of and patient satisfaction with the app using qualitative methods.
Read the detailed description
Design The iBLAD app study is an investigator-initiated, national, Danish multicenter, exploratory trial connected to the group of bladder cancer responsible specialists at the six Danish treatment centers. The study is carried out in accordance with the SPIRIT-PRO Protocol Guidance.
Study plan The app is developed by the app provider Journl who is specialized in ePRO apps. The app is in Danish. The patient will be able to download the app and create a user profile when a clinician has registered the patient in Journl's system as a bladder cancer patient in oncological treatment. After giving informed consent, the patient will (be helped to) download the app on their private smartphone. The patient will answer the first questionnaires in relation to the first treatment. The first patient is expected to be enrolled in December 2022. Patients can use the app as long as treatment is ongoing. Patients can at any time withdraw their consent and stop using the app. The patient will receive daily notifications from the app if there is an unanswered questionnaire to minimize missing data.
Questionnaires In the app, Bladder cancer patients will receive an electronic questionnaire weekly with selected questions from the PRO-CTCAE library. The questions have been carefully selected for their specific disease and condition. The epo-CTCAE questionnaire consists of 15 symptoms comprising of 30 questions on symptoms and side effects. Each symptom is elicited using between one to three questions on frequency, severity, and interference with daily activities. Weekly reporting was chosen as this is the preferred recall period for PRO-CTCAE questionnaires. Depending on the patients´ response and due to predefined thresholds, the patient will get feedback for supportive care or be advised to contact the hospital. Moreover, the patients will be asked to complete EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BLM30 monthly to monitor their QoL (see supplementary material). All electronic questionnaires will be completed at home. An expert group, consisting of nurses and clinicians, has selected the questionnaires as the most relevant questionnaires for this patient population.
Patient feedback and inclusion in the clinical encounter The questionnaires are the same regardless of the patient's oncological treatment but is developed to cover both chemotherapy and ICI. The patients receive immediate feedback in the app as they complete the symptom questionnaire. The advice given can continuously be found in the app. The advice is based on an algorithm linked to the severity of the symptoms or side effects that the patient reports. The algorithm including type of intervention was developed by the expert group. The symptom and QoL scores are also sent to the hospital where the clinician can access the patient reporting and are trained and prompted to review the scores at patient visits. Thus, the patient reporting not only serves as a reflection of the patient's condition to be used for research purposes but can also be used as a dialogue tool during the clinical encounter. Accordingly, the app will enable regular symptom tracking, feedback to patients and QoL reporting to achieve earlier symptom management and improved supportive care. The ePRO questionnaires are added to standard of care and the symptoms highlighted will be treated in alignment with standard procedures. In routine care, clinicians carry out toxicity registration prior to each cycle of anti-neoplastic treatment, typically every three or four weeks. The weekly patient reporting in the app takes place at home in between visits to the hospital. Alert algorithms and thresholds for alerts can be seen in Supplementary material.
Patient videos In addition to completing questionnaires in the app, the patients will also gain access to a variety of short videos with former bladder patients recruited from the Danish bladder cancer organization. The subjects of the videos were decided on during a workshop carried out with six bladder cancer patients who had all received anti-neoplastic treatment. Thus, the participants in the workshop took part in deciding what the app should contain in terms of informative and relevant video material on the experiences of bladder cancer patients. Fifty-three videos will be produced with five bladder cancer patients (three men and two women). In the videos, the patients share peer-to-peer insights on how they experience being bladder cancer patients, covering a wide range of topics such as living with cancer, operation, treatment, sexual issues, family relations, rehabilitation and quality of life.
Evaluation Patients will receive questionnaires on symptoms and QoL as long as treatment is ongoing. After 4 weeks of treatment, the patients will be asked to complete a validated Patient-Reported Experience Measure in the clinic to evaluate acceptability of the app. In addition, individual interviews will be performed with participants in the study from all six centers where usability and patient satisfaction is evaluated.
Endpoints Primary outcome is PRO symptoms´ correlation to QoL measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the specific bladder cancer questionnaire EORTC-QLQ-BLM-30 and submodules of these. Additionally, specific PRO symptoms development over time and time-dependency in relation to QoL will be investigated. The study is non-comparative and analyses will be exploratory. Secondary endpoints will be level of user acceptability and patient satisfaction.
Sample size No sample size calculation has been performed due to the study's explorative nature. To secure a broad geographic representation the aim is to include at least 100 patients with a minimum of 10 patients from each of the six centers. The study will be analyzed when 100 patients have been followed for at least 3 months. An interim analyses will be performed after 30 included patients primarily to evaluate compliance and adherence to the app.
Data collection and statistics Information on age, time of diagnosis, gender, histology, TNM stage, treatment type, treatment line and performance status will be noted. A baseline questionnaire on symptoms and QoL will be completed. The analyses of ePRO data will include descriptive statistics for both changes from baseline and observed scores after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 months of participation in the study. In case of missing data, imputation will not take place. PRO-data will be monitored regularly, in the beginning on a weekly basis. After 12 weeks, we will shift to monthly monitoring if adherence is acceptable. If patients do not comply with the study protocol, they will be contacted by the project manager and/or withdrawn from the study. Eligible patients will be informed about this upon enrolment and that it will have no impact on their treatment.
Ethics declaration The iBLAD app study was exempt for review by the Medical Research Ethics Committee, will follow General Data Protection Regulation, and is registered at the Capital Region of Denmark. The results of the study will be reported in a scientific journal.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Being tested
- iBLAD Application to monitor symptoms and quality of life by the use of pateint-reported outcomes
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iBLAD Application to monitor symptoms and quality of life by the use of pateint-reported outcomesDevice
Development and implementation of a national multimodality application for patients with bladder cancer that builds upon knowledge from the iBLAD study.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Development and implementation of the iBLAD-app
To develop and implement a national multimodality application (app) for patients with bladder cancer t
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
App contributions
To investigate how the app, containing PRO questions on symptoms and QoL, information for health care providers, and peer-to-peer advice, can provide more knowledge on symptoms, QoL, and the need for supportive care.
Measured: 2 years
Usability and evaluation
To examine the usability of and patient satisfaction with the app using qualitative methods.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2023
- Study start12 Dec 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Danish Cancer Society
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Laerke Kjaer Tolstrup, Odense University Hospital
- Investigators
- Helle Pappot, Professor, Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05710159
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R261-A16126
- Acronym
- iBLAD-app
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Taarnhoj GA, Lindberg H, Johansen C, Pappot H. Patient-Reported Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes for Urothelial Cancer Patients Receiving Chemo- or Immunotherapy: A Real-Life Experience. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 24;10(9):1852. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091852.
PubMed 33923176Taarnhoj GA, Johansen C, Lindberg H, Basch E, Dueck A, Pappot H. Patient reported symptoms associated with quality of life during chemo- or immunotherapy for bladder cancer patients with advanced disease. Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):3078-3087. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2958. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
PubMed 32154663Taarnhoj GA, Lindberg H, Dohn LH, Omland LH, Hjollund NH, Johansen C, Pappot H. Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 11;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01480-3.
PubMed 32653005Taarnhoj GA, Lindberg H, Johansen C, Pappot H. Patient-reported outcomes item selection for bladder cancer patients in chemo- or immunotherapy. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Aug 22;3(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0141-2.
PubMed 31440865
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The iBlad App - a National, Exploratory Study on a Multimodality Smartphone App in Bladder Cancer for Better Understanding of Symptoms, Quality of Life and Need for Supportive Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05710159
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iBLAD-app / R261-A16126
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Danish Cancer Society
- Study start
- 12 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims of this project are:
- to develop and implement a national multimodality application for patients with bladder cancer that builds upon knowledge from the iBLAD study.
- to investigate how the app, containing PRO questions on symptoms and QoL, information for health care providers, and peer-to-peer advice, can provide more knowledge on symptoms, QoL, and the need for supportive care.
- to examine the usability of and patient satisfaction with the app using qualitative methods.
Detailed description
Design The iBLAD app study is an investigator-initiated, national, Danish multicenter, exploratory trial connected to the group of bladder cancer responsible specialists at the six Danish treatment centers. The study is carried out in accordance with the SPIRIT-PRO Protocol Guidance.
Study plan The app is developed by the app provider Journl who is specialized in ePRO apps. The app is in Danish. The patient will be able to download the app and create a user profile when a clinician has registered the patient in Journl's system as a bladder cancer patient in oncological treatment. After giving informed consent, the patient will (be helped to) download the app on their private smartphone. The patient will answer the first questionnaires in relation to the first treatment. The first patient is expected to be enrolled in December 2022. Patients can use the app as long as treatment is ongoing. Patients can at any time withdraw their consent and stop using the app. The patient will receive daily notifications from the app if there is an unanswered questionnaire to minimize missing data.
Questionnaires In the app, Bladder cancer patients will receive an electronic questionnaire weekly with selected questions from the PRO-CTCAE library. The questions have been carefully selected for their specific disease and condition. The epo-CTCAE questionnaire consists of 15 symptoms comprising of 30 questions on symptoms and side effects. Each symptom is elicited using between one to three questions on frequency, severity, and interference with daily activities. Weekly reporting was chosen as this is the preferred recall period for PRO-CTCAE questionnaires. Depending on the patients´ response and due to predefined thresholds, the patient will get feedback for supportive care or be advised to contact the hospital. Moreover, the patients will be asked to complete EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BLM30 monthly to monitor their QoL (see supplementary material). All electronic questionnaires will be completed at home. An expert group, consisting of nurses and clinicians, has selected the questionnaires as the most relevant questionnaires for this patient population.
Patient feedback and inclusion in the clinical encounter The questionnaires are the same regardless of the patient's oncological treatment but is developed to cover both chemotherapy and ICI. The patients receive immediate feedback in the app as they complete the symptom questionnaire. The advice given can continuously be found in the app. The advice is based on an algorithm linked to the severity of the symptoms or side effects that the patient reports. The algorithm including type of intervention was developed by the expert group. The symptom and QoL scores are also sent to the hospital where the clinician can access the patient reporting and are trained and prompted to review the scores at patient visits. Thus, the patient reporting not only serves as a reflection of the patient's condition to be used for research purposes but can also be used as a dialogue tool during the clinical encounter. Accordingly, the app will enable regular symptom tracking, feedback to patients and QoL reporting to achieve earlier symptom management and improved supportive care. The ePRO questionnaires are added to standard of care and the symptoms highlighted will be treated in alignment with standard procedures. In routine care, clinicians carry out toxicity registration prior to each cycle of anti-neoplastic treatment, typically every three or four weeks. The weekly patient reporting in the app takes place at home in between visits to the hospital. Alert algorithms and thresholds for alerts can be seen in Supplementary material.
Patient videos In addition to completing questionnaires in the app, the patients will also gain access to a variety of short videos with former bladder patients recruited from the Danish bladder cancer organization. The subjects of the videos were decided on during a workshop carried out with six bladder cancer patients who had all received anti-neoplastic treatment. Thus, the participants in the workshop took part in deciding what the app should contain in terms of informative and relevant video material on the experiences of bladder cancer patients. Fifty-three videos will be produced with five bladder cancer patients (three men and two women). In the videos, the patients share peer-to-peer insights on how they experience being bladder cancer patients, covering a wide range of topics such as living with cancer, operation, treatment, sexual issues, family relations, rehabilitation and quality of life.
Evaluation Patients will receive questionnaires on symptoms and QoL as long as treatment is ongoing. After 4 weeks of treatment, the patients will be asked to complete a validated Patient-Reported Experience Measure in the clinic to evaluate acceptability of the app. In addition, individual interviews will be performed with participants in the study from all six centers where usability and patient satisfaction is evaluated.
Endpoints Primary outcome is PRO symptoms´ correlation to QoL measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the specific bladder cancer questionnaire EORTC-QLQ-BLM-30 and submodules of these. Additionally, specific PRO symptoms development over time and time-dependency in relation to QoL will be investigated. The study is non-comparative and analyses will be exploratory. Secondary endpoints will be level of user acceptability and patient satisfaction.
Sample size No sample size calculation has been performed due to the study's explorative nature. To secure a broad geographic representation the aim is to include at least 100 patients with a minimum of 10 patients from each of the six centers. The study will be analyzed when 100 patients have been followed for at least 3 months. An interim analyses will be performed after 30 included patients primarily to evaluate compliance and adherence to the app.
Data collection and statistics Information on age, time of diagnosis, gender, histology, TNM stage, treatment type, treatment line and performance status will be noted. A baseline questionnaire on symptoms and QoL will be completed. The analyses of ePRO data will include descriptive statistics for both changes from baseline and observed scores after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 months of participation in the study. In case of missing data, imputation will not take place. PRO-data will be monitored regularly, in the beginning on a weekly basis. After 12 weeks, we will shift to monthly monitoring if adherence is acceptable. If patients do not comply with the study protocol, they will be contacted by the project manager and/or withdrawn from the study. Eligible patients will be informed about this upon enrolment and that it will have no impact on their treatment.
Ethics declaration The iBLAD app study was exempt for review by the Medical Research Ethics Committee, will follow General Data Protection Regulation, and is registered at the Capital Region of Denmark. The results of the study will be reported in a scientific journal.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with bladder cancer defined as both urothelial tract-, bladder- and urethral cancer initiating first or second-line standard therapy with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with bladder cancer defined as both urothelial tract-, bladder- and urethral cancer initiating first or second-line standard therapy with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy
- Age ≥ 18 years,
- Performance status ≤ 2
- Ability to read Danish
- No serious cognitive impairment
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- No smartphone,
- Dementia, mental alteration, or psychiatric disease that can compromise informed consent from the patient and/or adherence to the protocol and the monitoring of the trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iBLAD Application to monitor symptoms and quality of life by the use of pateint-reported outcomesDevelopment and implementation of a national multimodality application for patients with bladder cancer that builds upon knowledge from the iBLAD study. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Development and implementation of the iBLAD-app
Time frame: 2 years
To develop and implement a national multimodality application (app) for patients with bladder cancer t
2 secondary outcomes
App contributions
Time frame: 2 years
Usability and evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 33923176Taarnhoj GA, Lindberg H, Johansen C, Pappot H. Patient-Reported Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes for Urothelial Cancer Patients Receiving Chemo- or Immunotherapy: A Real-Life Experience. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 24;10(9):1852. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091852.
- Background: PubMed 32154663Taarnhoj GA, Johansen C, Lindberg H, Basch E, Dueck A, Pappot H. Patient reported symptoms associated with quality of life during chemo- or immunotherapy for bladder cancer patients with advanced disease. Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):3078-3087. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2958. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
- Background: PubMed 32653005Taarnhoj GA, Lindberg H, Dohn LH, Omland LH, Hjollund NH, Johansen C, Pappot H. Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 11;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01480-3.
- Background: PubMed 31440865Taarnhoj GA, Lindberg H, Johansen C, Pappot H. Patient-reported outcomes item selection for bladder cancer patients in chemo- or immunotherapy. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Aug 22;3(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0141-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Study of ACC-1898 in Adult Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Enfortumab Vedotin in Combination With Pembrolizumab vs. Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in People With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (EV-309)
Urothelial Cancer, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Recruiting
A Study of a Side Effects and Resource Navigation Program for People With Cancer
Kidney Cancer, Bladder Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Uro-Cam Catheter Assessment System for Diagnosing Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helle Pappot, Professor principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 2 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Helle Pappot, Professor (+ 45 35454089, helle.pappot@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Development and implementation of the iBLAD-app (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05710159, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2024.