Atopic DermatitisPhase 3ROCKET-SHUTTLENCT05724199
A Study Assessing Rocatinlimab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroid and/or Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 234 sites in 26 countries.
Trial summary
The coprimary objectives of the study are to: evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab in combination with topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCS/TCI), compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Rocatinlimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 746 participants
- Where
- 234 sitesin 26 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Feb 2023to 4 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AD according to the AAD (American Academy of Dermatology) Consensus Criteria (2014) present for at least 12 months
- History of inadequate response to TCS of medium or higher potency (with or without TCI)
- EASI score ≥16
- vIGA-AD score ≥3
- ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement
- Worst pruritus numerical rating scale ≥ 4
Who cannot join
- Treatment with a biological product within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1:
- Systemic corticosteroids
- Nonbiologic, non-targeted Systemic immunosuppressants
- Phototherapy
- Janus kinase inhibitors
Show all 12Show fewer
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 1 week, prior to Day 1:
- TCS
- TCI
- Topical phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors
- Other topical immunosuppressive agents
- Combination topical agents including TCS of any potency or TCI, PDE4 inhibitors, or other topical immunosuppressive agents
Trial locations and contacts
234 sites in 26 countries.
234 sites in 26 countries
United States45 sites
Albuquerque Clinical Trials Incorporated
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Atlanta Dermatology, Vein and Research Center, PC
Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Divine Dermatology and Aesthetics
Atlanta, Georgia, 30315
Oakland Hills Dermatology
Auburn Hills, Michigan, 48326
US Dermatology Partners Jollyville
Austin, Texas, 78759
Kern Research Inc
Bakersfield, California, 93301
Bexley Dermatology Research
Bexley, Ohio, 43209
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
DS Research
Clarksville, Indiana, 47129
Newco 3A Research LLC
El Paso, Texas, 79925
Schweiger Dermatology Group, PC Research Division
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250
Sante Clinical Research
Kerrville, Texas, 78028
Vivida Dermatology
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center Leawood
Leawood, Kansas, 66211
Somnos Clinical Research
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68505
Keck Medicine of University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Wallace Medical Group Inc
Los Angeles, California, 90056
Velocity Clinical Research Inc
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Industrial Medicine Associates Clinical Research Advanced Dermatology Care
Monroe, Louisiana, 71201
Virginia Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Las Vegas Clinical Trials
North Las Vegas, Nevada, 89030
Arkansas Research Trials, LLC
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117
Skin Specialists PC
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Antelope Valley Clinical Trials
Palmdale, California, 93551
Paddington Testing Company Inc
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103
Medical Dermatology Specialists
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Southwest Skin Specialists
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Texas Dermatology Research Center
Plano, Texas, 75025
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Aesthetic and Dermatology Center
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
University of California at Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95816
Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95823
Acclaim Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92120
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Oakland
San Francisco, California, 94118
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94118
Synergy Dermatology
San Francisco, California, 94132
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Skokie, Illinois, 60077
US Dermatology Partners Sun City West
Sun City West, Arizona, 85375
TrueBlue Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33609
Olympian Clinical Research - Tampa
Tampa, Florida, 33615
Chear Center LLC
The Bronx, New York, 10455
Accellacare of Wilmington
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Canada21 sites
Dermatology Research Institute Incorporated
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1
SKiN Health
Coburg, Ontario, K9A 4J9
Laser Rejuvenation Clinics Edmonton D T Incorporated
Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S9
Alberta Derma Surgery Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3
Centricity Research London
London, Ontario, N6A 2C2
Clinique de Dermatologie Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1Y 3L1
Innovaderm Research Inc
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
Dr SK Siddha Medicine Professional Corporation
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8
Allergy Research Canada Incorporated
Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2H 1H5
North Bay Dermatology Centre
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 3Z7
Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2
JRB Research Incorporated
Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2
DIEX Recherche Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4T3
Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
The Centre for Dermatology
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1A5
Saskatoon Dermatology Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7T 0G3
Enverus Medical Research
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6
North York Research Incorporated
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3A6
Toronto Research Centre Inc
Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5Y8
Alliance Clinical Trials
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
Wiseman Dermatology Research Incorporated
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
China21 sites
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191
Peking University Peoples Hospital
Beijing, 100044
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
Chengdu Second Peoples Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000
The First Affiliated Hospital ,Sun-Yat Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510091
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
the First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016
Affiliated Hangzhou First Peoples Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310020
Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330000
Nanyang First Peoples Hospital
Nanyang, Henan, 473002
The First Affiliation Hospital Of Ningbo University
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010
Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital
Shanghai, 200443
The Fist Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
Shantou, Guangdong, 515041
Shenzhen Qianhai Shekou Free Trade Zone Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101
Taizhou Central Hospital
Taizhou, Zhejiang, 318000
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430022
Wuxi Second Peoples Hospital
Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214001
France17 sites
Hopital Prive d Antony
Antony, 92160
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux - Hôpital Saint André
Bordeaux, Cedex
Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire Brest Hopital Morvan
Brest, 29200
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, 59037
Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud - Hopital du Scorff
Lorient, 56322
Hôpital La Timone
Marseille, 13385
Cabinet du Docteur Ruer-Mulard Mireille
Martigues, 13500
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes Hôtel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet 2
Nice, 06202
Hopital Bichat Claude Bernard
Paris, 75018
Hopital Tenon
Paris, 75020
Hopital Saint Louis
Paris, 75475
Polyclinique de Courlancy
Reims, 51100
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes - Hopital Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen - Hôpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Etienne Hopital Nord
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
Hopital d instruction des armees sainte anne
Toulon, 83800
Japan15 sites
Mildix Skin Clinic
Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 120-0034
Ekihigashi Dermatology Allergy Clinic
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-0013
JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-0929
Katahira Dermatology Urology Clinic
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 890-0063
Kosugi Dermatology Clinic
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 211-0063
Jouzan Hihuka Hinyoukika Clinic
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-0066
Suizenji Dermatology Clinic
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 862-0950
Fukui Dermatology Clinic
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 454-0803
Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic
Neyagawa, Osaka, 572-0838
Takagi Dermatological Clinic Branch
Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080-0013
Medical Corporation Kojinkai Sapporo Skin Clinic
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0063
Naoko Dermatology Clinic
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 158-0097
NTT Medical Center Tokyo
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625
Yamate Dermatology Clinic
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-0075
Nomura Dermatology Clinic
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 221-0825
Belgium10 sites
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende
Bruges, 8000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann
Brussels, 1020
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels, 1090
Universite Catholique de Louvain Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
Brussels, 1200
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
Clinique Andre Renard
Herstal, 4040
Dermatologie Handelskaai
Kortrijk, 8500
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven Gasthuisberg
Leuven, 3000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege - Sart Tilman
Liège, 4000
Grand Hopital de Charleroi
Loverval, 6280
Germany10 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen - Georg-August-Universitaet
Göttingen, 37075
TFS Trial Form Support GmbH
Hamburg, 20537
MensingDerma research GmbH
Hamburg, 22391
Hautaerzte Zentrum Hannover
Hanover, 30159
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Universitaetsmedizin Mainz
Mainz, 55101
Beldio Research GmbH
Memmingen, 87700
Hautmedizin Saar
Merzing, 66663
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM
München, 80802
Hungary10 sites
Trial Pharma Kft
Békéscsaba, 5600
Csalogany Orvosi Kozpont
Budapest, 1027
Clinexpert Kft
Budapest, 1033
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
Budapest, 1036
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont
Debrecen, 4032
Gyongyosi Bugat Pal Korhaz
Gyöngyös, 3200
Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz
Kaposvár, 7400
DermaMed Research Kft
Orosháza, 5900
Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft
Szolnok, 5000
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Argentina8 sites
Buenos Aires Skin SA
Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1054
Fundacion Cidea
Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1121
Care- Centro de Alergia y Enfermedades Respiratorias
Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1414
Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria SRL
Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1425
Cinme - Centro de Investigaciones Metabolicas
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1027AAP
Framingham Centro Medico
La Plata, Buenos Aires, B1902COS
Dim Clinica Privada
Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, 1704
Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas Instituto Especialidades De La Salud De Rosario
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Malaysia7 sites
Hospital Pulau Pinang
George Town, Pulau Pinang, 10990
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
Ipoh, Perak, 30450
Hospital Sultan Ismail
Johor Bahru, Johor, 81100
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 88586
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 50586
Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000
University Malaya Medical Centre
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100
Poland7 sites
Dermapolis Medical Dermatology Center dr n med Edyta Gebska
Chorzów, 41-500
GynCentrum Spzoo NZOZ Holsamed - Oddzial Libero
Katowice, 40-600
Specjalistyczny Gabinet Dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno-Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski SpCywilna
Krakow, 30-002
AppleTreeClinics Network Spzoo
Lodz, 90-349
Ip Clinic Sp zoo
Lodz, 90-752
Twoja Przychodnia Scm
Szczecin, 71-500
DermMedica Spzoo Centrum Columbus
Wroclaw, 51-503
Australia6 sites
The Skin Centre
Benowa, Queensland, 4217
Emeritus Research Sydney
Botany, New South Wales, 2019
Emeritus Research Melbourne
Camberwell, Victoria, 3124
Princess Alexandra Hospital
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Veracity Clinical Research
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Greece6 sites
401 General Military Hospital Of Athens
Athens, 11525
Andreas Syngros Hospital Of Venereal And Dermatological Diseases
Athens, 16121
University General Hospital of Heraklion
Heraklion, 71500
General Hospital Of Nea Ionia Konstantopouleio Patision
Nea Ionia, 14233
Geniko Nosokomeio Peiraia Tzaneio
Piraeus, 18536
Ippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, 54642
United Kingdom6 sites
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust
Bath, BA1 3NG
Russells Hall Hospital
Dudley, DY1 2HQ
West Middlesex University Hospital
Isleworth, TW7 6AF
The Royal Free Hospital
London, NW3 2PF
Salford Care Organisation
Salford, M6 8HD
Accellacare Yorkshire
Shipley, BD18 3SA
Austria5 sites
Medizinische Universitaet Graz
Graz, 8036
Medizinische Universitaet Innsbruck
Innsbruck, 6020
Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg
Salzburg, 5020
Klinik Landstrasse
Vienna, 1030
Klinik Hietzing
Vienna, 1130
Bulgaria5 sites
Medical Center Asklepii OOD
Dupnitsa, 2600
Medical Center Medconsult Pleven OOD
Pleven, 5800
Medical Center Excelsior OOD
Sofia, 1407
Diagnostic-Consultative Center Alexandrovska EOOD
Sofia, 1431
Diagnostic-Consultative Center - Fokus-5 - Medical Institution for Outpatient Care OOD
Sofia, 1463
Spain5 sites
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Hospital Universitario Basurto
Bilbao, Basque Country, 48013
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra
Pontevedra, 36001
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, Valencia, 46014
Switzerland5 sites
Inselspital Bern
Bern, 3010
Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve
Geneva, 1211
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, 1011
Kantonsspital Sankt Gallen
Sankt Gallen, 9007
Universitaetsspital Zuerich
Zurich, 8091
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Ankara Bilkent Sehir Hastanesi
Ankara, 06800
Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Istanbul, 34390
Acibadem Altunizade Hastanesi
Istanbul, 34662
Marmara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Istanbul, 34899
Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Samsun, 55200
Italy4 sites
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS
Genova, 16132
Ospedale San Salvatore
LAquila, 67100
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, 00168
IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano MI, 20089
Slovakia4 sites
Maxderm, sro
Bardejov, 085 01
Univerzitna nemocnica Bratislava - Nemocnica Stare Mesto
Bratislava, 813 69
Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou JA Reimana Presov
Prešov, 081 81
Sanare spol sro
Svidník, 089 01
Netherlands3 sites
Bravis Ziekenhuis
Bergen op Zoom, 4624 VT
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Groningen, 9700 RB
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Romania3 sites
Theramed Healthcare SRL
Brasov, 500112
Institutul Regional de Gastroenterologie si Hepatologie Prof Dr Octavian Fodor
Cluj-Napoca, 400431
Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures
Târgu Mureş, 540613
Singapore3 sites
National University Hospital
Singapore, 117599
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 168753
National Skin Centre
Singapore, 308205
Slovenia2 sites
Univerzitetni klinicni center Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 1000
Univerzitetni Klinicni Center Maribor
Maribor, 2000
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, 24-week, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids and/or Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) (ROCKET-SHUTTLE)
The coprimary objectives of the study are to:
- evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab in combination with topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCS/TCI), compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™).
- evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab, in combination with TCS/TCI, compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI).
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Rocatinlimab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Atopic Dermatitis, AMG 451, Eczema, Rocatinlimab, KHK4083
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RocatinlimabDrug
Also called AMG 451
Subcutaneous (SC) injection
PlaceboOther
SC injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rocatinlimab Dose 1 + TCS/TCI | Experimental | Rocatinlimab Dose 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab |
| Rocatinlimab Dose 2 + TCS/TCI | Experimental | Rocatinlimab Dose 2 Q4W for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2. Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab |
| Placebo + TCS/TCI | Placebo comparator | Placebo Q4W for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24
vIGA-AD was a validated instrument rating AD severity on a 5-point scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Almost clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity. Participants achieving a score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline were considered 'Clear' or 'Almost clear'. For rIGA 0/1, when vIGA-AD = 1, investigators answered: "Did participant have barely perceptible erythema, no induration/papulation, no lichenification, and no oozing/crusting?" If "Yes," participant met rIGA 0/1; if "No," they did not. If vIGA-AD = 0, participant met rIGA 0/1. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 24
EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (28)
Number of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 at Week 16
EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 16
The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 24
The EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 90 was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) With a ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 24
The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Facial AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Facial AD at Baseline
The severity of facial AD was assessed using the Facial AD Severity Scale (FASS). The FASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of facial AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hand AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Hand AD at Baseline
The severity of hand AD was assessed using the Hand Atopic Dermatitis Severity Scale (HASS). The HASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of hand AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 16
The worst pruritus score was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (worst observation carried forward [WOCF]) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24
The worst pruritus score was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Severity Scoring (SCORing) of AD (SCORAD) Itch Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16
The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in SCORAD Itch VAS Score at Week 24
The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline DLQI ≥ 4
The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured participants' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 24
The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured patients' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD on health-related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline POEM Score ≥ 4
The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in POEM Score at Week 24
The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
AD skin pain was assessed using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
AD skin pain was assessed using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score at Week 24
Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score was defined as the mean of daily scores reported by participants in an electronic diary assessing the quality of their sleep over the past 24 hours. Sleep disturbance was measured using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 indicated the highest level of sleep disturbance. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their sleep disturbance using this scale each day. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in level of sleep disturbance.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-anxiety Subscale Score ≥ 8
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-Anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved HADS-depression Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-depression Subscale Score ≥ 8
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-anxiety Subscale Score at Week 24
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-Anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-depression Subscale Score at Week 24
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 8.7-point Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline SCORAD Total Score ≥ 8.7
The SCORAD total score used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. SCORAD total score ranged from 0 to 103 with a higher score indicating more severe AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2023
- Study start21 Feb 2023
- Primary completion15 Sep 2024
- Study completion4 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 746 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05724199
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20210144
- Other IDs
- 2022-501585-22-00
- Acronym
- ROCKET-SHUTTLE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.
Publications
Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, Kabashima K, Luna PC, Hercogova JT, Spelman L, Worm M, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Mano H, Charuworn P, Wang A, Kricorian G. ROCKET: a phase 3 program evaluating the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Immunotherapy. 2025 Feb;17(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2464528. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
PubMed 40012373
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, 24-week, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids and/or Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) (ROCKET-SHUTTLE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05724199
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROCKET-SHUTTLE / 20210144
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- Atopic Dermatitis, AMG 451, Eczema, Rocatinlimab, KHK4083
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 746 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Aug 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The coprimary objectives of the study are to:
- evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab in combination with topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCS/TCI), compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™).
- evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab, in combination with TCS/TCI, compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rocatinlimab Dose 1 + TCS/TCI | Experimental | Drug: RocatinlimabRocatinlimab Dose 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2. |
| Rocatinlimab Dose 2 + TCS/TCI | Experimental | Drug: RocatinlimabRocatinlimab Dose 2 Q4W for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2. |
| Placebo + TCS/TCI | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPlacebo Q4W for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AD according to the AAD (American Academy of Dermatology) Consensus Criteria (2014) present for at least 12 months
- History of inadequate response to TCS of medium or higher potency (with or without TCI)
- EASI score ≥16
- vIGA-AD score ≥3
- ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Treatment with a biological product within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1:
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 1 week, prior to Day 1:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RocatinlimabAlso: AMG 451Subcutaneous (SC) injection | Drug | Rocatinlimab Dose 1 + TCS/TCI, Rocatinlimab Dose 2 + TCS/TCI |
| PlaceboSC injection | Other | Placebo + TCS/TCI |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
vIGA-AD was a validated instrument rating AD severity on a 5-point scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Almost clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity. Participants achieving a score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline were considered 'Clear' or 'Almost clear'. For rIGA 0/1, when vIGA-AD = 1, investigators answered: "Did participant have barely perceptible erythema, no induration/papulation, no lichenification, and no oozing/crusting?" If "Yes," participant met rIGA 0/1; if "No," they did not. If vIGA-AD = 0, participant met rIGA 0/1. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
28 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) With a ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Facial AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Facial AD at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hand AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Hand AD at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Severity Scoring (SCORing) of AD (SCORAD) Itch Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in SCORAD Itch VAS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline DLQI ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline POEM Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in POEM Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-anxiety Subscale Score ≥ 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved HADS-depression Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-depression Subscale Score ≥ 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-anxiety Subscale Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-depression Subscale Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 8.7-point Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline SCORAD Total Score ≥ 8.7
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 40012373Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, Kabashima K, Luna PC, Hercogova JT, Spelman L, Worm M, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Mano H, Charuworn P, Wang A, Kricorian G. ROCKET: a phase 3 program evaluating the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Immunotherapy. 2025 Feb;17(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2464528. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Baricitinib in Patients With Job Syndrome With Lupus-Like Disease and/or Atopic Dermatitis
Hyper IgE Syndrome From STAT3 Mutation, Job s Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Cardamom and Topical Roseomonas in Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema
RecruitingObservational study
ADBest TREAT Registry
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 2
Effects of Treatments on Atopic Dermatitis
Eczema, Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History and Genetics of Food Allergy and Related Conditions
Food Allergy, Loeys-Dietz Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
234 sites in 26 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 234 sites in 26 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 234 sites in United States, Canada, China, France, Japan and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Aug 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05724199, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.