AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastroesophageal RefluxAPDGNCT05763485

Anti Reflux Mucosal Ablation Therapy in PPI Dependent GERD

A study testing Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Technical University of Munich at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, interventional, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) in PPI dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in comparison to controls with a sham procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Gastroesophageal Reflux
What is being tested?
Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
1 Mar 2023to 1 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • PPI dependent GERD for at least 6 months
  • Pathological esophageal acid exposure, defined by DeMeester score >14.7 or acid exposure time (AET) >4.2% in pH metry while off PPI
  • Exclusion of primary esophageal motility disorders by manometry
  • Upper endoscopy with biopsy (Exclusion of eosinophilic esophagitis)

Who cannot join

  • Sliding hiatal hernia >3cm
  • Los Angeles grade C/D esophagitis
  • Primary esophageal motility disorders
  • Grade IV Hill´s flap valve
  • Pregnancy or planed pregnancy in the next 12 months
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Paraesophageal hernia
  • Previous esophageal or gastric surgery
  • Barretts esophagus
  • Liver cirrhosis
  • Varices
  • Lack of consent
  • ASA physical status >III

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mohamed Abdelhafez, MD contact

08941409320

Mohamed.Abdelhafez@mri.tum.de

Rami Abbassi, MD contact

08941409349

rami.abbassi@mri.tum.de

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • II Medizinische Klinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München

    Munich, Bavaria, 81675

    Mohamed Abdelhafez, MD, +49894140 ext. 9320, mohamed.abdelhafez@tum.de

    Rami Abbassi, MD, 08941409349, rami.abbassi@mri.tum.de

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Anti Reflux Mucosal Ablation Therapy in PPI Dependent GERD: a Prospective Randomized, Single-blinded, Sham-controlled Trial

This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, interventional, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) in PPI dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in comparison to controls with a sham procedure.

Read the detailed description

Patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and, after informed consent, are willing to participate in this study will be prepared for ARMA. After sedation the patients will be randomized equally into an intervention and control Group. The patients are blinded to the procedure. The Patients in the intervention group receive ARMA using argon plasma coagulation (APC) at the gastroesophageal junction (EGJ) in two semicircular patterns while the control group receives a sham procedure. The approximate duration of the procedure is 30min. After the procedure the patients receive follow up controls at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. During the first follow up, 2 months after the procedure symptoms are evaluated by questionnaires (GERD- HRQL, FSSG, VAG). Subsequently the PPI- medication is stopped in all patients until the end of the study or worsening of symptoms. During the second follow up 4 months after the initial procedure the symptoms are reevaluated by questionnaires. The patients are then unblinded and are told if they received ARMA or sham procedure. Those patients who received ARMA are examined by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry and pH metry. Further assessments is performed by questionnaires 6 and 12 months after the initial procedure.

Those patients in the control group are allowed to take part in a crossover to receive the ARMA procedure as well. If they receive ARMA, symptoms are reevaluated 2 months after the procedure by questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry and pH metry. Further controls are performed after 4, 6 and 12 months by questionnaires.

Being tested
Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA), Sham procedure
Keywords
anti reflux mucosal ablation, ARMA
Medical subject headings
Gastroesophageal Reflux

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA)Procedure or surgery

    In patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and being randomized for ARMA, the procedure using argon plasma coagulation involves two semicircular ablations of the mucosa of the EGJ in a butterfly shape of a width of 2 cm. The approximate duration of the procedure is 30min.

    Follow includes objective evaluation of reflux disease by reflux questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry, pH metry.

  • Sham procedureProcedure or surgery

    In patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and being randomized for sham procedure, the procedure involves esophagogastroduodenoscopy with the same set of movements and duration as the ARMA procedure without the actual ablation.

Study groups in NCT05763485
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA)Active comparatorPatients randomized into the intervention arm receive ARMA and a follow up control after 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. PPI treatment is stopped after 2 months until the end of the study or worsening of symptoms. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, manometry and pH metry is performed after 4 months.
Receives: Procedure: Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA)
Sham procedureSham comparatorPatients randomized into the sham procedure arm receive a esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same setting as if ARMA would be performed. Patients in the Control group receive follow up controls after 2 and 4 months and after unblinding after 4 months are allowed to perform a crossover to receive ARMA. PPI treatment is stopped 2 months after the initial sham procedure until the end of the study or worsening of symptoms. If the patients receive ARMA as a crossover reevaluation is performed 2, 4, 6 and 12 months after the actual ARMA procedure.
Receives: Procedure: Sham procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease

    Improvement in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease by more than 50% from baseline in GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD- HRQL) at 4 months after procedure. Total score 0-50; higher scores indicate greater complaints.

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease

    Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD- HRQL) at 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-50; higher scores indicate greater complaints.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease

    Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in regurgitation score at 4, 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-30; higher scores indicate greater complaints.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease

    Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in Frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) at 4, 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-48; higher scores indicate greater complaints.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease

    Change in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease in visual analog scale (VAS) at 4, 6 and 12 months. Total score 0-10; higher scores indicate greater complaints.

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Complication rate

    Recording of all complications in relation to the ARMA- procedure

    Measured: 12 months

  6. PPI dependency

    Requirement and dose of PPI at 4, 6 and 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Change in esophageal acid exposure at 4 months after ARMA

    Change in esophageal acid exposure in pH metry 4 months after ARMA

    Measured: 4 months after ARMA

  8. Change in lower esophageal sphincter pressure 4 months after ARMA

    Change in lower esophageal sphincter pressure in manometry 4 months after ARMA

    Measured: 4 months after ARMA

  9. Postinterventional pain

    Recording of postinterventional pain in visual analog scale (VAS). Higher scores indicate greater complaints.

    Measured: 1day

  10. Changes in cardia morphology

    Changes in Hill's flap grade

    Measured: 4 months after ARMA

  11. Technical success rate

    Successful completion of ARMA

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2023
  2. Study start1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
4 months after the initial procedure (ARMA or sham-procedure) patients are unblinded. Patients who initially received the sham procedure are now allowed to be treated by ARMA.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05763485
Sponsor's protocol ID
R0001
Acronym
APDG
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
9 Feb 2023
Last updated
10 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anti reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Technical University of Munich at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mohamed Abdelhafez, MD (08941409320, Mohamed.Abdelhafez@mri.tum.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement in symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in