AzTrials
AzTrials

Shallow Vestibular DepthNCT05777811

The Relationship Between Root Coverage Procedures and Buccal Vestibular Depth

A study testing Vertically coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft. and Free gingival graft in people with Shallow Vestibular Depth and Gingival Recession, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this comparative trial, 50 patients with shallow vestibules and Type 1/2 recessions will be treated with either a vertically coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft or a free gingival graft. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Shallow Vestibular Depth, Gingival Recession
What is being tested?
Vertically coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft. and Free gingival graft
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
3 Jan 2021to 15 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores <15%
  • the presence of at least one recession type-1/2 recession and at least one recession with recession depth ≥ 2 mm
  • the presence of an identifiable cemento-enamel junction

Who cannot join

  • Vestibule depth > 6mm
  • Smoking > 10 cigarettes per day
  • Any contraindications for periodontal surgery
  • Unstable endodontic conditions or presence of any restoration.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Hacettepe University

    Ankara, 06100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effect of Different Recession Coverage Approaches on Sites With Shallow Vestibule Depth

In this comparative trial, 50 patients with shallow vestibules and Type 1/2 recessions will be treated with either a vertically coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft or a free gingival graft. At baseline, 3rd-month, 6th-month, and 12th-month visits, the following parameters will be evaluated: buccal vestibular depth, keratinized tissue height, gingival thickness, recession depth, recession width, probing depth, and clinical attachment level. Keratinized tissue change, gingival thickness change, root coverage, clinical attachment gain, and complete root coverage will be calculated. The wound healing index, tissue appearance, patient expectations, aesthetics, and dentin hypersensitivity will be assessed at baseline and at the 6th week.

Read the detailed description

Buccal vestibule depth was recorded using two different measurement methods. First, the distance between the cementoenamel junction and the deepest point of the vestibule sulcus was measured and recorded as VD1. Then, the distance between the gingival margin and the base of the vestibule sulcus was measured and recorded as VD2.

Being tested
Vertically coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft., Free gingival graft
Medical subject headings
Gingival Recession

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vertically coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft.Procedure or surgery

    The exposed root surfaces are planed with Gracey 1-2 curettes. An intrasulcular incision is made with a blade on the buccal aspects of the involved teeth. The incision is extended horizontally to the adjacent papilla. Then, slightly divergent vertical releasing incisions are carried 2 mm beyond the mucogingival junction. A full-thickness flap is raised with a periosteal elevator towards the mucogingival junction. After that, a partial-thickness dissection is carried out in the apical direction to release muscle tension and provide coronal advancement of the flap. The adjacent papillae are de-epithelialized. The connective tissue graft (CTG) is harvested from the lateral palate using the de-epithelialized gingival graft technique. After harvesting, the connective tissue graft is sutured to the recipient bed. Finally, the flap is positioned 2 mm over the cementoenamel junction and sutured with 6-0 polypropylene sutures. No periodontal dressing is applied.

  • Free gingival graftProcedure or surgery

    Also called epithelialized free gingival graft

    A partial-thickness flap is elevated (using a blade #15c) with horizontal incisions at the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) level of the adjacent teeth. Then, two vertical incisions extending to the apical are made from the two ends of the horizontal incision. The epithelium in the framed region is removed with a scalpel, and the underlying connective tissue is exposed. To achieve the best vascularization of the free gingival graft from the recipient site, bed preparation is completed with a split-thickness horizontal incision that joins the vertical incisions in the apical region. The free gingival graft is stabilized using interrupted sutures and a sling suture.

Study groups in NCT05777811
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vertically Coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graftActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Vertically coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft.
Free Gingival GraftActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Free gingival graft

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vestibule depth 2

    The distance between the free gingival margin and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Vestibule depth 2

    The distance between the free gingival margin and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: 3rd month

  3. Vestibule depth 2

    The distance between the free gingival margin and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: 6th month

  4. Vestibule depth 2

    The distance between the free gingival margin and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: 12th month.

  5. Vestibule depth 1

    The distance between the free semento-enamel junction and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Vestibule depth 1

    The distance between the free semento enamel junction and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: 3rd month

  7. Vestibule depth 1

    The distance between the free semento-enamel junction and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: 6th month

  8. Vestibule depth 1

    The distance between the free semento-enamel junction and the most apical point of the vestibul.

    Measured: 12th month

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Recession depth (RD)

    Measured as the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Recession depth (RD)

    Measured as the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin

    Measured: 6th week

  3. Recession depth (RD)

    Measured as the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin

    Measured: 6th month.

  4. Recession depth (RD)

    Measured as the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin

    Measured: 12th month.

  5. Probing depth (PD)

    Measures as the distance from the apical of gingival sulcus to the gingival margin.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Probing depth (PD)

    Measures as the distance from the apical of gingival sulcus to the gingival margin.

    Measured: 6th week

  7. Probing depth (PD)

    Measures as the distance from the apical of gingival sulcus to the gingival margin.

    Measured: 6th month

  8. Probing depth (PD)

    Measures as the distance from the apical of gingival sulcus to the gingival margin.

    Measured: 12th month.

  9. Clinical attachment level (CAL)

    measured as the distance from th tip of the probe inserted into the sulcus to de cementoenamel junction.

    Measured: Baseline.

  10. Clinical attachment level (CAL)

    measured as the distance from th tip of the probe inserted into the sulcus to de cementoenamel junction.

    Measured: 6th week

  11. Clinical attachment level (CAL)

    measured as the distance from th tip of the probe inserted into the sulcus to de cementoenamel junction.

    Measured: 6th month

  12. Clinical attachment level (CAL)

    measured as the distance from th tip of the probe inserted into the sulcus to de cementoenamel junction.

    Measured: 12th month.

  13. Keratinized tissue height (KTH)

    measured from the most apical point of the recession at the gingival margin to the mucogingival line.

    Measured: Baseline.

  14. Keratinized tissue height (KTH)

    measured from the most apical point of the recession at the gingival margin to the mucogingival line.

    Measured: 6th week

  15. Keratinized tissue height (KTH)

    measured from the most apical point of the recession at the gingival margin to the mucogingival line.

    Measured: 6th month

  16. Keratinized tissue height (KTH)

    measured from the most apical point of the recession at the gingival margin to the mucogingival line.

    Measured: 12th month.

  17. Gingival thickness (GT)

    determined 1.5 mm apical to the gingival margin, measured with the caliper accurete to the nearest 0.1 mm.

    Measured: Baseline.

  18. Gingival thickness (GT)

    determined 1.5 mm apical to the gingival margin, measured with the caliper accurete to the nearest 0.1 mm.

    Measured: 6th week.

  19. Gingival thickness (GT)

    determined 1.5 mm apical to the gingival margin, measured with the caliper accurete to the nearest 0.1 mm.

    Measured: 6th month.

  20. Gingival thickness (GT)

    determined 1.5 mm apical to the gingival margin, measured with the caliper accurete to the nearest 0.1 mm.

    Measured: 12th month.

  21. Wound healing index (WHI)

    Wound healing index (WHI) was recorded two-weeks after surgery. The wound surface was visually inspected and the soft tissue healing was defined as 'uneventful' (score 1), 'slightly disturbed' (score 2) or 'poor' (score 3) based on the presence and severity of the items including patient discomfort, erythema, edema, suppuration and flap dehiscence.

    Measured: 2nd week

  22. Tissue appearance (TA)

    Tissue appearance (TA) was evaluated by asking the patients to score the consistency, contour, color match, keloid formation degree and contiguity of their treated sites at T2. The scores were collected as points, shown in parentheses, by asking the consistency as firm (1p) or spongy (0p); contour as presence (2p) or absence (0p) of knife-edged and scalloped gingival margin; color match as excellent (3p), good (2p), adequate (1p) or unsatisfactory (0p); keloid formation degree as absent (1p) or present (0p); contiguity as the presence (-1p) or absence (0p) of each perceptible incision mark.

    Measured: 6th week

  23. Dentine hypersensitivity (DH)

    Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) was evaluated with air evaporative stimulus method at baseline and T2. After placement of finger(s) for preserving the nearby teeth, the recession sites were subjected to evaporative stimulus comprised of 1-second air blast from 1 to 3 mm distance by using the air spray at 40-65 psi pressure and 19±50C. After application, the patients were requested to give a score to their DH between 0 (=no pain) and 10 (=extreme pain).

    Measured: 6th week

  24. Patient expectations (PE)

    Patient expectations (PE) were evaluated by requesting from the patients to rate their treatment results at T2, as satisfactory or not, in terms of appearance, experience and obtained root coverage.

    Measured: 6th week

  25. Aesthetics (A)

    Aesthetics (A) was evaluated by the patient at T1 by rating its level as excellent, good, fair or poor.

    Measured: 6th week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2023
  2. Study start3 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion3 Jan 2023
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05777811
Sponsor's protocol ID
Buccal Vestibule Depth
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
9 Mar 2023
Last updated
23 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Parlak HM, Yilmaz BT, Durmaz MH, Toz H, Keceli HG. The effects of vertically coronally advanced flap and free gingival graft techniques on shallow vestibule: a randomized comparative prospective trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec;27(12):7425-7436. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05332-4. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

    PubMed 37855920

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vertically coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft. and Free gingival graft in people with Shallow Vestibular Depth and Gingival Recession, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vestibule depth 2 (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05777811, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in