AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)M-CAVNCT05751915

Magnetocardiography as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy for Identifying Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy

An observational study of Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), run by Genetesis Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose: To show early feasibility of magnetocardiography (MCG) to identify coronary Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is the preferred non-invasive tests to assess for CAV and incorporation of quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) assessment improves diagnostic accuracy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)
What is being tested?
CardioFlux
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 May 2023to 30 Jan 2024
How long will I take part?
1 Month
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Heart transplant recipients are susceptible to developing coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV), a disease that causes blockages in the arteries of the transplanted heart. CAV often progresses without symptoms, and transplant recipients undergo regular surveillance to detect CAV. Current tests used to detect CAV, such as invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and intravascular ultrasound (US) have clear limitations; in addition to being invasive with risk of complications, they are also expensive, time consuming, and require iodinated contrast, a concern in a population with high rates of kidney dysfunction. In addition, these tests may not be able to detect CAV in its early stages. Additionally, the diagnosis of CAV remains a challenge as angiography, the standard method for detecting focal plaques, lacks sensitivity in detecting CAV, and intravascular ultrasonography, a more sensitive method, lacks the ability to evaluate the entirety of the coronary arteries.

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years of age at the time of enrollment
  • Willing to provide written informed consent
  • Completed cardiac PET within the last 2 weeks
  • No changes to medication or intervention since the PET was completed

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to fit into device
  • Patients unable to lie supine for 5 minutes
  • Patients with implanted ferromagnetic objects above the costal margin of the rib cage (implanted pacemakers, cardioverter/defibrillators, infusion pumps, and/or neuro stimulators).
  • NOTE: Sternotomy wires stents are acceptable
  • Implanted pacemakers or cardioverter/defibrillators
  • Implanted infusion pumps and/or neuro stimulators
  • Severe claustrophobia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Melanie L Gruen, MS contact

8594684273

melanie.gruen@genetesis.com

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Purpose: To show early feasibility of magnetocardiography (MCG) to identify coronary Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is the preferred non-invasive tests to assess for CAV and incorporation of quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) assessment improves diagnostic accuracy. Based on ISHLT criteria, the following have been proposed for diagnosis of CAV by PET:

Read the detailed description

Diagnosing CAV by PET with quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) 3 PET CAV 0: Normal perfusion with normal global stress (> 1.7 mL/min/g)

PET CAV 1: Normal perfusion with abnormal global stress MBF (<1.7 mL/min/g and ejection fraction >45%) OR Single vessel perfusion defect with normal global stress MBF.

PET CAV 2/3: Normal perfusion with abnormal global stress MBF (<1.7 mL/min/g) and ejection fraction < 45% OR Single vessel perfusion defect with abnormal global stress MBF (<1.7 mL/min/g) OR Multivessel perfusion defects

With these diagnostic criteria, PET CAV 0 has been shown to have a high negative predictive value for moderate to severe CAV by invasive coronary angiography, and PET CAV 2/3 has been shown to have a high positive predictive value for moderate to severe CAV and is associated with adverse events.

This study further examines the feasibility of MCG in identifying CAV in adult heart transplant recipients and compares those results to the current non-invasive standard using PET CAV scores. This will help determine whether MCG is a potential test for regular surveillance of CAV in transplant recipients.

Being tested
CardioFlux
Keywords
Magnetocardiography

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CardioFluxDevice

    CardioFlux MCG is a process that observes incremental changes in the heart's electrical activity by the magnetic fields generated by these currents. These magnetic fields have been used for decades via electrocardiogram to help diagnose and treat both acute and chronic cardiac pathology. The CardioFlux device reaches the potential of this phenomenon by sensing a complete magnetic field map. It is equipped with a magnetic shielding chamber and can attenuate magnetic field noise by a factor of nearly 1500 which maximizes signal to noise ratio. CardioFlux is an easy to operate, noninvasive modality that can detect the presence of ischemic cardiac tissue in symptomatic patients in a less than 5-minute scan. The device uses the proprietary software called Faraday which processes MCG scans, create diagnostic functional images, and run analytics.

Study groups in NCT05751915
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PET CAV 0Normal perfusion with normal global stress (> 1.7 mL/min/g)
Receives: Device: CardioFlux
PET CAV 1Normal perfusion with abnormal global stress MBF (<1.7 mL/min/g and ejection fraction >45%) OR Single vessel perfusion defect with normal global stress MBF.
Receives: Device: CardioFlux
PET CAV 2/3Normal perfusion with abnormal global stress MBF (<1.7 mL/min/g) and ejection fraction < 45% OR Single vessel perfusion defect with abnormal global stress MBF (<1.7 mL/min/g) OR Multivessel perfusion defects v
Receives: Device: CardioFlux

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To compare the performance (diagnostic capabilities) of magnetocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary vasculopathy (CAV) as compared to PET as the currently accepted gold standard non-invasive tool.

    Ability of MCG to identify CAV 0 in heart transplant patients as measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To determine whether MCG is able to differentiate between CAV 0, 1, and 2/3, and to correlate with absolute stress myocardial blood flow, global CFR (Coronary flow reserve), and LVEF (Left ventricular ejection fraction), as measured by cardiac PET

    Differentiation between CAV 0, 1, and 2/3

    Correlation of MCG with absolute stress myocardial blood flow

    Correlation of MCG with global CFR

    Correlation of MCG with LVEF

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2023
  2. Study start23 May 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Month
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05751915
Sponsor's protocol ID
10007
Acronym
M-CAV
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
21 Feb 2023
Last updated
11 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), run by Genetesis Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Melanie L Gruen, MS (8594684273, melanie.gruen@genetesis.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To compare the performance (diagnostic capabilities) of magnetocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary vasculopathy (CAV) as compared to PET as the currently accepted gold standard non-invasive tool. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in