Shoulder ArthroscopyNCT05727345
Shoulder Anterior Capsular Block and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy
A study testing Interscalene brachial plexus block and Shoulder anterior capsular block in people with Shoulder Arthroscopy and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block, run by Haseki Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of our study is to reveal a comparison between interscalene brachial plexus block and shoulder anterior capsular block with respect to their efficacy on pain relief during perioperative anesthetic management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Arthroscopy, Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block, Shoulder Anterior Capsular Block
- What is being tested?
- Interscalene brachial plexus block and Shoulder anterior capsular block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2022to 30 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who have been diagnosed with rotator cuff rupture and admitted to receiving arthroscopic cuff repair surgery
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification I to III
- Patients who will give informed consent to peripheral nerve blocks
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate in the study
- History of neurologic deficits or neuropathy affecting the brachial plexus
- Infection at the site of the block application
- Coagulopathy
- Pre-existing respiratory dysfunction
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Uncooperated patients who cannot reliably answer verbal pain evaluation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Sultangazi, 34000
Berna Caliskan, MD, +905067108770, caliskan.b@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Shoulder Anterior Capsular Block and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Preliminary Analysis
The aim of our study is to reveal a comparison between interscalene brachial plexus block and shoulder anterior capsular block with respect to their efficacy on pain relief during perioperative anesthetic management. As intraoperative hemodynamic stability is an important factor for surgeons to achieve better outcomes because of its effect on the quality of arthroscopic visualization for shoulder arthroplasty, the investigators will also observe the effects of this matter.
50 patients scheduled for elective surgery will be randomized by closed envelope method into two groups (n=20) receiving either interscalene brachial plexus block or shoulder anterior capsular block preoperatively. Each group receives standardized general anesthesia and perioperative pain management protocol. Data to be recorded are numeric rating scales, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic use, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and arthroscopic visualization score. Moreover, block performance time, motor block, and side effects or complications will be noted.
Read the detailed description
Introduction: Pain management after shoulder arthroplasty continues to be challenging. Although interscalene brachial plexus block has been accepted to be the gold standard intervention to relieve pain and improve postoperative outcomes by effecting functional rehabilitation and recovery times, usually results in motor block and complications such as hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis are possible to encounter. For this reason, the research for novel techniques to alleviate these outcomes resumes on the anatomical point of view and ultrasonography guidance. Shoulder anterior capsular block is a recently described interfascial and pericapsular block and is shown to be effective in relieving shoulder pain without motor block or complications.
The aim of our study is to reveal a comparison between interscalene brachial plexus block and shoulder anterior capsular block with respect to their efficacy on pain relief during perioperative anesthetic management along with intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and their effect on the quality of arthroscopic visualization for shoulder arthroplasty.
Material method: Patients scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair after June 30, 2022, are eligible for this study after ethical board approval. Inclusion criteria are (1) patients aged between 18-90 years with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification I to III, (2) diagnosed with rotator cuff rupture, and (3) admitted receiving arthroscopic cuff repair surgery. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
Exclusion criteria are refusal to participate in the study, history of neurologic deficits or neuropathy affecting the brachial plexus; infection at the site of the block application; coagulopathy; pre-existing respiratory dysfunction; allergy to local anesthetics; uncooperative patients who cannot reliably answer to verbal pain evaluation.
All patients will receive standard general anesthesia under standard monitorization; induction with 0,03 mg/kg midazolam, 2 mg/kg propofol, 2 mcg/kg fentanyl, 0,6 mg /kg rocuronium followed by 2% MAC sevoflurane in an air-oxygen mixture for maintenance of anesthesia. Randomization is designed with concealed opaque envelope in a 1:1 ratio into 2 block groups (n= 20): interscalene brachial plexus block (Group A) and shoulder anterior capsular block (Group B). All blocks will be performed before surgical incision by a single experienced regional anaesthesiologist (B.Ç.) under ultrasound guidance with the same local anesthetic doses: 0.375 % bupivacaine anesthetic solution of 10 mL and 2 % lidocaine anesthetic solution of 5 mL. The duration of the block procedure will be recorded by the anesthesia technician. Then the investigator will apply dexamethasone 4 mg (IV) after each block and approximately 15 minutes later the patient will be ready for a surgical incision. Intraoperative hemodynamic values (heart rate, systolic, and mean arterial pressure) will be recorded by the same technician. The same analgesia protocol will be applied as an infusion of remifentanil (0.01 to 0.1 μg · kg-1 · min-1) if only needed to maintain the heart rate and mean blood pressure within 20% of pre-induction values and 1 gr paracetamol. At the end of the surgery, the surgeon who is blind to the groups will decide the arthroscopic visualization score.
After surgery, all patients will be followed by the same orthopaedist who is blind to the patient groups. Also, the patients themselves cannot know their groups as well. Pain will be evaluated both by a numeric rating scale (0-10) and verbal rating scale starting at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at time intervals 2-6-12-24-48th hours postoperatively. Patients with persistent pain scores higher than 4 of 10 will receive rescue analgesia with 1mg/kg (maximum daily dose, 4x1) tramadol and 1 gr (maximum daily dose, 4x1) paracetamol. The duration of motor blockade if any, the severity of rebound pain and the total amount of analgesic drug used during the postoperative follow-up of the patient will be recorded. Before discharge, patient satisfaction (1. Not at all satisfied, 2. Dissatisfied 3. Moderate 4. Satisfied 5. Very satisfied) will be evaluated and the presence of postoperative side effects and complications will be questioned.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Arthroscopy, Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block, Shoulder Anterior Capsular Block, Rotator Cuff Rupture
- Being tested
- Interscalene brachial plexus block, Shoulder anterior capsular block
- Keywords
- Shoulder arthroscopy, Postoperative pain, Interscalene brachial plexus block, Shoulder anterior capsular block, Hemodynamic stability
- Medical subject headings
- Rotator Cuff Injuries, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interscalene brachial plexus blockProcedure or surgery
Preoperative ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block application
Shoulder anterior capsular blockProcedure or surgery
Preoperative ultrasound-guided shoulder anterior capsular(SHAC) block application
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interscalene | Active comparator | Right after general anesthesia induction and patient intubation, the patient will be placed in the semi-sitting position. Following sterile skin preparation, an interscalene block will be performed by the same anaesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance with an in-plane posterior approach approximately between C6-C7 nerve roots through a 22-gauge 50-mm insulated stimulating needle (StimuPlex Nanoline, Braun). Neurostimulation with an initial current of 0,5 mA, pulse width of 100ms, and a frequency of 2 Hz will be used as protection for intraneural injection, once the needle tip is in proximity to the brachial plexus. 15 mL local anesthetic solution (0.375 % bupivacaine anesthetic solution of 10 mL and 2 % lidocaine anesthetic solution of 5 mL) will be observed to disperse within the interscalene space. Receives: Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block |
| SHAC | Experimental | Right after general anesthesia induction and patient intubation, the patient will be placed in the semi-sitting position with the arm in extension and abduction. Following sterile skin preparation, a SHAC block will be performed by the same anaesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance by visualization of the interfascial space between the deep lamina of the deltoid muscle fascia and the superficial lamina of the subscapularis fascia and glenohumeral pericapsular space. A 22-gauge 50-mm insulated stimulating needle (StimuPlex Nanoline, Braun) will be used to give 1-3 mL of 5% Dextrose for the correct location and then 15 mL local anesthetic solution will be divided into 7,5 mL (0.375 % bupivacaine 5 mL and 2 % lidocaine 2,5 mL) for each target points as interfascial space and pericapsular space. Receives: Procedure: Shoulder anterior capsular block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Numeric rating scale (NRS) worst pain imaginable as 10 points to zero pain. Verbal rating scale (VRS): no pain; slight pain; moderate pain; severe pain; unbearable pain
Measured: 2 days
Analgesic drug used
The total amount of analgesic drug used during the postoperative follow-up
Measured: 2 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
heart rate
heart rate value at the monitor
Measured: Intraoperative
Arthroscopic visualization score
arthroscopic visualization score: Grade 1: excellent; Grade 2: good sometimes cautery needed; Grade 3: moderate; often required cautery and manipulation; Grade 4: bad image
Measured: Intraoperative
blood pressure
systolic arterial blood pressure
Measured: Intraoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2023
- Study start30 Jun 2022
- Primary completion30 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shoulder ArthroscopyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Once the investigator chose from the opaque envelopes which group the patient will be included, interscalene brachial plexus block will be applied for Group A and shoulder anterior capsular block will be applied for Group B. All other interventions will be standardized.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Haseki Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Berna Caliskan, MD, Principal investigator, Haseki Training and Research Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05727345
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 142-2022
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yamak Altinpulluk E, Teles AS, Galluccio F, Simon DG, Olea MS, Salazar C, Fajardo Perez M. Pericapsular nerve group block for postoperative shoulder pain: A cadaveric radiological evaluation. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec;67:110058. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110058. Epub 2020 Sep 26. No abstract available.
PubMed 32987232Kang R, Jeong JS, Chin KJ, Yoo JC, Lee JH, Choi SJ, Gwak MS, Hahm TS, Ko JS. Superior Trunk Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia Compared with Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019 Dec;131(6):1316-1326. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002919.
PubMed 31490292
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Shoulder Anterior Capsular Block and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Preliminary Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05727345
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 142-2022
- Conditions
- Shoulder Arthroscopy, Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block, Shoulder Anterior Capsular Block, Rotator Cuff Rupture
- Keywords
- Shoulder arthroscopy, Postoperative pain, Interscalene brachial plexus block, Shoulder anterior capsular block, Hemodynamic stability
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Haseki Training and Research HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of our study is to reveal a comparison between interscalene brachial plexus block and shoulder anterior capsular block with respect to their efficacy on pain relief during perioperative anesthetic management. As intraoperative hemodynamic stability is an important factor for surgeons to achieve better outcomes because of its effect on the quality of arthroscopic visualization for shoulder arthroplasty, the investigators will also observe the effects of this matter.
50 patients scheduled for elective surgery will be randomized by closed envelope method into two groups (n=20) receiving either interscalene brachial plexus block or shoulder anterior capsular block preoperatively. Each group receives standardized general anesthesia and perioperative pain management protocol. Data to be recorded are numeric rating scales, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic use, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and arthroscopic visualization score. Moreover, block performance time, motor block, and side effects or complications will be noted.
Detailed description
Introduction: Pain management after shoulder arthroplasty continues to be challenging. Although interscalene brachial plexus block has been accepted to be the gold standard intervention to relieve pain and improve postoperative outcomes by effecting functional rehabilitation and recovery times, usually results in motor block and complications such as hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis are possible to encounter. For this reason, the research for novel techniques to alleviate these outcomes resumes on the anatomical point of view and ultrasonography guidance. Shoulder anterior capsular block is a recently described interfascial and pericapsular block and is shown to be effective in relieving shoulder pain without motor block or complications.
The aim of our study is to reveal a comparison between interscalene brachial plexus block and shoulder anterior capsular block with respect to their efficacy on pain relief during perioperative anesthetic management along with intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and their effect on the quality of arthroscopic visualization for shoulder arthroplasty.
Material method: Patients scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair after June 30, 2022, are eligible for this study after ethical board approval. Inclusion criteria are (1) patients aged between 18-90 years with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification I to III, (2) diagnosed with rotator cuff rupture, and (3) admitted receiving arthroscopic cuff repair surgery. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
Exclusion criteria are refusal to participate in the study, history of neurologic deficits or neuropathy affecting the brachial plexus; infection at the site of the block application; coagulopathy; pre-existing respiratory dysfunction; allergy to local anesthetics; uncooperative patients who cannot reliably answer to verbal pain evaluation.
All patients will receive standard general anesthesia under standard monitorization; induction with 0,03 mg/kg midazolam, 2 mg/kg propofol, 2 mcg/kg fentanyl, 0,6 mg /kg rocuronium followed by 2% MAC sevoflurane in an air-oxygen mixture for maintenance of anesthesia. Randomization is designed with concealed opaque envelope in a 1:1 ratio into 2 block groups (n= 20): interscalene brachial plexus block (Group A) and shoulder anterior capsular block (Group B). All blocks will be performed before surgical incision by a single experienced regional anaesthesiologist (B.Ç.) under ultrasound guidance with the same local anesthetic doses: 0.375 % bupivacaine anesthetic solution of 10 mL and 2 % lidocaine anesthetic solution of 5 mL. The duration of the block procedure will be recorded by the anesthesia technician. Then the investigator will apply dexamethasone 4 mg (IV) after each block and approximately 15 minutes later the patient will be ready for a surgical incision. Intraoperative hemodynamic values (heart rate, systolic, and mean arterial pressure) will be recorded by the same technician. The same analgesia protocol will be applied as an infusion of remifentanil (0.01 to 0.1 μg · kg-1 · min-1) if only needed to maintain the heart rate and mean blood pressure within 20% of pre-induction values and 1 gr paracetamol. At the end of the surgery, the surgeon who is blind to the groups will decide the arthroscopic visualization score.
After surgery, all patients will be followed by the same orthopaedist who is blind to the patient groups. Also, the patients themselves cannot know their groups as well. Pain will be evaluated both by a numeric rating scale (0-10) and verbal rating scale starting at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at time intervals 2-6-12-24-48th hours postoperatively. Patients with persistent pain scores higher than 4 of 10 will receive rescue analgesia with 1mg/kg (maximum daily dose, 4x1) tramadol and 1 gr (maximum daily dose, 4x1) paracetamol. The duration of motor blockade if any, the severity of rebound pain and the total amount of analgesic drug used during the postoperative follow-up of the patient will be recorded. Before discharge, patient satisfaction (1. Not at all satisfied, 2. Dissatisfied 3. Moderate 4. Satisfied 5. Very satisfied) will be evaluated and the presence of postoperative side effects and complications will be questioned.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Once the investigator chose from the opaque envelopes which group the patient will be included, interscalene brachial plexus block will be applied for Group A and shoulder anterior capsular block will be applied for Group B. All other interventions will be standardized.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interscalene | Active comparator | Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus blockRight after general anesthesia induction and patient intubation, the patient will be placed in the semi-sitting position. Following sterile skin preparation, an interscalene block will be performed by the same anaesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance with an in-plane posterior approach approximately between C6-C7 nerve roots through a 22-gauge 50-mm insulated stimulating needle (StimuPlex Nanoline, Braun). Neurostimulation with an initial current of 0,5 mA, pulse width of 100ms, and a frequency of 2 Hz will be used as protection for intraneural injection, once the needle tip is in proximity to the brachial plexus. 15 mL local anesthetic solution (0.375 % bupivacaine anesthetic solution of 10 mL and 2 % lidocaine anesthetic solution of 5 mL) will be observed to disperse within the interscalene space. |
| SHAC | Experimental | Procedure: Shoulder anterior capsular blockRight after general anesthesia induction and patient intubation, the patient will be placed in the semi-sitting position with the arm in extension and abduction. Following sterile skin preparation, a SHAC block will be performed by the same anaesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance by visualization of the interfascial space between the deep lamina of the deltoid muscle fascia and the superficial lamina of the subscapularis fascia and glenohumeral pericapsular space. A 22-gauge 50-mm insulated stimulating needle (StimuPlex Nanoline, Braun) will be used to give 1-3 mL of 5% Dextrose for the correct location and then 15 mL local anesthetic solution will be divided into 7,5 mL (0.375 % bupivacaine 5 mL and 2 % lidocaine 2,5 mL) for each target points as interfascial space and pericapsular space. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who have been diagnosed with rotator cuff rupture and admitted to receiving arthroscopic cuff repair surgery
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification I to III
- Patients who will give informed consent to peripheral nerve blocks
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Refusal to participate in the study
- History of neurologic deficits or neuropathy affecting the brachial plexus
- Infection at the site of the block application
- Coagulopathy
- Pre-existing respiratory dysfunction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interscalene brachial plexus blockPreoperative ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block application | Procedure or surgery | Interscalene |
| Shoulder anterior capsular blockPreoperative ultrasound-guided shoulder anterior capsular(SHAC) block application | Procedure or surgery | SHAC |
Primary outcome
Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Time frame: 2 days
Numeric rating scale (NRS) worst pain imaginable as 10 points to zero pain. Verbal rating scale (VRS): no pain; slight pain; moderate pain; severe pain; unbearable pain
Analgesic drug used
Time frame: 2 days
The total amount of analgesic drug used during the postoperative follow-up
3 secondary outcomes
heart rate
Time frame: Intraoperative
Arthroscopic visualization score
Time frame: Intraoperative
blood pressure
Time frame: Intraoperative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2023.
- Background: PubMed 32987232Yamak Altinpulluk E, Teles AS, Galluccio F, Simon DG, Olea MS, Salazar C, Fajardo Perez M. Pericapsular nerve group block for postoperative shoulder pain: A cadaveric radiological evaluation. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec;67:110058. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110058. Epub 2020 Sep 26. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 31490292Kang R, Jeong JS, Chin KJ, Yoo JC, Lee JH, Choi SJ, Gwak MS, Hahm TS, Ko JS. Superior Trunk Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia Compared with Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019 Dec;131(6):1316-1326. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002919.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Shoulder Arthroscopy
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant in Combined Costoclavicular Block and Suprascapular Block Versus Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopy
Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Analgesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Postoperative Pain, Acute, Shoulder Pain
Not yet recruiting
ESP Versus SPSIP Block for Pain Relief After Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Dynamic Anterior Stabilization With and Without Remplissage
Anterior Shoulder Instability
RecruitingObservational study
SPSIP Block in Shoulder Artroscopy
Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Berna Caliskan, MD principal investigator
Haseki Training and Research Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interscalene brachial plexus block and Shoulder anterior capsular block in people with Shoulder Arthroscopy and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block, run by Haseki Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Berna Caliskan, MD (+905067108770, caliskan.b@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numeric rating scale (NRS) (time frame: 2 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05727345, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2023.