AzTrials
AzTrials

CopdEarly Phase 1NCT05748977

Short Acting Agents Vs Long Acting in Frequent Excerbator COPD Patients

A Early Phase 1 study testing SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs in people with Copd, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is heterogeneous lung condition characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, exacerbations) due to abnormalities of the airways (bronchitis, bronchiolitis) and/or alveoli (emphysema) that cause persistent, often progressive ,airflow… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Copd
What is being tested?
SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
20 Feb 2023to 20 Mar 2024
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All frequent exacerabator copd patients

Who cannot join

  • patients less than 18

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

nermen M abuelkassem, lecturer contact

01000767713

nermenabuelkassem@gmail.com

mohammed gamal Abdelrahman, lecturer contact

01026600071

dr.mga2011@yahoo.com

Egypt1 site
  • Nermen Mohammed Abuelkassem

    Asyut, 71511

    Mohammed Gamal Abdalrahman Khalaf, 01026600071, dr.mga2011@yahoo.com

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Inhaled Fenotereol,Ipratroium Plus Beclomethasone Versus Salmeterol,Tiotropium Plus Fluticasone in Frequent Excerbator COPD Patients

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is heterogeneous lung condition characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, exacerbations) due to abnormalities of the airways (bronchitis, bronchiolitis) and/or alveoli (emphysema) that cause persistent, often progressive ,airflow obstruction.

There are network meta analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of short acting bronchodilators Vs long acting agents in treatment of COPD

Read the detailed description

Aim of the work1.To compare efficacy of short acting beta 2 agonists ,short acting antimuscrinic agents and beclomethasone versus long acting beta 2 agonist,short acting antimuscurnic agents and fluticasone.- Type of the study: This study is a randomized controlled trail 2.4. 2- Study Setting: Present study will be conducted in chest outpatient clinic Chest department Assiut University hospital 2.4. 3- Study subjects: Frequent exacerbator COPD patients Based on determining the main outcome variable, the estimated minimum required sample size is 80 patients (40 in each group).

Main outcome variable is difference in dyspnoea scores in frequent exacerbator COPD patients receiving long-acting steroids vs. short acting treatment. Based on previous systematic review we expected to find significant improvement in long-acting treatment group (large effect size). Data will be collected through: patients diagnosed COPD by different investigations (history, examinations spirometry) have recurrent exacerbations, some patients receiving short acting beta 2 agonists, short acting anti-muscurnic agents and beclomethasone versus long acting agents and fluticasone then all patients followed using dyspnea scores, CCQ, saint George questionnaire which assess heath related quality of life.

Conditions
Copd
Being tested
SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICsDrug

    Short acting agents,long acting agents ,ics

Study groups in NCT05748977
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SABA,SAMA ICSExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs
LABA,LAMA ICSExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. to assess improvement of symptoms mainly dyspnea

    to assess dyspnea in two groups by mMRC,saint gorge quetsonaire

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Mar 2023
  2. Study start20 Feb 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion20 Feb 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion20 Mar 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05748977
Sponsor's protocol ID
SABA,SAMA versus LABA,LAMAcopd
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
18 Feb 2023
Last updated
1 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs in people with Copd, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact nermen M abuelkassem, lecturer (01000767713, nermenabuelkassem@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

to assess improvement of symptoms mainly dyspnea (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in