Oral CancerRonco-OncoNCT05719779
Tolerance and Benefits of Mandibular Advanced Device for Snoring and Sleep Apnea in Oropharyngeal Cancer.
A study testing Ronco-Onco and MAD in people with Oral Cancer and Pharynx Cancer, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Evaluation of the Tolerance and Benefits of Mandibular Advanced Device (MAD) for Snoring and Sleep Apnea in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC): Mixed Design Study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Oral Cancer, Pharynx Cancer, Sleep Apnea
- What is being tested?
- Ronco-Onco and MAD
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 3 Feb 2023to 30 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis
- 18 years of age and over
- female or male; ratio of 1/4 toward men
- had received RTH in the Department of Radiation Oncology,
- reporting snoring and/or respiratory cessation complaints during sleep,
Who cannot join
- pregnant or breastfeeding woman;
- edentation preventing retention of the oral appliance;
- taking opioid or anxiolitic type medications;
- history of major depression,
- uncontrolled hypertension,
- history of stroke;
Show all 10Show fewer
- under treatment with CPAP for sleep apnea;
- regular and intense orofacial pain;
- under pharmacological treatment for insomnia;
- excessive alcohol or drug use (e.g., cannabis, opioid).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H3X 3E4
Karine Peaupert, 514-890-8000 ext. 14730
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Tolerance and Benefits of Mandibular Advanced Device for Snoring and Sleep Apnea in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer: Mixed Design Study.
Evaluation of the Tolerance and Benefits of Mandibular Advanced Device (MAD) for Snoring and Sleep Apnea in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC): Mixed Design Study.
Read the detailed description
The department of stomatology of the CHUM (Centre Hospitalier Université de Montreal) mandate is to ensure oral management of patients with oropharyngeal cancers (OPC), including papillomavirus (HPV), treated with radiotherapy (RTH), surgery and chemotherapy. At CHUM clinic, several patients who have had RTH treatments (with or without surgery or/and chemotherapy) complain of snoring and respiratory arrest during sleep. HPV-associated OPC, squamous cell carcinoma, has had a net increasing incidence for more than 20 years in North America (4.6/100,000) and male mortality has increased by 3.1% per year since 2001. In Quebec, the incidence is almost 26 cases per million. Worldwide, it is ranked to be the 13 most common cancer in male aged 25-39 years; the male/female ratio is 2.5 (female have more HPV cervix related cancer) - Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030- (Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022).
Snoring occurs in nearly 40% of the general population, increases with age and can be one of the telltale signs of sleep apnea (brief and repetitive breathing stops at risk of mortality if left untreated). Snoring can be associated with poor sleep quality and produces a loud disturbing noise for the sleeping partner. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is reported by 2-4% of the general population and by almost 30% of the elderly mainly related to obesity and heart disorders. The risk factors associated with these conditions are lost of airway muscle tone during sleep, retrognathia, deep/narrow palate, obesity and age. Fatigue and drowsiness are markers of OSA. Following RTH, there may be oropharyngeal tissue fibrosis that may contribute to snoring and sleep apnea.
Sleep disordered breathing are known in individuals with OPC. Our first results of the ongoing survey seem to indicate that severe snoring, causing drowsiness or fatigue, would be present in 47% of patients with OPC. A recently published literature review, from our team, also found a snoring self-reports prevalence from 33% to 82%. A polygraphic sleep recording study found that 65% of individuals with head and neck cancer (including OPC) have snoring, a value that increases to 92% when OSA is concomitant. On the other hand, OSA seem to be present in over 70% of OPC patients, before and after treatment. However, causality remains to be demonstrated; these sleep disorders are often pre-existing and can worsen as a result of RTH.
In adults, snoring is mainly controlled by devices correcting the dorsal position of sleep as well as with mandibular advanced device (MAD). Regarding apnea, positive pressure vessels (PPC or CPAP) are the most effective. The MAD is indicated for mild to moderate OSA or for low CPAP tolerance. To date, following RTH, there are no studies conducted under strict conditions. Some 'suggestions' in favour of standard treatments, PPC or MAD, were made. In addition, no studies have estimated the nasal discomfort and dryness associated with these treatments in the OPC population. Intuitively, nylon MAD, thin and with little contact on the mucous membranes, could be indicated in the presence of OPC. To date, only one study, based on 2 cases, suggests the use of MAD in the presence of OPC. There is therefore a gap of evidences in the literature as to whether patients treated for OPC presenting snoring and OSA would be able to tolerate and benefit from MAD.
Objectives: Conduct a pilot study, with a mixed quantitative and qualitative design, to reduce snoring or sleep apnea using an MAD, and improve the quality of life and sleep.
Hypotheses: Individuals who have received RTH as part of a treatment for OPC and who have snoring or OSA, can 1) tolerate and 2) benefit from treatment with MAD.
Experimental method and approach.
- Study design: Pilot trial, mixed and sequential design, randomized with active MAD vs. non-active MAD (control) and single-blind condition analyses for the participant. The D-SAD nylon MAD is marketed by Panthera Dental (Quebec) and provided free of charge as part of this project. The study includes a total of 8 visits to CHUM: 5 for clinical appointments and 3 nights of home sleep data collection. The 3 nights of sleep recordings will be spaced 4-5 weeks apart for adaptation to MAD. Night 1 will be for basal level, and nights 2 and 3 for recordings with active MAD or control. This will be done under the supervision of sleep lab director of CHUM, collaborator for over 25 years and residents. -- - Population: Adult patients (+18 years, female or male; ratio of 1/4 toward men; female is a rare phenotype of OSA pre-menopause) who received RTH in the Department of Radiation Oncology, with snoring-respiratory complaints during sleep, and follow-up in Stomatology at CHUM for OPC. Exclusions: Pregnant or breastfeeding woman; edentation preventing retention of the MAD; taking opioid-type medications; history of major depression, uncontrolled hypertension, stroke; under treatment with CPAP for sleep apnea; regular and intense orofacial pain; under pharmacological treatment for insomnia; excessive alcohol or drug use (e.g., cannabis, opioid). Recruitment: With the help of CHUM radiation oncology and dental staff (dentist and dental hygienist, resident). An informed consent will be completed.
- Sample size: It is expected that 24 participants (risk of 2-4 dropouts based on our experience) will be recuited. A 30% reduction in snoring and apnea/h is expected; this based on publications and an estimate of sample size. Indeed, a statistician, estimated that for a 30% decrease in snoring/night time (base at 8.9%/night, SD 3.4%) 15 participants are required for an effect size (ES) of 0.79; for apnea-hypopnea index/h (base at 11.5, SD 5)19 participants are required for a ES of 0.7. For subjective reports of snoring intensity (9 participants are required; ES of 1.11), however, an article reported significant results with 18 subjects. [20] A final sample of 20-22 subjects is targeted. These estimates are comparable to those in our previous orthotic studies of bruxism and OSA populations done by our group members.
- Types of data and collection: After completing the consent, the participant will be asked to complete demographic, sleep and basic medical information. It will be built from validated questionnaires estimating quality of life (SF-12), sleep (PSQI), sleepiness (Epworth), risk of apnea (Stop Bang), fatigue (Chalder), and orofacial pain. The data will be entered via WEB (REDCap) and saved on the CHUM/CITADELLE server. Following the 3 home sleep recordings, paticipants will assess on questionnaire their perception of change in sleep quality based on the validated scales used in our previous studies on apnea and MAD. In addition, the comfort of MAD (tolerance) and the perception of the spouse will also be estimated as in our previous studies. The quantitative home sleep data, namely duration and snoring indexes, apnea-hypopnea, instability and sleep duration, will be calculated, as already published, by the measurements obtained (breathing, oxygen saturation, sleep position, pulse, snoring) with the ambulatory recording instruments (Alice TM, Philips, USA) from CHUM sleep laboratory and analyzed by qualified technical staff. Qualitative data on MAD treatment expectations and oral health experiences related to POC (chewing, pain) will be estimated in a subgroup of participants (n=15), before and after MAD treatment. This will be done by a semi-structured interview.
- Statistics and design for analysis: Like sleep analyses, the results will be analyzed blindly with the following tests: 1) parametric tests such as: t-test for inter-group comparisons, linear mixed models and linear mixed models for repeated measurements, followed by contrasts for post-hoc comparisons where appropriate using the Tukey method (SPSS software); 2) nonparametric tests such as chi-square, Mann-Whitney and non-parametric ANOVA for repeated measurements followed by contrasts for post-hoc comparisons where appropriate using the Tukey method (for category data and/or when the data distribution does not correspond to a normal distribution); 3) correlation tests, such as Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, if applicable. A biostatistician will oversee the analyses. Qualitative data will be analyzed to extract recurring themes from transcripts of verbatims using software, N*VIVO. The collection of themes will be done until saturation. The software allows data coding and categorization for final analysis .
- Conditions
- Oral Cancer, Pharynx Cancer, Sleep Apnea, Snoring, Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Ronco-Onco and MAD
- Keywords
- oropharyngeal cancer, snoring, sleep apnea, oral appliance
- Medical subject headings
- Mouth Neoplasms, Pharyngeal Neoplasms, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Snoring, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ronco-Onco and MADDevice
Comparison of active over a neutral mandibular advacement oral appliance to assess tolerance and efficacy in oropharyngeal cancer individuals in managing snoring and sleep apnea following radiotherapy of oropharynx.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MAD-active | Active comparator | MAD = mandibular advancement appliance, in 60-70% forward position from maximum possible jaw advancement for a given participant Receives: Device: Ronco-Onco and MAD |
| Neutral MAD- control | Sham comparator | Mandibular advancement appliance in neurtral-control position, 10-20% of advancement - a non functional position to open upper airway Receives: Device: Ronco-Onco and MAD |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Index apnea-hypopnea
respiratory cessation index (number of event per hour of sleep, 1 to max of 100, rare value)
Measured: From sleep onset to wake time (6-8 hrs) in morning of night 1 for baseline vs difference of 2 or 3 according to ramdom allocation
Snoring
Total snoring time (minute per sleep duration of a given participant, average as mean or median) and event frequency (number of event per hour of sleep) - values expected from 0 to 100 for each outcome
Measured: From sleep onset to wake time (6-8 hrs) in morning of night 1 for baseline vs difference of 2 or 3 according to ramdom allocation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Sleep quality
Duration (estimated by participant in number of hour) and self perception of quality (0-10 visual analog scale)
Measured: Done in morning from 6-8 sleep period, assessed in morning of each of 3 nights
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2023
- Study start3 Feb 2023
- Primary completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Oral CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Active oral appliance in 60-70% advanced position of maximum jaw possible advancement for a given participant over the control position= neutral position one in 10-20% (no fucntional opening of upper airway at that position)
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05719779
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22.204
- Acronym
- Ronco-Onco
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: To follow our institutional guidelines
Publications
Dal Fabbro C, Harris P, Dufresne E, Herrero Babiloni A, Mayer P, Bahig H, Filion E, Nguyen F, Ghannoum J, Schmittbuhl M, Lavigne G. Orofacial Pain and Snoring/Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Individuals with Head and Neck Cancer: A Critical Review. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2022 Spring;36(2):85-102. doi: 10.11607/ofph.3176.
PubMed 35943322
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Tolerance and Benefits of Mandibular Advanced Device for Snoring and Sleep Apnea in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer: Mixed Design Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05719779
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ronco-Onco / 22.204
- Conditions
- Oral Cancer, Pharynx Cancer, Sleep Apnea, Snoring, Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Keywords
- oropharyngeal cancer, snoring, sleep apnea, oral appliance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluation of the Tolerance and Benefits of Mandibular Advanced Device (MAD) for Snoring and Sleep Apnea in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC): Mixed Design Study.
Detailed description
The department of stomatology of the CHUM (Centre Hospitalier Université de Montreal) mandate is to ensure oral management of patients with oropharyngeal cancers (OPC), including papillomavirus (HPV), treated with radiotherapy (RTH), surgery and chemotherapy. At CHUM clinic, several patients who have had RTH treatments (with or without surgery or/and chemotherapy) complain of snoring and respiratory arrest during sleep. HPV-associated OPC, squamous cell carcinoma, has had a net increasing incidence for more than 20 years in North America (4.6/100,000) and male mortality has increased by 3.1% per year since 2001. In Quebec, the incidence is almost 26 cases per million. Worldwide, it is ranked to be the 13 most common cancer in male aged 25-39 years; the male/female ratio is 2.5 (female have more HPV cervix related cancer) - Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030- (Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022).
Snoring occurs in nearly 40% of the general population, increases with age and can be one of the telltale signs of sleep apnea (brief and repetitive breathing stops at risk of mortality if left untreated). Snoring can be associated with poor sleep quality and produces a loud disturbing noise for the sleeping partner. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is reported by 2-4% of the general population and by almost 30% of the elderly mainly related to obesity and heart disorders. The risk factors associated with these conditions are lost of airway muscle tone during sleep, retrognathia, deep/narrow palate, obesity and age. Fatigue and drowsiness are markers of OSA. Following RTH, there may be oropharyngeal tissue fibrosis that may contribute to snoring and sleep apnea.
Sleep disordered breathing are known in individuals with OPC. Our first results of the ongoing survey seem to indicate that severe snoring, causing drowsiness or fatigue, would be present in 47% of patients with OPC. A recently published literature review, from our team, also found a snoring self-reports prevalence from 33% to 82%. A polygraphic sleep recording study found that 65% of individuals with head and neck cancer (including OPC) have snoring, a value that increases to 92% when OSA is concomitant. On the other hand, OSA seem to be present in over 70% of OPC patients, before and after treatment. However, causality remains to be demonstrated; these sleep disorders are often pre-existing and can worsen as a result of RTH.
In adults, snoring is mainly controlled by devices correcting the dorsal position of sleep as well as with mandibular advanced device (MAD). Regarding apnea, positive pressure vessels (PPC or CPAP) are the most effective. The MAD is indicated for mild to moderate OSA or for low CPAP tolerance. To date, following RTH, there are no studies conducted under strict conditions. Some 'suggestions' in favour of standard treatments, PPC or MAD, were made. In addition, no studies have estimated the nasal discomfort and dryness associated with these treatments in the OPC population. Intuitively, nylon MAD, thin and with little contact on the mucous membranes, could be indicated in the presence of OPC. To date, only one study, based on 2 cases, suggests the use of MAD in the presence of OPC. There is therefore a gap of evidences in the literature as to whether patients treated for OPC presenting snoring and OSA would be able to tolerate and benefit from MAD.
Objectives: Conduct a pilot study, with a mixed quantitative and qualitative design, to reduce snoring or sleep apnea using an MAD, and improve the quality of life and sleep.
Hypotheses: Individuals who have received RTH as part of a treatment for OPC and who have snoring or OSA, can 1) tolerate and 2) benefit from treatment with MAD.
Experimental method and approach.
- Study design: Pilot trial, mixed and sequential design, randomized with active MAD vs. non-active MAD (control) and single-blind condition analyses for the participant. The D-SAD nylon MAD is marketed by Panthera Dental (Quebec) and provided free of charge as part of this project. The study includes a total of 8 visits to CHUM: 5 for clinical appointments and 3 nights of home sleep data collection. The 3 nights of sleep recordings will be spaced 4-5 weeks apart for adaptation to MAD. Night 1 will be for basal level, and nights 2 and 3 for recordings with active MAD or control. This will be done under the supervision of sleep lab director of CHUM, collaborator for over 25 years and residents. -- - Population: Adult patients (+18 years, female or male; ratio of 1/4 toward men; female is a rare phenotype of OSA pre-menopause) who received RTH in the Department of Radiation Oncology, with snoring-respiratory complaints during sleep, and follow-up in Stomatology at CHUM for OPC. Exclusions: Pregnant or breastfeeding woman; edentation preventing retention of the MAD; taking opioid-type medications; history of major depression, uncontrolled hypertension, stroke; under treatment with CPAP for sleep apnea; regular and intense orofacial pain; under pharmacological treatment for insomnia; excessive alcohol or drug use (e.g., cannabis, opioid). Recruitment: With the help of CHUM radiation oncology and dental staff (dentist and dental hygienist, resident). An informed consent will be completed.
- Sample size: It is expected that 24 participants (risk of 2-4 dropouts based on our experience) will be recuited. A 30% reduction in snoring and apnea/h is expected; this based on publications and an estimate of sample size. Indeed, a statistician, estimated that for a 30% decrease in snoring/night time (base at 8.9%/night, SD 3.4%) 15 participants are required for an effect size (ES) of 0.79; for apnea-hypopnea index/h (base at 11.5, SD 5)19 participants are required for a ES of 0.7. For subjective reports of snoring intensity (9 participants are required; ES of 1.11), however, an article reported significant results with 18 subjects. [20] A final sample of 20-22 subjects is targeted. These estimates are comparable to those in our previous orthotic studies of bruxism and OSA populations done by our group members.
- Types of data and collection: After completing the consent, the participant will be asked to complete demographic, sleep and basic medical information. It will be built from validated questionnaires estimating quality of life (SF-12), sleep (PSQI), sleepiness (Epworth), risk of apnea (Stop Bang), fatigue (Chalder), and orofacial pain. The data will be entered via WEB (REDCap) and saved on the CHUM/CITADELLE server. Following the 3 home sleep recordings, paticipants will assess on questionnaire their perception of change in sleep quality based on the validated scales used in our previous studies on apnea and MAD. In addition, the comfort of MAD (tolerance) and the perception of the spouse will also be estimated as in our previous studies. The quantitative home sleep data, namely duration and snoring indexes, apnea-hypopnea, instability and sleep duration, will be calculated, as already published, by the measurements obtained (breathing, oxygen saturation, sleep position, pulse, snoring) with the ambulatory recording instruments (Alice TM, Philips, USA) from CHUM sleep laboratory and analyzed by qualified technical staff. Qualitative data on MAD treatment expectations and oral health experiences related to POC (chewing, pain) will be estimated in a subgroup of participants (n=15), before and after MAD treatment. This will be done by a semi-structured interview.
- Statistics and design for analysis: Like sleep analyses, the results will be analyzed blindly with the following tests: 1) parametric tests such as: t-test for inter-group comparisons, linear mixed models and linear mixed models for repeated measurements, followed by contrasts for post-hoc comparisons where appropriate using the Tukey method (SPSS software); 2) nonparametric tests such as chi-square, Mann-Whitney and non-parametric ANOVA for repeated measurements followed by contrasts for post-hoc comparisons where appropriate using the Tukey method (for category data and/or when the data distribution does not correspond to a normal distribution); 3) correlation tests, such as Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, if applicable. A biostatistician will oversee the analyses. Qualitative data will be analyzed to extract recurring themes from transcripts of verbatims using software, N*VIVO. The collection of themes will be done until saturation. The software allows data coding and categorization for final analysis .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Active oral appliance in 60-70% advanced position of maximum jaw possible advancement for a given participant over the control position= neutral position one in 10-20% (no fucntional opening of upper airway at that position)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MAD-active | Active comparator | Device: Ronco-Onco and MADMAD = mandibular advancement appliance, in 60-70% forward position from maximum possible jaw advancement for a given participant |
| Neutral MAD- control | Sham comparator | Device: Ronco-Onco and MADMandibular advancement appliance in neurtral-control position, 10-20% of advancement - a non functional position to open upper airway |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis
- 18 years of age and over
- female or male; ratio of 1/4 toward men
- had received RTH in the Department of Radiation Oncology,
- reporting snoring and/or respiratory cessation complaints during sleep,
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- pregnant or breastfeeding woman;
- edentation preventing retention of the oral appliance;
- taking opioid or anxiolitic type medications;
- history of major depression,
- uncontrolled hypertension,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ronco-Onco and MADComparison of active over a neutral mandibular advacement oral appliance to assess tolerance and efficacy in oropharyngeal cancer individuals in managing snoring and sleep apnea following radiotherapy of oropharynx. | Device | MAD-active, Neutral MAD- control |
Primary outcome
Index apnea-hypopnea
Time frame: From sleep onset to wake time (6-8 hrs) in morning of night 1 for baseline vs difference of 2 or 3 according to ramdom allocation
respiratory cessation index (number of event per hour of sleep, 1 to max of 100, rare value)
Snoring
Time frame: From sleep onset to wake time (6-8 hrs) in morning of night 1 for baseline vs difference of 2 or 3 according to ramdom allocation
Total snoring time (minute per sleep duration of a given participant, average as mean or median) and event frequency (number of event per hour of sleep) - values expected from 0 to 100 for each outcome
1 secondary outcome
Sleep quality
Time frame: Done in morning from 6-8 sleep period, assessed in morning of each of 3 nights
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 35943322Dal Fabbro C, Harris P, Dufresne E, Herrero Babiloni A, Mayer P, Bahig H, Filion E, Nguyen F, Ghannoum J, Schmittbuhl M, Lavigne G. Orofacial Pain and Snoring/Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Individuals with Head and Neck Cancer: A Critical Review. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2022 Spring;36(2):85-102. doi: 10.11607/ofph.3176.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. To follow our institutional guidelines
Related trials for Oral Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Oral Gallium Maltolate for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ronco-Onco and MAD in people with Oral Cancer and Pharynx Cancer, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gilles Lavigne, DMD, PhD (514-343-2310, gilles.lavigne@umontreal.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Index apnea-hypopnea (time frame: From sleep onset to wake time (6-8 hrs) in morning of night 1 for baseline vs difference of 2 or 3 according to ramdom allocation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05719779, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2024.