Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT05781724
Cardiac Biomarkers and Analytical Methods
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Myocardial Injury, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
In the western world the prevalence of myocardial infarction is estimated at around 1-2% of the population; increases progressively with age, reaching a percentage of 10% after the 75 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Injury
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2020to 31 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 500 samples, of residual serum, from patients hospitalized and/or referred to the DEA of our Polyclinic, for which troponin and/or NT-proBNP tests have been requested routinely or urgently by clinicians, will be included in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Patients arriving in the emergency room with chest pain of presumable cardiac origin and uncertain etiological diagnosis
- Routine request for cardiac Troponin and NT-ProBNP
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years;
- No requirement for cardiac Troponin and NT-ProBNP
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cardiac Biomarkers:Comparison Between Analytical Methods
In the western world the prevalence of myocardial infarction is estimated at around 1-2% of the population; increases progressively with age, reaching a percentage of 10% after the 75 years.
It is therefore considered the first cause of hospitalization and mortality in Western countries, as well as expenditure for the health system.
Read more
It is therefore very important to have cardiac biomarkers that allow to confirm the diagnostic suspicion of coronary heart disease and/or heart failure, carry out prognostic evaluations and stratify patients as precisely as possible in relation to their actual risk.
Currently as biomarkers of heart failure, natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) are widely used in clinical practice but, considering the complexity of heart failure and its clinical and pathophysiological heterogeneity, it is reasonable to think that a single biomarker is not sufficient . For these reasons, there is increasing interest in the scientific community in the search for new biomarkers useful for early diagnosis, for correct prognostic stratification and for evaluating the response to therapy.
Read the detailed description
The study aims to evaluate the analytical performance of different kits and molecular markers commercially available (or in pre-industrial development phase) for the assays of the cardiac biomarkers: cTnI , NT-proBNP and sST2.
500 samples (residual serum) from patients hospitalized and/or referred to the DEA Department, for which troponin and/or NT-proBNP tests have been requested routinely or urgently by clinicians, will be included in the study.
The analytical performance of the various kits and the intra- and interassay imprecision will be evaluated. Comparison of methods will be calculated by Passing-Bablok regression and graph by Bland-Altman.
Through the non-parametric Passing-Bablok model the obtained data will be compared with the various analytical methods, reporting them one in function of the other, together with the regression line.
From the regression equation, the proportional systematic error will be evaluated as angular coefficient of the straight line and the constant systematic error as an intercept of the equation
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Injury
- Keywords
- Troponin, sST2, NT-ProBNP, Laboratory assay
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate current and new laboratory methods and assays
The analytical performance of the assay will be evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A3 guidelines with the aim to highlight the differences respect to the methods currently used in laboratory and optimize the diagnostic accuracy and precison of the available tests.
Comparison between different methods with different analytical sensitivity for the same cardiac biomarker (eg Troponin ultra- Troponin Singulex- Troponin Hs).
Measured: 24 months
Evaluate new cardiac biomarkers
Evaluate new cardiac biomarkers (eg sST2) to implement in the panel of available assays, in response to clinician requests, international guidelines and the emerging potential of new biochemical tests.
Evaluate the medium-long term (1 year) predictive value of the new biomarker in the heart patients attending at the Emergency Department for non-STEMI Acute Chest Pain.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Create a multiparametric algorithm/score
Integrate the new cardiac biomarkers values in a multiparametric algorithm/score for the differential diagnosis and risk stratification in medium/long-term complications.
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Mar 2023
- Study start10 Feb 2020
- Primary completion8 Mar 2021
- Study completion31 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Baroni Silvia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05781724
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2216
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Apple FS, Collinson PO; IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers. Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem. 2012 Jan;58(1):54-61. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.165795. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
PubMed 21965555Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Kosowsky J, Conrad MJ, Murphy SA, Sabatine MS, Jarolim P, Morrow DA. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of current and next-generation assays for cardiac troponin I in the BWH-TIMI ED Chest Pain Study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep;2(3):195-202. doi: 10.1177/2048872613486249.
PubMed 24222830Januzzi JL, Mebazaa A, Di Somma S. ST2 and prognosis in acutely decompensated heart failure: the International ST2 Consensus Panel. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 2;115(7 Suppl):26B-31B. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.037. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
PubMed 25665762Samaha E, Avila A, Helwani MA, Ben Abdallah A, Jaffe AS, Scott MG, Nagele P. High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin After Cardiac Stress Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e008626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008626.
PubMed 30871395Neumann JT, Havulinna AS, Zeller T, Appelbaum S, Kunnas T, Nikkari S, Jousilahti P, Blankenberg S, Sydow K, Salomaa V. Comparison of three troponins as predictors of future cardiovascular events--prospective results from the FINRISK and BiomaCaRE studies. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e90063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090063. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24594734Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 23747642Sarlo F, De Luca C, Moretti G, Urbani A, Baroni S. Analytical performance evaluation of the new sST2 turbidimetric assay implemented in laboratory automation systems. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Oct 18;60(2):e54-e56. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0851. Print 2022 Jan 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 34655512
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cardiac Biomarkers:Comparison Between Analytical Methods
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05781724
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2216
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Injury
- Keywords
- Troponin, sST2, NT-ProBNP, Laboratory assay
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the western world the prevalence of myocardial infarction is estimated at around 1-2% of the population; increases progressively with age, reaching a percentage of 10% after the 75 years.
It is therefore considered the first cause of hospitalization and mortality in Western countries, as well as expenditure for the health system.
It is therefore very important to have cardiac biomarkers that allow to confirm the diagnostic suspicion of coronary heart disease and/or heart failure, carry out prognostic evaluations and stratify patients as precisely as possible in relation to their actual risk.
Currently as biomarkers of heart failure, natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) are widely used in clinical practice but, considering the complexity of heart failure and its clinical and pathophysiological heterogeneity, it is reasonable to think that a single biomarker is not sufficient . For these reasons, there is increasing interest in the scientific community in the search for new biomarkers useful for early diagnosis, for correct prognostic stratification and for evaluating the response to therapy.
Detailed description
The study aims to evaluate the analytical performance of different kits and molecular markers commercially available (or in pre-industrial development phase) for the assays of the cardiac biomarkers: cTnI , NT-proBNP and sST2.
500 samples (residual serum) from patients hospitalized and/or referred to the DEA Department, for which troponin and/or NT-proBNP tests have been requested routinely or urgently by clinicians, will be included in the study.
The analytical performance of the various kits and the intra- and interassay imprecision will be evaluated. Comparison of methods will be calculated by Passing-Bablok regression and graph by Bland-Altman.
Through the non-parametric Passing-Bablok model the obtained data will be compared with the various analytical methods, reporting them one in function of the other, together with the regression line.
From the regression equation, the proportional systematic error will be evaluated as angular coefficient of the straight line and the constant systematic error as an intercept of the equation
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 500 samples, of residual serum, from patients hospitalized and/or referred to the DEA of our Polyclinic, for which troponin and/or NT-proBNP tests have been requested routinely or urgently by clinicians, will be included in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Patients arriving in the emergency room with chest pain of presumable cardiac origin and uncertain etiological diagnosis
- Routine request for cardiac Troponin and NT-ProBNP
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age <18 years;
- No requirement for cardiac Troponin and NT-ProBNP
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Evaluate current and new laboratory methods and assays
Time frame: 24 months
The analytical performance of the assay will be evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A3 guidelines with the aim to highlight the differences respect to the methods currently used in laboratory and optimize the diagnostic accuracy and precison of the available tests. Comparison between different methods with different analytical sensitivity for the same cardiac biomarker (eg Troponin ultra- Troponin Singulex- Troponin Hs).
Evaluate new cardiac biomarkers
Time frame: 24 months
Evaluate new cardiac biomarkers (eg sST2) to implement in the panel of available assays, in response to clinician requests, international guidelines and the emerging potential of new biochemical tests. Evaluate the medium-long term (1 year) predictive value of the new biomarker in the heart patients attending at the Emergency Department for non-STEMI Acute Chest Pain.
1 secondary outcome
Create a multiparametric algorithm/score
Time frame: 36 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 21965555Apple FS, Collinson PO; IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers. Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem. 2012 Jan;58(1):54-61. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.165795. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 24222830Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Kosowsky J, Conrad MJ, Murphy SA, Sabatine MS, Jarolim P, Morrow DA. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of current and next-generation assays for cardiac troponin I in the BWH-TIMI ED Chest Pain Study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep;2(3):195-202. doi: 10.1177/2048872613486249.
- Background: PubMed 25665762Januzzi JL, Mebazaa A, Di Somma S. ST2 and prognosis in acutely decompensated heart failure: the International ST2 Consensus Panel. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 2;115(7 Suppl):26B-31B. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.037. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
- Background: PubMed 30871395Samaha E, Avila A, Helwani MA, Ben Abdallah A, Jaffe AS, Scott MG, Nagele P. High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin After Cardiac Stress Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e008626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008626.
- Background: PubMed 24594734Neumann JT, Havulinna AS, Zeller T, Appelbaum S, Kunnas T, Nikkari S, Jousilahti P, Blankenberg S, Sydow K, Salomaa V. Comparison of three troponins as predictors of future cardiovascular events--prospective results from the FINRISK and BiomaCaRE studies. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e90063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090063. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 23747642Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 34655512Sarlo F, De Luca C, Moretti G, Urbani A, Baroni S. Analytical performance evaluation of the new sST2 turbidimetric assay implemented in laboratory automation systems. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Oct 18;60(2):e54-e56. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0851. Print 2022 Jan 27. No abstract available.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Recruiting
ELEVATE-HFpEF Clinical Study
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
Not yet recruiting
A Study to Lower Blood Pressure One Year After Childbirth in Women Who Had Preeclampsia
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Effect of Lomitapide Treatment on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Clazakizumab (LY5724886) in Adults With Elevated hsCRP and at Increased Risk for Cardiovascular Event
Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Eloralintide (LY3841136) in Participants With Obesity or Overweight, Type 2 Diabetes, and Increased Cardiovascular Risk
Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Myocardial Injury, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate current and new laboratory methods and assays (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05781724, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 4 Nov 2026.