AzTrials
AzTrials

Calcified Coronary LesionsROCA-STEMINCT05752617

European Registry On Plaque ModifiCAtion in the STEMI Population (ROCA-STEMI)

An observational study of Calcified Coronary Lesions and ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, run by Hospital del Mar at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an European prospective cohort study from February 2023 until February 2024. The investigators want to analyze the clinical success, efficacy and safety of consecutive patients who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
15 Feb 2023to Feb 2024
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The ROCA-STEMI study is an European prospective cohort study from February 2023 until February 2024. We want to analyze the clinical success, efficacy and safety of consecutive patients who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo heavily calcified culprit lesion using plaque modification devices before stent implantation.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient with a STEMI
  • Primary percutaneous coronary intervention
  • De-novo culprit lesion in a native coronary artery
  • Severe calcification of the target lesion or its equivalent (balloon uncrossable or undilatable lesion) (See Definitions 4.4)
  • Mandatory use of a plaque modification device to treat the culprit lesion (See Study device and procedures 4.5)
  • The patient or legal representative signing an informed written consent

Who cannot join

  • The target vessel had a stent from a previous PCI
  • The target lesion was treated as a staged procedure
  • Pregnant women
  • Terminally ill patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital del Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

    Beatriz Vaquerizo, MD, PhD, 93.248.34.89, beavaquerizo@yahoo.es

    Hector Cubero-Gallego, MD, PhD, 93.248.34.89, hektorkubero@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

This is an European prospective cohort study from February 2023 until February 2024. The investigators want to analyze the clinical success, efficacy and safety of consecutive patients who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo heavily calcified culprit lesion using plaque modification devices before stent implantation.

Read the detailed description

The ROCA-STEMI study is an European prospective cohort study from February 2023 until February 2024. The investigators want to analyze the clinical success, efficacy and safety of consecutive patients who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo heavily calcified culprit lesion using plaque modification devices before stent implantation.

Clinical and angiographic endpoints will be defined according to the recommendations of the Academic Research Consortium. Academic Research Consortium represents a step toward standardization, facilitating the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of devices.

Bleeding as a safety endpoint will be defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Major bleeding will be defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 and 5.

Severe coronary calcified lesion: Imaging evidence of severe calcium at the culprit lesion site was based on the angiographic presence of radio-opacities noted without cardiac motion before contrast injection involving both sides of the arterial wall in at least 1 location, or presence of ≥270° of calcium at 1 cross-section through IVUS.

Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): will be defined as the composite of cardiac death; MI; stroke, and revascularization, including percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft. Deaths will be regarded to be attributable to a cardiac cause unless a non-cardiac death could be confirmed.

Target lesion revascularization (TLR): will be defined as repeat PCI to treat the same lesion treated during the index procedure.

Target vessel revascularization (TVR): will be defined as PCI of a new severe lesion at another location other than the segment vessel treated at the index PCI.

Non-TVR: will be defined as PCI of a different vessel treated at the index procedure.

Target-lesion failure (TLF): will be defined as the composite of clinically-driven TLR, myocardial infarction, or cardiac death related to the target vessel.

Segment treated thrombosis (STT): is defined according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition as definite, probable, or possible and as early (0 to 30 days), late (31 to 360 days), or very late (>360 days).

Acute closure: is defined as the occurrence of new, severely reduced flow (grade 0 or 1, according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) within the target vessel during the intervention that persists and requires another kind of treatment or results in MI or death.

Study device and procedures

Interventional procedure All coronary calcified lesions will be treated using at least one plaque-modification device. The concomitant use of other plaque-modification devices will be allowed in the presence of heavy calcium and at the operator's discretion.

Based on technology without balloon: rotational atherectomy (RA), orbital atherectomy (OA) and excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA). Among devices based on technologies with balloon there are the cutting balloon, the scoring balloon, the coronary lithoplasty balloon (CL) and the super-high-pressure twin layer non-compliant (NC) balloon, OPN.

Cutting balloon and scoring balloon. The WOLVERINE cutting balloon (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) consists of a NC balloon with 3 micro-blades longitudinally arranged on its surface. Sequential inflation up to 6 atm is advisable. Other available devices are the AngioSculpt, Scoreflex, and NSE Alpha scoring balloons.

Shockwave Coronary IVL System. The lithoplasty balloon (LB) is a rapid-exchange balloon catheter with emitters that generate sonic waves to crack the calcium and to improve vessel compliance. The LB is inflated at calcified lesion level at a pressure of 4 atm and 1 Hz shockwaves are administered. Once the LB is on the lesion, it is connected to an external unit that generates pulsatile mechanical waves. The LB is initially inflated at a pressure of 4 atm and 10 pulses are administered (around 10 seconds are required). Then, the LB is inflated at a 6 atm pressure and then it is deflated to restore the flow. New cycles are then applied; a total of 8 therapies (80 pulses) per balloon and lesion can be administered. Due to its size, if the length of the lesion is > 12 mm, the LB can be repositioned to treat the lesion entirely.

Rotational atherectomy (RA): is an endovascular procedure to modify atherosclerotic plaque by advancing a diamond-coated rotating metal olive-shaped burr. The rotational speed recommended is between 135.000 rpm and 180.000 rpm. Decelerations > 5000 rpm should be avoided. The burr should be advanced gradually with easy back-and-forth moves and rotablation time should be < 20 seconds with pauses in between each cycle. Once rotablation has been performed, the olive-shaped burr is removed and the Dynaglide mode is activated.

Orbital atherectomy (OA): is an endovascular procedure to modify atherosclerotic plaque by using a diamond-coated crown whose mechanism of action consists of the antegrade and retrograde modification of the plaque.14-16 The OA mechanism of action is the elliptical rotation of the crown that gradually increases orbital diameter as rotation speed increases from 80.000 rpm to 120.000 rpm. The OA effect is time-dependent; 30 second-cycles are advisable with 30 second-pauses in between them. The continuous infusion of a lubricant solution (ViperSlide) is required to minimize thermal lesions during OA; also, 18 mL/min of fluid are administered to cool the device down and eliminate residue, thus reducing ischemia and distal embolization.

Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA): The Philips CVX-300 ELCA system uses xenon chloride and emits pulses of ultraviolet (UV) light at a 308-nm wavelength. The UV pulses generated only penetrate 50 μm deep, which disintegrates the calcified plaque through a mechanism of ablation without damage to the middle or adventitia layers.29,30 There are 4 different sizes of ELCA monorail catheter available (0.9, 0.14, 1.7 and 2.0 mm) that can be advanced on a 0.014 in guidewire. The right size is selected on a 0.5:0.6 ratio between catheter and vessel. Slowly moving the device forward promotes an increased luminal gain at lesion level. The number of pulses, length and total time of ELCA treatment should be individualized depending on the characteristics of the lesion. The particles generated have a diameter < 10 μm so they are reabsorbed by the reticuloendothelial system, thus avoiding microvascular obstruction.

The implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) is then performed at the discretion of the operator along with high-pressure (>16 atm) postdilation. Dual-antiplatelet therapy will be administered following the established clinical practice guidelines.

Clinical and angiographic data Clinical data and clinical events will be investigator-reported through an electronic case report form (eCRF). Detailed outcome definitions have been described previously.

Angiographic analysis the presence of severe coronary calcification was evaluated, based on coronary angiography, during the index procedure by each investigator at the participating centers.

Ethics Aspects The study will be conducted according to the ethical principles derived from the Declaration of Helsinki (Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013), ISO 14155, and clinical practice guidelines. In addition, the study will be conducted according to the protocol of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) following the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines and regulatory requirements for participating institutions. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and the hospital's research commission. Once a patient has been identified as a candidate for participation in the study (meeting all inclusion criteria and none exclusion criteria), and after duly informing the patient about the characteristics of the study, an informed consent will be signed and recorded in the corresponding file of the center's investigator. Baseline demographics, procedural features, clinical outcomes and follow-up data will be collected by the coinvestigators at each institution through dedicated electronic case report form (e-CRF).

Medical subject headings
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Target Vessel Failure

    The occurrence of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infraction and target vessel revascularization.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Cardiac death

    Death that could not be attributed to a noncardiac etiology was considered cardiac death.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

    Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 12 months (death, re-infarction, acute cardiovascular disease, hemorrhagy and/or stent thrombosis).

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Target vessel revascularization

    Target vessel revascularization was defined as repeated revascularization by PCI or surgery of the target vessel.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Target lesion revascularization

    Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization procedure performed at the site of the treated lesion associated with clinical and/or objective evidence of inducible myocardial ischemia.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2023
  2. Study start15 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completionFeb 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05752617
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020/9525
Acronym
ROCA-STEMI
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
15 Feb 2023
Last updated
2 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 20;14(14):1435-1534. doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M01_01. No abstract available.

    PubMed 30667361
  • Otsuka F, Sakakura K, Yahagi K, Joner M, Virmani R. Has our understanding of calcification in human coronary atherosclerosis progressed? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Apr;34(4):724-36. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302642. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

    PubMed 24558104
  • Bourantas CV, Zhang YJ, Garg S, Iqbal J, Valgimigli M, Windecker S, Mohr FW, Silber S, Vries Td, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, Morel MA, Serruys PW. Prognostic implications of coronary calcification in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient-level pooled analysis of 7 contemporary stent trials. Heart. 2014 Aug;100(15):1158-64. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305180. Epub 2014 May 20.

    PubMed 24846971
  • Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger DC, Henry TD, Cox DA, Duffy PL, Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Mazzaferri EL Jr, Xu K, Parise H, Mehran R, Mintz GS, Stone GW. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study. Circulation. 2014 Jan 28;129(4):463-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003942. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

    PubMed 24281330
  • Barbato E, Shlofmitz E, Milkas A, Shlofmitz R, Azzalini L, Colombo A. State of the art: evolving concepts in the treatment of heavily calcified and undilatable coronary stenoses - from debulking to plaque modification, a 40-year-long journey. EuroIntervention. 2017 Aug 25;13(6):696-705. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00473.

    PubMed 28844031
  • De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP. Management of Calcific Coronary Artery Lesions: Is it Time to Change Our Interventional Therapeutic Approach? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug 12;12(15):1465-1478. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.038.

    PubMed 31395217
  • Shavadia JS, Vo MN, Bainey KR. Challenges With Severe Coronary Artery Calcification in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Narrative Review of Therapeutic Options. Can J Cardiol. 2018 Dec;34(12):1564-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.482. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

    PubMed 30527144
  • Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, Onuma Y, Morel MA, van Es GA, Zuckerman B, Fearon WF, Taggart D, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Cutlip D, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289.

    PubMed 29891620
  • Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21670242
  • Abdel-Wahab M, Richardt G, Joachim Buttner H, Toelg R, Geist V, Meinertz T, Schofer J, King L, Neumann FJ, Khattab AA. High-speed rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions: the randomized ROTAXUS (Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent Treatment for Complex Native Coronary Artery Disease) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

    PubMed 23266232
  • Abdel-Wahab M, Toelg R, Byrne RA, Geist V, El-Mawardy M, Allali A, Rheude T, Robinson DR, Abdelghani M, Sulimov DS, Kastrati A, Richardt G. High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Versus Modified Balloons Prior to Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007415. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007415.

    PubMed 30354632
  • Kawamoto H, Latib A, Ruparelia N, Ielasi A, D'Ascenzo F, Pennacchi M, Sardella G, Garbo R, Meliga E, Moretti C, Rossi ML, Presbitero P, Magri CJ, Nakamura S, Colombo A, Boccuzzi GG. In-hospital and midterm clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy followed by stent implantation: the ROTATE multicentre registry. EuroIntervention. 2016 Dec 20;12(12):1448-1456. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00386.

    PubMed 27998836
  • Parikh K, Chandra P, Choksi N, Khanna P, Chambers J. Safety and feasibility of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions: the ORBIT I trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1134-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24700. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

    PubMed 23460596
  • Chambers JW, Feldman RL, Himmelstein SI, Bhatheja R, Villa AE, Strickman NE, Shlofmitz RA, Dulas DD, Arab D, Khanna PK, Lee AC, Ghali MG, Shah RR, Davis TP, Kim CY, Tai Z, Patel KC, Puma JA, Makam P, Bertolet BD, Nseir GY. Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orbital atherectomy system in treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions (ORBIT II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.158.

    PubMed 24852804
  • Lee M, Genereux P, Shlofmitz R, Phillipson D, Anose BM, Martinsen BJ, Himmelstein SI, Chambers JW. Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):261-264. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

    PubMed 28162989

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Calcified Coronary Lesions and ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, run by Hospital del Mar at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Target Vessel Failure (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05752617, which also lists 29 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in