Prostate CancerACTI-PAIR2NCT05739565
Impact of a Physical Activity Intervention With Motivational Support From Peers for Prostate Cancer Patients
A study testing Acti-Pair program in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 25 sites in France.
Trial summary
Despite the recognized benefits of physical activity in tertiary prevention, 60-70% of prostate cancer patients are insufficiently active. Yet 150 minutes of brisk walking per week (new WHO recommendations) is associated with a 29% reduction in cancer mortality and a 57% reduction in recurrence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Acti-Pair program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 850 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Apr 2023to 30 Sep 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosed with prostate cancer for at least 1 year
- PA practice < 150 minutes per week (considered inactive according to WHO)
- Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
- Having received informed information about the study and having co-signed, with the investigator, a consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- For patients:
- Undergoing treatment (except hormone therapy)
- Significant comorbidities contraindicating the practice of physical activity: associated cardiac pathologies, respiratory pathologies, disabling joint pathologies
- Deprived of liberty or under guardianship
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
25 sites in 1 country
France25 sites, 25 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Savoie
Chambéry
Fabrice DESCOMBES, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CH Chambéry
Chambéry
Guillaume MORICEAU, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - DAHLIR 63
Clermont-Ferrand
Joris MARTIN, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Clermont-Ferrand - ONCOLOGIE
Clermont-Ferrand
Aurore DOUGE
Rémi FILLATRE
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Clermont-Ferrand - Urologie
Clermont-Ferrand
Laurent GUY
Florian CERUTI, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Isère
Grenoble
MD
Manon GIRARD, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Grenoble - Urologie
Grenoble
Jean-Luc DESCOTES, MD
Jean-Luc DESCOTES, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - DAHLIR 43
Le Puy-en-Velay
Anaïs CHARRA, MD
Anaïs CHARRA, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CH Le Puy en Velay
Le Puy-en-Velay
Corinne BRUCHET, MD
Corinne BRUCHET, MD
- Not yet recruiting
HCL - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69000
Marc COLOMBEL, PhD
Sébastien CROUZET
- Not yet recruiting
HCL - Hôpital Croix Rousse
Lyon, 69004
Claire FALANDRY, MD PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - DAHLIR 69
Lyon
Julie Julie, MD
Julie Julie, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CLB - Oncologie
Lyon
Cécile LAUDE, MD
Cécile LAUDE, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CLB - Radiothérapie
Lyon
Sofiane HANAYA, MD
Sofiane HANAYA, MD
- Not yet recruiting
HCL - CH Lyon Sud
Lyon
Alain RUFFION, MD
Alain RUFFION, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Ardèche
Privas
Jonathan BAZARD, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CH Roanne
Roanne
Lionel VINCENT, MD
Lionel VINCENT, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - DAPAP 42
Saint-Etienne
Maël GARROS, MD
Maël GARROS, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Saint-Etienne - Oncologie
Saint-Etienne
Pierre CORNILLON, MD
Pierre CORNILLON, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Saint-Etienne - Radiothérapie
Saint-Etienne
Anne-Laure BAREILLE, MD
Anne-Laure BAREILLE, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpital Privé de la Loire
Saint-Etienne
Stéphane LORIN, MD
Stéphane LORIN, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Clinique du parc
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
Hocine HABCHI, MD
Amine MESSAOUD
- Not yet recruiting
Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Drôme
Valence
Aline CARLIER, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpitaux Drôme Nord - Valence
Valence
Thomas POLGUER, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Radiologie Drôme-Ardèche - Valence
Valence
Jean-Baptiste GUY, MD
Sébastien CLIPPE
About this study
Official title: Title Impact of a Physical Activity Intervention With Motivational Support From Peers for Prostate Cancer Patients - ACTI-PAIR 2 Multicenter, Randomized Stepped-wedge Study
Despite the recognized benefits of physical activity in tertiary prevention, 60-70% of prostate cancer patients are insufficiently active.
Yet 150 minutes of brisk walking per week (new WHO recommendations) is associated with a 29% reduction in cancer mortality and a 57% reduction in recurrence.
Read more
Increasing patients' adherence to regular physical activity appears to be a new challenge for personalized cancer care.
Personalized physical activity programmes (1) at home, (2) supported by health professionals, or (3) by peers have shown the effectiveness of regular physical activity.
However, these interventions last less than 6 months and do not allow for long-term sustainability of physical activity.
This study proposes to combine 3 interventions, which aim to initiate and maintain regular physical activity in prostate cancer patients:
- 1-The realization of a personalized and realistic physical activity project via physical activity support devices (sport health centers)
- 2-Coaching by a peer (a patient with the same disease who has reached the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up
- 3-Support by health professionals (attending physician) through the prescription of physical activity.
The feasibility of ACTI-PAIR program has been demonstrated, the investigators now wish to evaluate it effectiveness.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Acti-Pair program
- Keywords
- Physical activity, prostate cancer, interventional research
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acti-Pair programBehavioural
Motivational support by the peer (a patient with the same pathology who meets the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up
- The implementation of a personalized and realistic physical activity project for the patient via the physical activity support systems (sport health centers)
- Support from health professionals (GP) via the prescription of physical activity and from adapted physical activity (APA) professionals
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acti-Pair program | Experimental | * Motivational support by the peer (a patient with the same pathology who meets the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up
* The implementation of a personalized and realistic physical activity project for the patient via the physical activity support systems (sport health centers)
* Support from health professionals (GP) via the prescription of physical activity and from adapted physical activity (APA) professionals Receives: Behavioral: Acti-Pair program |
| Usual care | No intervention | The control group will be made up of patients followed up for prostate cancer and benefiting from usual care which consists of giving advice and recommendations for physical activity in consultation, aiming to make patients more active in their daily lives (=usual practice, physical activity to be carried out independently, at home). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective measurement of physical activity (in MET-hr/week, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), measures the intensity of physical activity)
via actimetry (Actigraph GT9x, Pensacola, Florida, USA) 12 months (+/- 1 month) after the patient's inclusion in the Acti-Pair program
Measured: Month: 12
Secondary outcomes (19)
Objective measurement of physical activity (in MET-hr/week, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), measures intensity of physical activity)
via actimetry (Actigraph GT9x, Pensacola, Florida, USA) (at 3 and 6 months).
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Objective measure of physical inactivity (in h/d)
via actimetry (Actigraph GT9x, Pensacola, Florida, USA)
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Subjective measurement of physical activity (in Metabolic equivalent of task-h/week) and sedentary time (h/d)
Via the e-Adult Physical Activity Questionnaire (e-APAQ, EA SNA-EPIS, University of Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France) e-Adult Physical Activity Questionnaire (e-APAQ) assesses the 5 categories of physical activity (work, travel, daily life, leisure and sport) and daily life, leisure and sport). The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 300. More the physical activity score is high, more the patient is active. This questionnaire authenticates the periods of sedentarity (at work, during travel and daily life, leisure and sport). The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 24. More the sedentarity score is high, more the patient is sedentary.
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Measurement of physical capacity: walking distance (meters)
via the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Measurement of muscle strength: biceps muscle strength (kg)
via the handgrip (JAMAR Hand Dynamometer, Nottingham, UK).
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Level of fatigue assessed by measuring heart rate variability (SDNN and RMSSD in ms)
via heart rate monitor connected to an actimeter (Actigraph GT3x, Pensacola, Florida, USA) for 24 hours
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Level of fatigue
via the FACIT-F questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale). This questionnaire asseses fatigue and it impacts. The score range is 0 to 160. More the score is higher, more the fatigue is high.
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Health-related quality of life
via the EuroQol-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The score range is -0.148 to 0.949. Mre the score is high, more the quality of life is good.
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by physicians
Number of physicians including patients
Measured: through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by peers
Number of peers recruited
Measured: through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals
Number of patients followed by APA professionals
Measured: through study completion, an average of 42 Months
Time dedicated by peers, Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals and health professionals to the Acti-Pair program
Number of hours spend to follow-up patient specifically for the Acti-Pair program by peers, Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals and health professionals
Measured: through study completion, an average of 42 Months
Assessment of the context:factors favoring and hindering implementation, achievement, adaptation and sustainability of the programme ; compliance with the programme ; social representations
Semi-structured interviews
Measured: Before and after the implementation of the intervention
Percentage of adherence to the intervention
via the number of patients continuing the programme 12 months after initiation
Measured: 12 months
Motivation to engage in physical activity for patients and peers
via the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire (BREQ-2). This questionnaire consists of 19 items includes 6 sub-scores of motivations : introjected regulation (3 items), external regulation (4 items), intrinsic regulation (4 items), integrated regulation, amotivation (4 items) and identified regulation (4 items) on a scale from 1 (Not at all true for me) to 5 (Absolutely true for me).
Measured: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Alliance between the patient and the peer
via the Working Alliance Inventory - short version (WAI-SR). This questionnaire measures three dimensions: bonding (development of a positive interpersonal attachment between the patient and the peer including mutual trust and respect), tasks (each partner's perception of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the care tasks, as well as tasks, as well as shared responsibility for their execution) and goals (understanding, validation and acceptance by both partners of the objectives of change in physical activity management).
Patients rate items on a 5-point Likert scale anchored at each end with 'rarely or never' (1) and 'always' (5). The Goal, Task and Bond domains each have scores ranging from 5 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better therapeutic alliance.
Measured: 12 months
Patients, peers and professionals satisfaction
Via a satisfaction questionnaire constructed for the Acti-Pair programme. The proposed responses are a likert scale ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. Each item will be described with a percentage of Likert scale for each response. More participants will fill out they have been strongly agree, more they will be satisfied.This questionnaire does not have a score.
Measured: 12 months
Cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained through the intervention (quality adjusted life year)
Quality of life data will be collected (e.g. quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, Appendix 3), transformed into utilities to calculate quality adjusted life year (QALY), and the number of patients continuing physical activity at 12 months. Cost data will be collected throughout the study, in each of the 8 departments involved. The analysis will be carried out from the payer's (health insurance) perspective. The time horizon will be that of the study (12 months), and therefore in accordance with French guidelines (HAS), no discount rate will be applied
Measured: 12 months
Cost per patient continuing physical activity at 12 months through the intervention
The costs will include : - direct medical costs : health professionals consultations, peer-to-peer, patient sessions with APA professionals - indirect costs of implementing the intervention: training, facility rental operating costs, investment in small equipment
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2023
- Study start25 Apr 2023
- Primary completion30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sport Health Center of Auvergne-Rhône Alpes, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, INSERM ECEVE 1123, Ministry of Health, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David HUPIN, MD PhD, Principal investigator, CHU de Saint-Etienne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05739565
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20PH286
- Other IDs
- 2022-A01094-39
- Acronym
- ACTI-PAIR2
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bonn SE, Sjolander A, Lagerros YT, Wiklund F, Stattin P, Holmberg E, Gronberg H, Balter K. Physical activity and survival among men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):57-64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0707. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
PubMed 25527697Richman EL, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Paciorek A, Carroll PR, Chan JM. Physical activity after diagnosis and risk of prostate cancer progression: data from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor. Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;71(11):3889-95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3932. Epub 2011 May 24.
PubMed 21610110Phillips SM, Stampfer MJ, Chan JM, Giovannucci EL, Kenfield SA. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and health-related quality of life in prostate cancer survivors in the health professionals follow-up study. J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Sep;9(3):500-11. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0426-2. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
PubMed 25876555Steindorf K, Depenbusch J, Haussmann A, Tsiouris A, Schmidt L, Hermann S, Sieverding M, Wiskemann J, Ungar N. Change patterns and determinants of physical activity differ between breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jul;28(7):3207-3218. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05097-1. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
PubMed 31720802Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH. Cancer survivors' exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire-survey. Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):186-94. doi: 10.1002/pon.2072. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
PubMed 23296635Livingston PM, Craike MJ, Salmon J, Courneya KS, Gaskin CJ, Fraser SF, Mohebbi M, Broadbent S, Botti M, Kent B; ENGAGE Uro-Oncology Clinicians' Group. Effects of a clinician referral and exercise program for men who have completed active treatment for prostate cancer: A multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial (ENGAGE). Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2646-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29385. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
PubMed 25877784Tudor-Locke C, Lauzon N, Myers AM, Bell RC, Chan CB, McCargar L, Speechley M, Rodger NW. Effectiveness of the First step Program delivered by professionals versus peers. J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jul;6(4):456-62. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.4.456.
PubMed 19842459Buman MP, Giacobbi PR Jr, Dzierzewski JM, Morgan AA, McCrae CS, Roberts BL, Marsiske M. Peer Volunteers Improve Long-Term Maintenance of Physical Activity With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8(s2):S257-S266. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s257.
PubMed 28829716Pinto BM, Stein K, Dunsiger S. Peers promoting physical activity among breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2015 May;34(5):463-72. doi: 10.1037/hea0000120. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
PubMed 25110844Galvao DA, Newton RU, Girgis A, Lepore SJ, Stiller A, Mihalopoulos C, Gardiner RA, Taaffe DR, Occhipinti S, Chambers SK. Randomized controlled trial of a peer led multimodal intervention for men with prostate cancer to increase exercise participation. Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):199-207. doi: 10.1002/pon.4495. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
PubMed 28685892Baudot A, Barth N, Colas C, Garros M, Garcin A, Oriol M, Roche F, Chauvin F, Mottet N, Hupin D; on behalf the Acti-Pair investigators. The physical activity experience of prostate cancer patients: a multicentre peer motivation monitoring feasibility study. The Acti-Pair study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 21;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00966-9.
PubMed 35063040Baudot A, Fayolle E, Garros M, Barth N, Colin F, Presles E, Oriol M, Collange F, Chauvin F, Bourmaud A, Hupin D. Impact of the Acti-Pair programme on physical activity in patients with prostate cancer: protocol of the Acti-Pair 2 stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 Dec 22;10(4):e002344. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002344. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39717077
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Title Impact of a Physical Activity Intervention With Motivational Support From Peers for Prostate Cancer Patients - ACTI-PAIR 2 Multicenter, Randomized Stepped-wedge Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05739565
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACTI-PAIR2 / 20PH286
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Physical activity, prostate cancer, interventional research
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sport Health Center of Auvergne-Rhône Alpes, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, INSERM ECEVE 1123, Ministry of Health, France
- Study start
- 25 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite the recognized benefits of physical activity in tertiary prevention, 60-70% of prostate cancer patients are insufficiently active.
Yet 150 minutes of brisk walking per week (new WHO recommendations) is associated with a 29% reduction in cancer mortality and a 57% reduction in recurrence.
Increasing patients' adherence to regular physical activity appears to be a new challenge for personalized cancer care.
Personalized physical activity programmes (1) at home, (2) supported by health professionals, or (3) by peers have shown the effectiveness of regular physical activity.
However, these interventions last less than 6 months and do not allow for long-term sustainability of physical activity.
This study proposes to combine 3 interventions, which aim to initiate and maintain regular physical activity in prostate cancer patients:
- 1-The realization of a personalized and realistic physical activity project via physical activity support devices (sport health centers)
- 2-Coaching by a peer (a patient with the same disease who has reached the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up
- 3-Support by health professionals (attending physician) through the prescription of physical activity.
The feasibility of ACTI-PAIR program has been demonstrated, the investigators now wish to evaluate it effectiveness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acti-Pair program | Experimental | Behavioral: Acti-Pair program* Motivational support by the peer (a patient with the same pathology who meets the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up * The implementation of a personalized and realistic physical activity project for the patient via the physical activity support systems (sport health centers) * Support from health professionals (GP) via the prescription of physical activity and from adapted physical activity (APA) professionals |
| Usual care | No intervention | –The control group will be made up of patients followed up for prostate cancer and benefiting from usual care which consists of giving advice and recommendations for physical activity in consultation, aiming to make patients more active in their daily lives (=usual practice, physical activity to be carried out independently, at home). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosed with prostate cancer for at least 1 year
- PA practice < 150 minutes per week (considered inactive according to WHO)
- Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
- Having received informed information about the study and having co-signed, with the investigator, a consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Undergoing treatment (except hormone therapy)
- Significant comorbidities contraindicating the practice of physical activity: associated cardiac pathologies, respiratory pathologies, disabling joint pathologies
- Deprived of liberty or under guardianship
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acti-Pair programMotivational support by the peer (a patient with the same pathology who meets the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up * The implementation of a personalized and realistic physical activity project for the patient via the physical activity support systems (sport health centers) * Support from health professionals (GP) via the prescription of physical activity and from adapted physical activity (APA) professionals | Behavioural | Acti-Pair program |
Primary outcome
Objective measurement of physical activity (in MET-hr/week, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), measures the intensity of physical activity)
Time frame: Month: 12
via actimetry (Actigraph GT9x, Pensacola, Florida, USA) 12 months (+/- 1 month) after the patient's inclusion in the Acti-Pair program
19 secondary outcomes
Objective measurement of physical activity (in MET-hr/week, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), measures intensity of physical activity)
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Objective measure of physical inactivity (in h/d)
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Subjective measurement of physical activity (in Metabolic equivalent of task-h/week) and sedentary time (h/d)
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Measurement of physical capacity: walking distance (meters)
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Measurement of muscle strength: biceps muscle strength (kg)
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Level of fatigue assessed by measuring heart rate variability (SDNN and RMSSD in ms)
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Level of fatigue
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by physicians
Time frame: through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by peers
Time frame: through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 42 Months
Time dedicated by peers, Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals and health professionals to the Acti-Pair program
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 42 Months
Assessment of the context:factors favoring and hindering implementation, achievement, adaptation and sustainability of the programme ; compliance with the programme ; social representations
Time frame: Before and after the implementation of the intervention
Percentage of adherence to the intervention
Time frame: 12 months
Motivation to engage in physical activity for patients and peers
Time frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
Alliance between the patient and the peer
Time frame: 12 months
Patients, peers and professionals satisfaction
Time frame: 12 months
Cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained through the intervention (quality adjusted life year)
Time frame: 12 months
Cost per patient continuing physical activity at 12 months through the intervention
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2025.
- Background: PubMed 25527697Bonn SE, Sjolander A, Lagerros YT, Wiklund F, Stattin P, Holmberg E, Gronberg H, Balter K. Physical activity and survival among men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):57-64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0707. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
- Background: PubMed 21610110Richman EL, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Paciorek A, Carroll PR, Chan JM. Physical activity after diagnosis and risk of prostate cancer progression: data from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor. Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;71(11):3889-95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3932. Epub 2011 May 24.
- Background: PubMed 25876555Phillips SM, Stampfer MJ, Chan JM, Giovannucci EL, Kenfield SA. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and health-related quality of life in prostate cancer survivors in the health professionals follow-up study. J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Sep;9(3):500-11. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0426-2. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 31720802Steindorf K, Depenbusch J, Haussmann A, Tsiouris A, Schmidt L, Hermann S, Sieverding M, Wiskemann J, Ungar N. Change patterns and determinants of physical activity differ between breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jul;28(7):3207-3218. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05097-1. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 23296635Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH. Cancer survivors' exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire-survey. Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):186-94. doi: 10.1002/pon.2072. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
- Background: PubMed 25877784Livingston PM, Craike MJ, Salmon J, Courneya KS, Gaskin CJ, Fraser SF, Mohebbi M, Broadbent S, Botti M, Kent B; ENGAGE Uro-Oncology Clinicians' Group. Effects of a clinician referral and exercise program for men who have completed active treatment for prostate cancer: A multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial (ENGAGE). Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2646-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29385. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 19842459Tudor-Locke C, Lauzon N, Myers AM, Bell RC, Chan CB, McCargar L, Speechley M, Rodger NW. Effectiveness of the First step Program delivered by professionals versus peers. J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jul;6(4):456-62. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.4.456.
- Background: PubMed 28829716Buman MP, Giacobbi PR Jr, Dzierzewski JM, Morgan AA, McCrae CS, Roberts BL, Marsiske M. Peer Volunteers Improve Long-Term Maintenance of Physical Activity With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8(s2):S257-S266. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s257.
- Background: PubMed 25110844Pinto BM, Stein K, Dunsiger S. Peers promoting physical activity among breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2015 May;34(5):463-72. doi: 10.1037/hea0000120. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
- Background: PubMed 28685892Galvao DA, Newton RU, Girgis A, Lepore SJ, Stiller A, Mihalopoulos C, Gardiner RA, Taaffe DR, Occhipinti S, Chambers SK. Randomized controlled trial of a peer led multimodal intervention for men with prostate cancer to increase exercise participation. Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):199-207. doi: 10.1002/pon.4495. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
- Background: PubMed 35063040Baudot A, Barth N, Colas C, Garros M, Garcin A, Oriol M, Roche F, Chauvin F, Mottet N, Hupin D; on behalf the Acti-Pair investigators. The physical activity experience of prostate cancer patients: a multicentre peer motivation monitoring feasibility study. The Acti-Pair study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 21;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00966-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39717077Baudot A, Fayolle E, Garros M, Barth N, Colin F, Presles E, Oriol M, Collange F, Chauvin F, Bourmaud A, Hupin D. Impact of the Acti-Pair programme on physical activity in patients with prostate cancer: protocol of the Acti-Pair 2 stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 Dec 22;10(4):e002344. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002344. eCollection 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
David HUPIN, MD PhD principal investigator
CHU de Saint-Etienne
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acti-Pair program in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 25 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact HUPIN DAVID, MD ((0)477828413 ext. +33, David.Hupin@chu-st-etienne.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective measurement of physical activity (in MET-hr/week, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), measures the intensity of physical activity) (time frame: Month: 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05739565, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2025.