BalanceGMINCT05715112
Graded Motor Imagery and Fall Risk in Older Adults
An observational study of Balance and Fall Risk, run by St. Ambrose University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To determine if there is any carry over effect of sensation training for the feet, officially called Graded Motor Imagery (GMI), will impact balance and fall risk factors in older individuals. This will be looked at to see if there is a difference in balance and sensation before and right after the training. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Graded Motor Imagery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Aug 2022to 18 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Study population: A convenience sample of older adults (65 and older) will be recruited for the study.
Who may be able to join
- Be able to read and understand English
- Be over the age of 65
- Be independent with ambulation (with or without an assistive device)
- Not have any skin condition or injury to the plantar or dorsal part of the foot
- Have the visual ability to view images on a tablet to partake in a test
Who cannot join
- No existing skin conditions on the bottom of the foot that would impair sensation
- No current injury to the plantar or dorsal side of the foot
- No prior surgery or major injury to the plantar or dorsal side of the foot
- Lacking sensation in the foot
- Unable to read and understand English
- Lacking ability to view images on a tablet to partake in a test
- Unable to ambulate (with or without an assistive device)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Graded Motor Imagery and Fall Risk in Older Adults: An Exploratory Study
To determine if there is any carry over effect of sensation training for the feet, officially called Graded Motor Imagery (GMI), will impact balance and fall risk factors in older individuals. This will be looked at to see if there is a difference in balance and sensation before and right after the training.
Read the detailed description
In order to increase acuity of body maps, various tactile and movement-based strategies have been recommended and supported for research focusing on sensory discrimination. Current evidence, specific to painful conditions related to altered cortical mapping, have shown growing evidence in reducing pain and disability. In regards to it's ability to alter foot pain in older adults and decreasing fall risk, prior conference case study and case series presentations have suggested potential clinical benefit, but it has not been formally studied. The aim of this study is to determine if a sensory discrimination training for feet in older adults can alleviate pain, improve sensory discrimination, and also decrease fall risk. Specifically, does a 20 minute training session improve pain, balance (Brief-BEST test), and sensory discrimination in individuals over 65 years of age. Secondary analysis may exam characteristics that best identify those who benefit from this training.
- Being tested
- Graded Motor Imagery
- Keywords
- Graded Motor Imagery, Balance, Fall Risk, Elderly
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Graded Motor ImageryProcedure or surgery
Also called GMI
GMI consisting of education, sensory integration of the foot using contact, flooring samples, immersion, and two point discrimination.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | A convenience sample of older adults (65 and older). Receives: Procedure: Graded Motor Imagery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lower extremity pain rating
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in pain for the lower extremity using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS - 0 to 10 where 0 = no pain and 10 + maximum pain)
Measured: self-reported, change from before to immediately after treatment
Laterality Speed
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in speed of foot recognition using Recognize (TM) (speed in seconds to recognize each of 40 images as right or left foot)
Measured: tested for 60 seconds before and immediately after treatment
Laterality Accuracy
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in accuracy of foot recognition using Recognize (TM) (percent accurately correctly identified as right or left foot of those 40 images)
Measured: tested for 60 seconds before and immediately after treatment
Balance / fall risk
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Brief-BESTest (6 task subsets to assess static and dynamic balance) (0 - 15 scale where 0 - lowest score / unstable and 15 = highest / no balance issues)
Measured: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of dominant hand
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of web space of dominant hand (in pounds)
Measured: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of Right Foot
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of right foot (in pounds)
Measured: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of Left Foot
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of left foot (in pounds)
Measured: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2023
- Study start17 Aug 2022
- Primary completion18 Aug 2022
- Study completion18 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for BalanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Ambrose University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kevin Farrell, St. Ambrose University
- Investigators
- Kevin Farrell, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, St. Ambrose University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05715112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- StAmbroseU GMI fall risk
- Acronym
- GMI
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 10 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Graded Motor Imagery and Fall Risk in Older Adults: An Exploratory Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05715112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GMI / StAmbroseU GMI fall risk
- Keywords
- Graded Motor Imagery, Balance, Fall Risk, Elderly
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Ambrose UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine if there is any carry over effect of sensation training for the feet, officially called Graded Motor Imagery (GMI), will impact balance and fall risk factors in older individuals. This will be looked at to see if there is a difference in balance and sensation before and right after the training.
Detailed description
In order to increase acuity of body maps, various tactile and movement-based strategies have been recommended and supported for research focusing on sensory discrimination. Current evidence, specific to painful conditions related to altered cortical mapping, have shown growing evidence in reducing pain and disability. In regards to it's ability to alter foot pain in older adults and decreasing fall risk, prior conference case study and case series presentations have suggested potential clinical benefit, but it has not been formally studied. The aim of this study is to determine if a sensory discrimination training for feet in older adults can alleviate pain, improve sensory discrimination, and also decrease fall risk. Specifically, does a 20 minute training session improve pain, balance (Brief-BEST test), and sensory discrimination in individuals over 65 years of age. Secondary analysis may exam characteristics that best identify those who benefit from this training.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | – | Procedure: Graded Motor ImageryA convenience sample of older adults (65 and older). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- A convenience sample of older adults (65 and older) will be recruited for the study.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Be able to read and understand English
- Be over the age of 65
- Be independent with ambulation (with or without an assistive device)
- Not have any skin condition or injury to the plantar or dorsal part of the foot
- Have the visual ability to view images on a tablet to partake in a test
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- No existing skin conditions on the bottom of the foot that would impair sensation
- No current injury to the plantar or dorsal side of the foot
- No prior surgery or major injury to the plantar or dorsal side of the foot
- Lacking sensation in the foot
- Unable to read and understand English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Graded Motor ImageryAlso: GMIGMI consisting of education, sensory integration of the foot using contact, flooring samples, immersion, and two point discrimination. | Procedure or surgery | Experimental group |
Primary outcome
Lower extremity pain rating
Time frame: self-reported, change from before to immediately after treatment
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in pain for the lower extremity using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS - 0 to 10 where 0 = no pain and 10 + maximum pain)
Laterality Speed
Time frame: tested for 60 seconds before and immediately after treatment
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in speed of foot recognition using Recognize (TM) (speed in seconds to recognize each of 40 images as right or left foot)
Laterality Accuracy
Time frame: tested for 60 seconds before and immediately after treatment
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in accuracy of foot recognition using Recognize (TM) (percent accurately correctly identified as right or left foot of those 40 images)
Balance / fall risk
Time frame: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Brief-BESTest (6 task subsets to assess static and dynamic balance) (0 - 15 scale where 0 - lowest score / unstable and 15 = highest / no balance issues)
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of dominant hand
Time frame: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of web space of dominant hand (in pounds)
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of Right Foot
Time frame: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of right foot (in pounds)
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of Left Foot
Time frame: Assessed before and immediately after treatment
Change (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of left foot (in pounds)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Balance
RecruitingObservational study
Motor Development and Early Predictors of Psychomotor Outcomes in Preterm and Term Infants Assessed by MOS-R and Caregiver Questionnaire at 18 and 36 Months
Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Motor Skills Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Pilates vs. Core Stabilization for Balance and Mobility in Elderly Type 2 Diabetics
Mellitus Balance Deficits Postural Balance Mobility Limitation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
Effects of Breathing Exercises on Cognition in Older Adults
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Cognition
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergaming on Reaction Time, Physical Performance, and Muscle Activity in Children
Neuromuscular Performance, Reaction Time
Not yet recruiting
Dynamic Stabilometry Combined With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Balance and Motor Recovery After Ischemic Stroke
Hemiparesis, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin Farrell, PT, PhD principal investigator
St. Ambrose University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Balance and Fall Risk, run by St. Ambrose University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lower extremity pain rating (time frame: self-reported, change from before to immediately after treatment). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2023.