AzTrials
AzTrials

Eustachian Tube DysfunctionNCT05719207

Efficacy of Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube in Eustachian Tube Dilatory Dysfunction

A study testing Balloon dilation of eustachian tube in people with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Barotitis, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is being conducted to learn more about a procedure, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, in treating patients with eustachian tube dysfunction. Traditionally, eustachian tube dysfunction is treated with nasal steroid sprays and decongestants, or by placement of ear tubes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, Barotitis
What is being tested?
Balloon dilation of eustachian tube
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
76 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
25 Jun 2023to 1 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • >3 months of symptoms of ETDD (otalgia, ear pressure, muffled hearing, tinnitus, cracking or popping, feeling clogged) persistent at enrollment
  • Persistence of symptoms despite >4 weeks INCS or >7d course of systemic steroid within 6 months from enrollment
  • Documented Type B or C tympanogram at or within 6 months from enrollment
  • ETDQ7 ≥ 2.1 at enrollment
  • >12 months of baro-challenge induced symptoms occurring at least every 4 months within the past year
  • Symptoms include otalgia, ear pressure, muffled hearing, tinnitus, cracking or popping, feeling clogged, vertigo, or facial nerve palsy, which resolve within 3 days of pressure equalization.
  • Failure of at least one of: topical/oral decongestant, pneumatization device, and/or pressure relief ear plugs.

Who cannot join

  • Signs/symptoms of patulous eustachian tube dysfunction (autophony, tympanic membrane movement with breathing)
  • Adjunctive surgical procedure needed (ex. septoplasty, tympanostomy tube)
  • Presence of a tympanic membrane (TM) perforation or tympanostomy tube
  • Fluctuating SNHL, AOM, grade IV TM retraction, or tympanosclerosis of >50% of the TM
  • Uncontrolled sino-nasal disease, reflux, TMJ disorder, immunodeficiency, or allergies
  • Known ICA dehiscence of the bony ET of the symptomatic ear
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Recent head and neck surgery within the past 3 months or planned procedure during study
  • History of radiation to the head and neck
  • History of craniofacial abnormality
  • Prior ET intervention
  • Psychiatric condition or cognitive impairment which precludes capacity to consent.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Otology Clinic, Clinic 7A, South Health Campus

    Calgary, Alberta

    Justin Lui, MD, justin.lui@ucalgary.ca

    Recruiting
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center

    Toronto, Ontario

    Trung Le, MD, PhD, FRCSC, trung.le@sunnybrook.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube in Eustachian Tube Dilatory Dysfunction: a Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial

This study is being conducted to learn more about a procedure, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, in treating patients with eustachian tube dysfunction. Traditionally, eustachian tube dysfunction is treated with nasal steroid sprays and decongestants, or by placement of ear tubes. However, current evidence suggest that medical options are ineffective, and placement of ear tubes is not risk-free. The investigators are carrying out this research study with the following goals:

  1. Determine if balloon dilation of the eustachian tube is superior to a placebo procedure in treating patients with eustachian tube dilatory dysfunction
  2. Identify patient variables associated with positive response to balloon dilation of the eustachian tube
  3. Re-demonstrate the safety of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube
Read more

What does participation in this study involve? Participants in this study will:

  • Agree to be randomly assigned to undergo either: balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, or a placebo procedure, with the option to undergo dilation of the eustachian tube 6 weeks later
  • Agree to allowing the investigators access to their personal health information
  • Complete the following assessments and questionnaires in clinic before undergoing balloon dilation or placebo procedure:
  • A questionnaire to assess your eustachian tube dysfunction
  • An assessment of the movement of your ear drum (tympanogram)
  • A hearing test (audiogram)
  • A questionnaire to assess the impact of eustachian tube dysfunction on work/activity
  • A questionnaire to assess overall health-related quality of life
  • An assessment of the ability to equalize middle ear pressure(s)
  • Visual examination of the ear drums
  • Repeat the above assessments and questionnaires over the course of four follow-up appointments at 6-, 24-, and 52-weeks after the procedure.
Read the detailed description

Adult eustachian tube dilatory dysfunction (ETDD) accounts for over 2 million healthcare visits annually. It can cause longstanding negative middle ear pressure which may lead to otitis media with effusion, tympanic membrane retraction, perforation, middle ear atelectasis and cholesteatoma. Despite this, effective treatments for ETDD are unavailable. Recently, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) has gained popularity, where the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube undergoes local dilation with balloon inflation. This technique underwent industry-funded clinical trials in the United States demonstrating its safety and it's superiority to medical management. However, these studies are confounded by industry funding and lack of a blinded control group, the latter of which is critical in a condition where patient-reported outcome measures are relied on. Furthermore, the randomized studies to date do not include patients with baro-challenge ETDD, where symptoms are limited to the context of ambient pressure changes. As such, the investigators opted to perform a non-industry-funded, placebo-controlled trial including both chronic and baro-challenge ETDD patients in a Canadian setting.

Potential participants will be identified as possible study candidates with either chronic ETDD or baro-challenge ETDD, who have failed conservative management. At baseline, participants would undergo pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, and otoscopy. An ETDQ7, ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire would be completed. The patient's ability to equalize their middle ear pressure would be assessed by direct visualization of the tympanic membrane as the patient equalizes their middle ear pressure. For patients with baro-challenge ETDD, a baseline ad hoc questionnaire to quantify their symptoms will be completed as well.

Patients would then be randomized into BDET versus placebo groups. Patients in the experimental group undergoing BDET in-office will undergo dilation after anxiolytic pre-medication, nasal decongestion, as well as topical anesthesia of the lateral tympanic membrane, the eustachian tube orifice, and the nasal cavity. Patients randomized to the placebo group would undergo a similar procedure in-office, but without dilation of the eustachian tube. Patients in the experimental group with contraindication to in-office BDET will undergo BDET under general anesthetic in an operating room setting. The participants' first follow-up visit with the surgeon is at 6 weeks post-procedure, where patients in the placebo control group would be offered the option to cross-over into the BDET group. Follow up would also be repeated at 24 weeks and 52 weeks post-procedure.

Being tested
Balloon dilation of eustachian tube, Sham procedure
Keywords
BDET, ETD, ETDD, baro-challenge

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Balloon dilation of eustachian tubeDevice

    Also called Stryker XprESS LoProfile ENT dilation system (Stryker ENT, Plymouth, MN, USA.), Stryker Audion ET dilation system (Stryker ENT, Plymouth, MN, USA)

    Patients in the intervention group would undergo balloon dilation of the eustachian tube under local anesthetic in clinic. The Stryker XprESS LoProfile ENT dilation system or the Stryker Audion ET dilation system will be used.

  • Sham procedureOther

    Patients in the sham group will undergo the motions of an in-office dilation of the eustachian tube, without actually dilating the eustachian tube.

Study groups in NCT05719207
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Balloon dilation of eustachian tubeExperimentalThese patient will undergo balloon dilation dilation of the eustachian tube.
Receives: Device: Balloon dilation of eustachian tube
Sham procedureSham comparatorThese patients will undergo a sham procedure, where the motions of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube will be simulated.
Receives: Other: Sham procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in mean Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) score

    Score range 1-7, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms

    Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention

  2. Change in symptoms (ad hoc baro-challenge ETDD symptom questionnaire)

    Composite of quantitative and qualitative data points

    Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in tympanogram type and pressure at peak compliance

    Change from type C to A or type B to C or type B to A is considered improvement, and vice versa is considered deterioration. Pressure at peak compliance (continuous variable, where a value of zero is normal, and more negative values indicate worse ET function).

    Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention

  2. Change in audiogram (pure tone average thresholds)

    Pure tone average thresholds measured at 500hz, 1khz, 2khz, and 4khz, where values below 25dB are normal, and higher values indicate worse hearing. Air-bone gap at 500hz, 1khz, 2khz, 4khz where normal value is 0dB, and higher values indicate worse conductive hearing.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  3. Improvement in ability to equalize middle ear pressure

    Qualitative measure where inability to equalize middle ear pressures is a negative outcome.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention

  4. Tympanic membrane position on otoscopy

    Qualitative measure where the tympanic membrane will be in a normal position, or in an abnormal retracted position.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention

  5. Ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire score

    Score range 1-7, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms

    Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2023
  2. Study start25 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel design with optional crossover from control to intervention at 6 weeks.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
76 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05719207
Sponsor's protocol ID
REB22-1601
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
15 Jan 2023
Last updated
3 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Aleinati M, Spiegel JL, Le TN, Lui JT. In-office balloon dilation for baro-challenge-induced Eustachian tube dysfunction: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Jun 17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09853-7. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42310698

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Balloon dilation of eustachian tube in people with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Barotitis, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jaimi Workun (403-764-4755 ext. 4, jaimi.workun@albertahealthservices.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in mean Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) score (time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05719207, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in