AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3ROCKET-SHUTTLENCT05724199

A Study Assessing Rocatinlimab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroid and/or Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 234 sites in 26 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The coprimary objectives of the study are to: evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab in combination with topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCS/TCI), compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Rocatinlimab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
746 participants
Where
234 sitesin 26 countries
Study dates
21 Feb 2023to 4 Dec 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AD according to the AAD (American Academy of Dermatology) Consensus Criteria (2014) present for at least 12 months
  • History of inadequate response to TCS of medium or higher potency (with or without TCI)
  • EASI score ≥16
  • vIGA-AD score ≥3
  • ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement
  • Worst pruritus numerical rating scale ≥ 4

Who cannot join

  • Treatment with a biological product within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1
  • Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1:
  • Systemic corticosteroids
  • Nonbiologic, non-targeted Systemic immunosuppressants
  • Phototherapy
  • Janus kinase inhibitors
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 1 week, prior to Day 1:
  • TCS
  • TCI
  • Topical phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors
  • Other topical immunosuppressive agents
  • Combination topical agents including TCS of any potency or TCI, PDE4 inhibitors, or other topical immunosuppressive agents

Trial locations and contacts

234 sites in 26 countries.

234 sites in 26 countries

United States45 sites
  • Albuquerque Clinical Trials Incorporated

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Atlanta Dermatology, Vein and Research Center, PC

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022

  • University of Michigan Medical Center

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Divine Dermatology and Aesthetics

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30315

  • Oakland Hills Dermatology

    Auburn Hills, Michigan, 48326

  • US Dermatology Partners Jollyville

    Austin, Texas, 78759

  • Kern Research Inc

    Bakersfield, California, 93301

  • Bexley Dermatology Research

    Bexley, Ohio, 43209

  • The University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • DS Research

    Clarksville, Indiana, 47129

  • Newco 3A Research LLC

    El Paso, Texas, 79925

  • Schweiger Dermatology Group, PC Research Division

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250

  • Sante Clinical Research

    Kerrville, Texas, 78028

  • Vivida Dermatology

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119

  • Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center Leawood

    Leawood, Kansas, 66211

  • Somnos Clinical Research

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68505

  • Keck Medicine of University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Wallace Medical Group Inc

    Los Angeles, California, 90056

  • Velocity Clinical Research Inc

    Medford, Oregon, 97504

  • Industrial Medicine Associates Clinical Research Advanced Dermatology Care

    Monroe, Louisiana, 71201

  • Virginia Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Las Vegas Clinical Trials

    North Las Vegas, Nevada, 89030

  • Arkansas Research Trials, LLC

    North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117

  • Skin Specialists PC

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Antelope Valley Clinical Trials

    Palmdale, California, 93551

  • Paddington Testing Company Inc

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103

  • Medical Dermatology Specialists

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Southwest Skin Specialists

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85018

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Texas Dermatology Research Center

    Plano, Texas, 75025

  • Health Concepts

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702

  • Aesthetic and Dermatology Center

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • University of California at Davis Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95816

  • Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95823

  • Acclaim Clinical Research

    San Diego, California, 92120

  • Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Oakland

    San Francisco, California, 94118

  • Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94118

  • Synergy Dermatology

    San Francisco, California, 94132

  • NorthShore University HealthSystem

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • US Dermatology Partners Sun City West

    Sun City West, Arizona, 85375

  • TrueBlue Clinical Research

    Tampa, Florida, 33609

  • Olympian Clinical Research - Tampa

    Tampa, Florida, 33615

  • Chear Center LLC

    The Bronx, New York, 10455

  • Accellacare of Wilmington

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401

Other trials in United States

Canada21 sites
  • Dermatology Research Institute Incorporated

    Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1

  • SKiN Health

    Coburg, Ontario, K9A 4J9

  • Laser Rejuvenation Clinics Edmonton D T Incorporated

    Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S9

  • Alberta Derma Surgery Centre

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3

  • Centricity Research London

    London, Ontario, N6A 2C2

  • Clinique de Dermatologie Rosemont

    Montreal, Quebec, H1Y 3L1

  • Innovaderm Research Inc

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Dr SK Siddha Medicine Professional Corporation

    Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8

  • Allergy Research Canada Incorporated

    Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2H 1H5

  • North Bay Dermatology Centre

    North Bay, Ontario, P1B 3Z7

  • Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre

    Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2

  • JRB Research Incorporated

    Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2

  • DIEX Recherche Quebec

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4T3

  • Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis

    Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4

  • The Centre for Dermatology

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1A5

  • Saskatoon Dermatology Centre

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7T 0G3

  • Enverus Medical Research

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6

  • North York Research Incorporated

    Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3A6

  • Toronto Research Centre Inc

    Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5Y8

  • Alliance Clinical Trials

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4

  • Wiseman Dermatology Research Incorporated

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4

Other trials in Canada

China21 sites
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050

  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

  • Peking University Peoples Hospital

    Beijing, 100044

  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun, Jilin, 130021

  • Chengdu Second Peoples Hospital

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000

  • The First Affiliated Hospital ,Sun-Yat Sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080

  • Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510091

  • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120

  • the First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016

  • Affiliated Hangzhou First Peoples Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310020

  • Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province

    Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330000

  • Nanyang First Peoples Hospital

    Nanyang, Henan, 473002

  • The First Affiliation Hospital Of Ningbo University

    Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010

  • Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital

    Shanghai, 200443

  • The Fist Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College

    Shantou, Guangdong, 515041

  • Shenzhen Qianhai Shekou Free Trade Zone Hospital

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101

  • Taizhou Central Hospital

    Taizhou, Zhejiang, 318000

  • Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of science and Technology

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022

  • Wuxi Second Peoples Hospital

    Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214001

Other trials in China

France17 sites
  • Hopital Prive d Antony

    Antony, 92160

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux - Hôpital Saint André

    Bordeaux, Cedex

  • Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire Brest Hopital Morvan

    Brest, 29200

  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez

    Lille, 59037

  • Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud - Hopital du Scorff

    Lorient, 56322

  • Hôpital La Timone

    Marseille, 13385

  • Cabinet du Docteur Ruer-Mulard Mireille

    Martigues, 13500

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes Hôtel Dieu

    Nantes, 44093

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Archet 2

    Nice, 06202

  • Hopital Bichat Claude Bernard

    Paris, 75018

  • Hopital Tenon

    Paris, 75020

  • Hopital Saint Louis

    Paris, 75475

  • Polyclinique de Courlancy

    Reims, 51100

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes - Hopital Pontchaillou

    Rennes, 35033

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen - Hôpital Charles Nicolle

    Rouen, 76031

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Etienne Hopital Nord

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270

  • Hopital d instruction des armees sainte anne

    Toulon, 83800

Other trials in France

Japan15 sites
  • Mildix Skin Clinic

    Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 120-0034

  • Ekihigashi Dermatology Allergy Clinic

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-0013

  • JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital

    Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-0929

  • Katahira Dermatology Urology Clinic

    Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 890-0063

  • Kosugi Dermatology Clinic

    Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 211-0063

  • Jouzan Hihuka Hinyoukika Clinic

    Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-0066

  • Suizenji Dermatology Clinic

    Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 862-0950

  • Fukui Dermatology Clinic

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 454-0803

  • Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic

    Neyagawa, Osaka, 572-0838

  • Takagi Dermatological Clinic Branch

    Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080-0013

  • Medical Corporation Kojinkai Sapporo Skin Clinic

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0063

  • Naoko Dermatology Clinic

    Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 158-0097

  • NTT Medical Center Tokyo

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625

  • Yamate Dermatology Clinic

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-0075

  • Nomura Dermatology Clinic

    Yokohama, Kanagawa, 221-0825

Other trials in Japan

Belgium10 sites
  • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende

    Bruges, 8000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann

    Brussels, 1020

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

    Brussels, 1090

  • Universite Catholique de Louvain Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc

    Brussels, 1200

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • Clinique Andre Renard

    Herstal, 4040

  • Dermatologie Handelskaai

    Kortrijk, 8500

  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege - Sart Tilman

    Liège, 4000

  • Grand Hopital de Charleroi

    Loverval, 6280

Other trials in Belgium

Germany10 sites
  • Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen - Georg-August-Universitaet

    Göttingen, 37075

  • TFS Trial Form Support GmbH

    Hamburg, 20537

  • MensingDerma research GmbH

    Hamburg, 22391

  • Hautaerzte Zentrum Hannover

    Hanover, 30159

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, 30625

  • Universitaetsmedizin Mainz

    Mainz, 55101

  • Beldio Research GmbH

    Memmingen, 87700

  • Hautmedizin Saar

    Merzing, 66663

  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM

    München, 80802

Other trials in Germany

Hungary10 sites
  • Trial Pharma Kft

    Békéscsaba, 5600

  • Csalogany Orvosi Kozpont

    Budapest, 1027

  • Clinexpert Kft

    Budapest, 1033

  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft

    Budapest, 1036

  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Gyongyosi Bugat Pal Korhaz

    Gyöngyös, 3200

  • Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz

    Kaposvár, 7400

  • DermaMed Research Kft

    Orosháza, 5900

  • Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft

    Szolnok, 5000

  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft

    Zalaegerszeg, 8900

Other trials in Hungary

Argentina8 sites
  • Buenos Aires Skin SA

    Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1054

  • Fundacion Cidea

    Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1121

  • Care- Centro de Alergia y Enfermedades Respiratorias

    Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1414

  • Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria SRL

    Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1425

  • Cinme - Centro de Investigaciones Metabolicas

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1027AAP

  • Framingham Centro Medico

    La Plata, Buenos Aires, B1902COS

  • Dim Clinica Privada

    Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, 1704

  • Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas Instituto Especialidades De La Salud De Rosario

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

Other trials in Argentina

Malaysia7 sites
  • Hospital Pulau Pinang

    George Town, Pulau Pinang, 10990

  • Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun

    Ipoh, Perak, 30450

  • Hospital Sultan Ismail

    Johor Bahru, Johor, 81100

  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 88586

  • Hospital Kuala Lumpur

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 50586

  • Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000

  • University Malaya Medical Centre

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100

Other trials in Malaysia

Poland7 sites
  • Dermapolis Medical Dermatology Center dr n med Edyta Gebska

    Chorzów, 41-500

  • GynCentrum Spzoo NZOZ Holsamed - Oddzial Libero

    Katowice, 40-600

  • Specjalistyczny Gabinet Dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno-Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski SpCywilna

    Krakow, 30-002

  • AppleTreeClinics Network Spzoo

    Lodz, 90-349

  • Ip Clinic Sp zoo

    Lodz, 90-752

  • Twoja Przychodnia Scm

    Szczecin, 71-500

  • DermMedica Spzoo Centrum Columbus

    Wroclaw, 51-503

Other trials in Poland

Australia6 sites
  • The Skin Centre

    Benowa, Queensland, 4217

  • Emeritus Research Sydney

    Botany, New South Wales, 2019

  • Emeritus Research Melbourne

    Camberwell, Victoria, 3124

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101

  • Westmead Hospital

    Westmead, New South Wales, 2145

  • Veracity Clinical Research

    Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102

Other trials in Australia

Greece6 sites
  • 401 General Military Hospital Of Athens

    Athens, 11525

  • Andreas Syngros Hospital Of Venereal And Dermatological Diseases

    Athens, 16121

  • University General Hospital of Heraklion

    Heraklion, 71500

  • General Hospital Of Nea Ionia Konstantopouleio Patision

    Nea Ionia, 14233

  • Geniko Nosokomeio Peiraia Tzaneio

    Piraeus, 18536

  • Ippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki

    Thessaloniki, 54642

Other trials in Greece

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

    Bath, BA1 3NG

  • Russells Hall Hospital

    Dudley, DY1 2HQ

  • West Middlesex University Hospital

    Isleworth, TW7 6AF

  • The Royal Free Hospital

    London, NW3 2PF

  • Salford Care Organisation

    Salford, M6 8HD

  • Accellacare Yorkshire

    Shipley, BD18 3SA

Other trials in United Kingdom

Austria5 sites
  • Medizinische Universitaet Graz

    Graz, 8036

  • Medizinische Universitaet Innsbruck

    Innsbruck, 6020

  • Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg

    Salzburg, 5020

  • Klinik Landstrasse

    Vienna, 1030

  • Klinik Hietzing

    Vienna, 1130

Other trials in Austria

Bulgaria5 sites
  • Medical Center Asklepii OOD

    Dupnitsa, 2600

  • Medical Center Medconsult Pleven OOD

    Pleven, 5800

  • Medical Center Excelsior OOD

    Sofia, 1407

  • Diagnostic-Consultative Center Alexandrovska EOOD

    Sofia, 1431

  • Diagnostic-Consultative Center - Fokus-5 - Medical Institution for Outpatient Care OOD

    Sofia, 1463

Other trials in Bulgaria

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036

  • Hospital Universitario Basurto

    Bilbao, Basque Country, 48013

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra

    Pontevedra, 36001

  • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, Valencia, 46014

Other trials in Spain

Switzerland5 sites
  • Inselspital Bern

    Bern, 3010

  • Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve

    Geneva, 1211

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

    Lausanne, 1011

  • Kantonsspital Sankt Gallen

    Sankt Gallen, 9007

  • Universitaetsspital Zuerich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Ankara Bilkent Sehir Hastanesi

    Ankara, 06800

  • Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi

    Istanbul, 34390

  • Acibadem Altunizade Hastanesi

    Istanbul, 34662

  • Marmara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi

    Istanbul, 34899

  • Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi

    Samsun, 55200

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Italy4 sites
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS

    Genova, 16132

  • Ospedale San Salvatore

    LAquila, 67100

  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

    Roma, 00168

  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas

    Rozzano MI, 20089

Other trials in Italy

Slovakia4 sites
  • Maxderm, sro

    Bardejov, 085 01

  • Univerzitna nemocnica Bratislava - Nemocnica Stare Mesto

    Bratislava, 813 69

  • Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou JA Reimana Presov

    Prešov, 081 81

  • Sanare spol sro

    Svidník, 089 01

Other trials in Slovakia

Netherlands3 sites
  • Bravis Ziekenhuis

    Bergen op Zoom, 4624 VT

  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

    Groningen, 9700 RB

  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3584 CX

Other trials in Netherlands

Romania3 sites
  • Theramed Healthcare SRL

    Brasov, 500112

  • Institutul Regional de Gastroenterologie si Hepatologie Prof Dr Octavian Fodor

    Cluj-Napoca, 400431

  • Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures

    Târgu Mureş, 540613

Other trials in Romania

Singapore3 sites
  • National University Hospital

    Singapore, 117599

  • Singapore General Hospital

    Singapore, 168753

  • National Skin Centre

    Singapore, 308205

Other trials in Singapore

Slovenia2 sites
  • Univerzitetni klinicni center Ljubljana

    Ljubljana, 1000

  • Univerzitetni Klinicni Center Maribor

    Maribor, 2000

Other trials in Slovenia

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Doctor Samuel Sanchez PSC

    Caguas, 00727-9507

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, 24-week, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids and/or Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) (ROCKET-SHUTTLE)

The coprimary objectives of the study are to:

  • evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab in combination with topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCS/TCI), compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™).
  • evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab, in combination with TCS/TCI, compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI).
Being tested
Rocatinlimab, Placebo
Keywords
Atopic Dermatitis, AMG 451, Eczema, Rocatinlimab, KHK4083
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RocatinlimabDrug

    Also called AMG 451

    Subcutaneous (SC) injection

  • PlaceboOther

    SC injection

Study groups in NCT05724199
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rocatinlimab Dose 1 + TCS/TCIExperimentalRocatinlimab Dose 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2.
Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab
Rocatinlimab Dose 2 + TCS/TCIExperimentalRocatinlimab Dose 2 Q4W for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2.
Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab
Placebo + TCS/TCIPlacebo comparatorPlacebo Q4W for 24 weeks + TCS/TCI + loading dose at Week 2.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24

    vIGA-AD was a validated instrument rating AD severity on a 5-point scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Almost clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity. Participants achieving a score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline were considered 'Clear' or 'Almost clear'. For rIGA 0/1, when vIGA-AD = 1, investigators answered: "Did participant have barely perceptible erythema, no induration/papulation, no lichenification, and no oozing/crusting?" If "Yes," participant met rIGA 0/1; if "No," they did not. If vIGA-AD = 0, participant met rIGA 0/1. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 24

    EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 at Week 16

    EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 16

    The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  3. Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4

    The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  4. Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4

    The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  5. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 24

    The EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 90 was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  6. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) With a ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 24

    The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  8. Number of Participants Who Achieved Facial AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Facial AD at Baseline

    The severity of facial AD was assessed using the Facial AD Severity Scale (FASS). The FASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of facial AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  9. Number of Participants Who Achieved Hand AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Hand AD at Baseline

    The severity of hand AD was assessed using the Hand Atopic Dermatitis Severity Scale (HASS). The HASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of hand AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 16

    The worst pruritus score was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (worst observation carried forward [WOCF]) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24

    The worst pruritus score was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline in Severity Scoring (SCORing) of AD (SCORAD) Itch Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16

    The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  13. Change From Baseline in SCORAD Itch VAS Score at Week 24

    The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  14. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline DLQI ≥ 4

    The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured participants' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  15. Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 24

    The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured patients' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD on health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  16. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline POEM Score ≥ 4

    The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  17. Change From Baseline in POEM Score at Week 24

    The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  18. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  19. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  20. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  21. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3

    AD skin pain was assessed using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  22. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3

    AD skin pain was assessed using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  23. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score at Week 24

    Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score was defined as the mean of daily scores reported by participants in an electronic diary assessing the quality of their sleep over the past 24 hours. Sleep disturbance was measured using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 indicated the highest level of sleep disturbance. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their sleep disturbance using this scale each day. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in level of sleep disturbance.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  24. Number of Participants Who Achieved Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-anxiety Subscale Score ≥ 8

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-Anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  25. Number of Participants Who Achieved HADS-depression Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-depression Subscale Score ≥ 8

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  26. Change From Baseline in HADS-anxiety Subscale Score at Week 24

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-Anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  27. Change From Baseline in HADS-depression Subscale Score at Week 24

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  28. Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 8.7-point Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline SCORAD Total Score ≥ 8.7

    The SCORAD total score used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. SCORAD total score ranged from 0 to 103 with a higher score indicating more severe AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2023
  2. Study start21 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion4 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
746 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05724199
Sponsor's protocol ID
20210144
Other IDs
2022-501585-22-00
Acronym
ROCKET-SHUTTLE
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
2 Feb 2023
Last updated
6 Aug 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.

Publications

  • Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, Kabashima K, Luna PC, Hercogova JT, Spelman L, Worm M, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Mano H, Charuworn P, Wang A, Kricorian G. ROCKET: a phase 3 program evaluating the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Immunotherapy. 2025 Feb;17(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2464528. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

    PubMed 40012373

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 234 sites in 26 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 234 sites in United States, Canada, China, France, Japan and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Aug 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05724199, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in