AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerLarchNCT05747443

Multilevel Interventions to Increase Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening

A study testing Stepped Reminders and Patient Education in people with Lung Cancer and Lung Cancer Screening, run by Kaiser Permanente at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Screening for lung cancer has the potential for a profound public health benefit. Repeat annual screening is necessary for early detection of lung cancer. The investigators will test two interventions which include patient education and reminders to improve adherence to lung cancer screening. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 78 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer, Lung Cancer Screening
What is being tested?
Stepped Reminders and Patient Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,837 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
12 Dec 2022to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 78 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • KPWA members
  • Aged 50-78 years
  • Have a negative screening LDCT scan
  • Speak English or Spanish
  • Meet US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines

Who cannot join

  • Patients who were previously diagnosed with lung cancer,
  • Patients who have a positive scan,
  • Patients who have an indicator for interpreter services, except for Spanish

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Kaiser Permanente

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

Other trials in United States

About this study

Screening for lung cancer has the potential for a profound public health benefit. Repeat annual screening is necessary for early detection of lung cancer. The investigators will test two interventions which include patient education and reminders to improve adherence to lung cancer screening.

Read the detailed description

Screening for lung cancer has the potential for a profound public health benefit.

Successful population-based screening requires continuous monitoring to adherence repeat screening in high risk adults to achieve similar results. Repeat annual screening is necessary for early detection of lung cancer. Baseline or first LDCT scans detect prevalent lung cancer, when subsequent screening detects new nodules. However, adherence to screening is low, ranging at 28-38% from centers nationally.

The investigators developed two novel, patient-centered interventions to address patient education and offering reminders for on-time screening. To address these goals, the specific aims are to: 1) Compare effectiveness of two multilevel interventions relative to usual care in improving (a) rates of adherence to lung cancer screening, (b) patient-centered outcomes; and (c) clinic outcomes; and 2) Determine the patient-, clinician-, and system-level factors that influence changes in adherence to inform lung cancer screening programs.

Being tested
Stepped Reminders, Patient Education
Keywords
Lung Cancer, Low dose CT (LDCT), Lung Cancer Screening, Stepped Reminders, Educational Video, User centered design, Stakeholders, Evaluation, Qualitative, Patient Partners, Adherence
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stepped RemindersOther

    Stepped Reminders, which directly reminds providers to order the next LDCT scan and then reminds patients they are due and prompts them to schedule LDCT with Radiology.

  • Patient EducationOther

    The Patient Voices Video is an educational video about lung cancer screening.

Study groups in NCT05747443
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patient Video onlyExperimentalAbout 3 weeks after the index LDCT, the study Medical Assistant (MA) will deliver a link to the Patient Voices Video, an educational video about lung cancer screening.
Receives: Other: Patient Education
Stepped Reminders onlyExperimentalPrior to patient's next LDCT scan is due, MA begins Stepped Reminders intervention: MA pends LDCT orders to PCP to sign. MA sends reminders to patient when order is placed and follows up by phone if patient has not scheduled LDCT.
Receives: Other: Stepped Reminders
Patient Video and Stepped RemindersExperimentalSee above. Those assigned to the Patient Video and Stepped Reminders will receive both interventions, as described above.
Receives: Other: Stepped Reminders; Other: Patient Education
Usual CareNo interventionThose assigned to the the Usual Care arm will continue to receive usual lung cancer screening care.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of repeat annual lung cancer screening

    Electronic health records will be searched for screening low dose CT (LDCT).

    Measured: 9-15 months after index LDCT

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Knowledge of lung cancer screening

    Knowledge of lung cancer screening eligibility, time to return and cost on patient reported outcomes survey.

    Measured: 8 weeks after index LDCT

  2. Attitudes and beliefs

    The Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scale measures self-efficacy for lung cancer screening. The self-efficacy for lung cancer screening scale ranges from 9-36, with higher scores indicating lower self-efficacy.

    Measured: 8 weeks after index LDCT

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2023
  2. Study start12 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion5 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,837 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05747443
Sponsor's protocol ID
220-115.001
Acronym
Larch
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
17 Feb 2023
Last updated
24 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Palazzo L, Luce C, Vasavada A, Mettert K, Gao H, Ralston JD, Bezman N, Green BB, Rogers K, Anderson ML, Su YR, Triplette M, Carter-Bawa L, Wernli KJ. I need it. Without it, I wouldn't have gone, and I do want to go: patient perspectives on the acceptability and appropriateness of two patient-centered interventions to improve adherence to annual lung cancer screening. Front Health Serv. 2026 Sep 23;6:1810956. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2026.1810956. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 42846115
  • Wernli KJ, Anderson ML, Palazzo L, Luce C, Bezman N, Rogers K, Chin M, Gao H, Ralston J, Su YR, Carter-Bawa L, Triplette M, Tuzzio L, Vasavada A, Green BB. Health Communication and Stepped Reminders Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2026 Aug 10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.3666. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42574003
  • Vasavada A, Palazzo L, Luce C, Sanchez M, Triplette M, Ralston JD, Carter-Bawa L, Green BB, Gao H, Li CI, Anderson ML, Su YR, Rogers K, Wernli KJ. Understanding older adults' perceptions and attitudes toward digital health and technology in a lung cancer screening-eligible population: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 Jul 21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-15124-7. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42482048
  • Vasavada A, Palazzo L, Luce C, Sanchez M, Triplette M, Ralston JD, Carter-Bawa L, Green BB, Gao H, Li CI, Anderson ML, Su YR, Rogers K, Wernli KJ. "It's coming whether we want it to or not": A qualitative exploration of older adults' comfort with and perceptions of technology and digital health. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2025 Nov 19:rs.3.rs-8001649. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8001649/v1.

    PubMed 41333381
  • Wernli KJ, Anderson ML, Palazzo L, Luce C, Bezman N, Chin M, Gao H, Ralston JD, Rogers K, Su YR, Triplette M, Carter-Bawa L, Vasavada A, Jordan M, West M, Boler S, Green BB. Effectiveness of Health Communication Intervention to Improve Knowledge on Timeliness to Return for Annual Lung Cancer Screening: The Larch Trial. Chest. 2026 Feb;169(2):550-561. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.07.4111. Epub 2025 Sep 10.

    PubMed 40939933
  • Luce C, Palazzo L, Anderson ML, Carter-Bawa L, Gao H, Green BB, Ralston JD, Rogers K, Su YR, Tuzzio L, Triplette M, Wernli KJ. A pragmatic randomized clinical trial of multilevel interventions to improve adherence to lung cancer screening (The Larch Study): Study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 May;140:107495. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107495. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

    PubMed 38467273

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stepped Reminders and Patient Education in people with Lung Cancer and Lung Cancer Screening, run by Kaiser Permanente at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of repeat annual lung cancer screening (time frame: 9-15 months after index LDCT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05747443, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in