AzTrials
AzTrials

MelanomaNCT05736523

Improving Early Detection of Melanoma Recurrence With Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA)

An observational study of Melanoma, run by University of Utah at 2 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a non-randomized experimental biomarker study evaluating ctDNA levels in patients with stage IIB/C and stage IIIB/C/D melanoma skin cancer pre and post-surgery Study participants will complete a ctDNA test within 4 weeks of their planned surgical resection of their melanoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma
How many people
28 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
23 Sep 2020to Jun 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient who have Stage IIB/C or Stage IIB/C/D melanoma skin cancer

Who may be able to join

  • Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Patient must be a surgical candidate with Stage IIB, IIC melanoma or fully resectable Stage III B/C/D cutaneous melanoma.
  • Patients with resectable in transit/nodal metastatic disease who have had prior adjuvant or systemic/intralesional therapy can be included provided that the planned resected lesions either progressed or developed while on or after completion of prior treatment. Patients with resectable in transit/nodal metastatic disease who are treated with neoadjuvant therapy prior to resection are also eligible provided that the initial blood and tumor biopsy sample are taken prior to initiation of neoadjuvant therapy.
  • Tissue available meeting one of the following criteria:
  • For patients with Clinical stage II primary tumors that have been biopsied prior to evaluation by the surgeon, or those with stage III tumors that have been partially/fully excised prior to definitive surgery, adequate tissue will be confirmed prior to enrollment to follow Natera's tissue sample collection instructions when selecting the appropriate specimen.
  • OR
Show all 9Show fewer
  • For patients with bulky lymph nodes involved with clinically evident, biopsy proven metastatic disease, in transit metastasis, or with extensive residual primary tumor present prior to excision, and in the treating surgeon's assessment there will be extensive tumor for evaluation, the patient can be enrolled with tissue adequacy evaluation post resection
  • Patient is willing to provide blood samples for Signatera testing as outlined in the study calendar.
  • Patient is able to provide informed consent and willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines.

Who cannot join

  • Patient is unable to provide informed consent or is unwilling to sign an approved consent form.
  • Patient has other clinically significant disorders that would preclude safe study participation

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Intermountain Medical Center

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Huntsman Cancer Institute

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

Other trials in United States

About this study

This is a non-randomized experimental biomarker study evaluating ctDNA levels in patients with stage IIB/C and stage IIIB/C/D melanoma skin cancer pre and post-surgery

Study participants will complete a ctDNA test within 4 weeks of their planned surgical resection of their melanoma. Within 4 weeks post-surgery another ctDNA test will be completed. During these time points stool samples and diet questionnaires will be collected for biospecimen banking.

Read the detailed description

The investigators hypothesize that ctDNA levels drawn before and after surgical resection of a primary tumor and either sentinel lymph nodes or clinically involved metastatic lymph nodes will correlate with the presence of sentinel node microscopic metastatic disease and clinically evident nodal metastatic disease. The investigators also predict that approximately 20% of sentinel lymph node negative Stage IIB/IIC patients will have evidence of ctDNA positivity post-surgery.

Primary Objective:

  • To assess the feasibility of generating patient specific ctDNA assay from Signatera© test for primary melanoma samples submitted with clinical stage IIB/IIC and stage III melanoma patients.

Secondary Objective(s):

  • To investigate serum levels of melanoma ctDNA pre and postoperatively in clinical Stage IIB/C and Stage III melanoma patients.
  • To evaluate the relationship of serum ctDNA levels pre-operatively with sentinel lymph node biopsy status in clinical Stage IIB/C patients.
  • Evaluate for clearance or persistence of ctDNA levels post complete resection in patients with clinically evident lymph node metastasis (Stage IIIB/C/D).
  • Assess feasibility of collection of pre- and post-operative stool samples
Conditions
Melanoma
Keywords
Stage II Melanoma, Stage III Melanoma, ctDNA, Circulating Tumor DNA, surgical resection, tumor marker, melanoma recurrence
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Serum ctDNA acquisition, processing and results

    The proportion of cases in which sample acquisition, processing and return of results from the two initial ctDNA (serum VAF allele levels, ng/ml) analyses occurs within 6 weeks of acquisition of the post-operative serum sample. The two ctDNA analyses are from the initial tumor biopsy and blood, and post-operative blood draw.

    Measured: Within 4 weeks pre-surgery through a maximum of 4 weeks post-surgery

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Pre and Post-operative Serum Variant Allele Frequency

    Pre-operative and post-operative serum Variant allele frequency (VAF) ng/ml from the Signatera© test in all evaluable patients

    Measured: Within 4 weeks pre-surgery through a maximum of 4 weeks post-surgery

  2. Association of pre-operative and post-operative serum Variant allele frequency (VAF) levels (ng/ml) from the Signatera© test and sentinel lymph node biopsy metastatic status

    Evaluate the relationship of serum Variant allele frequency (VAF) levels (ng/ml) pre-operatively with sentinel lymph node biopsy clinical outcome (positive/negative for metastatic disease) in clinical Stage IIB/C melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

    Measured: Within 4 weeks pre-surgery

  3. Pre-operative serum VAF levels (ng/mL) from Signatera© stratified by pre-operative sentinel lymph node and clinically evident lymph node metastatic status.

    Evaluate association of pre-operative serum VAF levels (ng/ml) from Signatera© stratified by pre-operative sentinel lymph node eligible (Clinical stage IIB/IIC) patients vs. patients with clinically evident lymph node metastases (clinical stage III).

    Measured: Within 4 weeks post-surgery

  4. Quantify the number of patients who develop detectable VAF levels (ng/ml) within the first 3 years after surgery and evaluate possible correlation with recurrence.

    Proportion of participants with detectable VAF levels (ng/ml) using the Signatera© test at any time point during the surveillance period and any clinical or radiologic evidence of recurrence.

    Measured: 3 years post resection of the last patient enrolled.

  5. Pre and Post-operative Stool Samples

    Proportion of cases in which pre-operative and post-operative patient stool samples are successfully obtained

    Measured: Within 4 weeks pre-surgery through a maximum of 4 weeks post-surgery

  6. The proportion of patients for which serum VAF levels (ng/ml) are undetectable post complete resection of either sentinel nodes or clinically evident lymph node metastases

    The proportion of patients for which serum VAF levels (ng/ml) are undetectable post complete resection of either sentinel nodes or clinically evident lymph node metastases

    Measured: Within 4 weeks post-surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2023
  2. Study start23 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05736523
Sponsor's protocol ID
133519
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
16 Sep 2022
Last updated
7 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, Sondak VK, Long GV, Ross MI, Lazar AJ, Faries MB, Kirkwood JM, McArthur GA, Haydu LE, Eggermont AMM, Flaherty KT, Balch CM, Thompson JF; for members of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Expert Panel and the International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):472-492. doi: 10.3322/caac.21409. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

    PubMed 29028110
  • Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, Haydon A, Lichinitser M, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig S, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Koornstra R, Hernandez-Aya L, Maio M, van den Eertwegh AJM, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, Jamal R, Lorigan P, Ibrahim N, Marreaud S, van Akkooi ACJ, Suciu S, Robert C. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1789-1801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802357. Epub 2018 Apr 15.

    PubMed 29658430
  • Long GV, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandala M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Larkin J, Nyakas M, Dutriaux C, Haydon A, Robert C, Mortier L, Schachter J, Schadendorf D, Lesimple T, Plummer R, Ji R, Zhang P, Mookerjee B, Legos J, Kefford R, Dummer R, Kirkwood JM. Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708539. Epub 2017 Sep 10.

    PubMed 28891408
  • Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, Dalle S, Schenker M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Marquez-Rodas I, Grob JJ, Butler MO, Middleton MR, Maio M, Atkinson V, Queirolo P, Gonzalez R, Kudchadkar RR, Smylie M, Meyer N, Mortier L, Atkins MB, Long GV, Bhatia S, Lebbe C, Rutkowski P, Yokota K, Yamazaki N, Kim TM, de Pril V, Sabater J, Qureshi A, Larkin J, Ascierto PA; CheckMate 238 Collaborators. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1824-1835. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709030. Epub 2017 Sep 10.

    PubMed 28891423
  • Christensen E, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Sethi H, Shchegrova S, Salari R, Nordentoft I, Wu HT, Knudsen M, Lamy P, Lindskrog SV, Taber A, Balcioglu M, Vang S, Assaf Z, Sharma S, Tin AS, Srinivasan R, Hafez D, Reinert T, Navarro S, Olson A, Ram R, Dashner S, Rabinowitz M, Billings P, Sigurjonsson S, Andersen CL, Swenerton R, Aleshin A, Zimmermann B, Agerbaek M, Lin CJ, Jensen JB, Dyrskjot L. Early Detection of Metastatic Relapse and Monitoring of Therapeutic Efficacy by Ultra-Deep Sequencing of Plasma Cell-Free DNA in Patients With Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 20;37(18):1547-1557. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02052. Epub 2019 May 6.

    PubMed 31059311
  • Coombes RC, Page K, Salari R, Hastings RK, Armstrong A, Ahmed S, Ali S, Cleator S, Kenny L, Stebbing J, Rutherford M, Sethi H, Boydell A, Swenerton R, Fernandez-Garcia D, Gleason KLT, Goddard K, Guttery DS, Assaf ZJ, Wu HT, Natarajan P, Moore DA, Primrose L, Dashner S, Tin AS, Balcioglu M, Srinivasan R, Shchegrova SV, Olson A, Hafez D, Billings P, Aleshin A, Rehman F, Toghill BJ, Hills A, Louie MC, Lin CJ, Zimmermann BG, Shaw JA. Personalized Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA Antedates Breast Cancer Metastatic Recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 15;25(14):4255-4263. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3663. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

    PubMed 30992300
  • Iafolla, Marco & Yang, SY Cindy & Dashner, Scott & Xu, Wei & Hansen, Aaron & Bedard, Philippe & Lheureux, Stéphanie & Spreafico, Anna & Razak, Albiruni & Wu, Hsin-Ta & Shchegrova, Svetlana & Liu, Zhihui & Ohashi, Pamela & Torti, Dax & Louie, Maggie & Sethi, Himanshu & Aleshin, Alexey & Siu, Lillian & Bratman, Scott & Pugh, Trevor. (2019). Bespoke circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis as a predictive biomarker in solid tumor patients (pts) treated with single-agent pembrolizumab (P).. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37. 2542-2542. 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.2542.

  • Magbanua, MJM & Swigart, Lamorna & Hirst, Gillian & Yau, C & Wolf, Denise & Ma, AA & Bergin, E & Venters, S & Sethi, H & Wu, H-T & Tin, Tony & Sawyer, S & Louie, M & Zimmermann, Bernhard & Lin, C-HJ & Keats, J & Liang, WS & (Phillips) Cuyugan, Lori & van 't Veer, Laura. (2019). Abstract PD2-01: Personalized serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in high-risk early stage breast cancer patients to monitor and predict response to neoadjuvant therapy and outcome in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Cancer Research. 79. PD2-01. 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-PD2-01.

  • Reinert T, Henriksen TV, Christensen E, Sharma S, Salari R, Sethi H, Knudsen M, Nordentoft I, Wu HT, Tin AS, Heilskov Rasmussen M, Vang S, Shchegrova S, Frydendahl Boll Johansen A, Srinivasan R, Assaf Z, Balcioglu M, Olson A, Dashner S, Hafez D, Navarro S, Goel S, Rabinowitz M, Billings P, Sigurjonsson S, Dyrskjot L, Swenerton R, Aleshin A, Laurberg S, Husted Madsen A, Kannerup AS, Stribolt K, Palmelund Krag S, Iversen LH, Gotschalck Sunesen K, Lin CJ, Zimmermann BG, Lindbjerg Andersen C. Analysis of Plasma Cell-Free DNA by Ultradeep Sequencing in Patients With Stages I to III Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;5(8):1124-1131. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0528.

    PubMed 31070691
  • Mounessa JS, Caravaglio JV, Dellavalle RP. Comparison of Regional and State Differences in Melanoma Rates in the United States: 2003 vs 2013. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;153(3):345-347. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4625. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28030665

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Melanoma, run by University of Utah at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Serum ctDNA acquisition, processing and results (time frame: Within 4 weeks pre-surgery through a maximum of 4 weeks post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05736523, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in