Single Embryo TransferNCT05721495
Deferred Embryo Transfer in an In Vitro Program With Single Embryo Transfer Policy
A study testing freeze all strategy embryo transfer and fresh embryo transfer strategy in people with Single Embryo Transfer and Embryo Implantation, Delayed, run by University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Single embryo transfer decreases the multiple pregnancy rate and its complications. However, studies are needed to help increase the effectiveness of this technique to increase its use, which undoubtedly improves the safety of our patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 37 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Single Embryo Transfer, Embryo Implantation, Delayed, Pregnancy Rate
- What is being tested?
- freeze all strategy embryo transfer and fresh embryo transfer strategy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 144 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2017to 30 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 37 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- BMI 19-29 kg/m2
- AMH > 0.5 ng/mL
- FIV/ICSI cycle: first or second
Who cannot join
- uterus surgery
- endometriosis
- miscarriage >1
- REM < 1 million spz
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Utility of Deferred Embryo Transfer in an In Vitro Program With Single Embryo Transfer Policy
Single embryo transfer decreases the multiple pregnancy rate and its complications. However, studies are needed to help increase the effectiveness of this technique to increase its use, which undoubtedly improves the safety of our patients.
Objectives:
Read more
To assess the results of IVF / ICSI cycles with single embryo transfer, in terms of both pregnancy and live birth rates, comparing a group of patients in which an elective delayed cryotransfer of an embryo without fresh transfer is performed (experimental group ), with patients in whom a fresh embryo is transferred electively.
Methodology:
A prospective randomized clinical trial with two arms in parallel, not blinded, including 138 couples using an IVF / ICSI cycle at the Reproduction Unit of the Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves de Granada. The inclusion criteria classify them as having a good reproductive prognosis, and the patients will follow an ovulation treatment protocol with GnRH agonists or antagonists. Couples will undergo an IVF / ICSI cycle, randomly assigned to:
- Group I (experimental): fresh transfer is not performed, the best quality embryo is cryopreserved. Elective transfer in a later cycle of the cryopreserved embryo.
- Group II (control): fresh transfer of the best quality embryo.
Read the detailed description
The study has been designed as a prospective, randomized, two-arm, parallel, unblinded study, during which the investigators will include 138 couples (69 in each group) of IVF / ICSI users. Cycles canceled or punctured but without embryo transfer (either due to not obtaining oocytes, non-fertilization or arrest of embryonic development) will not be included in the study. The assignment of the couples to each of the groups will be carried out by means of a consecutive random sampling procedure. The randomization list will be created specifically for this project and will be kept safely by someone not included in the research team:
- Group I (experimental): fresh transfer is not performed, the best quality embryo is cryopreserved. Elective transfer in a later cycle of the cryopreserved embryo.
- Group II (control): fresh transfer of the best quality embryo.
Subjects of study:
Patients who come to the Human Reproduction Unit of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital to perform a first or second cycle of IVF / ICSI. Couples will be selected according to inclusion criteria that classify them as good reproductive prognosis (which is consistent with the usual eSET practice).
Couples will be able to participate in the study for only one cycle. Each couple will be interviewed to explain the characteristics of the study and will be given an Information Sheet. Written informed consent must be obtained from each couple. The person outside the research team who is guarding the randomization list will assign the corresponding treatment group.
Before starting the study, ethical approval was processed by the Ethics Committee through the Ethics Portal for Biomedical Research of Andalusia.
For the objective of assesing the null hypothesis that includes the equality of live birth rates in the group of women who undergo an elective deferred transfer of a single embryo and the group who undergo elective transfer of a fresh embryo, a power of 80% has been established to detect statistically significant differences by means of a bilateral Chi-square test for two independent samples, taking into account that the level of significance is 5%, and assuming that the proportion in the group of women who undergo a fresh transfer is 50.9%, the proportion in the group of women who receive the deferred elective transfer is 78%, and that the proportion of women with respect to the total is 50%, it will be necessary to include 48 women in each group, with the objetive to obtain 96 experimental units in the study. Taking into account that the expected dropout rate is three out of ten women, it will be necessary to include 69 women per group. The 138 women will be assigned to one of the groups using a random procedure, following a sequence of random numbers generated by specific software (Epidat, Epidemiological Data Analysis Program Tabulated. Version 3.1).
Methodology The patients must follow an ovulation stimulation treatment, in order to achieve multiple follicular development. A so-called "long analog" GnRH agonist protocol will be used. This consists of administering from day 22 of the cycle 0.1 mg / day of GnRH analog (Decapeptyl 0.1; Lasa, Barcelona, Spain) until the day on which the administration of gonadotropin is started, in which the dose is reduced at 50% until the day of hCG. After 10-14 days of administration of the agonist, the pituitary restraint is checked by means of ovarian vaginal ultrasound (absence of follicles and cysts) and serum estradiol determination (<50 pg / mL). If this medical hypophysectomy is confirmed, 300 IU of recombinant FSH (FSHr) is administered per day (Gonal F, Serono, Madrid, Spain) for two days, and 150 IU of FSHr from the 3rd to the 7th day. On this day, ultrasound monitoring of follicular development and serum estradiol determination are performed in order to once again adjust the dose of rFSH to each patient. Once the follicular response is adequate (more than 3 ovarian follicles greater than 18 mm in diameter), ovulation is triggered using 6,500 IU of hCG (Ovitrelle, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
IVF / ICSI and embryo culture will then be performed. To perform sperm microinsemination (ICSI) it is necessary to remove the cumulus and radiated crown from the oocyte. To decumulate, the crown-oocyte cluster complex is submerged in a solution with 80 IU / mL of hyaluronidase (HYASE, IVF Science Scandinavia, Gothenburg, Sweden) for 10-20 seconds, aspirating the complex several times using a pasteur pipette. The microinsemination technique is performed under an inverted microscope with Eppendorf and Narishigue micromanipulators and microinjectors. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) is performed in a five-well plate, depositing 0.5 mL of IVF medium (Vitrolife, Sweden) and 0.5 mL of Ovoil (Vitrolife, Sweden) in each well. Five cumulus are left per well and 100,000 sperm / mL are added. In both cases, the oocytes are cultured in a Thermo-Fisher incubator, within a morphokinetic platform (PrimoVision) that takes photographs of them every 5-10 minutes. The following days are evaluated for classification, choosing the one with the best implantation potential according to the division times measured by morphokinetics and the morphological criteria of the Spanish Association for the Study of Reproduction Biology (ASEBIR) reviewed in 2015.
The embryo transfer will be carried out in group 2 on the third day choosing the best embryo according to the previous criteria. In group 1, the embryos will be cryopreserved by vitrification, selecting the best one for delayed transfer. The commercial vitrification media (Medicult Vitrification, Denmark) and the storage device will be Cryoleaf (McGill Cryoleaf, Medicult, Denmark). All cryopreserved embryos will be stored in liquid nitrogen at -196ºC in storage cylinders (Air Liquide, France). The day before cryotransfer the embryo is devitrified, using the thawing kit (Medicult Warming, Denmark). At the end, the embryo is washed in G2 medium (Vitrolife), leaving it in culture until the next day, after evaluating the embryo quality and cryosurvival (percentage of lysed cells). The woman's endometrium is prepared by treatment with estradiol valerate and progesterone. On the day of cryotransfer, embryo quality is assessed again, with emphasis on embryo division. Cryotransfer is performed using the same technique as transfer.
Study limitations The project has been carried out taking into account the resources available in the Human Reproduction Unit of the University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, and therefore there do not seem to be any limitations in this regard.
The study could be completed by performing a preimplantation genetic diagnosis to determine if there are embryonic genetic alterations prior to intrauterine transfer, but this technique is not yet performed in our Unit. Likewise, blastocyst transfer can increase pregnancy rates, but by increasing the cancellation rate of embryo transfer, so it is not routinely performed in our Unit.
- Being tested
- freeze all strategy embryo transfer, fresh embryo transfer strategy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
freeze all strategy embryo transferOther
criopreservation of all viable embryos in order to transfere the best one in a posterior cycle
fresh embryo transfer strategyOther
transfer of the best embryo two or three days after the fecundation technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Freeze all strategy embryo transfer | Experimental | Three days after fecundation, the best embryo is criopreserved. It is transferred in a posterior cicle Receives: Other: freeze all strategy embryo transfer |
| Fresh embryo transfer strategy | Active comparator | Two or three days after fecundation, the best embryo is transferred. Receives: Other: fresh embryo transfer strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Live birth rate
Live birth rate after freeze-all or fresh embryo strategy in an Assisted Reproduction program
Measured: 15 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Metaphase II rate
Number of oocytes in Metaphase II stage of the total oocytes obtained
Measured: 1 month
Fertility rate
Number of fertilized oocytes of the toal oocytes obtained
Measured: 1 month
Good embryo quality rate
Number of embryos A or B of the total embryos obtained
Measured: 1 month
Survival to devitrification rate
Number of embryos that survive to devitrification
Measured: 4 months
Gestation rate
Clinical gestation rate (positive beta-hCG and positive heartbeat on 7 gestational week )
Measured: 4 months
Implantation rate
Implantation rate
Measured: 4 months
Miscarriage rate
Miscarriage rate
Measured: 4 months
Newborn weight
Weight in grames of the newborn
Measured: 15 months
Adverse events rates
Number of adverse events after or during treatment of the total treatments
Measured: 15 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2017
- Primary completion28 Feb 2022
- Study completion30 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Single Embryo TransferStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial with two parallel arms
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Junta de Andalucia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ana Clavero Gilabert, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
- Investigators
- Ana Clavero-Gilabert, PhD, Principal investigator, HU Virgen de las Nieves
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05721495
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI-0353-2016
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Utility of Deferred Embryo Transfer in an In Vitro Program With Single Embryo Transfer Policy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05721495
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PI-0353-2016
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Virgen de las NievesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Junta de Andalucia
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Single embryo transfer decreases the multiple pregnancy rate and its complications. However, studies are needed to help increase the effectiveness of this technique to increase its use, which undoubtedly improves the safety of our patients.
Objectives:
To assess the results of IVF / ICSI cycles with single embryo transfer, in terms of both pregnancy and live birth rates, comparing a group of patients in which an elective delayed cryotransfer of an embryo without fresh transfer is performed (experimental group ), with patients in whom a fresh embryo is transferred electively.
Methodology:
A prospective randomized clinical trial with two arms in parallel, not blinded, including 138 couples using an IVF / ICSI cycle at the Reproduction Unit of the Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves de Granada. The inclusion criteria classify them as having a good reproductive prognosis, and the patients will follow an ovulation treatment protocol with GnRH agonists or antagonists. Couples will undergo an IVF / ICSI cycle, randomly assigned to:
- Group I (experimental): fresh transfer is not performed, the best quality embryo is cryopreserved. Elective transfer in a later cycle of the cryopreserved embryo.
- Group II (control): fresh transfer of the best quality embryo.
Detailed description
The study has been designed as a prospective, randomized, two-arm, parallel, unblinded study, during which the investigators will include 138 couples (69 in each group) of IVF / ICSI users. Cycles canceled or punctured but without embryo transfer (either due to not obtaining oocytes, non-fertilization or arrest of embryonic development) will not be included in the study. The assignment of the couples to each of the groups will be carried out by means of a consecutive random sampling procedure. The randomization list will be created specifically for this project and will be kept safely by someone not included in the research team:
- Group I (experimental): fresh transfer is not performed, the best quality embryo is cryopreserved. Elective transfer in a later cycle of the cryopreserved embryo.
- Group II (control): fresh transfer of the best quality embryo.
Subjects of study:
Patients who come to the Human Reproduction Unit of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital to perform a first or second cycle of IVF / ICSI. Couples will be selected according to inclusion criteria that classify them as good reproductive prognosis (which is consistent with the usual eSET practice).
Couples will be able to participate in the study for only one cycle. Each couple will be interviewed to explain the characteristics of the study and will be given an Information Sheet. Written informed consent must be obtained from each couple. The person outside the research team who is guarding the randomization list will assign the corresponding treatment group.
Before starting the study, ethical approval was processed by the Ethics Committee through the Ethics Portal for Biomedical Research of Andalusia.
For the objective of assesing the null hypothesis that includes the equality of live birth rates in the group of women who undergo an elective deferred transfer of a single embryo and the group who undergo elective transfer of a fresh embryo, a power of 80% has been established to detect statistically significant differences by means of a bilateral Chi-square test for two independent samples, taking into account that the level of significance is 5%, and assuming that the proportion in the group of women who undergo a fresh transfer is 50.9%, the proportion in the group of women who receive the deferred elective transfer is 78%, and that the proportion of women with respect to the total is 50%, it will be necessary to include 48 women in each group, with the objetive to obtain 96 experimental units in the study. Taking into account that the expected dropout rate is three out of ten women, it will be necessary to include 69 women per group. The 138 women will be assigned to one of the groups using a random procedure, following a sequence of random numbers generated by specific software (Epidat, Epidemiological Data Analysis Program Tabulated. Version 3.1).
Methodology The patients must follow an ovulation stimulation treatment, in order to achieve multiple follicular development. A so-called "long analog" GnRH agonist protocol will be used. This consists of administering from day 22 of the cycle 0.1 mg / day of GnRH analog (Decapeptyl 0.1; Lasa, Barcelona, Spain) until the day on which the administration of gonadotropin is started, in which the dose is reduced at 50% until the day of hCG. After 10-14 days of administration of the agonist, the pituitary restraint is checked by means of ovarian vaginal ultrasound (absence of follicles and cysts) and serum estradiol determination (<50 pg / mL). If this medical hypophysectomy is confirmed, 300 IU of recombinant FSH (FSHr) is administered per day (Gonal F, Serono, Madrid, Spain) for two days, and 150 IU of FSHr from the 3rd to the 7th day. On this day, ultrasound monitoring of follicular development and serum estradiol determination are performed in order to once again adjust the dose of rFSH to each patient. Once the follicular response is adequate (more than 3 ovarian follicles greater than 18 mm in diameter), ovulation is triggered using 6,500 IU of hCG (Ovitrelle, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
IVF / ICSI and embryo culture will then be performed. To perform sperm microinsemination (ICSI) it is necessary to remove the cumulus and radiated crown from the oocyte. To decumulate, the crown-oocyte cluster complex is submerged in a solution with 80 IU / mL of hyaluronidase (HYASE, IVF Science Scandinavia, Gothenburg, Sweden) for 10-20 seconds, aspirating the complex several times using a pasteur pipette. The microinsemination technique is performed under an inverted microscope with Eppendorf and Narishigue micromanipulators and microinjectors. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) is performed in a five-well plate, depositing 0.5 mL of IVF medium (Vitrolife, Sweden) and 0.5 mL of Ovoil (Vitrolife, Sweden) in each well. Five cumulus are left per well and 100,000 sperm / mL are added. In both cases, the oocytes are cultured in a Thermo-Fisher incubator, within a morphokinetic platform (PrimoVision) that takes photographs of them every 5-10 minutes. The following days are evaluated for classification, choosing the one with the best implantation potential according to the division times measured by morphokinetics and the morphological criteria of the Spanish Association for the Study of Reproduction Biology (ASEBIR) reviewed in 2015.
The embryo transfer will be carried out in group 2 on the third day choosing the best embryo according to the previous criteria. In group 1, the embryos will be cryopreserved by vitrification, selecting the best one for delayed transfer. The commercial vitrification media (Medicult Vitrification, Denmark) and the storage device will be Cryoleaf (McGill Cryoleaf, Medicult, Denmark). All cryopreserved embryos will be stored in liquid nitrogen at -196ºC in storage cylinders (Air Liquide, France). The day before cryotransfer the embryo is devitrified, using the thawing kit (Medicult Warming, Denmark). At the end, the embryo is washed in G2 medium (Vitrolife), leaving it in culture until the next day, after evaluating the embryo quality and cryosurvival (percentage of lysed cells). The woman's endometrium is prepared by treatment with estradiol valerate and progesterone. On the day of cryotransfer, embryo quality is assessed again, with emphasis on embryo division. Cryotransfer is performed using the same technique as transfer.
Study limitations The project has been carried out taking into account the resources available in the Human Reproduction Unit of the University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, and therefore there do not seem to be any limitations in this regard.
The study could be completed by performing a preimplantation genetic diagnosis to determine if there are embryonic genetic alterations prior to intrauterine transfer, but this technique is not yet performed in our Unit. Likewise, blastocyst transfer can increase pregnancy rates, but by increasing the cancellation rate of embryo transfer, so it is not routinely performed in our Unit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial with two parallel arms
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Freeze all strategy embryo transfer | Experimental | Other: freeze all strategy embryo transferThree days after fecundation, the best embryo is criopreserved. It is transferred in a posterior cicle |
| Fresh embryo transfer strategy | Active comparator | Other: fresh embryo transfer strategyTwo or three days after fecundation, the best embryo is transferred. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 37 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- BMI 19-29 kg/m2
- AMH > 0.5 ng/mL
- FIV/ICSI cycle: first or second
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- uterus surgery
- endometriosis
- miscarriage >1
- REM < 1 million spz
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| freeze all strategy embryo transfercriopreservation of all viable embryos in order to transfere the best one in a posterior cycle | Other | Freeze all strategy embryo transfer |
| fresh embryo transfer strategytransfer of the best embryo two or three days after the fecundation technique | Other | Fresh embryo transfer strategy |
Primary outcome
Live birth rate
Time frame: 15 months
Live birth rate after freeze-all or fresh embryo strategy in an Assisted Reproduction program
9 secondary outcomes
Metaphase II rate
Time frame: 1 month
Fertility rate
Time frame: 1 month
Good embryo quality rate
Time frame: 1 month
Survival to devitrification rate
Time frame: 4 months
Gestation rate
Time frame: 4 months
Implantation rate
Time frame: 4 months
Miscarriage rate
Time frame: 4 months
Newborn weight
Time frame: 15 months
Adverse events rates
Time frame: 15 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2023.
Related trials for Single Embryo Transfer
Not yet recruiting
AI-Assisted Euploid Embryo Selection for Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Women of Advanced Maternal Age
Female Infertility
Recruiting
Hormone-free Antral Retrieval for Viable Embryo Storage & Transfer
Infertility
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Correlation Of Clinical Outcomes After Transfer Of Good-Quality Morphology Embryos In Patients With A Favorable Prognosis And Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing For Aneuploidy (NiPGT-A) Results
Infertility (IVF Patients), Clinical Pregnancy After Single Embryo Transfer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Intrauterine G-CSF Infusion for Thin Endometrium
Thin Endometrium, Female Infertility
Recruiting
Hyaluronan-enriched Medium and Euploid Blastocyst Transfers
Infertility, Implantation Rate
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ana Clavero-Gilabert, PhD principal investigator
HU Virgen de las Nieves
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing freeze all strategy embryo transfer and fresh embryo transfer strategy in people with Single Embryo Transfer and Embryo Implantation, Delayed, run by University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Live birth rate (time frame: 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2023.