ACL TearACL BFRNCT05735236
Comparison of Methods in Post Operative Knee Arthroscopy Rehabilitation
A study testing BFR Cuff in people with ACL Tear, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy in post-operative rehabilitation following knee arthroscopy for primary ACL reconstruction. BFR has been shown to effect time to return to activity and strength postoperatively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ACL Tear
- What is being tested?
- BFR Cuff
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Nov 2022to 8 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing primary knee arthroscopy for ACL reconstruction without meniscus repair
- Completing initial 12 weeks of physical therapy at the Steadman Hawkins Clinic in Denver
- Patients with access to smartphone device
Who cannot join
- Bilateral knee surgeries to be performed within 12 weeks of each other
- Patients received meniscus repairs, chondral lesion repair/transplants,
- Prior surgery on the same knee
- Anyone who meets the following contraindications for BFR therapy:
- Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
- Pulmonary Embolism
Show all 16Show fewer
- Hemorrhagic/Thrombolytic Stroke
- Clotting Disorders
- Hemophilia or taking blood thinners
- Pregnant or up to 6 months post-partum
- Untreated Hypertension
- Untreated Hypotension
- Rhabdomyolysis or recent traumatic injury
- 2. Exclusion criteria will be evaluated via the medical record as well as by the expert opinion of the physician.
- 3. If at any point in the study a subject develops one of the above contraindications, they will be removed from the study.
- 4. If a subject becomes pregnant while participating in the intervention portion of the study, they will be removed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UCHealth Steadman Hawkins Clinic
Centennial, Colorado, 80111
About this study
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy in post-operative rehabilitation following knee arthroscopy for primary ACL reconstruction. BFR has been shown to effect time to return to activity and strength postoperatively. This study aims to analyze the effects of BFR therapy in patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery compared to controls. Participants will be randomized into either a treatment (BFR Cuff) or control (no BFR cuff) group. All participants will follow standard of care (SOC) physical therapy protocol for 12 weeks after surgery according to their treatment group. Strength and patient outcome measures will be recorded throughout the 2 year study period.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy in post operative rehabilitation following knee arthroscopy. The current standard of care and post-operative pain levels can limit patients from applying load necessary to increase muscle size and strength development due to partial weight baring after surgery. We hypothesize that immediate and consistent use of BFR augmenting our current standard post operative knee arthroscopy rehabilitation protocol will result in greater improvement in strength and quicker achievement of phase-based rehabilitation goals. We hypothesize that these objective improvements in strength will correlate with clinically meaningful improvement in Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), return to sport, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), pain and resiliency (patient reported outcome, PRO) scores indicative of greater functional recovery compared to our standard rehabilitation protocol alone.
- Conditions
- ACL Tear
- Being tested
- BFR Cuff
- Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BFR CuffDevice
Also called Blood Flow Restriction Device, Blood Flow Restriction Cuff
The BFR cuff will be applied to the proximal thigh of the surgical leg while the patient completes specified physical therapy exercises.80% occlusion pressure will be determined by PT's in clinic through the use of a Delphi unit. Subjects will then be able to use the Saga Fitness app to adjust this pressure if it differs from the automatic calibrated pressure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Participants undergo standard post-operative physical therapy as prescribed by their surgeon. |
| BFR Cuff | Active comparator | Patients undergo standard post-operative physical therapy as prescribed by their surgeon with the addition of a Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) cuff that is used during their exercises. Receives: Device: BFR Cuff |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knee extensor strength
Strength of knee extensors via handheld dynamometry (HHD) and reported as a measure of limb symmetry index (LSI) comparing operative limb to non-operative lim
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
hamstrings musculature strength
Strength of knee flexors via handheld dynamometry (HHD) and reported as a measure of limb symmetry index (LSI) comparing operative limb to non-operative limb.
Measured: 6 months
single leg squat test
Performance on a Repeated Single Leg Squat test to 45 deg knee flexion over the course of 90 seconds reported as a measure of LSI
Measured: 6 months
Tegner Activity Scale
Tegner Activity Scale: Range 0 (disability because of knee problems) - 10 (national or international level soccer)
Measured: 6 months
LEFS
Range 0 (extreme difficulty) -100 (nodifficulty);MDIC = Δ 123
Measured: 2 years
Pain NPRS
Range 1 (low pain) -10 (high pain); MDC = Δ 34
Measured: 2 Years
PROMIS Pain
Range 0 (low pain) -100 (highpain); MDC = Δ 85
Measured: 2 Years
PROMIS Physical Function
Range 0 (low function) -100 (high function); MDC = Δ 85
Measured: 2 Years
Brief Resiliency Score (BRS)
Range 1(low resilience) -5 (high resilience); MDC = Δ low (1-2.99) to normal (3-4.3) to high (4.31-5)
Measured: 2 Years
ACL-RSI
Range 1 (low function) -100 (high function); MDC = ∆15.1 for short form version
Measured: 2 Years
IKDC
Range 1 (low function) -100 (high function); MDC = ∆8.8 low to ∆15.6 high
Measured: 2 Years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2023
- Study start8 Nov 2022
- Primary completion8 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion8 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ACL TearStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Colorado, DenverThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephanie Mayer, MD, Principal investigator, University of Colorado, Denver
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05735236
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-1052
- Acronym
- ACL BFR
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bowman EN, Elshaar R, Milligan H, Jue G, Mohr K, Brown P, Watanabe DM, Limpisvasti O. Proximal, Distal, and Contralateral Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on the Lower Extremities: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sports Health. 2019 Mar/Apr;11(2):149-156. doi: 10.1177/1941738118821929. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
PubMed 30638439Tabata S, Suzuki Y, Azuma K, Matsumoto H. Rhabdomyolysis After Performing Blood Flow Restriction Training: A Case Report. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jul;30(7):2064-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001295.
PubMed 26677831Slysz J, Stultz J, Burr JF. The efficacy of blood flow restricted exercise: A systematic review & meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Aug;19(8):669-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
PubMed 26463594Yasuda T, Fukumura K, Fukuda T, Uchida Y, Iida H, Meguro M, Sato Y, Yamasoba T, Nakajima T. Muscle size and arterial stiffness after blood flow-restricted low-intensity resistance training in older adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Oct;24(5):799-806. doi: 10.1111/sms.12087. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
PubMed 23730848Charles D, White R, Reyes C, Palmer D. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECTS OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING ON QUADRICEPS MUSCLE ATROPHY AND CIRCUMFERENCE POST ACL RECONSTRUCTION. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;15(6):882-891. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200882.
PubMed 33344004Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, Spiker R, Brodke D. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.
PubMed 30179950Grzybowski JS, Malloy P, Stegemann C, Bush-Joseph C, Harris JD, Nho SJ. Rehabilitation Following Hip Arthroscopy - A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2015 May 26;2:21. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00021. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26075208Chahal J, Van Thiel GS, Mather RC 3rd, Lee S, Song SH, Davis AM, Salata M, Nho SJ. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1844-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587739. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
PubMed 26078452Bronner S, Chodock E, Urbano IER, Smith T. Psychometric Properties of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS): Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Feb;49(2):64-79. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8247. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
PubMed 30053790Enseki K, Harris-Hayes M, White DM, Cibulka MT, Woehrle J, Fagerson TL, Clohisy JC; Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Nonarthritic hip joint pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;44(6):A1-32. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0302.
PubMed 24881906Luebbers PE, Witte EV, Oshel JQ, Butler MS. Effects of Practical Blood Flow Restriction Training on Adolescent Lower-Body Strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Oct;33(10):2674-2683. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002302.
PubMed 29084094Lu Y, Patel BH, Kym C, Nwachukwu BU, Beletksy A, Forsythe B, Chahla J. Perioperative Blood Flow Restriction Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):2325967120906822. doi: 10.1177/2325967120906822. eCollection 2020 Mar.
PubMed 32232065Weatherholt AM, Vanwye WR, Lohmann J, Owens JG. The Effect of Cuff Width for Determining Limb Occlusion Pressure: A Comparison of Blood Flow Restriction Devices. Int J Exerc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;12(3):136-143. doi: 10.70252/RWVU7100. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30761200Ingram JG, Fields SK, Yard EE, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of knee injuries among boys and girls in US high school athletics. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1116-22. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314400. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
PubMed 18375784Powell JW, Barber-Foss KD. Injury patterns in selected high school sports: a review of the 1995-1997 seasons. J Athl Train. 1999 Jul;34(3):277-84.
PubMed 16558577
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Methods in Post Operative Knee Arthroscopy Rehabilitation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05735236
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACL BFR / 22-1052
- Conditions
- ACL Tear
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, DenverUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy in post-operative rehabilitation following knee arthroscopy for primary ACL reconstruction. BFR has been shown to effect time to return to activity and strength postoperatively. This study aims to analyze the effects of BFR therapy in patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery compared to controls. Participants will be randomized into either a treatment (BFR Cuff) or control (no BFR cuff) group. All participants will follow standard of care (SOC) physical therapy protocol for 12 weeks after surgery according to their treatment group. Strength and patient outcome measures will be recorded throughout the 2 year study period.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy in post operative rehabilitation following knee arthroscopy. The current standard of care and post-operative pain levels can limit patients from applying load necessary to increase muscle size and strength development due to partial weight baring after surgery. We hypothesize that immediate and consistent use of BFR augmenting our current standard post operative knee arthroscopy rehabilitation protocol will result in greater improvement in strength and quicker achievement of phase-based rehabilitation goals. We hypothesize that these objective improvements in strength will correlate with clinically meaningful improvement in Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), return to sport, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), pain and resiliency (patient reported outcome, PRO) scores indicative of greater functional recovery compared to our standard rehabilitation protocol alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Participants undergo standard post-operative physical therapy as prescribed by their surgeon. |
| BFR Cuff | Active comparator | Device: BFR CuffPatients undergo standard post-operative physical therapy as prescribed by their surgeon with the addition of a Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) cuff that is used during their exercises. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients undergoing primary knee arthroscopy for ACL reconstruction without meniscus repair
- Completing initial 12 weeks of physical therapy at the Steadman Hawkins Clinic in Denver
- Patients with access to smartphone device
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Bilateral knee surgeries to be performed within 12 weeks of each other
- Patients received meniscus repairs, chondral lesion repair/transplants,
- Prior surgery on the same knee
- Anyone who meets the following contraindications for BFR therapy:
- 2. Exclusion criteria will be evaluated via the medical record as well as by the expert opinion of the physician.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BFR CuffAlso: Blood Flow Restriction Device, Blood Flow Restriction CuffThe BFR cuff will be applied to the proximal thigh of the surgical leg while the patient completes specified physical therapy exercises.80% occlusion pressure will be determined by PT's in clinic through the use of a Delphi unit. Subjects will then be able to use the Saga Fitness app to adjust this pressure if it differs from the automatic calibrated pressure. | Device | BFR Cuff |
Primary outcome
Knee extensor strength
Time frame: 6 months
Strength of knee extensors via handheld dynamometry (HHD) and reported as a measure of limb symmetry index (LSI) comparing operative limb to non-operative lim
10 secondary outcomes
hamstrings musculature strength
Time frame: 6 months
single leg squat test
Time frame: 6 months
Tegner Activity Scale
Time frame: 6 months
LEFS
Time frame: 2 years
Pain NPRS
Time frame: 2 Years
PROMIS Pain
Time frame: 2 Years
PROMIS Physical Function
Time frame: 2 Years
Brief Resiliency Score (BRS)
Time frame: 2 Years
ACL-RSI
Time frame: 2 Years
IKDC
Time frame: 2 Years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30638439Bowman EN, Elshaar R, Milligan H, Jue G, Mohr K, Brown P, Watanabe DM, Limpisvasti O. Proximal, Distal, and Contralateral Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on the Lower Extremities: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sports Health. 2019 Mar/Apr;11(2):149-156. doi: 10.1177/1941738118821929. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 26677831Tabata S, Suzuki Y, Azuma K, Matsumoto H. Rhabdomyolysis After Performing Blood Flow Restriction Training: A Case Report. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jul;30(7):2064-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001295.
- Results publication: PubMed 26463594Slysz J, Stultz J, Burr JF. The efficacy of blood flow restricted exercise: A systematic review & meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Aug;19(8):669-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 23730848Yasuda T, Fukumura K, Fukuda T, Uchida Y, Iida H, Meguro M, Sato Y, Yamasoba T, Nakajima T. Muscle size and arterial stiffness after blood flow-restricted low-intensity resistance training in older adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Oct;24(5):799-806. doi: 10.1111/sms.12087. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 33344004Charles D, White R, Reyes C, Palmer D. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECTS OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING ON QUADRICEPS MUSCLE ATROPHY AND CIRCUMFERENCE POST ACL RECONSTRUCTION. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;15(6):882-891. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200882.
- Results publication: PubMed 30179950Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, Spiker R, Brodke D. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.
- Results publication: PubMed 26075208Grzybowski JS, Malloy P, Stegemann C, Bush-Joseph C, Harris JD, Nho SJ. Rehabilitation Following Hip Arthroscopy - A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2015 May 26;2:21. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00021. eCollection 2015.
- Results publication: PubMed 26078452Chahal J, Van Thiel GS, Mather RC 3rd, Lee S, Song SH, Davis AM, Salata M, Nho SJ. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1844-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587739. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 30053790Bronner S, Chodock E, Urbano IER, Smith T. Psychometric Properties of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS): Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Feb;49(2):64-79. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8247. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 24881906Enseki K, Harris-Hayes M, White DM, Cibulka MT, Woehrle J, Fagerson TL, Clohisy JC; Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Nonarthritic hip joint pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;44(6):A1-32. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0302.
- Results publication: PubMed 29084094Luebbers PE, Witte EV, Oshel JQ, Butler MS. Effects of Practical Blood Flow Restriction Training on Adolescent Lower-Body Strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Oct;33(10):2674-2683. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002302.
- Results publication: PubMed 32232065Lu Y, Patel BH, Kym C, Nwachukwu BU, Beletksy A, Forsythe B, Chahla J. Perioperative Blood Flow Restriction Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):2325967120906822. doi: 10.1177/2325967120906822. eCollection 2020 Mar.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for ACL Tear
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Biological Outcomes of BioBrace-Augmented ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Extended Post-Operative Oral Tranexamic Acid Dosing After ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
RecruitingObservational study
BioBrace® Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures
ACL Tears
RecruitingPhase 2
Preventing Injured Knees From osteoArthritis: Severity Outcomes
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephanie Mayer, MD principal investigator
University of Colorado, Denver
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BFR Cuff in people with ACL Tear, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knee extensor strength (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05735236, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2026.