AzTrials
AzTrials

BronchiolectasisNCT05719597

PEP Breathing Versus Incentive Spirometry on Dyspnea and Sputum Profile in Bronchiolectasis Patients

A study testing PEP (Positive Expiratory Pressure) and IS (Incentive spirometry) in people with Bronchiolectasis, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bronchiolectasis is the manifestation of chronic bronchitis characterized by saccular dilatation of the terminal bronchioles \& bronchiectasis refers to abnormal dilatation of the bronchi. In bronchiolectasis more proximal bronchi may or may not show radiological changes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Bronchiolectasis
What is being tested?
PEP (Positive Expiratory Pressure) and IS (Incentive spirometry)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 Jun 2022to 30 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age group of 22 to 85 years
  • Both GenderCOVID-19 negative
  • Indoor patients
  • Ability to use PEP devices
  • Diagnosed Bronchiolectasis Patients (through CT scan, X-Ray)

Who cannot join

  • Rib fracture
  • Neurological problems
  • Lungs carcinomas
  • Any other serious comorbidity

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Mayo Hospital Lahore

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure Breathing Versus Incentive Spirometry on Dyspnea and Sputum Profile in Bronchiolectasis Patients

Bronchiolectasis is the manifestation of chronic bronchitis characterized by saccular dilatation of the terminal bronchioles \& bronchiectasis refers to abnormal dilatation of the bronchi. In bronchiolectasis more proximal bronchi may or may not show radiological changes. Airway dilatation can lead to failure of mucus clearance and increased risk of infection. Pathophysiological mechanism of bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis include persistent bacterial infections, deregulated immune responses, impaired mucociliary clearance and airway obstruction. Treatment is directed at reducing the frequency of exacerbations, improving quality of life. Although no therapy is licensed for bronchiectasis by regulatory agencies, evidence supports the effectiveness of airway clearance techniques, antibiotics and mucolytic agents. Enhancing effective expectoration of stagnated bronchopulmonary secretions, usually with physiotherapy support, is key to management. There are different methods for delivering chest physiotherapy, such as the active cycle of breathing technique, postural drainage, (PEP) and oscillating PEP devices. The objective of the study is to compare the effects of PEP \& Incentive spirometry techniques on bronchiolectasis patients.

The study will be a randomized clinical trial. Total 24 subjects will be assigned randomly into two groups by using convenient sampling technique. Baseline treatment will be same (chest physiotherapy) in both groups. Group A will use PEP and Group B will use incentive spirometry technique for total 60 repetitions (15 repetitions 2 sets, two times per a day) 5 sessions per week and total 4 weeks. Dyspnea severity index and cough \& sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) would be used as an outcome measurement tools. Measurements will be taken at Baseline, and at the end of the 4 weeks treatment session. After assessing the normality, data will be analyzed by using parametric and non-parametric tests.

Being tested
PEP (Positive Expiratory Pressure), IS (Incentive spirometry)
Keywords
Bronchiolectasis, Dyspnea Severity Index, Incentive Spirometry, Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP), Saccular Dilation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEP (Positive Expiratory Pressure)Other

    Group A containing 12 participants, will perform Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) technique for total 60 repetitions (15 repetitions 2 sets, twice) per a day (5 sessions/week and total 4 weeks).

  • IS (Incentive spirometry)Other

    Group B containing 12 participants, will perform Incentive spirometry technique for total 60 repetitions (15 repetitions 2 sets, twice) per a day (5 sessions/week and total 4 weeks).

Study groups in NCT05719597
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PEP (Positive Expiratory Pressure)ExperimentalGroup A
Receives: Other: PEP (Positive Expiratory Pressure)
IS (Incentive Spirometry)ExperimentalGroup B
Receives: Other: IS (Incentive spirometry)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dyspnea Severity Index

    The Dyspnea severity index is a patient-centered questionnaire that can be used for assessment of initial severity of dyspnea symptoms related to the upper airway and can also be used as a follow-up assessment tool to evaluate treatment outcomes and drive evidence-based medical decisions.

    Measured: 4 Weeks

  2. Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q)

    The CASA-Q is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses cough and sputum based on their frequency, severity, and impact on daily activities in the previous 7 days. The CASA-Q contains four domains: cough symptoms, cough impact, sputum symptoms, and sputum impact.

    Measured: 4 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2023
  2. Study start1 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05719597
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCR&AHS/22/0352
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
31 Jan 2023
Last updated
9 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Anderson WH, Coakley RD, Button B, Henderson AG, Zeman KL, Alexis NE, Peden DB, Lazarowski ER, Davis CW, Bailey S, Fuller F, Almond M, Qaqish B, Bordonali E, Rubinstein M, Bennett WD, Kesimer M, Boucher RC. The Relationship of Mucus Concentration (Hydration) to Mucus Osmotic Pressure and Transport in Chronic Bronchitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul 15;192(2):182-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201412-2230OC.

    PubMed 25909230
  • King PT. The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:411-9. doi: 10.2147/copd.s6133. Epub 2009 Nov 29.

    PubMed 20037680
  • WISOFF CP. Bronchiolectasis in chronic bronchitis. Radiology. 1958 Jun;70(6):848-50. doi: 10.1148/70.6.848. No abstract available.

    PubMed 13554852
  • Redondo M, Keyt H, Dhar R, Chalmers JD. Global impact of bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis. Breathe (Sheff). 2016 Sep;12(3):222-235. doi: 10.1183/20734735.007516.

    PubMed 28210295
  • King PT, Holdsworth SR, Freezer NJ, Villanueva E, Holmes PW. Characterisation of the onset and presenting clinical features of adult bronchiectasis. Respir Med. 2006 Dec;100(12):2183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 May 2.

    PubMed 16650970
  • Dodd JD, Lavelle LP, Fabre A, Brady D. Imaging in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;36(2):194-206. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546749. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

    PubMed 25826587
  • Chalmers JD, Chang AB, Chotirmall SH, Dhar R, McShane PJ. Bronchiectasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Nov 15;4(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0042-3.

    PubMed 30442957
  • Lee AL, Williamson HC, Lorensini S, Spencer LM. The effects of oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy in adults with stable non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2015 Feb;12(1):36-46. doi: 10.1177/1479972314562407. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

    PubMed 25518845
  • Gartner-Schmidt JL, Shembel AC, Zullo TG, Rosen CA. Development and validation of the Dyspnea Index (DI): a severity index for upper airway-related dyspnea. J Voice. 2014 Nov;28(6):775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Oct 12.

    PubMed 25311596
  • Reychler G, Uribe Rodriguez V, Hickmann CE, Tombal B, Laterre PF, Feyaerts A, Roeseler J. Incentive spirometry and positive expiratory pressure improve ventilation and recruitment in postoperative recovery: A randomized crossover study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Mar;35(3):199-205. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1443185. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

    PubMed 29485340

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PEP (Positive Expiratory Pressure) and IS (Incentive spirometry) in people with Bronchiolectasis, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dyspnea Severity Index (time frame: 4 Weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05719597, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in