Prostate AdenocarcinomaNCT05735223
A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Maximal Urethral Length Preservation Technique During Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy on the Stretched Flaccid Penile Length and Continence
A study testing Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP). in people with Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Incontinence Stress, run by Larkin Health System at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
After robotic prostatectomy, besides erectile function and achievement of oncological control, staying dry is also a very important desire expressed frequently by the patients. This has led to the concept of trifecta achievement after robotic prostatectomies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Incontinence Stress, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
- What is being tested?
- Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP).
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2021to 15 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Exposure to androgen deprivation therapy
- Prior treatment for prostate cancer
- Metastatic prostate cancer
- History of hypospadias or urethral reconstruction
- History of penile implant, intracorporal injections, intraurethral suppositories
- Prior pelvic surgery. -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Maximal Urethral Length Preservation Technique During Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in Terms of Continence Rates
After robotic prostatectomy, besides erectile function and achievement of oncological control, staying dry is also a very important desire expressed frequently by the patients. This has led to the concept of trifecta achievement after robotic prostatectomies. Hence, continence preserving prostatectomies are the order of the day today. Patient acceptance to surgery is low if the continence cannot be assured preoperatively. Many techniques have been promulgated in the last two decades.
The investigators present a novel technique of maximal urethral length preservation during surgery as an effective method of continence preservation. The investigators hypothesize that maximal preservation of urethra would lead to improved and early continence after robotic prostatectomy. The investigators also hypothesize that urethral preservation spares penile length shortening. The investigators therefore propose to prospectively evaluate penile length shortening.
While penile length change after radical prostatectomy has been studied in the past, the investigators like to assess the penile morphometric assessment following the novel technique of maximal urethral length preservation radical prostatectomy.
- Conditions
- Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Incontinence Stress, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
- Being tested
- Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP).
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP).Procedure or surgery
Stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) was measured by a single male assessor at preoperative visit, and at the time of catheter removal (10 days post-surgery). The subjects were blinded to the measurements to prevent bias. Multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) of the prostate were reviewed when available for surgical planning. All subjects underwent RALP with MULP using the technique previously published by Hamada et al. Continence defined as requiring no pads was assessed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) following RALP. | Experimental | Stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) was measured by a single male assessor at preoperative visit, and at the time of catheter removal (10 days post-surgery). Receives: Procedure: Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Penile Length
Stretched Flaccid Penile Length
Measured: 10 days post operatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
Urinary continence
Pads used.
Measured: 3 months and 6 months postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2023
- Study start30 Sep 2021
- Primary completion15 Jan 2023
- Study completion15 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate AdenocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- In an IRB approved study, we prospectively evaluated the stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) pre and post robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in subjects with a diagnosis of prostate cancer. The multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) was utilized for surgical planning if available preoperatively. Repeated measures t-test, linear regression and 2-way ANOVA analyses were performed.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Larkin Health System
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Balaji Reddy, MD, Larkin Health System
- Investigators
- Sanjay Razdan, MD, MCh, Study chair, Larkin Health SystemBalaji Reddy, MD, Principal investigator, Larkin Health System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05735223
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LCH-2-092019
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Frey AU, Sonksen J, Fode M. Neglected side effects after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Sex Med. 2014 Feb;11(2):374-85. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12403. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
PubMed 24267516Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, Otero JR, Serio AM, Scardino PT, Hricak H, Guillonneau B. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2009 Mar;55(3):629-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.057. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
PubMed 18801612Kadono Y, Machioka K, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K, Nohara T, Narimoto K, Izumi K, Kitagawa Y, Konaka H, Gabata T, Mizokami A. Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: investigation of the underlying anatomical mechanism. BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):293-299. doi: 10.1111/bju.13777. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
PubMed 28181381Hamada A, Razdan S, Etafy MH, Fagin R, Razdan S. Early return of continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using modified maximal urethral length preservation technique. J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):930-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0794. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
PubMed 24739066Munding MD, Wessells HB, Dalkin BL. Pilot study of changes in stretched penile length 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2001 Oct;58(4):567-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01270-5.
PubMed 11597540Hammerer P, Huland H. [Urodynamic changes after radical prostatectomy]. Urologe A. 1997 Nov;36(6):535-9. doi: 10.1007/s001200050133. German.
PubMed 9487589Fraiman MC, Lepor H, McCullough AR. Changes in Penile Morphometrics in Men with Erectile Dysfunction after Nerve-Sparing Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy. Mol Urol. 1999;3(2):109-115.
PubMed 10851312Berookhim BM, Nelson CJ, Kunzel B, Mulhall JP, Narus JB. Prospective analysis of penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5b):E131-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.12443. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
PubMed 24053766Kwon YS, Farber N, Yu JW, Rhee K, Han C, Ney P, Hong JH, Lee P, Gupta N, Kim WJ, Kim IY. Longitudinal recovery patterns of penile length and the underexplored benefit of long-term phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use after radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol. 2018 May 9;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0341-8.
PubMed 29739455Dalkin BL, Christopher BA. Preservation of penile length after radical prostatectomy: early intervention with a vacuum erection device. Int J Impot Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;19(5):501-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901561. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
PubMed 17657210Vasconcelos JS, Figueiredo RT, Nascimento FL, Damiao R, da Silva EA. The natural history of penile length after radical prostatectomy: a long-term prospective study. Urology. 2012 Dec;80(6):1293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.060. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
PubMed 23102441Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, Sakamoto J, Makino T, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K, Izumi K, Mizokami A. Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Andrology. 2018 Nov;6(6):903-908. doi: 10.1111/andr.12517. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
PubMed 29968337Briganti A, Fabbri F, Salonia A, Gallina A, Chun FK, Deho F, Zanni G, Suardi N, Karakiewicz PI, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007 Sep;52(3):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.050. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
PubMed 17418936Engel JD, Sutherland DE, Williams SB, Wagner KR. Changes in penile length after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011 Jan;25(1):65-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0382. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
PubMed 21114411Brock G, Montorsi F, Costa P, Shah N, Martinez-Jabaloyas JM, Hammerer P, Ludovico GM, Lee JC, Henneges C, Hamidi K, Rossi A, Mulhall J, Buttner H. Effect of Tadalafil Once Daily on Penile Length Loss and Morning Erections in Patients After Bilateral Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1090-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.058. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PubMed 25813656
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Maximal Urethral Length Preservation Technique During Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in Terms of Continence Rates
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05735223
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LCH-2-092019
- Conditions
- Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Incontinence Stress, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Larkin Health SystemUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
After robotic prostatectomy, besides erectile function and achievement of oncological control, staying dry is also a very important desire expressed frequently by the patients. This has led to the concept of trifecta achievement after robotic prostatectomies. Hence, continence preserving prostatectomies are the order of the day today. Patient acceptance to surgery is low if the continence cannot be assured preoperatively. Many techniques have been promulgated in the last two decades.
The investigators present a novel technique of maximal urethral length preservation during surgery as an effective method of continence preservation. The investigators hypothesize that maximal preservation of urethra would lead to improved and early continence after robotic prostatectomy. The investigators also hypothesize that urethral preservation spares penile length shortening. The investigators therefore propose to prospectively evaluate penile length shortening.
While penile length change after radical prostatectomy has been studied in the past, the investigators like to assess the penile morphometric assessment following the novel technique of maximal urethral length preservation radical prostatectomy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- In an IRB approved study, we prospectively evaluated the stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) pre and post robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in subjects with a diagnosis of prostate cancer. The multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) was utilized for surgical planning if available preoperatively. Repeated measures t-test, linear regression and 2-way ANOVA analyses were performed.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) following RALP. | Experimental | Procedure: Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP).Stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) was measured by a single male assessor at preoperative visit, and at the time of catheter removal (10 days post-surgery). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Exposure to androgen deprivation therapy
- Prior treatment for prostate cancer
- Metastatic prostate cancer
- History of hypospadias or urethral reconstruction
- History of penile implant, intracorporal injections, intraurethral suppositories
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP).Stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) was measured by a single male assessor at preoperative visit, and at the time of catheter removal (10 days post-surgery). The subjects were blinded to the measurements to prevent bias. Multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) of the prostate were reviewed when available for surgical planning. All subjects underwent RALP with MULP using the technique previously published by Hamada et al. Continence defined as requiring no pads was assessed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. | Procedure or surgery | Stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) following RALP. |
Primary outcome
Penile Length
Time frame: 10 days post operatively
Stretched Flaccid Penile Length
1 secondary outcome
Urinary continence
Time frame: 3 months and 6 months postoperatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2023.
- Background: PubMed 24267516Frey AU, Sonksen J, Fode M. Neglected side effects after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Sex Med. 2014 Feb;11(2):374-85. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12403. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
- Background: PubMed 18801612Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, Otero JR, Serio AM, Scardino PT, Hricak H, Guillonneau B. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2009 Mar;55(3):629-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.057. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
- Background: PubMed 28181381Kadono Y, Machioka K, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K, Nohara T, Narimoto K, Izumi K, Kitagawa Y, Konaka H, Gabata T, Mizokami A. Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: investigation of the underlying anatomical mechanism. BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):293-299. doi: 10.1111/bju.13777. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
- Background: PubMed 24739066Hamada A, Razdan S, Etafy MH, Fagin R, Razdan S. Early return of continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using modified maximal urethral length preservation technique. J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):930-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0794. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 11597540Munding MD, Wessells HB, Dalkin BL. Pilot study of changes in stretched penile length 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2001 Oct;58(4):567-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01270-5.
- Background: PubMed 9487589Hammerer P, Huland H. [Urodynamic changes after radical prostatectomy]. Urologe A. 1997 Nov;36(6):535-9. doi: 10.1007/s001200050133. German.
- Background: PubMed 10851312Fraiman MC, Lepor H, McCullough AR. Changes in Penile Morphometrics in Men with Erectile Dysfunction after Nerve-Sparing Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy. Mol Urol. 1999;3(2):109-115.
- Background: PubMed 24053766Berookhim BM, Nelson CJ, Kunzel B, Mulhall JP, Narus JB. Prospective analysis of penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5b):E131-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.12443. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 29739455Kwon YS, Farber N, Yu JW, Rhee K, Han C, Ney P, Hong JH, Lee P, Gupta N, Kim WJ, Kim IY. Longitudinal recovery patterns of penile length and the underexplored benefit of long-term phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use after radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol. 2018 May 9;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0341-8.
- Background: PubMed 17657210Dalkin BL, Christopher BA. Preservation of penile length after radical prostatectomy: early intervention with a vacuum erection device. Int J Impot Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;19(5):501-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901561. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
- Background: PubMed 23102441Vasconcelos JS, Figueiredo RT, Nascimento FL, Damiao R, da Silva EA. The natural history of penile length after radical prostatectomy: a long-term prospective study. Urology. 2012 Dec;80(6):1293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.060. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
- Background: PubMed 29968337Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, Sakamoto J, Makino T, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K, Izumi K, Mizokami A. Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Andrology. 2018 Nov;6(6):903-908. doi: 10.1111/andr.12517. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Multitargeted Recombinant Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/Brachyury-Based Immunotherapy (TriAdeno) Vaccine With IL-15 Superagonist N-803 in Participants With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance
Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
ARCTIC: Liquid Biomarkers in the Prospective Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSI) Resistance Clinical Trials
Prostate Cancer, Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sanjay Razdan, MD, MCh study chair
Larkin Health System
Balaji Reddy, MD principal investigator
Larkin Health System
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Maximal urethral length preservation technique of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP). in people with Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Incontinence Stress, run by Larkin Health System at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Penile Length (time frame: 10 days post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05735223, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2023.