Jaw, EdentulousNCT05720143
Evaluation of Dental Implants After Using Several Bone Splitting Techniques
A study testing Osseodensification, Magnetic mallet and Piezo-surgery in people with Jaw, Edentulous, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.
Trial summary
In both complete and partial tooth loss, the use of dental implants as artificial replacements for missing teeth is a well-established and effective treatment modality, leading to high patient satisfaction and improved quality of life (1). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Jaw, Edentulous
- What is being tested?
- Osseodensification, Magnetic mallet and Piezo-surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSyria
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2023to 28 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients able to attend follow-up appointments.
- Alveolar ridges with sufficient height for the placement of a standard dental implant.
- Presence of spongy bone with at least 1 mm of width between the cortical plates.
- Absence of systemic or local conditions that could affect bone metabolism.
Who cannot join
- Severe concavity on the vestibular or palatal side of the alveolar ridge.
- Uncontrolled periodontal disease.
- History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.
- Smokers or patients with parafunctional habits.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate Dental Implants After Using Three Bone Splitting Techniques in Narrow Mandibular Alveolar Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
In both complete and partial tooth loss, the use of dental implants as artificial replacements for missing teeth is a well-established and effective treatment modality, leading to high patient satisfaction and improved quality of life (1).
Horizontal deficiencies of the alveolar ridge can hinder implant-supported rehabilitation due to insufficient bone volume to support implant dimensions, negatively affecting the final prosthetic outcome from both functional and esthetic perspectives (2).
Read more
The split-crest technique reduces treatment time, the number of required surgical procedures, and the risk of complications, making it more acceptable to patients. Additionally, it allows for dental implant placement during the same surgical procedure and eliminates the need for a donor site for graft harvesting (3).
In this study, patients with posterior tooth loss in a narrow mandibular ridge underwent dental implant rehabilitation following alveolar ridge splitting and expansion performed using osseodensification, piezosurgery, or a magnetic mallet.
Read the detailed description
The objective of this study is to compare ridge width gain following ridge splitting and expansion with simultaneous implant placement using osseodensification, piezosurgery, or a magnetic mallet in individuals with narrow mandibular alveolar ridges.
Thirty-nine patients will be randomly allocated into three groups. In Group 1, ridge splitting and expansion will be performed using piezosurgery and bone expanders, followed by simultaneous implant placement.
In Group 2, osseodensification burs will be used after ridge splitting, with simultaneous implant placement.
In Group 3, a magnetic mallet will be used after ridge splitting, with simultaneous implant placement.
- Conditions
- Jaw, Edentulous
- Being tested
- Osseodensification, Magnetic mallet, Piezo-surgery
- Keywords
- Osseodensification, Piezosurgery, Magnetic mallet
- Medical subject headings
- Jaw, Edentulous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OsseodensificationProcedure or surgery
Procedure: Two horizontal and one vertical osteotomies will be performed using piezosurgery, followed by ridge expansion with osseodensification burs. Immediate implant placement will then be performed.
Magnetic malletProcedure or surgery
Procedure: Two horizontal and one vertical osteotomies will be performed using piezosurgery, followed by ridge expansion using chisels with a magnetic mallet. Immediate implant placement will then be performed.
Piezo-surgeryProcedure or surgery
Two horizontal and one vertical osteotomies will be performed using piezosurgery, followed by ridge expansion using piezosurgery inserts and bone expanders. Immediate implant placement will then be performed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Osseodensification group: | Experimental | Ridge splitting and expansion were carried out by creating horizontal and vertical cuts with piezosurgery, followed by expansion of the alveolar ridge using osseodensification burs Receives: Procedure: Osseodensification |
| Magnetic mallet group: | Experimental | Ridge splitting and expansion were performed using piezosurgery to create horizontal and vertical cuts, followed by chisels with a magnetic mallet to expand the ridge Receives: Procedure: Magnetic mallet |
| Piezo-surgery group | Experimental | Ridge splitting and expansion were performed with piezosurgery inserts, followed by bone expanders Receives: Procedure: Piezo-surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The marginal bone loss
Changes in bone height following ridge splitting and expansion were assessed radiographically. Measurements were performed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiography
Measured: Assessments will be conducted 4 months after surgery and 6 months after functional loading.
The bone width gain radiographically
The extent of bony expansion represents the increase in alveolar ridge width in the buccolingual direction, as determined by radiographic assessment using CBCT.
Measured: At baseline, after surgery, 4 months after surgery, and 6 months after functional loading.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Implant stability quotients (ISQ)
The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ), measured using the MEGA device, provides a numerical assessment of both primary and secondary stability of dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability and a higher likelihood of successful osseointegration.
Measured: Measurements will be taken at the time of surgery and again 4 months postoperatively.
Insertion Torque
The implant insertion torque was measured during implant placement using a dental implant torque wrench and recorded in Newton-centimeters (N·cm).
Measured: During the surgical procedure.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2023
- Study start25 Jan 2023
- Primary completion28 Feb 2025
- Study completion28 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Jaw, EdentulousStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Damascus University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ahmad Albassal, MSc, Principal investigator, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, DamascusMunir Harfouch, MSc PhD, Study director, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, DamascusMazen Zenati, MSc PhD, Study director, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05720143
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UDDS-OMFS-01-2023
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pozzi A, Mura P. Immediate Loading of Conical Connection Implants: Up-to-2-Year Retrospective Clinical and Radiologic Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):142-52. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4061.
PubMed 26800171Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:136-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01357.x.
PubMed 16968389Bassetti MA, Bassetti RG, Bosshardt DD. The alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Mar;27(3):310-24. doi: 10.1111/clr.12537. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
PubMed 25586966Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):161-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
PubMed 9586460Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):144-53. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x.
PubMed 11952734
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate Dental Implants After Using Three Bone Splitting Techniques in Narrow Mandibular Alveolar Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05720143
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UDDS-OMFS-01-2023
- Conditions
- Jaw, Edentulous
- Keywords
- Osseodensification, Piezosurgery, Magnetic mallet
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Damascus UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In both complete and partial tooth loss, the use of dental implants as artificial replacements for missing teeth is a well-established and effective treatment modality, leading to high patient satisfaction and improved quality of life (1).
Horizontal deficiencies of the alveolar ridge can hinder implant-supported rehabilitation due to insufficient bone volume to support implant dimensions, negatively affecting the final prosthetic outcome from both functional and esthetic perspectives (2).
The split-crest technique reduces treatment time, the number of required surgical procedures, and the risk of complications, making it more acceptable to patients. Additionally, it allows for dental implant placement during the same surgical procedure and eliminates the need for a donor site for graft harvesting (3).
In this study, patients with posterior tooth loss in a narrow mandibular ridge underwent dental implant rehabilitation following alveolar ridge splitting and expansion performed using osseodensification, piezosurgery, or a magnetic mallet.
Detailed description
The objective of this study is to compare ridge width gain following ridge splitting and expansion with simultaneous implant placement using osseodensification, piezosurgery, or a magnetic mallet in individuals with narrow mandibular alveolar ridges.
Thirty-nine patients will be randomly allocated into three groups. In Group 1, ridge splitting and expansion will be performed using piezosurgery and bone expanders, followed by simultaneous implant placement.
In Group 2, osseodensification burs will be used after ridge splitting, with simultaneous implant placement.
In Group 3, a magnetic mallet will be used after ridge splitting, with simultaneous implant placement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Osseodensification group: | Experimental | Procedure: OsseodensificationRidge splitting and expansion were carried out by creating horizontal and vertical cuts with piezosurgery, followed by expansion of the alveolar ridge using osseodensification burs |
| Magnetic mallet group: | Experimental | Procedure: Magnetic malletRidge splitting and expansion were performed using piezosurgery to create horizontal and vertical cuts, followed by chisels with a magnetic mallet to expand the ridge |
| Piezo-surgery group | Experimental | Procedure: Piezo-surgeryRidge splitting and expansion were performed with piezosurgery inserts, followed by bone expanders |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients able to attend follow-up appointments.
- Alveolar ridges with sufficient height for the placement of a standard dental implant.
- Presence of spongy bone with at least 1 mm of width between the cortical plates.
- Absence of systemic or local conditions that could affect bone metabolism.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Severe concavity on the vestibular or palatal side of the alveolar ridge.
- Uncontrolled periodontal disease.
- History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.
- Smokers or patients with parafunctional habits.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OsseodensificationProcedure: Two horizontal and one vertical osteotomies will be performed using piezosurgery, followed by ridge expansion with osseodensification burs. Immediate implant placement will then be performed. | Procedure or surgery | Osseodensification group: |
| Magnetic malletProcedure: Two horizontal and one vertical osteotomies will be performed using piezosurgery, followed by ridge expansion using chisels with a magnetic mallet. Immediate implant placement will then be performed. | Procedure or surgery | Magnetic mallet group: |
| Piezo-surgeryTwo horizontal and one vertical osteotomies will be performed using piezosurgery, followed by ridge expansion using piezosurgery inserts and bone expanders. Immediate implant placement will then be performed. | Procedure or surgery | Piezo-surgery group |
Primary outcome
The marginal bone loss
Time frame: Assessments will be conducted 4 months after surgery and 6 months after functional loading.
Changes in bone height following ridge splitting and expansion were assessed radiographically. Measurements were performed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiography
The bone width gain radiographically
Time frame: At baseline, after surgery, 4 months after surgery, and 6 months after functional loading.
The extent of bony expansion represents the increase in alveolar ridge width in the buccolingual direction, as determined by radiographic assessment using CBCT.
2 secondary outcomes
Implant stability quotients (ISQ)
Time frame: Measurements will be taken at the time of surgery and again 4 months postoperatively.
Insertion Torque
Time frame: During the surgical procedure.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 26800171Pozzi A, Mura P. Immediate Loading of Conical Connection Implants: Up-to-2-Year Retrospective Clinical and Radiologic Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):142-52. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4061.
- Background: PubMed 16968389Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:136-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01357.x.
- Background: PubMed 25586966Bassetti MA, Bassetti RG, Bosshardt DD. The alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Mar;27(3):310-24. doi: 10.1111/clr.12537. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
- Background: PubMed 9586460Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):161-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
- Background: PubMed 11952734Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):144-53. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Jaw, Edentulous
Recruiting
Dynamic vs. Static Jaw Relations in Implant-Supported Prostheses: Chewing Efficiency
Chewing Efficiency in Completely Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated With Implant-Supported Full-Arch Prostheses
Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Clinical Outcome of PrimeTaper EV Implant in Single Tooth Restorations
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of UV-Treated Dental Implants With or Without Melatonin in the Upper Posterior Jaw
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Bone Resorption
Active, not recruiting
A Clinical Study on Acuris™ - Conometric Concept for Single Tooth Restoration
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Recruiting
Clinical Outcomes of 3D Printed and Milled Complete Dentures
Edentulous Mouth, Edentulous Jaw
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ahmad Albassal, MSc principal investigator
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus
Munir Harfouch, MSc PhD study director
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus
Mazen Zenati, MSc PhD study director
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Osseodensification, Magnetic mallet and Piezo-surgery in people with Jaw, Edentulous, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Syria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The marginal bone loss (time frame: Assessments will be conducted 4 months after surgery and 6 months after functional loading.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05720143, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2026.