Eustachian Tube DysfunctionNCT05719207
Efficacy of Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube in Eustachian Tube Dilatory Dysfunction
A study testing Balloon dilation of eustachian tube in people with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Barotitis, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This study is being conducted to learn more about a procedure, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, in treating patients with eustachian tube dysfunction. Traditionally, eustachian tube dysfunction is treated with nasal steroid sprays and decongestants, or by placement of ear tubes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, Barotitis
- What is being tested?
- Balloon dilation of eustachian tube
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 25 Jun 2023to 1 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >3 months of symptoms of ETDD (otalgia, ear pressure, muffled hearing, tinnitus, cracking or popping, feeling clogged) persistent at enrollment
- Persistence of symptoms despite >4 weeks INCS or >7d course of systemic steroid within 6 months from enrollment
- Documented Type B or C tympanogram at or within 6 months from enrollment
- ETDQ7 ≥ 2.1 at enrollment
- >12 months of baro-challenge induced symptoms occurring at least every 4 months within the past year
- Symptoms include otalgia, ear pressure, muffled hearing, tinnitus, cracking or popping, feeling clogged, vertigo, or facial nerve palsy, which resolve within 3 days of pressure equalization.
- Failure of at least one of: topical/oral decongestant, pneumatization device, and/or pressure relief ear plugs.
Who cannot join
- Signs/symptoms of patulous eustachian tube dysfunction (autophony, tympanic membrane movement with breathing)
- Adjunctive surgical procedure needed (ex. septoplasty, tympanostomy tube)
- Presence of a tympanic membrane (TM) perforation or tympanostomy tube
- Fluctuating SNHL, AOM, grade IV TM retraction, or tympanosclerosis of >50% of the TM
- Uncontrolled sino-nasal disease, reflux, TMJ disorder, immunodeficiency, or allergies
- Known ICA dehiscence of the bony ET of the symptomatic ear
Show all 11Show fewer
- Recent head and neck surgery within the past 3 months or planned procedure during study
- History of radiation to the head and neck
- History of craniofacial abnormality
- Prior ET intervention
- Psychiatric condition or cognitive impairment which precludes capacity to consent.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Otology Clinic, Clinic 7A, South Health Campus
Calgary, Alberta
Justin Lui, MD, justin.lui@ucalgary.ca
- Recruiting
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
Toronto, Ontario
Trung Le, MD, PhD, FRCSC, trung.le@sunnybrook.ca
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube in Eustachian Tube Dilatory Dysfunction: a Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial
This study is being conducted to learn more about a procedure, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, in treating patients with eustachian tube dysfunction. Traditionally, eustachian tube dysfunction is treated with nasal steroid sprays and decongestants, or by placement of ear tubes. However, current evidence suggest that medical options are ineffective, and placement of ear tubes is not risk-free. The investigators are carrying out this research study with the following goals:
- Determine if balloon dilation of the eustachian tube is superior to a placebo procedure in treating patients with eustachian tube dilatory dysfunction
- Identify patient variables associated with positive response to balloon dilation of the eustachian tube
- Re-demonstrate the safety of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube
Read more
What does participation in this study involve? Participants in this study will:
- Agree to be randomly assigned to undergo either: balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, or a placebo procedure, with the option to undergo dilation of the eustachian tube 6 weeks later
- Agree to allowing the investigators access to their personal health information
- Complete the following assessments and questionnaires in clinic before undergoing balloon dilation or placebo procedure:
- A questionnaire to assess your eustachian tube dysfunction
- An assessment of the movement of your ear drum (tympanogram)
- A hearing test (audiogram)
- A questionnaire to assess the impact of eustachian tube dysfunction on work/activity
- A questionnaire to assess overall health-related quality of life
- An assessment of the ability to equalize middle ear pressure(s)
- Visual examination of the ear drums
- Repeat the above assessments and questionnaires over the course of four follow-up appointments at 6-, 24-, and 52-weeks after the procedure.
Read the detailed description
Adult eustachian tube dilatory dysfunction (ETDD) accounts for over 2 million healthcare visits annually. It can cause longstanding negative middle ear pressure which may lead to otitis media with effusion, tympanic membrane retraction, perforation, middle ear atelectasis and cholesteatoma. Despite this, effective treatments for ETDD are unavailable. Recently, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) has gained popularity, where the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube undergoes local dilation with balloon inflation. This technique underwent industry-funded clinical trials in the United States demonstrating its safety and it's superiority to medical management. However, these studies are confounded by industry funding and lack of a blinded control group, the latter of which is critical in a condition where patient-reported outcome measures are relied on. Furthermore, the randomized studies to date do not include patients with baro-challenge ETDD, where symptoms are limited to the context of ambient pressure changes. As such, the investigators opted to perform a non-industry-funded, placebo-controlled trial including both chronic and baro-challenge ETDD patients in a Canadian setting.
Potential participants will be identified as possible study candidates with either chronic ETDD or baro-challenge ETDD, who have failed conservative management. At baseline, participants would undergo pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, and otoscopy. An ETDQ7, ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire would be completed. The patient's ability to equalize their middle ear pressure would be assessed by direct visualization of the tympanic membrane as the patient equalizes their middle ear pressure. For patients with baro-challenge ETDD, a baseline ad hoc questionnaire to quantify their symptoms will be completed as well.
Patients would then be randomized into BDET versus placebo groups. Patients in the experimental group undergoing BDET in-office will undergo dilation after anxiolytic pre-medication, nasal decongestion, as well as topical anesthesia of the lateral tympanic membrane, the eustachian tube orifice, and the nasal cavity. Patients randomized to the placebo group would undergo a similar procedure in-office, but without dilation of the eustachian tube. Patients in the experimental group with contraindication to in-office BDET will undergo BDET under general anesthetic in an operating room setting. The participants' first follow-up visit with the surgeon is at 6 weeks post-procedure, where patients in the placebo control group would be offered the option to cross-over into the BDET group. Follow up would also be repeated at 24 weeks and 52 weeks post-procedure.
- Conditions
- Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, Barotitis
- Being tested
- Balloon dilation of eustachian tube, Sham procedure
- Keywords
- BDET, ETD, ETDD, baro-challenge
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Balloon dilation of eustachian tubeDevice
Also called Stryker XprESS LoProfile ENT dilation system (Stryker ENT, Plymouth, MN, USA.), Stryker Audion ET dilation system (Stryker ENT, Plymouth, MN, USA)
Patients in the intervention group would undergo balloon dilation of the eustachian tube under local anesthetic in clinic. The Stryker XprESS LoProfile ENT dilation system or the Stryker Audion ET dilation system will be used.
Sham procedureOther
Patients in the sham group will undergo the motions of an in-office dilation of the eustachian tube, without actually dilating the eustachian tube.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Balloon dilation of eustachian tube | Experimental | These patient will undergo balloon dilation dilation of the eustachian tube. Receives: Device: Balloon dilation of eustachian tube |
| Sham procedure | Sham comparator | These patients will undergo a sham procedure, where the motions of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube will be simulated. Receives: Other: Sham procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in mean Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) score
Score range 1-7, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms
Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Change in symptoms (ad hoc baro-challenge ETDD symptom questionnaire)
Composite of quantitative and qualitative data points
Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in tympanogram type and pressure at peak compliance
Change from type C to A or type B to C or type B to A is considered improvement, and vice versa is considered deterioration. Pressure at peak compliance (continuous variable, where a value of zero is normal, and more negative values indicate worse ET function).
Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Change in audiogram (pure tone average thresholds)
Pure tone average thresholds measured at 500hz, 1khz, 2khz, and 4khz, where values below 25dB are normal, and higher values indicate worse hearing. Air-bone gap at 500hz, 1khz, 2khz, 4khz where normal value is 0dB, and higher values indicate worse conductive hearing.
Measured: 24 weeks
Improvement in ability to equalize middle ear pressure
Qualitative measure where inability to equalize middle ear pressures is a negative outcome.
Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Tympanic membrane position on otoscopy
Qualitative measure where the tympanic membrane will be in a normal position, or in an abnormal retracted position.
Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire score
Score range 1-7, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms
Measured: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2023
- Study start25 Jun 2023
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Eustachian Tube DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel design with optional crossover from control to intervention at 6 weeks.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Justin Lui, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Justin Lui, MD, FRCSC, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05719207
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB22-1601
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aleinati M, Spiegel JL, Le TN, Lui JT. In-office balloon dilation for baro-challenge-induced Eustachian tube dysfunction: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Jun 17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09853-7. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42310698
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube in Eustachian Tube Dilatory Dysfunction: a Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05719207
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REB22-1601
- Conditions
- Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, Barotitis
- Keywords
- BDET, ETD, ETDD, baro-challenge
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is being conducted to learn more about a procedure, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, in treating patients with eustachian tube dysfunction. Traditionally, eustachian tube dysfunction is treated with nasal steroid sprays and decongestants, or by placement of ear tubes. However, current evidence suggest that medical options are ineffective, and placement of ear tubes is not risk-free. The investigators are carrying out this research study with the following goals:
- Determine if balloon dilation of the eustachian tube is superior to a placebo procedure in treating patients with eustachian tube dilatory dysfunction
- Identify patient variables associated with positive response to balloon dilation of the eustachian tube
- Re-demonstrate the safety of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube
What does participation in this study involve? Participants in this study will:
- Agree to be randomly assigned to undergo either: balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, or a placebo procedure, with the option to undergo dilation of the eustachian tube 6 weeks later
- Agree to allowing the investigators access to their personal health information
- Complete the following assessments and questionnaires in clinic before undergoing balloon dilation or placebo procedure:
- A questionnaire to assess your eustachian tube dysfunction
- An assessment of the movement of your ear drum (tympanogram)
- A hearing test (audiogram)
- A questionnaire to assess the impact of eustachian tube dysfunction on work/activity
- A questionnaire to assess overall health-related quality of life
- An assessment of the ability to equalize middle ear pressure(s)
- Visual examination of the ear drums
- Repeat the above assessments and questionnaires over the course of four follow-up appointments at 6-, 24-, and 52-weeks after the procedure.
Detailed description
Adult eustachian tube dilatory dysfunction (ETDD) accounts for over 2 million healthcare visits annually. It can cause longstanding negative middle ear pressure which may lead to otitis media with effusion, tympanic membrane retraction, perforation, middle ear atelectasis and cholesteatoma. Despite this, effective treatments for ETDD are unavailable. Recently, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) has gained popularity, where the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube undergoes local dilation with balloon inflation. This technique underwent industry-funded clinical trials in the United States demonstrating its safety and it's superiority to medical management. However, these studies are confounded by industry funding and lack of a blinded control group, the latter of which is critical in a condition where patient-reported outcome measures are relied on. Furthermore, the randomized studies to date do not include patients with baro-challenge ETDD, where symptoms are limited to the context of ambient pressure changes. As such, the investigators opted to perform a non-industry-funded, placebo-controlled trial including both chronic and baro-challenge ETDD patients in a Canadian setting.
Potential participants will be identified as possible study candidates with either chronic ETDD or baro-challenge ETDD, who have failed conservative management. At baseline, participants would undergo pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, and otoscopy. An ETDQ7, ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire would be completed. The patient's ability to equalize their middle ear pressure would be assessed by direct visualization of the tympanic membrane as the patient equalizes their middle ear pressure. For patients with baro-challenge ETDD, a baseline ad hoc questionnaire to quantify their symptoms will be completed as well.
Patients would then be randomized into BDET versus placebo groups. Patients in the experimental group undergoing BDET in-office will undergo dilation after anxiolytic pre-medication, nasal decongestion, as well as topical anesthesia of the lateral tympanic membrane, the eustachian tube orifice, and the nasal cavity. Patients randomized to the placebo group would undergo a similar procedure in-office, but without dilation of the eustachian tube. Patients in the experimental group with contraindication to in-office BDET will undergo BDET under general anesthetic in an operating room setting. The participants' first follow-up visit with the surgeon is at 6 weeks post-procedure, where patients in the placebo control group would be offered the option to cross-over into the BDET group. Follow up would also be repeated at 24 weeks and 52 weeks post-procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel design with optional crossover from control to intervention at 6 weeks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Balloon dilation of eustachian tube | Experimental | Device: Balloon dilation of eustachian tubeThese patient will undergo balloon dilation dilation of the eustachian tube. |
| Sham procedure | Sham comparator | Other: Sham procedureThese patients will undergo a sham procedure, where the motions of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube will be simulated. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- >3 months of symptoms of ETDD (otalgia, ear pressure, muffled hearing, tinnitus, cracking or popping, feeling clogged) persistent at enrollment
- Persistence of symptoms despite >4 weeks INCS or >7d course of systemic steroid within 6 months from enrollment
- Documented Type B or C tympanogram at or within 6 months from enrollment
- ETDQ7 ≥ 2.1 at enrollment
- >12 months of baro-challenge induced symptoms occurring at least every 4 months within the past year
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Signs/symptoms of patulous eustachian tube dysfunction (autophony, tympanic membrane movement with breathing)
- Adjunctive surgical procedure needed (ex. septoplasty, tympanostomy tube)
- Presence of a tympanic membrane (TM) perforation or tympanostomy tube
- Fluctuating SNHL, AOM, grade IV TM retraction, or tympanosclerosis of >50% of the TM
- Uncontrolled sino-nasal disease, reflux, TMJ disorder, immunodeficiency, or allergies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Balloon dilation of eustachian tubeAlso: Stryker XprESS LoProfile ENT dilation system (Stryker ENT, Plymouth, MN, USA.), Stryker Audion ET dilation system (Stryker ENT, Plymouth, MN, USA)Patients in the intervention group would undergo balloon dilation of the eustachian tube under local anesthetic in clinic. The Stryker XprESS LoProfile ENT dilation system or the Stryker Audion ET dilation system will be used. | Device | Balloon dilation of eustachian tube |
| Sham procedurePatients in the sham group will undergo the motions of an in-office dilation of the eustachian tube, without actually dilating the eustachian tube. | Other | Sham procedure |
Primary outcome
Change in mean Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) score
Time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Score range 1-7, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms
Change in symptoms (ad hoc baro-challenge ETDD symptom questionnaire)
Time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Composite of quantitative and qualitative data points
5 secondary outcomes
Change in tympanogram type and pressure at peak compliance
Time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Change in audiogram (pure tone average thresholds)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Improvement in ability to equalize middle ear pressure
Time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Tympanic membrane position on otoscopy
Time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire score
Time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42310698Aleinati M, Spiegel JL, Le TN, Lui JT. In-office balloon dilation for baro-challenge-induced Eustachian tube dysfunction: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Jun 17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09853-7. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Recruiting
Nasal Dilator Therapy for Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
EarFlo: A Non-Invasive Treatment for Otitis Media With Effusion & Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults
Otitis Media With Effusion (OME), Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
Active vs. Passive VR During Office-based ENT Procedures
Pain, Anxiety
RecruitingObservational study
AERA Pediatrics Registry
Dysfunction of Eustachian Tube
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Diagnostic Precision and Accuracy Using the Teed Scoring System Versus the O'Neill Grading System
Otic Barotrauma, Pressure Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Justin Lui, MD, FRCSC principal investigator
University of Calgary
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Balloon dilation of eustachian tube in people with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Barotitis, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jaimi Workun (403-764-4755 ext. 4, jaimi.workun@albertahealthservices.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in mean Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) score (time frame: 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05719207, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025.