AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 1TAS3351NCT05765734

A Study of TAS3351 in NSCLC Patients With EGFRmt

A Phase 1 study testing TAS3351 in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Taiho Oncology, Inc. at 8 sites in 5 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a first-in-human, open label, Phase 1/2 study to investigate the safety and efficacy of TAS3351 in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an acquired C797S epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
TAS3351
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
8 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
25 May 2023to 14 Mar 2025
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Locally advanced, non-resectable or metastatic NSCLC
  • Have adequate organ function
  • Have a performance status of 0 or 1 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale
  • Has tumor tissue available to allow for analysis of EGFRmt status
  • Dose Escalation:
  • Has any EGFRmt status
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Dose Escalation back-fill part, Dose Expansion and Phase II:
  • Has any sensitizing EGFRmt and a confirmed C797S EGFRmt
  • Has measurable disease per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

Who cannot join

  • Participating in medical research not compatible with this study
  • Symptomatic and unstable central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • Have not recovered from prior cancer treatment
  • Have a significant cardiac condition
  • Are a pregnant or breastfeeding female
  • A serious illness or medical condition
  • Unable to swallow or digest pills

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 5 countries.

8 sites in 5 countries

United States3 sites
  • Next Oncology - Virginia

    Fairfax, Virginia, 22031

  • University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Tennessee Oncology

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

Other trials in United States

Japan2 sites
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East

    Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8577

  • Shizuoka Cancer Center

    Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777

Other trials in Japan

France1 site
  • Institut Gustave Roussy

    Villejuif, Val De Marne, 94805

Other trials in France

Germany1 site
  • Universitaetsklinikum Koeln

    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands1 site
  • Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

    Leiden, 2333ZA

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Phase 1/2 Study of TAS3351 in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR Mutations

This is a first-in-human, open label, Phase 1/2 study to investigate the safety and efficacy of TAS3351 in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an acquired C797S epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation.

Read the detailed description

This study will be conducted in 3 parts (i.e. dose escalation, dose expansion, and a phase 2 portion). The dose escalation part will investigate the safety and determine the recommended phase 2 dose and the recommended dosing regimen of TAS3351 administered orally. The dose expansion part will explore the efficacy of TAS3351 in NSCLC participants with C797S EGFR mutations. The phase 2 part will assess the efficacy of TAS3351 in NSCLC participants with C797S EGFR mutations.

Being tested
TAS3351
Keywords
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC, EGFR mutation, C797S mutation, TAS3351
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TAS3351Drug

    Oral tablets.

Study groups in NCT05765734
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Part A1: Dose Escalation: 50 mgExperimentalParticipants received TAS3351 50 milligrams (mg), tablets, orally, once daily (QD), on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle, for maximum duration of 66 days.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part A1: Dose Escalation: 100 mgExperimentalParticipants received TAS3351 100 mg, tablets, orally, QD, on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle, for a maximum duration of 126 days.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part A1: Dose Escalation: 200 mgExperimentalParticipants received TAS3351 200 mg, tablets, orally, QD, on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle, for a maximum duration of 94 days.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part A1: Dose Escalation: 350 mgExperimentalParticipants received TAS3351 350 mg, tablets, orally, QD, on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle, for a maximum duration of 46 days.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part A1: Dose Escalation: 500 mgExperimentalParticipants received TAS3351 500 mg, tablets, orally, QD, on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle, for a maximum duration of 87 days.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part A1: Dose Escalation: 700 mgExperimentalParticipants were to receive TAS3351 700 mg, tablets, orally, QD, on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part A2: BackfillExperimentalParticipants were to be enrolled in Part A2 (backfill) when a dose level in Part A1 was determined to be safe and preliminary antitumor activity was observed.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part B: Dose ExpansionExperimental.NSCLC participants with C797S EGFR mutations were planned for enrollment in Part B (dose expansion) and were to receive the recommended Phase 2 dose established in Part A.
Receives: Drug: TAS3351
Part C: Phase 2ExperimentalNSCLC participants with C797S EGFR mutations were planned for enrollment in Part C (Phase 2) and were to receive the recommended Phase 2 dose established in Part A
Receives: Drug: TAS3351

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; it did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as an AE that started or worsened at the time of or after the first dose of study drug administration and within 30 days after the last dose of study drug and did not necessarily have a causal relationship to the use of the study drug.

    Measured: From first dose of the study drug up to 30 days after last dose (up to 21.7 months)

  2. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    DLTs were defined as adverse events (AEs) graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0) assessed by the Investigator to be related to study treatment administration during Cycle 1 \& included:Hematologic Toxicity;grade 4 neutropenia greater than[>]7days; febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] less than(<)1000 per cubic millimeter (1000/mm3) with fever greater than or equal to(≥)38.3 degree celsius (°C) or fever ≥38.0°C for > 1hour); grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Hepatic Toxicity: grade ≥3 total bilirubin >7days; grade 4 total bilirubin; Renal Toxicity:creatinine clearance(CrCl)<30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) for > 3days despite supportive care;Other Nonhematologic Toxicity:grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity with: grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or hyperglycemia, prolonged delay (>2 weeks) in initiating Cycle 2 due to treatment-related toxicity; Any death not clearly attributed to the underlying disease or extraneous causes.

    Measured: Cycle 1 (cycle length = 21 days)

  3. Part B: Dose Expansion: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review (ICR)

    ORR was the proportion of participants experiencing a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 millimeters (mm).

    Measured: Up to 21.7 months

  4. Part C: Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With ORR by ICR

    ORR was the proportion of participants experiencing a PR or CR according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10mm.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Percentage of Participants With ORR

    ORR was the proportion of participants experiencing a best overall response of PR or CR according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10mm.

    Measured: From first dose of the study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to approximately 21.7 months)

  2. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Duration of Response (DoR)

    DOR was calculated for all responders from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    Measured: From first dose of the study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to approximately 21.7 months)

  3. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Percentage of Participants Exhibiting Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    DCR was the proportion of participants who achieved a CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis <10 mm. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), referencing the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Measured: From first dose of the study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to approximately 21.7 months)

  4. Part A2: Backfill: Number of Participants Exhibiting Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from date of first dose to the date of documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first.

    Measured: From first dose of the study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 21.7 months)

  5. Part A2: Backfill: Number of Participants Exhibiting Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was measured from the date of first dose until the date of death due to any cause.

    Measured: From first dose of the study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 21.7 months)

  6. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of TAS3351

    Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration within the dosing interval. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 24 hours post dose

  7. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC24) of TAS3351

    AUC24 is the area under the curve from the time of dosing up to time 24hours. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 24 hours post dose

  8. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUCinf) of TAS3351

    AUCinf is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing extrapolated to infinity. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose

  9. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Time To Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of TAS3351

    Tmax is the time to maximum plasma concentration within the dosing interval. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 24 hours post dose

  10. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (T½) of TAS3351

    T1/2 is the terminal elimination half-life. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose

  11. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Cmax of Metabolite TAS-05-14317

    Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration within the dosing interval. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 24 hours post dose

  12. Part A1: Dose Escalation: AUC24 of Metabolite TAS-05-14317

    AUC24 is the area under the curve from the time of dosing up to time 24hours. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 24 hours post dose

  13. Part A1: Dose Escalation: AUCinf of Metabolite TAS-05-14317

    AUCinf is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing extrapolated to infinity. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose

  14. Part A1: Dose Escalation: Tmax of Metabolite TAS-05-14317

    Tmax is the time to maximum plasma concentration within the dosing interval. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 24 hours post dose

  15. Part A1: Dose Escalation: T½ of Metabolite TAS-05-14317

    T1/2 is the terminal elimination half-life. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at specified timepoints. A PK lead-in with a single TAS3351 dose on Cycle 1 Day -3, followed by PK sampling three days before the start of continuous daily dosing, was included to characterize the PK profile.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day -3: Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints up to 72 hours post dose

  16. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: Number of Participants With TEAEs

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; it did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as an AE that is starting or worsening at the time of or after the first dose of study drug administration and within 30 days after the last dose of study drug and did not necessarily have a causal relationship to the use of the study drug.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  17. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: DoR by ICR

    DOR was calculated for all responders from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  18. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: PFS by ICR

    PFS is the time from date of first dose to the date of documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurs first.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  19. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: DCR by ICR

    DCR was the proportion of participants who achieved a CR, PR, or SD. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis <10 mm. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referencing the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  20. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: ORR by Investigator Assessment

    ORR was the proportion of participants experiencing a PR or CR according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10mm.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  21. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: DoR by Investigator Assessment

    DOR was calculated for all responders from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  22. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: PFS by Investigator Assessment

    PFS was defined as the time from date of first dose to the date of documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  23. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: DCR by Investigator Assessment

    DCR was the proportion of participants who achieved a CR, PR, or SD. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis <10 mm. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referencing the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  24. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: Intracranial ORR (icORR) by Investigator Assessment

    The icORR was defined as percentage of participants experiencing a PR or CR. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10mm. The icORR was planned to be assessed based on ORR of central nerve system (CNS) lesions only.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  25. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: Intracranial DoR (icDOR) by Investigator Assessment

    The icDoR was planned to be calculated for all responders from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. The icDoR was planned to be assessed based on DoR of CNS lesions only.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  26. Part B: Dose Expansion and Part C: Phase 2: OS

    OS was measured from the date of first dose until the date of death due to any cause.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  27. Part C: Phase 2: Participant Reported Outcome Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire meant to assess different aspects that define the quality of life of cancer participants and survivors. It facilitates insights into participants' physical, emotional, and social wellbeing, ultimately supporting more informed treatment decisions and care strategies. The questionnaire is divided into 4 parts, namely global health status/ quality of life, functional scales, symptom scales and single-item symptoms. Each item was meant to be scored on a scale of 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores obtained from each section are transformed to a 0-100 score. For the functional and global health status scales, higher scores indicate better functioning or quality of life. For symptom scales and single-item measures, higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

  28. Part C: Phase 2: Participant Reported Outcome Assessed by EuroQol 5D-5L Questionnaire

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, generic, participant-reported instrument developed by the EuroQol Group to assess health-related quality of life across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants were to rate five dimensions namely, mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each item is scores on a score of 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The combination of responses forms a 5-digit health state which is converted into a single utility index score using a country-specific value set. Higher utility scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Up to approximately 21.7 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2023
  2. Study start25 May 2023
  3. Primary completion14 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion14 Mar 2025

Why it stopped: Sponsor's decision, not based on safety concerns

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05765734
Sponsor's protocol ID
10073010
Other IDs
2022-502595-23-00
Acronym
TAS3351
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
8 Feb 2023
Last updated
2 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing TAS3351 in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Taiho Oncology, Inc. at 8 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States, Japan, France, Germany, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Apr 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Part A1: Dose Escalation: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) (time frame: From first dose of the study drug up to 30 days after last dose (up to 21.7 months)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in