Cerebrovascular DisordersNCT05737420
Video-call Assisted Assessment of Acute Stroke in Addition to Stroke Severity Scales in a Prehospital Setting
A study testing Video call in people with Cerebrovascular Disorders and Brain Diseases, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study aims to investigate whether a live stream video between the on-call neurologist and the emergency medical services is feasible. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Video call
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 6 Jul 2023to 30 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suspected stroke within 24 hours from onset (confirmed with Pre-hospital stroke score 1 ≥1)
- Catchment area of Hospital Sønderjylland
- Deferred informed consent obtained from patient or patient surrogate
Who cannot join
- In-hospital stroke or private transport to hospital
- Unconsciousness defined as Glascow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8 (as they cannot be rated)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Video-call Assisted Assessment of Acute Stroke in Addition to Stroke Severity Scales in a Prehospital Setting: A Cluster Randomised Pilot Trial
This study aims to investigate whether a live stream video between the on-call neurologist and the emergency medical services is feasible.
Read the detailed description
Multiple stroke severity scales have been coined in order to examine patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting in order to identify and transfer patients eligible for thrombectomy directly to a comprehensive stroke centre (CSC). However, performance and feasibility vary greatly in different validation studies suggesting that those outcomes are greatly dependent on other factors i.e. acceptance amongst stakeholders, implementation process, patient segment etc. Some recent studies have shown promising results using telemedicine i.e. video solutions between emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and on-call neurologist in examining patients suspected of stroke in the prehospital phase. The investigators will perform this trial to examine whether a cluster randomised trial with video call assisted assessment of patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting is an appropriate trial design and feasible with regard to recruitment and retention, acceptability among stakeholders (EMS and neurologists) as well as patients and lastly with regard to stakeholders' adherence to protocol.
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Stroke, Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases
- Being tested
- Video call
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Stroke, Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video callDiagnostic test
The on-call neurologist can see and communicate with the patient via live stream video-call.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional video call | Experimental | All patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting are examined according to a prehospital stroke score. The emergency services personnel then contact the on-call neurologist and a live video stream is initiated. The on-call neurologist then examines the patient via the video-call. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Video call |
| Control with standard care | No intervention | All patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting are examined according to a prehospital stroke score. The emergency services personnel then contact the on-call neurologist by telephone. . |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment Rate
Rate of patients included in the trial amongst all patients screened
Measured: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Exclusion rate
rate of patients excluded from participation amongst all patients screened
Measured: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Attrition rate
rate of patients and data lost
Measured: Through study completion, approximately 5 months
Adherence to protocol by the Emergency Medical Services
Evaluation of missing data in the clinical examination prehospital in Pre-hospital patient journal
Measured: Baseline (Prehospital examination of patient conducted by Emergency Medical Services)
Adherence to protocol by the neurologist prehospital
Evaluation of missing data in the clinical examination conducted with video
Measured: Baseline (Prehospital examination of patient conducted on video by neurologists)
Adherence to protocol by the neurologist intrahospital
Evaluation of missing data in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale conducted intrahospital by neurologist
Measured: At admission
Stakeholder Feedback Survey
Mixed open-ended and closed (Likert type response) questions to assess trial and intervention acceptability
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Patient Feedback Survey
Semistructured interview with open-ended and closed (Likert type response) questions to assess intervention acceptability
Measured: Between the day after admission and 5 days after admission
Secondary outcomes (8)
Acute ischemic stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion on neuroimaging
Acute ischemic stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) on neuroimaging (computer tomography (CT), CT angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRi), MR angiography or catheter-based angiography). LVO is defined as an occlusion or sub-occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery M1 or M2, basilar artery. Sign of a dense cerebral artery on CT is also considered LVO positive.
Measured: At admission
Other large vessel Acute ischemic stroke
Neuroimaging (computer tomography (CT), CT angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRi), MR angiography or catheter-based angiography) with AIS with occlusion or sub-occlusion of either anterior cerebral artery A1 or A2, posterior cortical artery P1 or intracranial vertebral artery
Measured: at admission
Other Acute ischemic stroke
Neuroimaging (computer tomography (CT), CT angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRi), MR angiography or catheter-based angiography) with Acute ischemic stroke
Measured: at admission
Haemorrhagic stroke
Neuroimaging (computer tomography (CT), CT angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRi), MR angiography or catheter-based angiography) with intra cranial haemorrhage (ICH)
Measured: at admission
Duration of examination on video-call
Duration of examination on video-call measured in minutes
Measured: up to 60 minutes (prior to admission, prehospital phase)
Mimic mistaken for stroke
Mimic mistaken for stroke evaluated as discrepancy between stroke as tentative diagnoses at primary contact from EMS and final diagnosis at discharge
Measured: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Prehospital time on scene
Time on scene from arrival of Emergency Medical Services to departure of Emergency Medical Services measured in minutes
Measured: up to 60 minutes (at prehospital contact)
90 days modified Rankin Scale
Modified Rankin Scale score in stroke patients as evaluated through a structured telephone-based interview performed by a central assessor who is blinded to group assignment
Measured: 90 days post admission date
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2023
- Study start6 Jul 2023
- Primary completion6 Oct 2023
- Study completion30 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebrovascular DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Southern DenmarkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern Denmark
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Backer Mogensen, Study director, Hospital of Southern Denmark - Aabenraa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05737420
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHS-Neuro-1-2023
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 31 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nguyen TTM, van den Wijngaard IR, Bosch J, van Belle E, van Zwet EW, Dofferhoff-Vermeulen T, Duijndam D, Koster GT, de Schryver ELLM, Kloos LMH, de Laat KF, Aerden LAM, Zylicz SA, Wermer MJH, Kruyt ND. Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;78(2):157-164. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418.
PubMed 33252631Mazya MV, Berglund A, Ahmed N, von Euler M, Holmin S, Laska AC, Mathe JM, Sjostrand C, Eriksson EE. Implementation of a Prehospital Stroke Triage System Using Symptom Severity and Teleconsultation in the Stockholm Stroke Triage Study. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):691-699. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0319.
PubMed 32250423
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Video-call Assisted Assessment of Acute Stroke in Addition to Stroke Severity Scales in a Prehospital Setting: A Cluster Randomised Pilot Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05737420
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHS-Neuro-1-2023
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Disorders, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Stroke, Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern DenmarkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to investigate whether a live stream video between the on-call neurologist and the emergency medical services is feasible.
Detailed description
Multiple stroke severity scales have been coined in order to examine patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting in order to identify and transfer patients eligible for thrombectomy directly to a comprehensive stroke centre (CSC). However, performance and feasibility vary greatly in different validation studies suggesting that those outcomes are greatly dependent on other factors i.e. acceptance amongst stakeholders, implementation process, patient segment etc. Some recent studies have shown promising results using telemedicine i.e. video solutions between emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and on-call neurologist in examining patients suspected of stroke in the prehospital phase. The investigators will perform this trial to examine whether a cluster randomised trial with video call assisted assessment of patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting is an appropriate trial design and feasible with regard to recruitment and retention, acceptability among stakeholders (EMS and neurologists) as well as patients and lastly with regard to stakeholders' adherence to protocol.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional video call | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Video callAll patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting are examined according to a prehospital stroke score. The emergency services personnel then contact the on-call neurologist and a live video stream is initiated. The on-call neurologist then examines the patient via the video-call. |
| Control with standard care | No intervention | –All patients suspected of stroke in a prehospital setting are examined according to a prehospital stroke score. The emergency services personnel then contact the on-call neurologist by telephone. . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Suspected stroke within 24 hours from onset (confirmed with Pre-hospital stroke score 1 ≥1)
- Catchment area of Hospital Sønderjylland
- Deferred informed consent obtained from patient or patient surrogate
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- In-hospital stroke or private transport to hospital
- Unconsciousness defined as Glascow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8 (as they cannot be rated)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video callThe on-call neurologist can see and communicate with the patient via live stream video-call. | Diagnostic test | Interventional video call |
Primary outcome
Recruitment Rate
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Rate of patients included in the trial amongst all patients screened
Exclusion rate
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
rate of patients excluded from participation amongst all patients screened
Attrition rate
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 months
rate of patients and data lost
Adherence to protocol by the Emergency Medical Services
Time frame: Baseline (Prehospital examination of patient conducted by Emergency Medical Services)
Evaluation of missing data in the clinical examination prehospital in Pre-hospital patient journal
Adherence to protocol by the neurologist prehospital
Time frame: Baseline (Prehospital examination of patient conducted on video by neurologists)
Evaluation of missing data in the clinical examination conducted with video
Adherence to protocol by the neurologist intrahospital
Time frame: At admission
Evaluation of missing data in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale conducted intrahospital by neurologist
Stakeholder Feedback Survey
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Mixed open-ended and closed (Likert type response) questions to assess trial and intervention acceptability
Patient Feedback Survey
Time frame: Between the day after admission and 5 days after admission
Semistructured interview with open-ended and closed (Likert type response) questions to assess intervention acceptability
8 secondary outcomes
Acute ischemic stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion on neuroimaging
Time frame: At admission
Other large vessel Acute ischemic stroke
Time frame: at admission
Other Acute ischemic stroke
Time frame: at admission
Haemorrhagic stroke
Time frame: at admission
Duration of examination on video-call
Time frame: up to 60 minutes (prior to admission, prehospital phase)
Mimic mistaken for stroke
Time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Prehospital time on scene
Time frame: up to 60 minutes (at prehospital contact)
90 days modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: 90 days post admission date
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 33252631Nguyen TTM, van den Wijngaard IR, Bosch J, van Belle E, van Zwet EW, Dofferhoff-Vermeulen T, Duijndam D, Koster GT, de Schryver ELLM, Kloos LMH, de Laat KF, Aerden LAM, Zylicz SA, Wermer MJH, Kruyt ND. Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;78(2):157-164. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418.
- Background: PubMed 32250423Mazya MV, Berglund A, Ahmed N, von Euler M, Holmin S, Laska AC, Mathe JM, Sjostrand C, Eriksson EE. Implementation of a Prehospital Stroke Triage System Using Symptom Severity and Teleconsultation in the Stockholm Stroke Triage Study. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):691-699. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0319.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cerebrovascular Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
TicAgreLor Versus Placebo to Prevent Cerebral ISCHemia in anEuRysmal Low Grade SAH A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Study
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Ischemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Backer Mogensen study director
Hospital of Southern Denmark - Aabenraa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video call in people with Cerebrovascular Disorders and Brain Diseases, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment Rate (time frame: Through study completion, approximately 2 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05737420, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2024.