Premature Ventricular ContractionsPhase 4SUPPRESSNCT05784051
Prophylactic Frequent Premature Ventricular complexeS sUPPression on Left ventriculaR Function impairmEnt in aSymptomatic patientS
A Phase 4 study testing Experimental group in people with Premature Ventricular Contractions and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.
Trial summary
The main objective of the study is to demonstrate that prophylactic treatment of patients with asymptomatic frequent (>10%) PVCs is superior to simple follow-up strategy with no therapy to prevent subsequent LV dysfunction at 24 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Premature Ventricular Contractions, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
- What is being tested?
- Experimental group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 298 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2023to 1 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 ≤ Age ≤ 85
- PVC burden ≥ to 10% regardless of current or preexisting antiarrhythmic drug intake (for instance, a patient under betablocker therapy because of his PVCs or hypertension can be included)
- Asymptomatic status
- Normal (>or= 55%) LVEF. Patients with underlying cardiomyopathy can be included as long as LV function remains preserved.
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnant woman or Female of childbearing potential without effective method of birth control or nursing woman.
- Patients that can't undergo MRI study
- De novo requirement for antiarrhythmic drug prescription for another indication (e.g. atrial fibrillation…)
- The physician already decided that the patient requires drug initiation or escalation;
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy requiring revascularization (PCI or surgery)
- History of LV dysfunction
Show all 9Show fewer
- Participation in another research involving the human person
- Patient under legal protection
- Non affiliation to a social security scheme
About this study
The main objective of the study is to demonstrate that prophylactic treatment of patients with asymptomatic frequent (>10%) PVCs is superior to simple follow-up strategy with no therapy to prevent subsequent LV dysfunction at 24 months. The prophylactic treatment is based on drugs ± ablation (ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain >10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment since the initiation of the study).
The primary endpoint will be the development of LV dysfunction (PVC-iCMP) defined as a 15% relative LVEF decrease (and/or a LVEF <50%) within 2 years following randomization, on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) (or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) when not possible).
Read the detailed description
Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice, in the setting of underlying heart disease as well as in "normal" hearts. Frequent PVCs have been shown to impact long term prognosis in patients with structurally normal hearts,[1] as well as in documented cardiomyopathy. In both settings, PVCs may cause symptoms and, in rare cases, sudden cardiac death. For about two decades, it has been accepted that frequent PVCs may also induce left ventricular (LV) dysfunction called PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (PVC-iCMP). Indeed, PVC suppression by using drugs or catheter ablation has been associated with full recovery of left ventricular dysfunction.[2-4] De facto, PVC-iCMP diagnosis as well as identification of predictors has always been established retrospectively. Therefore, risk stratification or simply knowing the exact incidence of the disease in exposed patients remain difficult.
European and US guidelines recommend to treat symptomatic PVC patients regardless of the burden or their risk profile, as well as "frequent PVCs" associated with LV dysfunction (Experts tend to consider worthwhile treating for burden >10%, which was the lowest burden associated with PVC-iCMP).
However, there is no clear recommendation for asymptomatic patients exposed to very frequent PVCs, at risk of developing cardiomyopathy. As no previous studies included such population, expert suggested that these patients should be at least closely followed. Consequently, management of such patients is widely heterogeneous.
The hypothesis of this study is that prophylactic suppression of very frequent PVCs (>10%) will prevent or significantly reduce the incidence of PVC-iCMP.
- Being tested
- Experimental group, Control group
- Medical subject headings
- Ventricular Premature Complexes, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental groupDrug
Also called medical treatment
medical treatment including drug administration ± catheter ablation (Ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain >10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment).
Control groupDrug
Also called Therapeutic abstention or no modification of therapy
patients of this group have no therapeutic or no treatment modification such as drug therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Patients treated for PVCs with drug therapy and/or catheter ablation/ medical treatment including drug administration ± catheter ablation (Ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain >10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment). Receives: Drug: Experimental group |
| Control group | Active comparator | Patients with therapeutic abstention or no treatment modification such as drug therapy/ Therapeutic abstention or no modification of therapy Receives: Drug: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
occurence of Left ventricular dysfunction (PVC-iCMP)
The primary endpoint will be the development of left ventricular dysfunction (PVC-iCMP) defined as a 15% relative LVEF decrease (and/or a LVEF <50%) within 2 years following randomization, on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) (or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) when not possible).
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Rate of Death
Death from any cause
Measured: 24 months
Rate of Cardiovascular Death
measure of safety endpoint: Death cause of death
Measured: 24 months
Rate of Hospitalization for an adverse event
occurence of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) within follow-up that may be linked or not to anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) or ablation procedure
Measured: 24 months
Percentage of patients with a PVC burden <10%
measure of efficacy endpoints:
PVC burden will be measured the second year following randomization
Measured: during 24 months follow up
LVEF variation
LVEF variation(from baseline to M24)
Measured: 24 months
Nt-ProBNP relative variation
Nt-ProBNP relative variation from baseline to M24
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2023
- Study start1 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Premature Ventricular ContractionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The SUPPRESS study will be a national multicenter randomized open label trial using the PROBE study design (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-point). Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria (asymptomatic patients with frequent (\> 10%/day) PVCs and normal LVEF) and without any exclusion criteria that agree to enter the protocol will be randomized to: 1. Experimental group: 149 patients treated for PVCs with drug therapy and/or catheter ablation/ medical treatment including drug administration ± catheter ablation (Ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain \>10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment). 2. Control group: 149 patients with therapeutic abstention or no treatment modification such as drug therapy/ Therapeutic abstention or no modification of therapy
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05784051
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP180618
- Acronym
- SUPPRESS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prophylactic Frequent Premature Ventricular complexeS sUPPression on Left ventriculaR Function impairmEnt in aSymptomatic patientS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05784051
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUPPRESS / APHP180618
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of the study is to demonstrate that prophylactic treatment of patients with asymptomatic frequent (>10%) PVCs is superior to simple follow-up strategy with no therapy to prevent subsequent LV dysfunction at 24 months. The prophylactic treatment is based on drugs ± ablation (ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain >10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment since the initiation of the study).
The primary endpoint will be the development of LV dysfunction (PVC-iCMP) defined as a 15% relative LVEF decrease (and/or a LVEF <50%) within 2 years following randomization, on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) (or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) when not possible).
Detailed description
Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice, in the setting of underlying heart disease as well as in "normal" hearts. Frequent PVCs have been shown to impact long term prognosis in patients with structurally normal hearts,[1] as well as in documented cardiomyopathy. In both settings, PVCs may cause symptoms and, in rare cases, sudden cardiac death. For about two decades, it has been accepted that frequent PVCs may also induce left ventricular (LV) dysfunction called PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (PVC-iCMP). Indeed, PVC suppression by using drugs or catheter ablation has been associated with full recovery of left ventricular dysfunction.[2-4] De facto, PVC-iCMP diagnosis as well as identification of predictors has always been established retrospectively. Therefore, risk stratification or simply knowing the exact incidence of the disease in exposed patients remain difficult.
European and US guidelines recommend to treat symptomatic PVC patients regardless of the burden or their risk profile, as well as "frequent PVCs" associated with LV dysfunction (Experts tend to consider worthwhile treating for burden >10%, which was the lowest burden associated with PVC-iCMP).
However, there is no clear recommendation for asymptomatic patients exposed to very frequent PVCs, at risk of developing cardiomyopathy. As no previous studies included such population, expert suggested that these patients should be at least closely followed. Consequently, management of such patients is widely heterogeneous.
The hypothesis of this study is that prophylactic suppression of very frequent PVCs (>10%) will prevent or significantly reduce the incidence of PVC-iCMP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The SUPPRESS study will be a national multicenter randomized open label trial using the PROBE study design (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-point). Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria (asymptomatic patients with frequent (> 10%/day) PVCs and normal LVEF) and without any exclusion criteria that agree to enter the protocol will be randomized to: 1. Experimental group: 149 patients treated for PVCs with drug therapy and/or catheter ablation/ medical treatment including drug administration ± catheter ablation (Ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain >10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment). 2. Control group: 149 patients with therapeutic abstention or no treatment modification such as drug therapy/ Therapeutic abstention or no modification of therapy
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Drug: Experimental groupPatients treated for PVCs with drug therapy and/or catheter ablation/ medical treatment including drug administration ± catheter ablation (Ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain >10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment). |
| Control group | Active comparator | Drug: Control groupPatients with therapeutic abstention or no treatment modification such as drug therapy/ Therapeutic abstention or no modification of therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 18 ≤ Age ≤ 85
- PVC burden ≥ to 10% regardless of current or preexisting antiarrhythmic drug intake (for instance, a patient under betablocker therapy because of his PVCs or hypertension can be included)
- Asymptomatic status
- Normal (>or= 55%) LVEF. Patients with underlying cardiomyopathy can be included as long as LV function remains preserved.
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnant woman or Female of childbearing potential without effective method of birth control or nursing woman.
- Patients that can't undergo MRI study
- De novo requirement for antiarrhythmic drug prescription for another indication (e.g. atrial fibrillation…)
- The physician already decided that the patient requires drug initiation or escalation;
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy requiring revascularization (PCI or surgery)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental groupAlso: medical treatmentmedical treatment including drug administration ± catheter ablation (Ablation can be performed if the PVC burden remain >10% after 2 lines of AAD treatment). | Drug | Experimental group |
| Control groupAlso: Therapeutic abstention or no modification of therapypatients of this group have no therapeutic or no treatment modification such as drug therapy | Drug | Control group |
Primary outcome
occurence of Left ventricular dysfunction (PVC-iCMP)
Time frame: 24 months
The primary endpoint will be the development of left ventricular dysfunction (PVC-iCMP) defined as a 15% relative LVEF decrease (and/or a LVEF <50%) within 2 years following randomization, on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) (or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) when not possible).
6 secondary outcomes
Rate of Death
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of Cardiovascular Death
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of Hospitalization for an adverse event
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of patients with a PVC burden <10%
Time frame: during 24 months follow up
LVEF variation
Time frame: 24 months
Nt-ProBNP relative variation
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Sep 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Premature Ventricular Contractions
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Premature Ventricular Complex and Diet Inflamatuar Index
Premature Ventricular Complexes, Diet Quality
RecruitingObservational study
AI-Based Differential Diagnosis and Localization of Tachycardia Using ECG: Multicenter Registry (EP-AI ASSIST)
Tachycardia, Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia
Recruiting
Disrupted Sleep and Concurrent Ectopy or Atrial Fibrillation
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC)
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Premature Ventricular Complexes
Premature Ventricular Complexes, Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Experimental group in people with Premature Ventricular Contractions and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
occurence of Left ventricular dysfunction (PVC-iCMP) (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2023.