Recurrent Atrial FibrillationAMPER-AFNCT05776797
AV Junction Ablation or Optimal Medical Treatment in PatiEnts With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in people with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 9 sites in Czechia.
Trial summary
A study comparing atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) versus continued optimum medical rate control in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and atrial fibrillation (AF) with suboptimal heart rate control on optimum medication. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 480 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesCzechia
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2023to 31 Mar 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Treatment with CRT using either a biventricular pacemaker/defibrillator or conduction system pacemaker (>6 months)
- Diagnosis of AF and classified as: permanent AF or recurrent persistent AF, requiring emergency visits and/or hospitalizations (at least one in recent year)
- Optimized HF medical treatment and rate control medication
- BiVP% + ventricular premature complex (VPC%) <99% and >85% during the minimum period of 1 month while already on optimum medical therapy (applicable only for patients with permanent AF)
- Age >18 and <85 years
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) <3 months
- Technical failure of the CRT system
- Intentional preference for spontaneous AV conduction
- Expected survival <1 year
- Other significant comorbidities and/or conditions that interfere with the proper conduction of the trial
- Dementia as assessed by mini-mental test (<23 points)
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
9 sites in 1 country
Czechia9 sites, 9 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno
Brno, South Moravian, 602 00
František Lehár, MD,PhD, 0042054318 ext. 2187, frantisek.lehar@fnusa.cz
František Lehár, MD,PhD
- Recruiting
University Hospital Brno
Brno, South Moravian, 625 00
Lubomír Křivan, Assoc.Prof.,MD,PhD, 0042053223 ext. 2451, lubomir.krivan@med.muni.cz
Lubomír Křivan, Assoc.Prof.,MD,PhD
- Recruiting
Hospital České Budějovice
České Budějovice, South Bohemian Region, 370 01
Alan Bulava, prof.,MD,Mgr.,PhD, 0042038787 ext. 2006, bulava.alan@nemcb.cz
Alan Bulava, prof.,MD,Mgr.,PhD
- Recruiting
Regional Hospital Liberec
Liberec, Liberec Region, 460 01
Tomáš Roubíček, MD,PhD,FESC, 0042048531 ext. 2847, tomas.roubicek@nemlib.cz
Tomáš Roubíček, MD,PhD,FESC
- Recruiting
University Hospital Olomouc
Olomouc, Olomouc Region, 779 00
Tomáš Skála, Assoc.Prof.,MD,PhD,FESC, 0042058844 ext. 3212, tomas.skala@fnol.cz
Tomáš Skála, Assoc.Prof.,MD,PhD,FESC
- Recruiting
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, 70852
Jiří Hynčica, 0042059737 ext. 2587, jiri.hyncica@fno.cz
Jiří Plášek, MD,PhD,FESC
- Recruiting
Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Prague, 14021
Josef Kautzner, prof.,MD,CSc,FESC, 0042023605 ext. 5006, josef.kautzner@ikem.cz
Josef Kautzner, prof.,MD,CSc,FESC
- Recruiting
Military University Hospital Prague
Prague, 169 02
Patrik Jarkovský, MD, 97320 ext. 3047, patrik.jarkovsky@uvn.cz
Patrik Jarkovský, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Podlesí, Inc.
Třinec, Moravian-Silesian Region, 739 61
Radek Neuwirth, MD,MBA, 0042055830 ext. 4140, radek.neuwirth@npo.agel.cz
Radek Neuwirth, MD,MBA
About this study
A study comparing atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) versus continued optimum medical rate control in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and atrial fibrillation (AF) with suboptimal heart rate control on optimum medication.
Read the detailed description
Patients fulfilling the enrolment criteria will be randomly (randomization with variable blocks of 4, 6, and 8 patients) allocated to intervention and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. AVJA will be done in patients belonging to the intervention group without undue delay after the randomization. The procedure will be repeated in case of recovery of AV nodal conduction during the trial.
CRT device will be programmed to a base rate of 70 bpm, hysteresis switched off, and rate response functions activated unless not tolerated by the patient. The triggered mode will be encouraged.
All patients will be regularly followed in outpatient clinics. Cross-over to the AVJA study arm will be considered and performed at any time during the trial at the discretion of the operators. This may particularly concern patients with clinical deterioration in terms of functional status, quality of life, systolic left ventricular function, and/or repeated hospitalization, and in whom biventricular pacing (BiVP%) <<100% could be suspected as a significant underlying factor.
- Being tested
- Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular junction ablation, biventricular pacing, heart rate control, cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)Procedure or surgery
Ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node is a procedure used to disrupt or break the electrical connection between the upper heart chambers (the atria) and the lower heart chambers (the ventricles).
Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)Drug
Optimal medication therapy according to the prescription of the physician.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) | Experimental | Patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) randomized in this arm will undergo atrioventricular junction ablation. Receives: Procedure: Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) |
| Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) | Active comparator | Patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) randomized in this arm will receive optimal medication treatment. Receives: Drug: Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Heart failure (HF) events
The number of HF events will be observed.
Measured: 3 years
36-Item Quality of Life (QoL)
QoL will be assessed using the 36-Item Quality of Life Questionnaire. QoL will be evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months as a sum of points that are assigned to individual outcome measures, specifically to their change compared to the baseline.
To score the SF-36, scales are standardized to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.
Measured: 3 years
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
MLHFQ values will be recorded and evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months. The questionnaire is comprised of 21 questions around several physical, emotional and socioeconomic ways heart failure can adversely affect a patient's life. The patient marks a 0 (zero) to 5 (five) scale to indicate the extent to which each itemized adversity of heart failure has prevented the patient from living as they wanted to live during the past 4 weeks. The questionnaire is simply scored by summation of all 21 responses.
Measured: 3 years
Dose of loop diuretics
Change in the dose of loop diuretics will be observed and recorded. This parameter will be evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months as an increase or decrease of the dose compared to the baseline.
Measured: 3 years
NYHA classification
Changes in the New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) will be observed. The NYHA classification values will be evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regards to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and or angina pain.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
All-cause death
Patient deaths from all causes will be observed, recorded and analysed.
Measured: 3 years
Death from cardiovascular diseases (CV death)
Incidents of CV death will be observed, recorded and analysed.
Measured: 3 years
Combined heart failure (HF) death and HF hospitalization
Incidents of combined heart failure (HF) death and HF hospitalization will be observed, recorded and analysed.
Measured: 3 years
Time-averaged proportional change in NT-pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro-BNP)
The time-averaged proportional change in NT-pro-BNP will be observed, recorded and analysed.
Measured: 3 years
Days in the hospital because of heart failure (HF)
The number of days in the hospital because of heart failure (HF) will be recorded.
Measured: 3 years
Time-averaged change in the NYHA class
The time-averaged change in the NYHA class will be observed, recorded and analysed.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2023
- Study start1 Apr 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Recurrent Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients fulfilling the enrolment criteria will be randomly (randomization with variable blocks of 4, 6, and 8 patients) allocated to intervention and control groups in a 1:1 ratio.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Ostrava
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jiří Plášek, MD,PhD,FESC, Principal investigator, University Hospital Ostrava
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05776797
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMPER-AF trial
- Acronym
- AMPER-AF
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers. The data may be provided upon request.
Publications
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabes JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylen I, Tolosana JM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. No abstract available.
PubMed 34455430Ousdigian KT, Borek PP, Koehler JL, Heywood JT, Ziegler PD, Wilkoff BL. The epidemic of inadequate biventricular pacing in patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation and its association with mortality. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;7(3):370-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001212. Epub 2014 May 17.
PubMed 24838004Koplan BA, Kaplan AJ, Weiner S, Jones PW, Seth M, Christman SA. Heart failure decompensation and all-cause mortality in relation to percent biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: is a goal of 100% biventricular pacing necessary? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 27;53(4):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.043.
PubMed 19161886Ganesan AN, Brooks AG, Roberts-Thomson KC, Lau DH, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Role of AV nodal ablation in cardiac resynchronization in patients with coexistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb 21;59(8):719-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.891.
PubMed 22340263Waranugraha Y, Rizal A, Setiawan D, Aziz IJ. The Benefit of Atrioventricular Junction Ablation for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Mar-Apr;21(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PubMed 33548449Dong K, Shen WK, Powell BD, Dong YX, Rea RF, Friedman PA, Hodge DO, Wiste HJ, Webster T, Hayes DL, Cha YM. Atrioventricular nodal ablation predicts survival benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep;7(9):1240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
PubMed 20156595Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, Sutradhar SC, Anker SD, Cropp AB, Anand I, Maggioni A, Burton P, Sullivan MD, Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Mann DL, Packer M. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):1424-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584102. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
PubMed 16534009Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid CM, Adamopoulos S, Albert N, Anker SD, Atherton J, Bohm M, Butler J, Drazner MH, Michael Felker G, Filippatos G, Fiuzat M, Fonarow GC, Gomez-Mesa JE, Heidenreich P, Imamura T, Jankowska EA, Januzzi J, Khazanie P, Kinugawa K, Lam CSP, Matsue Y, Metra M, Ohtani T, Francesco Piepoli M, Ponikowski P, Rosano GMC, Sakata Y, Seferovic P, Starling RC, Teerlink JR, Vardeny O, Yamamoto K, Yancy C, Zhang J, Zieroth S. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Mar;23(3):352-380. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2115. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
PubMed 33605000Packer M. Development and Evolution of a Hierarchical Clinical Composite End Point for the Evaluation of Drugs and Devices for Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A 20-Year Perspective. Circulation. 2016 Nov 22;134(21):1664-1678. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023538.
PubMed 27881506Hussain A, Misra A, Bozkurt B. Endpoints in Heart Failure Drug Development. Card Fail Rev. 2022 Jan 18;8:e01. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.13. eCollection 2022 Jan.
PubMed 35111335Huber A, Oldridge N, Hofer S. International SF-36 reference values in patients with ischemic heart disease. Qual Life Res. 2016 Nov;25(11):2787-2798. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1316-4. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
PubMed 27318487
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- AV Junction Ablation or Optimal Medical Treatment in PatiEnts With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05776797
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMPER-AF / AMPER-AF trial
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular junction ablation, biventricular pacing, heart rate control, cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital OstravaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A study comparing atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) versus continued optimum medical rate control in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and atrial fibrillation (AF) with suboptimal heart rate control on optimum medication.
Detailed description
Patients fulfilling the enrolment criteria will be randomly (randomization with variable blocks of 4, 6, and 8 patients) allocated to intervention and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. AVJA will be done in patients belonging to the intervention group without undue delay after the randomization. The procedure will be repeated in case of recovery of AV nodal conduction during the trial.
CRT device will be programmed to a base rate of 70 bpm, hysteresis switched off, and rate response functions activated unless not tolerated by the patient. The triggered mode will be encouraged.
All patients will be regularly followed in outpatient clinics. Cross-over to the AVJA study arm will be considered and performed at any time during the trial at the discretion of the operators. This may particularly concern patients with clinical deterioration in terms of functional status, quality of life, systolic left ventricular function, and/or repeated hospitalization, and in whom biventricular pacing (BiVP%) <<100% could be suspected as a significant underlying factor.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients fulfilling the enrolment criteria will be randomly (randomization with variable blocks of 4, 6, and 8 patients) allocated to intervention and control groups in a 1:1 ratio.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) | Experimental | Procedure: Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)Patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) randomized in this arm will undergo atrioventricular junction ablation. |
| Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) | Active comparator | Drug: Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)Patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) randomized in this arm will receive optimal medication treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Treatment with CRT using either a biventricular pacemaker/defibrillator or conduction system pacemaker (>6 months)
- Diagnosis of AF and classified as: permanent AF or recurrent persistent AF, requiring emergency visits and/or hospitalizations (at least one in recent year)
- Optimized HF medical treatment and rate control medication
- BiVP% + ventricular premature complex (VPC%) <99% and >85% during the minimum period of 1 month while already on optimum medical therapy (applicable only for patients with permanent AF)
- Age >18 and <85 years
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) <3 months
- Technical failure of the CRT system
- Intentional preference for spontaneous AV conduction
- Expected survival <1 year
- Other significant comorbidities and/or conditions that interfere with the proper conduction of the trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)Ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node is a procedure used to disrupt or break the electrical connection between the upper heart chambers (the atria) and the lower heart chambers (the ventricles). | Procedure or surgery | Atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) |
| Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)Optimal medication therapy according to the prescription of the physician. | Drug | Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) |
Primary outcome
Heart failure (HF) events
Time frame: 3 years
The number of HF events will be observed.
36-Item Quality of Life (QoL)
Time frame: 3 years
QoL will be assessed using the 36-Item Quality of Life Questionnaire. QoL will be evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months as a sum of points that are assigned to individual outcome measures, specifically to their change compared to the baseline. To score the SF-36, scales are standardized to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
Time frame: 3 years
MLHFQ values will be recorded and evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months. The questionnaire is comprised of 21 questions around several physical, emotional and socioeconomic ways heart failure can adversely affect a patient's life. The patient marks a 0 (zero) to 5 (five) scale to indicate the extent to which each itemized adversity of heart failure has prevented the patient from living as they wanted to live during the past 4 weeks. The questionnaire is simply scored by summation of all 21 responses.
Dose of loop diuretics
Time frame: 3 years
Change in the dose of loop diuretics will be observed and recorded. This parameter will be evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months as an increase or decrease of the dose compared to the baseline.
NYHA classification
Time frame: 3 years
Changes in the New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) will be observed. The NYHA classification values will be evaluated at 12, 24 and 36 months. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regards to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and or angina pain.
6 secondary outcomes
All-cause death
Time frame: 3 years
Death from cardiovascular diseases (CV death)
Time frame: 3 years
Combined heart failure (HF) death and HF hospitalization
Time frame: 3 years
Time-averaged proportional change in NT-pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro-BNP)
Time frame: 3 years
Days in the hospital because of heart failure (HF)
Time frame: 3 years
Time-averaged change in the NYHA class
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2023.
- Background: PubMed 34455430Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabes JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylen I, Tolosana JM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24838004Ousdigian KT, Borek PP, Koehler JL, Heywood JT, Ziegler PD, Wilkoff BL. The epidemic of inadequate biventricular pacing in patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation and its association with mortality. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;7(3):370-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001212. Epub 2014 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 19161886Koplan BA, Kaplan AJ, Weiner S, Jones PW, Seth M, Christman SA. Heart failure decompensation and all-cause mortality in relation to percent biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: is a goal of 100% biventricular pacing necessary? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 27;53(4):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.043.
- Background: PubMed 22340263Ganesan AN, Brooks AG, Roberts-Thomson KC, Lau DH, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Role of AV nodal ablation in cardiac resynchronization in patients with coexistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb 21;59(8):719-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.891.
- Background: PubMed 33548449Waranugraha Y, Rizal A, Setiawan D, Aziz IJ. The Benefit of Atrioventricular Junction Ablation for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Mar-Apr;21(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 20156595Dong K, Shen WK, Powell BD, Dong YX, Rea RF, Friedman PA, Hodge DO, Wiste HJ, Webster T, Hayes DL, Cha YM. Atrioventricular nodal ablation predicts survival benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep;7(9):1240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 16534009Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, Sutradhar SC, Anker SD, Cropp AB, Anand I, Maggioni A, Burton P, Sullivan MD, Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Mann DL, Packer M. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):1424-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584102. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
- Background: PubMed 33605000Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid CM, Adamopoulos S, Albert N, Anker SD, Atherton J, Bohm M, Butler J, Drazner MH, Michael Felker G, Filippatos G, Fiuzat M, Fonarow GC, Gomez-Mesa JE, Heidenreich P, Imamura T, Jankowska EA, Januzzi J, Khazanie P, Kinugawa K, Lam CSP, Matsue Y, Metra M, Ohtani T, Francesco Piepoli M, Ponikowski P, Rosano GMC, Sakata Y, Seferovic P, Starling RC, Teerlink JR, Vardeny O, Yamamoto K, Yancy C, Zhang J, Zieroth S. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Mar;23(3):352-380. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2115. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 27881506Packer M. Development and Evolution of a Hierarchical Clinical Composite End Point for the Evaluation of Drugs and Devices for Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A 20-Year Perspective. Circulation. 2016 Nov 22;134(21):1664-1678. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023538.
- Background: PubMed 35111335Hussain A, Misra A, Bozkurt B. Endpoints in Heart Failure Drug Development. Card Fail Rev. 2022 Jan 18;8:e01. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.13. eCollection 2022 Jan.
- Background: PubMed 27318487Huber A, Oldridge N, Hofer S. International SF-36 reference values in patients with ischemic heart disease. Qual Life Res. 2016 Nov;25(11):2787-2798. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1316-4. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers. The data may be provided upon request.
Related trials for Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Standard Treatment for Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Without Hypertension
Atrial Fibrillation (Persistent), Catheter Ablation
RecruitingObservational study
Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent
RecruitingObservational study
BOdygUardian MOnitoriNg for ReCurrencE of AF
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
Mazdutide for Reducing Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Obese Patients
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Ablation Treatment
Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Low-Level Tragus Stimulation on Inflammation and Early Recurrence After Pulsed Field Ablation: A Randomized Controlled Study
Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jiří Plášek, MD,PhD,FESC principal investigator
University Hospital Ostrava
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and Optimal medication treatment in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in people with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 9 sites in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jiří Hynčica (0042059737 ext. 2587, jiri.hyncica@fno.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Heart failure (HF) events (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05776797, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2023.