AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT05729685

Aerobic Adaptations With Various Training Methods

A study testing Interval training and Continuous training in people with Healthy, run by Ilias Smilios at 1 site in Greece.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this intervention study is to compare the adaptations after a 6-week training period between an intense continuous and a high-intensity interval training program performed under iso-effort conditions on aerobic performance parameters in young healthy adults. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Interval training and Continuous training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteGreece
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 10 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • All participants should have been involved in low intensity continuous training,
  • All participants should have been training 1-3 times per week for 30-45 min for at least three months.

Who cannot join

  • Not familiar with aerobic training
  • Any health issues that did not allow participation in regular exercise training.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Greece1 site
  • Department of Physical Education and Sport Science

    Komotini, Rodopi, 69100

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: Aerobic Adaptations Following Two Iso-effort Training Programs: An Intense Continuous and a High-intensity Interval

The goal of this intervention study is to compare the adaptations after a 6-week training period between an intense continuous and a high-intensity interval training program performed under iso-effort conditions on aerobic performance parameters in young healthy adults. The main question it aims to answer are if the intense continuous and a high-intensity interval training programs will induce similar adaptations in maximal (VO2max and PTV) and submaximal (critical velocity, lactate threshold parameters and running economy) aerobic performance parameters. Participants will be ere randomly assigned either to an intense continuous training group (CON) or to a high-intensity interval training group (INT). The training program will comprise of 14 training sessions performed over a 6-week period.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study was to compare the adaptations after a 6-week training period between the intense continuous and the high-intensity interval training methods performed under iso-effort conditions on maximal (VO2max and PTV) and submaximal (critical velocity, lactate threshold parameters and running economy) aerobic performance parameters.

A parallel group research design was used in the present study. Initially, 26 participants (10 males and 16 females), using stratified randomization (gender was the variable of stratification) were randomly assigned (1:1), according to a random-number table, either to an intense continuous training group (CON) or to a high-intensity interval training group (INT).

The INT group trained using the interval method. During the exercise sessions the participants ran each bout at an intensity corresponding to 90% of PTV. PTV was used to prescribe the exercise intensity at the INT group. The duration of the running-bouts was equal to ¼ of the individual time to exhaustion at 90% of PTV (determined during the CV testing) followed by passive rest equal to 2/3 of exercise duration. The duration of the exercise-bouts was individualized based on the time to exhaustion at 90% of PTV to reduce the between subject's variability. The participants terminated each exercise session when an RPE value of 17 was reached. Running bout duration and intensity were adjusted after 7 training sessions (during the 3rd week) following a reassessment of the time to exhaustion at 90% of the "new" PTV achieved during mid-testing as a result of training.

The CONT group trained using the continuous method. During the training sessions the participants ran with an intensity corresponding to -2,5% of CV until they reported a rating of 17 at the 6-20 Borg's scale. Running velocity was adjusted after 7 training sessions (during the 3rd week) after reassessment of CV. CV was used to determine the exercise intensity in the CONT group to ensure that all individuals would ran at the heavy intensity domain and be able to complete at least 15 min of continuous running, and to minimize the high inter-individual variations in endurance time at intensities near the upper limit of the heavy intensity domain. Using PTV to determine the intensity in the CONT group, would increase the possibility for trainees to exercise at different exercise intensity domains.

During the experiment, participants will not perform any other form of training besides of that applied in the current study. VO2max, PTV, oxygen consumptions, heart rates and the velocities corresponding to the 1st and the 2nd lactate thresholds (LT1 and LT2), the velocity at 4 mmol/L of blood lactate concentration (v4mmol), running economy, and critical velocity (CV) will be measured before, after 7 training sessions (3rd week, two days after the 7th training session), and after the completion of training program.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Interval training, Continuous training
Keywords
exercise, maximal oxygen consumption, endurance
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interval trainingOther

    The interval training group trained using the interval method. During the exercise sessions the participants ran each bout at an intensity corresponding to 90% of PTV. PTV was used to prescribe the exercise intensity at the INT group. The duration of the running-bouts was equal to ¼ of the individual time to exhaustion at 90% of PTV (determined during the CV testing) followed by passive rest equal to 2/3 of exercise duration. The duration of the exercise-bouts was individualized based on the time to exhaustion at 90% of PTV to reduce the between subject's variability. The participants terminated each exercise session when an RPE value of 17 was reached. Running bout duration and intensity were adjusted after 7 training sessions (during the 3rd week) following a reassessment of the time to exhaustion at 90% of the "new" PTV achieved during mid-testing as a result of training.

  • Continuous trainingOther

    The continuous group trained using the continuous method. During the training sessions the participants ran with an intensity corresponding to -2,5% of CV until they reported a rating of 17 at the 6-20 Borg's scale. Running velocity was adjusted after 7 training sessions (during the 3rd week) after reassessment of CV. CV was used to determine the exercise intensity in the CONT group to ensure that all individuals would ran at the heavy intensity domain and be able to complete at least 15 min of continuous running, and to minimize the high inter-individual variations in endurance time at intensities near the upper limit of the heavy intensity domain. Using PTV to determine the intensity in the CONT group, would increase the possibility for trainees to exercise at different exercise intensity domains.

Study groups in NCT05729685
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Interval trainingExperimentalThe interval group trained using the interval trainining method.
Receives: Other: Interval training
Continuous trainingExperimentalThe continuous group trained using the continuous training method.
Receives: Other: Continuous training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in maximal oxygen consumption

    Maximal oxygen consumption in ml/kg/min

    Measured: At the beginning of the training program, the 3rd week of training (after 7 training sessions), and the 7th week after the start of the intervention (after the completion of 6 weeks of training, 14 training sessions)

  2. Changes in peak treadmill velocity

    Peak treadmill velocity using a maximal incremental test to exhaustion on a treadmill in km/h

    Measured: At the beginning of the training program, the 3rd week of training (after 7 training sessions), and the 7th week after the start of the intervention (after the completion of 6 weeks of training, 14 training sessions)

  3. Changes in running velocities at the 1st and the 2nd lactate thresholds

    Running velocities (km/h) at the 1st and the 2nd lactate thresholds by measuring the changes in blood lactate concentration during a maximal incremental test to exhaustion on a treadmill.

    Measured: At the beginning of the training program, the 3rd week of training (after 7 training sessions), and the 7th week after the start of the intervention (after the completion of 6 weeks of training, 14 training sessions)

  4. Changes in critical velocity

    Critical velocity (km/h) determined by having the participants ran until exhaustion at velocities corresponding to 90, 100, and 110% of peak treadmill velocity. Using linear regression analyses, the relationship between the distance covered at each run and the time to exhaustion was calculated. Τhe slope of the linear regression line was the critical velocity.

    Measured: At the beginning of the training program, the 3rd week of training (after 7 training sessions), and the 7th week after the start of the intervention (after the completion of 6 weeks of training, 14 training sessions)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Changes in running economy

    Running economy determined by measuring the oxygen consumption (ml/kg/min) while running for 10 min at a velocity corresponding to 70% of the pre-training peak treadmill velocity

    Measured: At the beginning of the training program and the 7th week after the start of the intervention (after the completion of 6 weeks of training, 14 training sessions)

  2. Changes in running velocity at a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol/L

    Running velocity (km/h) at a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol/L determined by the individual relationship between lactate concentrations and running velocities during an incremental test by applying a nonlinear regression model.

    Measured: At the beginning of the training program and the 7th week after the start of the intervention (after the completion of 6 weeks of training, 14 training sessions)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion10 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A parallel group research design was used in the present study. Initially, 26 participants (10 males and 16 females), using stratified randomization (gender was the variable of stratification) were randomly assigned (1:1), according to a random-number table, either to an intense continuous training group (CON) or to a high-intensity interval training group (INT).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05729685
Sponsor's protocol ID
AERCONINT
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
26 Jan 2023
Last updated
15 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interval training and Continuous training in people with Healthy, run by Ilias Smilios at 1 site in Greece.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in maximal oxygen consumption (time frame: At the beginning of the training program, the 3rd week of training (after 7 training sessions), and the 7th week after the start of the intervention (after the completion of 6 weeks of training, 14 training sessions)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in