AzTrials
AzTrials

Decompensated CirrhosisPhase 4SURVICNCT05783661

Trial Comparing Conventional Antibiotic Strategies Versus Regimens Guided by Epidemiological Surveillance in Infected Patients With Cirrhosis (SURVIC_STUDY)

A Phase 4 study testing Conventional antibiotic strategies and Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance in people with Decompensated Cirrhosis and Bacterial Infections, run by Eva Bonfill at 1 site in Spain.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study to comparing conventrional antibiotic strategies versus regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance in infected patients with cirrhosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Decompensated Cirrhosis, Bacterial Infections
What is being tested?
Conventional antibiotic strategies and Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
198 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
11 Dec 2023to Mar 2027
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation aged ≥18 years.
  • Proven or suspected bacterial infection requiring antibiotic therapy (diagnosis will be established according to local guidelines, Appendix 1).
  • Signed informed consent or consent given by their legal representatives or close relatives.

Who cannot join

  • Bacterial infection lasting for > 48 hours.
  • Infection in a critically ill cirrhotic patient (ICU admission). In this population, epidemiological surveillance is standard clinical practice.
  • MDR colonization or infection in the last month.
  • Evidence of current locally advanced or metastatic malignancy (patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria and non-melanocytic skin cancer can be included).
  • Pregnant and/or breast-feeding woman.
  • Patients who cannot provide prior informed consent and when there is documented evidence that the patient has no legal surrogate decision-maker and it appears unlikely that the patient will regain consciousness or sufficient ability to provide delayed informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Eva Bonfill

    Barcelona, 08036

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Antibiotic Strategies Versus Regimens Guided by Epidemiological Surveillance in Infected Patients With Cirrhosis

Study to comparing conventrional antibiotic strategies versus regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance in infected patients with cirrhosis.

Being tested
Conventional antibiotic strategies, Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance
Medical subject headings
Bacterial Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Conventional antibiotic strategiesOther

    Treatment according to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona.

  • Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillanceOther

    Treatment according to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona guided by colonization/epidemiological surveillance.

Study groups in NCT05783661
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional antibiotic strategiesActive comparatorThe control group will receive treatment according to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona.
Receives: Other: Conventional antibiotic strategies
Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillanceExperimentalThe experimental group will receive treatment to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona guided by colonization/epidemiological surveillance.
Receives: Other: Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Probability/rate of participants of developing antibiotic resistance in both treatment arms at 28 days.

    Measured by the appearance of new colonizations and/or infections by MDROs.

    Measured: 28 days

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Probability of antibiotic resistance development during hospitalization in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the appearance of new colonizations and/or infections by MDROs.

    Measured: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.

  2. Rate of antibiotic resistance development during hospitalization in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the appearance of new colonizations and/or infections by MDROs.

    Measured: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.

  3. Rate of MDRO colonization during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the appearance of new colonications by MDROs.

    Measured: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.

  4. Probability of MDRO colonization during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the appearance of new colonications by MDROs.

    Measured: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.

  5. Rate of MDRO infection during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the appearance of new infections by MDROs.

    Measured: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.

  6. Probability of MDRO infection during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the appearance of new infections by MDROs.

    Measured: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.

  7. Infection resolution rate with initial and final strategies in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the number of infections resolution with initial strategies or final strategies.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  8. Evolution of score ACLF (Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure) in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the result of ACLF score. Minimum ACLF score: 6 points. Maximum ACLF score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  9. Evolution of score MELD (Model For End-Stage Liver Disease) in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the result of MELD score. Minimum MELD score: 6 points. Maximum MELD score: 40 points. Higher scores means a worse result.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  10. Evolution of score Child-Pugh in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the result of Child -Pugh score. Minimum Child-Pugh score: 5 points. Maximum Child-Pugh score: 15 points. Higher scores means a worse result.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  11. Evolution of score CLIF-OF (Liver Failure Consortium - Organ Failure) in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the result of CLIF-OF score. Minimum CLIF-OF score: 6 points. Maximum CLIF-OF score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  12. Evolution of score CLIF-C AD (Chronic Liver Failure Consortium - non-ACLF patients with Acute Decompensation) in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the result of CLIF-C AD score.

    Minimum CLIF-C AD score: 6 points. Maximum CLIF-C AD score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  13. Evolution of score CLIF-C ACLF (Chronic Liver Failure Consortium - Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure) in both treatment arms.

    Measured by the result of CLIF-C ACLF score. Minimum CLIF-C ACLF score: 6 points. Maximum CLIF-C ACLF score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  14. Days of admission to the ICU if needed.

    Measured by the days of admission to the ICU.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  15. Days of life support (dialysis, vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation) if needed.

    Measured by the days of life support.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  16. Days of hospital stay

    Measured by the days of hospital stay.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  17. Number of rehospitalizations.

    Measured by the number of rehospitalizations.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  18. Antibiotics consumption

    Measured by the days of antibiotics consumption.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  19. Antibiotics consumption

    Measured by dose of antibiotics.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days.

  20. Antibiotics consumption

    Measured by type of antibiotics.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  21. Health costs

    Measured by the cost of antibiotic, cost of hospital/ICU stay and of organ support(s).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  22. Proportion of participants with antibiotic-related AE, SAEs, SUSARs and other SAEs.

    Measured by the number of participants with antibiotic-related AE, SAEs, SUSARs and other SAEs.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  23. Hospital survival

    Number of survival participants

    Measured: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.

  24. 28-day survival

    Number of survival participants

    Measured: 28 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2023
  2. Study start11 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completionMar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will recieve: 1. Antibiotic regimens guided by colonization/epidemiological surveillance. 2. Conventional antibiotic regimens.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
198 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05783661
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-001858-33
Acronym
SURVIC
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
15 Feb 2023
Last updated
7 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Conventional antibiotic strategies and Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance in people with Decompensated Cirrhosis and Bacterial Infections, run by Eva Bonfill at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eva Bonfill (+34 932275400 ext. 4198, bonfill@recerca.clinic.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Probability/rate of participants of developing antibiotic resistance in both treatment arms at 28 days. (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in