AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast Cancer FemaleNCT05760755

Stick Together - Pilot Intervention Study

A study testing Stick Together in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study investigates the acceptability and feasibility of 'Stick Together', a self-guided online intervention, for younger women with breast cancer and their cohabiting partners. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 49 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer Female
What is being tested?
Stick Together
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Feb 2023to 6 Aug 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 49 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • women newly diagnosed with first primary breast cancer, treated with curative intent at Department of breast surgery, Gentofte Hospital
  • living with a romantic partner
  • living in romantic partnership with a patient eligible for the intervention

Who cannot join

  • severe relationship difficulties or current couples counselling
  • severe, untreated mental illness in one or both partners
  • capable of participating (mastery of Danish language, available smartphone, tablet or other device, no cognitive impairment)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Department of breast surgery, Gentofte Hospital

    Gentofte Municipality

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Stick Together - a Dyadic Web-intervention for Younger Patients with Breast Cancer and Their Partners

This pilot study investigates the acceptability and feasibility of 'Stick Together', a self-guided online intervention, for younger women with breast cancer and their cohabiting partners.

Read the detailed description

This one-arm feasibility study pilots the 'Stick Together' intervention among 20 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer at age 25-49 and their cohabiting partners. The intervention aims to strengthen couples' positive dyadic coping and communication, as well as participants mental health and quality of life, as well as quality of life of underage children.

Being tested
Stick Together

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stick TogetherBehavioural

    The intervention consists of 12 online modules, completed flexibly during and immediately after primary cancer treatment. The intervention contains interviews with other couples, psychoeducational information, and interactive exercises on themes such as dyadic coping and communication, being diagnosed at a young age, fertility and children, and life after treatment.

Study groups in NCT05760755
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention group (Stick Together)ExperimentalIntervention group (all participants)
Receives: Behavioral: Stick Together

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participation (Acceptability 1)

    Percentage of eligible participants consenting to participate

    Measured: baseline

  2. Participants satisfaction (Acceptability 2)

    Percentage of participants satisfied with the intervention

    Measured: Post-intervention follow-up (7-9 months post diagnosis)

  3. Completion (Feasibility)

    Percentage of participants completing the intervention (65% completion)

    Measured: Post-intervention (7-9 months post diagnosis)

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Change from baseline to post-intervention in supportive dyadic coping

    Score on supportive dyadic coping (min 5, max 25), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  2. Change from baseline to post-intervention in delegated dyadic coping

    Score on delegated dyadic coping (min 2, max 10), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  3. Change from baseline to post-intervention in negative dyadic coping

    Score on negative dyadic coping (min 4, max 20), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  4. Change from baseline to post-intervention in stress communication

    Score on stress communication (min 4, max 20), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  5. Change from baseline to post-intervention in satisfaction with dyadic coping

    Score on satisfaction with dyadic coping (min 2, max 10), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  6. Change from baseline to post-intervention in joint dyadic coping

    Score on joint dyadic coping (min 5, max 25), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  7. Change from baseline to post-intervention in perceived stress

    Score on perceived stress (min 0, max 16), as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  8. Change from baseline to post-intervention in anxiety

    Score on anxiety symptoms (min 0, max 21), as measured by the Generalized anxiety scale-7. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  9. Change from baseline to post-intervention in depression

    Score on depression symptoms (min 0, max 27), as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  10. Change from baseline to post-intervention in protective buffering

    Score on protective buffering (min 8, max 40), as measured by the Ways of Giving Support-questionnaire subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  11. Change from baseline to post-intervention in active engagement

    Score on active engagement (min 5, max 25), as measured by the Ways of Giving Support-questionnaire subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  12. Change from baseline to post-intervention in overprotection

    Score on overprotection (min 6, max 30), as measured by the Ways of Giving Support-questionnaire subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  13. Change from baseline to post-intervention in psychological quality of life

    Score on psychological quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version subscale (WHOQOL-BREF). Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  14. Change from baseline to post-intervention in physical quality of life

    Score on physical quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version scubscale (WHOQOL-BREF). Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  15. Change from baseline to post-intervention in social quality of life

    Score on social quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version subscale (WHOQOL-BREF). Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

  16. Change from baseline to post-intervention in children's quality of life

    Total mean score on quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the Pediatric Quality of LIfe inventory (PEDSQL). Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2023
  2. Study start1 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion6 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion6 Aug 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05760755
Sponsor's protocol ID
P-2020-246
Other IDs
H-22032044
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
26 Jan 2023
Last updated
19 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD can be shared upon reasonable request to the Principal Investigator, when it can be allowed by applicable law and regulations.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stick Together in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participation (Acceptability 1) (time frame: baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in