AzTrials
AzTrials

Hip FracturesPhase 4Zoo-PNCT05743179

The Effect of Zoledronate on the Prevention of Pneumonia in Hip Fracture Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Zoledronate in people with Hip Fractures and Pneumonia, run by The University of Hong Kong at 5 sites in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs; such as alendronate and zoledronate) are commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention, in which zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hip Fractures, Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Zoledronate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,692 participants
Where
5 sitesHong Kong
Study dates
5 Dec 2022to Jun 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female ≥ 60 years
  • With recent fragility hip fracture at proximal femur
  • Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent, including consent for the use and discloser of research-related health information, and comply with the study data collection procedures. Provide signed and dated informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Known to be hypersensitive to any N-BPs
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body surface area
  • Regular user of anti-osteoporosis medications (including bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatides, and raloxifene) or oral or intravenous systemic glucocorticoids in the previous year.
  • Subject currently involved in a clinical trial or in an exclusion period following participation in another clinical trial

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD contact

+852 2831-5080

lung1212@hku.hk

5 sites in 1 country

Hong Kong5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Queen Mary Hospital

    Hong Kong

    Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD, +852 2831-5080, lung1212@hku.hk

    Recruiting
  • United Christian Hospital

    Kwun Tong

    Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD, +852 2831-5080, lung1212@hku.hk

    Recruiting
  • Caritas Medical Centre

    Sham Shui Po

    Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD, +852 2831-5080, lung1212@hku.hk

    Recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Shatin

    Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD, +852 2831-5080, lung1212@hku.hk

    Not yet recruiting
  • Tai Po Hospital

    Tai Po

    Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD, +852 2831-5080, lung1212@hku.hk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Zoledronate on the Prevention of Pneumonia in Hip Fracture Patients (Zoo-P): An Open-label, Pragmatic, Randomised Controlled Trial

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs; such as alendronate and zoledronate) are commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention, in which zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study showed that the use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. In addition to cardiovascular diseases, both preclinical study and sensitivity analysis also suggest evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. Moreover, a pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate effect of the tested intervention in real-life routine clinical practice since traditional explanatory radomised controlled trial (RCT) may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. This study aims to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

This is an open-label, multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients will be recruited from 4 hospitals, namely Caritas Medical Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Queen Mary Hospital, and United Christian Hospital. Age, sex, body mass index, eGFR, history of fracture, chronic respiratory diseases, and other medical history, will be measured and recorded at recruitment.

Read the detailed description

N-BPs are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention. Although alendronate is the first-line antiosteoporosis medication in many countries, it is associated with esophageal and gastrointestinal irritation. In addition, the regimen for alendronate is one tablet per week and careful use of alendronate is required to avoid gastrointestinal irritation (e.g. take the tablet on an empty stomach, stay upright for at least 30 minutes after taking the medication), leading to relative low drug compliance. On the other hand, the regimen of zoledronate is 5mg infusion once a year. Since the route of administration is intravenous infusion, it avoids the gastrointestinal irritation problem. In terms of fracture prevention, zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. Most importantly, previous HORIZON recurrent fracture trial showed that zoledronate use reduced risk of mortality in addition to fracture prevention. Thus, zoledronate is considered the most efficacious N-BP in clinical use.

N-BPs could exert extra-skeletal beneficial effects. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study (N=34,991) using the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), a clinical database managed by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority, showed that use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. Later in the same year, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 2,000 osteopenic women showed that zoledronate may reduce risk of myocardial infarction with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36-1.02) after following up for 6 years. They subsequently performed a detailed post-hoc analysis and showed that zoledronate use was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction, composite cardiovascular end-point, and fatal stroke. This example demonstrated not only the extra-skeletal effect of N-BPs, but also showed that high-quality real-world data with state-of-the-art statistical method could potentially be useful in causal inference.

In addition to cardiovascular diseases, N-BPs may be useful in preventing pneumonia. Preclinical study showed that N-BPs are anti-inflammatory and may modulate macrophages in response to pneumonia. In addition, pharmacokinetic studies showed that the highest concentration of N-BPs was detected in trachea other than bone after oral ingestion or intravenous infusion of N-BPs. Among various N-BPs, alendronate was detected in the trachea with a concentration of 607 ng/ml 72 hours after oral ingestion, which was almost half of the concentration (1370 ng/ml) detected in vertebrae. Thus, we conducted a real-world population-based propensity score matched study in a cohort of 54,047 hip fracture patients to investigate the association of N-BP use with risk of pneumonia. Among hip fracture patients, N-BP use was significantly associated with 24% risk reduction in pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.83), with an absolute risk difference of 2%. Similar significant association was observed for pneumonia mortality. To further reduce the potential bias of confounding by indication, we performed a sensitivity analysis by including users of other anti-osteoporosis medications in the control group, instead of patients without using any anti-osteoporosis medications. A similar significant association was observed. In agreement with the preclinical studies, we provided evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. This finding attracted wide media coverage, including Reuters and the New York Times.

Although utilisation of real-world data is an emerging approach in evaluating drug effectiveness, RCT is still considered the gold standard in evaluating drug efficacy. However, traditional explanatory RCT may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. Thus, pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate if the tested intervention is effective in real-life routine clinical practice, by reducing bias using randomization and improving generalizability using real-world setting. We aim to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

Being tested
Zoledronate
Keywords
Zoledronic Acid, Pneumonia, Hip Fractures
Medical subject headings
Hip Fractures, Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ZoledronateDrug

    Also called Zoledronic acid, Aclasta

    Aclasta Solution for Infusion 5mg/100ml (zoledronic acid)

Study groups in NCT05743179
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ZoledronateExperimentalZoledronate intravenous infusion (5mg) once and usual care will be provided to the patient and mark the start of 12-month follow-up period
Receives: Drug: Zoledronate
ControlNo interventionOnly usual care will be provided to the patient with 12-month follow-up period.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pneumonia hospitalizations

    Diagnosis records of pneumonia from electronic medical records

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Cardiovascular events

    Diagnosis records of cardiovascular events from electronic medical records

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Refracture events

    Diagnosis records of refracture from electronic medical records

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Problems associated with fracture healing, including revision surgery

    Diagnosis and operation records from electronic medical records

    Measured: 12 months

  4. All-cause mortality

    Date of death and cause of death information from electronic medical records

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2023
  2. Study start5 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completionMay 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,692 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05743179
Sponsor's protocol ID
Zoo-P_001
Acronym
Zoo-P
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
14 Feb 2023
Last updated
20 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will be shared upon special request to the principal investigator.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Zoledronate in people with Hip Fractures and Pneumonia, run by The University of Hong Kong at 5 sites in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD (+852 2831-5080, lung1212@hku.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pneumonia hospitalizations (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in