Dental ImplantPhase 3NCT05711147
One-time Abutment Placement Versus 4 Times Abutment Removal Around Dental Implants
A Phase 3 study testing Abutment removal and Placement of definitive abutment in people with Dental Implant and Prosthetic Abutment, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Introduction: the repeated connection and disconnection of healing abutments during dental implants´ osseointegration has been associated with significant increased peri-implant bone loss, when compared with placing the final prosthetic abutment during implant placement surgery and non-removing it ever again. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implant, Prosthetic Abutment
- What is being tested?
- Abutment removal and Placement of definitive abutment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2017to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least two adjacent missing teeth in the posterior maxilla or mandible (positions 4 to 7)
- Willing to receive implant supported fixed partial dentures
- There must be a natural tooth mesial to the most proximal implant site, however free end situations will be allowed for the distal implants
- Healed sites (minimum 12 weeks post-extraction)
- In the case of prior bone augmentation, a minimum of 6 months of healing is required
- Simultaneous bone augmentation will be allowed only for close sinus lifting
Who cannot join
- Systemic exclusion criteria:
- Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids and/or medications that can interfere with bone metabolism
- History of leukocyte dysfunction and deficiencies
- History of neoplastic disease requiring the use of radiation or chemotherapy
- History of renal failure
- Metabolic disorders such as osteoporosis
Show all 27Show fewer
- History of uncontrolled endocrine disorders
- Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
- Alcoholism or drug abuse
- History of immunodeficiency syndromes
- Smokers of >10 cigarettes per day, cigar equivalents or tobacco chewers
- Any other condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent completion of the study participation or interfere with the analysis of the study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability
- Local exclusion criteria:
- Any kind of bone augmentation performed on the implant site, with a healing period of <6 months
- Local inflammation (including untreated periodontitis)
- Mucosal diseases such as erosive liquen planus
- Less than 2mm of keratinized mucosa in the intended implant sites
- History of local irradiation therapy
- Presence of osseous lesions
- History of implant failure
- Post-extraction sites with <12 weeks of healing
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits
- Persistent intraoral infection
- Exclusion criteria at surgery: in any of the following circumstances, the patient will not be randomized and will be excluded from the analysis
- Lack of primary stability at surgery
- Need for crestal augmentation procedures during implant surgery
- Inability to place the implants according to the prosthetic requirements
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: One-time Abutment Placement Versus 4 Times Abutment Removal on Interproximal Bone Levels and Peri-implant Soft Tissues: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Introduction: the repeated connection and disconnection of healing abutments during dental implants´ osseointegration has been associated with significant increased peri-implant bone loss, when compared with placing the final prosthetic abutment during implant placement surgery and non-removing it ever again. Previous data from animal studies suggests that the higher the number of removals of the healing abutments, the greater the bone resorption around implants, however the evidence in humans is scarce and heterogeneous. Furthermore, this greater bone resorption has been claimed to be associated to the inflammatory status of the peri-implant soft tissues, which would be greater as a consequence of the repeated disruption of the soft-tissues attachment to the prosthetic abutment, and the hypothetical microbial contamination of the implant-abutment interphase, induced by the repeated manipulation of the prosthetic components.
Objective: to evaluate the changes in peri-implant crestal bone levels between two prosthetic protocols, the control being the conventional protocol where healing abutments are placed during surgery and removed four times before the delivery of the final abutment and prostheses, and the test protocol where definitive abutments are placed immediately after implant placement and are not removed ever again.
Material and methods: 80 platform switched implants will be placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible of 40 partial edentulous patients. Immediately after implant placement, patients will be randomized to receive the definitive abutment at the moment of implant placement (one abutment-one time protocol), or 12 weeks later, after removing the healing abutment four times during the confection of the final prostheses, following the conventional protocol for implant supported restorations. The day of prostheses delivery, a mucosal biopsy from the implant surrounding tissues will be taken for histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses of the inflammatory response of the peri-implant soft tissues. Radiographic assessment of vertical bone level changes (primary outcome), clinical status of peri-implant tissues, changes in soft tissues margin, patient related outcomes and adverse events will be assessed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after loading.
- Conditions
- Dental Implant, Prosthetic Abutment
- Being tested
- Abutment removal, Placement of definitive abutment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Abutment removalProcedure or surgery
4 times healing abutment removal during prosthesis making (impressions, metal try-in, ceramic try-in, prosthesis loading)
Placement of definitive abutmentProcedure or surgery
Placement of the final prosthetic abutment at the moment of implantation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Definitive abutment | Experimental | Definitive prosthetic abutment placed at the moment of implant placement Receives: Procedure: Placement of definitive abutment |
| Healing abutment | Active comparator | Conventional healing abutment placed at the moment of implant placement and removed 4 times during prosthesis making Receives: Procedure: Abutment removal |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in interproximal bone levels
Changes at the mesial and distal crestal bone levels measured in periapical digital radiographs at the mesial and distal implant aspects
Measured: Implantation, prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Mobility
Implant and/or prostheses mobility
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Keratinized peri-implant mucosa
Presence or absence of keratinized peri-implant mucosa in the mid-buccal and mid-lingual aspects
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Modified plaque index
Modified plaque index (Mombelli et al. 1987) at six sites per implant
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Sulcus bleeding index
Sulcus bleeding index (Mombelli et al. 1987) at six sites per implant
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Probing depth
Probing depth (Mombelli et al. 1987) at six sites per implant
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Clinical crown length of the adjacent tooth
CLT: distance in mm from the highest line of gingival/mucosal curvature of the crown to the occlusal aspect of the tooth
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Clinical crown length of the implant supported crown
CLI: distance in mm from the highest line of mucosal curvature of the crown to the occlusal aspect of the implant prostheses
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Papilla index
IP: distance in mm from the top of the mesial and distal papillae of each implant to the most coronal portion of the contact point or the occlusal surface (Grunder 2000)
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Patient-reported outcomes
5-items questionnaire (comfort, appearance, masticatory function, taste and overall satisfaction) rated according to the following scale: very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, fair, satisfied, and very satisfied
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Adverse events
Occurrence and nature of adverse events, either "implant or prostheses associated" (device related adverse events and other tissue complications), or "non-implant associated" (death, serious illness or any condition requiring hospitalization for more than 1 day).
Measured: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Hystomorphometric analysis of soft tissue biopsy samples
Total areas of the sample, the epithelium, the connective tissue, the inflammatory infiltrate and cell density in an interest area into the inflammatory infiltrate
Measured: Prosthesis loading
Immunohistochemical analysis of the histologic sections
Nature and extension of the inflammatory infiltrate in the connective tissue: high positive (HP), positive (P), low positive (LP) or negative (N) staining
Measured: Prosthesis loading
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2023
- Study start1 Dec 2017
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental ImplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universidad Complutense de MadridThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Camlog Oral Reconstruction Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ana Molina Villar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Investigators
- Mariano Sanz, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, University Complutense of Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05711147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17/291-R_X
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- One-time Abutment Placement Versus 4 Times Abutment Removal on Interproximal Bone Levels and Peri-implant Soft Tissues: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05711147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17/291-R_X
- Conditions
- Dental Implant, Prosthetic Abutment
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Camlog Oral Reconstruction Foundation
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: the repeated connection and disconnection of healing abutments during dental implants´ osseointegration has been associated with significant increased peri-implant bone loss, when compared with placing the final prosthetic abutment during implant placement surgery and non-removing it ever again. Previous data from animal studies suggests that the higher the number of removals of the healing abutments, the greater the bone resorption around implants, however the evidence in humans is scarce and heterogeneous. Furthermore, this greater bone resorption has been claimed to be associated to the inflammatory status of the peri-implant soft tissues, which would be greater as a consequence of the repeated disruption of the soft-tissues attachment to the prosthetic abutment, and the hypothetical microbial contamination of the implant-abutment interphase, induced by the repeated manipulation of the prosthetic components.
Objective: to evaluate the changes in peri-implant crestal bone levels between two prosthetic protocols, the control being the conventional protocol where healing abutments are placed during surgery and removed four times before the delivery of the final abutment and prostheses, and the test protocol where definitive abutments are placed immediately after implant placement and are not removed ever again.
Material and methods: 80 platform switched implants will be placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible of 40 partial edentulous patients. Immediately after implant placement, patients will be randomized to receive the definitive abutment at the moment of implant placement (one abutment-one time protocol), or 12 weeks later, after removing the healing abutment four times during the confection of the final prostheses, following the conventional protocol for implant supported restorations. The day of prostheses delivery, a mucosal biopsy from the implant surrounding tissues will be taken for histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses of the inflammatory response of the peri-implant soft tissues. Radiographic assessment of vertical bone level changes (primary outcome), clinical status of peri-implant tissues, changes in soft tissues margin, patient related outcomes and adverse events will be assessed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after loading.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Definitive abutment | Experimental | Procedure: Placement of definitive abutmentDefinitive prosthetic abutment placed at the moment of implant placement |
| Healing abutment | Active comparator | Procedure: Abutment removalConventional healing abutment placed at the moment of implant placement and removed 4 times during prosthesis making |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- At least two adjacent missing teeth in the posterior maxilla or mandible (positions 4 to 7)
- Willing to receive implant supported fixed partial dentures
- There must be a natural tooth mesial to the most proximal implant site, however free end situations will be allowed for the distal implants
- Healed sites (minimum 12 weeks post-extraction)
- In the case of prior bone augmentation, a minimum of 6 months of healing is required
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids and/or medications that can interfere with bone metabolism
- History of leukocyte dysfunction and deficiencies
- History of neoplastic disease requiring the use of radiation or chemotherapy
- History of renal failure
- Metabolic disorders such as osteoporosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Abutment removal4 times healing abutment removal during prosthesis making (impressions, metal try-in, ceramic try-in, prosthesis loading) | Procedure or surgery | Healing abutment |
| Placement of definitive abutmentPlacement of the final prosthetic abutment at the moment of implantation | Procedure or surgery | Definitive abutment |
Primary outcome
Changes in interproximal bone levels
Time frame: Implantation, prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Changes at the mesial and distal crestal bone levels measured in periapical digital radiographs at the mesial and distal implant aspects
12 secondary outcomes
Mobility
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Keratinized peri-implant mucosa
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Modified plaque index
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Sulcus bleeding index
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Probing depth
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Clinical crown length of the adjacent tooth
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Clinical crown length of the implant supported crown
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Papilla index
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Patient-reported outcomes
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Adverse events
Time frame: Prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Hystomorphometric analysis of soft tissue biopsy samples
Time frame: Prosthesis loading
Immunohistochemical analysis of the histologic sections
Time frame: Prosthesis loading
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2023.
Related trials for Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dentsply Sirona PrimeTaper Implants
Dental Implants
Active, not recruiting
The Aim of the Study Will be Clinically and Radio Graphically Comparison of Two Implant Designs Used to Treat Atrophied Mandible . Implant Design Comparison Will Done for Implant Stability,Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health Changes and Bone Changes .Patients Will be Divided Randomly Into Two Group
Dental Implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mariano Sanz, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
University Complutense of Madrid
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Abutment removal and Placement of definitive abutment in people with Dental Implant and Prosthetic Abutment, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in interproximal bone levels (time frame: Implantation, prosthesis loading, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2023.