AzTrials
AzTrials

FrailtyNCT05750121

E-health Enhanced Motor-cognitive Training for AED Discharged Older Adults With Cognitive Frailty

A study testing E-health enhanced motor-cognitive training in people with Frailty and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to explore the feasibility of e-health enhanced motor-cognitive interventions for discharged community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty in the emergency department and to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions on (1) cognitive functions, (2)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Frailty, Mild Cognitive Impairment
What is being tested?
E-health enhanced motor-cognitive training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
23 Mar 2023to 1 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 60 years old or above;
  • discharged from the AED;
  • Cantonese speaking;
  • have a smartphone and have experience in using the smartphone for at least six months;
  • with cognitive frailty, the coexistence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and physical frailty, without being diagnosed as dementia.

Who cannot join

  • unable to make consent,
  • unable to communicate due to language barrier or visual impairment or uncorrectable hearing impairment,
  • old aged home residents,
  • already participated in other interventional studies,
  • participate in any geriatric program and training, or
  • impaired mobility

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Daphne Cheung, PhD contact

+852 27664534

daphne.cheung@polyu.edu.hk

Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
  • School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Hong Kong

    Daphne Cheung, PhD, +852 27664534, daphne.cheung@polyu.edu.hk

    Rick Kwan, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Effects of E-health Enhanced Motor-cognitive Training on Cognitive Functions, Physical Frailty and Physical Functions of Accident and Emergency Department Discharged Community-dwelling Older Adults With Cognitive Frailty: A Pilot Trial

The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to explore the feasibility of e-health enhanced motor-cognitive interventions for discharged community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty in the emergency department and to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions on (1) cognitive functions, (2) physical functions and (3) frailty status.

Participants in the intervention group will receive three-90-minute weekly physical and cognitive training for 12 weeks, facilitated with persuasive technology on smartphones, in addition to the usual care. The control group will receive the usual care. Researchers will explore the feasibility and compare the changes of outcomes between two groups.

Read the detailed description

Motor-cognitive training effectively reverses and prevents further deterioration of cognitive function, frailty status, and physical function in older adults with cognitive frailty. Recent systematic reviews showed that older adults with cognitive frailty are more likely to develop dementia and have falls than those with frailty alone. The current time-pressured Accident and Emergency Department (AED) setting is challenging for the practitioners to have an intervention to maintain or improve the current physical and cognitive function of these older adults with non-acute complaints and prone to further deteriorate after being discharged from AED. There is a mismatch of services in traditional emergency medicine with the demand of the elderly population. Particular intervention for these older adults is needed. Based on the systematic review and the previous literature, motor-cognitive training is an essential intervention component. Interventions in a home setting can increase flexibility and improve adherence to the intervention. However, the effect on motor-cognitive training in a home setting is unknown. This study aims to explore the feasibility of e-health enhanced motor-cognitive interventions for discharged community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty in the emergency department and to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions on (1) cognitive functions, (2) physical functions and (3) frailty status.

This study is a single-blinded pilot randomised, controlled study. Subjects will be allocated to either the intervention or control group by a 1:1 ratio, where they will receive motor-cognitive training in addition to usual care or usual care only. The program will be targeted older adults aged 60 or above with cognitive frailty and discharged from AED. The intervention lasts for 12 weeks, with three 90 minutes sessions (60 minutes of physical activity and 30 minutes of cognitive training) per week. Trained emergency nurses will provide respective assessments and interventions separately. The primary outcomes are to check the feasibility, including compliance, adherence and adverse effect of the study. Intervention efficacy is the secondary outcome, including physical frailty level, physical performance, and cognitive function. Fried Frailty Index will measure frailty level, physical performance will be measured by Timed-Up-Go Test, handgrip strength, gait speed, chair stand test, arm curl test and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly. Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), Fuld object-memory evaluation (FOME), trail making test (TMT) will be used to measure the cognitive functions. Secondary outcome indicators included. Data will be collected in two-time points, baseline and post-intervention Findings of the study can help in improving the actual research and providing evidence for implementing motor-cognitive training for AED-discharged older adults with cognitive frailty.

Being tested
E-health enhanced motor-cognitive training
Keywords
Cognitive frailty, Motor-Cognitive Training, Older Adults, Discharged
Medical subject headings
Frailty, Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • E-health enhanced motor-cognitive trainingBehavioural

    The intervention group will implement physical activity (aerobic exercise and resistance training) and cognitive training (CogniFit) intervention with the e-health components (persuasive technology). The intervention period will last for 12 weeks, with three 90 minutes sessions (60 minutes of physical activity and 30 minutes of cognitive training) per week.

Study groups in NCT05750121
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment groupExperimentalThe intervention group will receive home-based motor-cognitive training and usual emergency care.
Receives: Behavioral: E-health enhanced motor-cognitive training
Usual care groupNo interventionUsual care includes wound care, community nurse service, medications and on-site physiotherapy, occupational therapy, community nurse service, medical social work service, and geriatric nurse follow-up service will be referred when necessary.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment rate

    One of the feasibility outcomes. It is the overall recruitment rate, which will be calculated by dividing the number of recruited and randomized, by the total invited eligible potential participants. It will range from 0 to 100%.

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Retention rate

    One of the feasibility outcomes. It is calculated by dividing the number of randomised participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data at the end of the project, by the recruited participants. It will range from 0 to 100%.

    Measured: At the 12th - 14th week (post-intervention)

  3. Adverse events

    A feasibility indicators, which is defined as an undesired effect of the intervention. Any adverse events reported by the participants will be documented and reported.

    Measured: Continuous monitoring throughout the 12 weeks of intervention

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Global cognition

    It will be assessed with the Hong Kong version Montreal of Cognitive Assessment. The total score of the instrument ranges from 0 - 30. Higher score indicates better cognitive functions.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  2. Memory

    It will be measured with Fuld Object Memory Evaluation. It consists of three subscores, namely the total storage, total retrieval and delayed recall with the highest possible scores of 50, 50, and 10 respectively. Higher the scores indicate better cognitive functions.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  3. Visual attention and task switching

    It will be measured with the Trail Making Test (TMT), which consists of two parts: TMT-A and TMT-B. Shorter the time used indicates better cognitive functions.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  4. Mobility

    It will be measured with the Time-up-and-Go test. It represents the total time needed for the participants to stand and walk for 3 meters, turn around and walk back to the chair and sit down. Shorter the time used indicates better monility.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  5. Gait speed

    The time used for the 6-meter walk, shorter the time used indicates better gait speed.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  6. Leg strength and endurance

    It will be assessed with the Chair Stand Test. The participants will be required to stand up repeatedly from a chair for 30 seconds. The higher number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds, indicates a better leg strength and endurance.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  7. Physical activity

    It will be measured with the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, which quantify the amount of daily physical activity. The total score ranges from 0 to 793, with a higher score indicates a larger amount of physical activity.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  8. Hand-grip strength

    It will be measured with a handgrip dyanometer.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  9. Strength of upper extremities

    It will be measured with the Arm-Curl Test. The number of bicep curls in 30 seconds while holding a hand weight.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

  10. Actigraph data

    Data will be collected with a wrist worn Actigraph GT3X+ device.

    Measured: Throughout the 12 weeks intervention period.

  11. Frailty status

    The Fried Frailty Index will be used to measure the frailty status. The total score ranges from 0 to five. Higher score indicates a higher frailty level. Score 0, 1-2, and 3-5 correspond to robust, pre-frail, and frail respectively.

    Measured: At baseline, and the 12th - 14th week (post intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Mar 2023
  2. Study start23 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion29 Jan 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05750121
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSEARS20220307001
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
19 Jan 2023
Last updated
28 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing E-health enhanced motor-cognitive training in people with Frailty and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Daphne Cheung, PhD (+852 27664534, daphne.cheung@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment rate (time frame: At baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in