Febrile NeutropeniaPhase 4NCT05784844
Antimicrobial Revision in Persistent Febrile Neutropenia
A Phase 4 study testing Meropenem and Micafungin in people with Febrile Neutropenia, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences.
Trial summary
Febrile neutropenia is often seen in patients with hematologic malignancies who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy. These patients are usually placed on posaconazole prophylaxis upon starting chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Febrile Neutropenia
- What is being tested?
- Meropenem and Micafungin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2024to Apr 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of hematologic malignancy
- Receiving chemotherapy as treatment of hematologic malignancy
- Neutropenia defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤ 500 cells/mm3 or an ANC ≤ 1000 cells/mm3 with a predicted decline to < 500 cells/mm3 within 48 hours
- Prescribed cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam as initial treatment for febrile neutropenia
- Persistent fever for ≥ 96 hours since initiation of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam OR recurrent fever that occurs ≥ 96 hours since initiation of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam (fever defined as single temperature of ≥ 38.3°C (101°F) or a temperature of ≥ 38°C (100.4°F) on two consecutive measures separated by at least one hour)
- Receipt of posaconazole as neutropenia prophylaxis for at least 3 calendar days
Who cannot join
- Clinically or microbiologically confirmed infection at time of enrollment, For example, a positive culture or rapid diagnostic test, positive imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) or biomarker, such as galactomannan, that is consistent with infection
- History of infection with organism known to be resistant to meropenem or micafungin
- Documented allergy to carbapenems or echinocandins
- Concomitant use of valproic acid
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Pregnancy
- Previous enrollment in this study
About this study
Official title: Antimicrobial Revision in Patients With Persistent Febrile Neutropenia: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
Febrile neutropenia is often seen in patients with hematologic malignancies who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy. These patients are usually placed on posaconazole prophylaxis upon starting chemotherapy. If an episode of febrile neutropenia occurs, generally an anti-pseudomonal beta lactam, like cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam, is initiated. In patients who continue to fever on these agents, the optimal method of antimicrobial revision has yet to be determined.
Read the detailed description
In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial, the primary objective is to compare the clinical efficacy of two approaches to antimicrobial revision among patients with persistent febrile neutropenia. Neutropenic patients on cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam who continue to fever for greater than 96 hours will be randomized to receive either meropenem or micafungin dosed according to local guidelines. The primary outcome is a global success rate including a composite of defervescence within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation, absence of signs or symptoms of infection, and no modification to antimicrobial regimen after initiation of meropenem or micafungin. The secondary outcomes to be collected include in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice, hospital length of stay, time to defervescence, days of therapy of meropenem or micafungin, rate of Clostridioides difficile infection on meropenem or micafungin, and cause of any proven breakthrough infection while on meropenem or micafungin.
- Conditions
- Febrile Neutropenia
- Being tested
- Meropenem, Micafungin
- Keywords
- acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Febrile Neutropenia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MeropenemDrug
Also called Merrem
Carbapenem antibiotic
MicafunginDrug
Also called Mycamine
Echinocandin antifungal
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem Arm | Active comparator | Patients who meet inclusion criteria may be randomized to meropenem (routine standard of care) dose according to local dosing guidelines to include the use of extended-infusions and adjustments to account for renal function. Duration will be managed by the primary team. Receives: Drug: Meropenem |
| Micafungin Arm | Active comparator | Patients who meet inclusion criteria may be randomized to micafungin dosed as 150mg intravenously every 24 hours according to local dosing guidelines. Duration will be managed by the primary team. Receives: Drug: Micafungin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Global Success Rate
Percentage of study candidates who meet all of the following criteria:
- Defervescence, as defined by a temperature < 38°C (100.4°F) sustained for at least 24 consecutive hours, within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation
- Absence of signs or symptoms of infection within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation including but not limited to hypotension, erythema at catheter sites or cellulitis, positive imaging concerning for infection (e.g., pneumonia, osteomyelitis, abscesses etc.), positive cultures or rapid diagnostic tests, positive biomarkers (e.g. galactomannan), dysuria, hypothermia (≤ 35°C or ≤ 95°F) etc.
- No modification to antimicrobial regimen after initiation of meropenem or micafungin unless the antibiotic modification is considered de-escalation (e.g. discontinuation of vancomycin)
Measured: Hour 72
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of Subjects In-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice
Death during in-hospital admission or discharge from in-hospital admission to hospice care
Measured: From hospital admission to death/discharge to hospice, up to 4 days
Hospital length of stay (days)
Number of days admitted to hospital
Measured: From hospital admission to discharge, up to 4 days
Time to defervescence (hours)
- Time of defervescence defined as the beginning of the 24 consecutive hour afebrile period
- Time to defervescence defined as the time in hours from the initial documented fever to the beginning of the 24 consecutive hour afebrile period
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Days of therapy of meropenem or micafungin
1 antibiotic x the number of days administered, any calendar day in which at least one dose is given counts as a full day of therapy - Time in days from initiation to discontinuation of meropenem or micafungin
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Rate of Clostridioides difficile infection on meropenem or micafungin
Percentage of patients who develop Clostridioides difficile infection while on meropenem or micafungin
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Collection of Causes of any proven breakthrough infection while on meropenem or micafungin
Collection of origin of proven breakthrough infection
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2023
- Study startAug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2025 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Study was never initiated or activated - Reason was lack of funding
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Febrile NeutropeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Wake Forest University Health SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, open-label, single center trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Williamson, PharmD, Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05784844
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00088805
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Prevention and Treatment of Cancer-Related Infections Version 1.2022. Accessed July 12, 2022. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=3&id=1457
Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad II, Rolston KV, Young JA, Wingard JR; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 15;52(4):e56-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir073.
PubMed 21258094Averbuch D, Orasch C, Cordonnier C, Livermore DM, Mikulska M, Viscoli C, Gyssens IC, Kern WV, Klyasova G, Marchetti O, Engelhard D, Akova M; ECIL4, a joint venture of EBMT, EORTC, ICHS, ESGICH/ESCMID and ELN. European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Haematologica. 2013 Dec;98(12):1826-35. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091025.
PubMed 24323983Zimmer AJ, Freifeld AG. Optimal Management of Neutropenic Fever in Patients With Cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):19-24. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00269.
PubMed 30629902Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.
PubMed 15459300Oyake T, Kowata S, Murai K, Ito S, Akagi T, Kubo K, Sawada K, Ishida Y. Comparison of micafungin and voriconazole as empirical antifungal therapies in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Haematol. 2016 Jun;96(6):602-9. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12641. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PubMed 26216048Oztoprak N, Piskin N, Aydemir H, Celebi G, Akduman D, Keskin AS, Gokmen A, Engin H, Ankarali H. Piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenem therapy with and without amikacin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: results of an open randomized trial at a university hospital. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;40(8):761-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq046. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20427546Wang Y, Du Z, Chen Y, Liu Y, Yang Z. Meta-analysis: combination of meropenem vs ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 26;100(8):e24883. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024883.
PubMed 33663117Nakane T, Tamura K, Hino M, Tamaki T, Yoshida I, Fukushima T, Tatsumi Y, Nakagawa Y, Hatanaka K, Takahashi T, Akiyama N, Tanimoto M, Ohyashiki K, Urabe A, Masaoka T, Kanamaru A; Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. Cefozopran, meropenem, or imipenem-cilastatin compared with cefepime as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic adult patients: A multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Infect Chemother. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
PubMed 25239059Nakagawa Y, Suzuki K, Ohta K, Hino M, Ohyashiki K, Kanamaru A, Tamura K, Urabe A, Masaoka T; Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. Prospective randomized study of cefepime, panipenem, or meropenem monotherapy for patients with hematological disorders and febrile neutropenia. J Infect Chemother. 2013 Feb;19(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0466-8. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
PubMed 22948387Ratliff CM, Beardsley JR, Kennedy L, Ohl C, Johnson JW, Luther VP, William JC. Efficacy of doripenem compared with meropenem for treatment of febrile neutropenia among patients who became febrile while on cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam. Poster Presented at: Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting; October 21, 2011; Boston, MA. https://idsa.confex.com/idsa/2011/webprogram/Paper30902.html
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Antimicrobial Revision in Patients With Persistent Febrile Neutropenia: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05784844
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00088805
- Conditions
- Febrile Neutropenia
- Keywords
- acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study was never initiated or activated - Reason was lack of funding
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Febrile neutropenia is often seen in patients with hematologic malignancies who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy. These patients are usually placed on posaconazole prophylaxis upon starting chemotherapy. If an episode of febrile neutropenia occurs, generally an anti-pseudomonal beta lactam, like cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam, is initiated. In patients who continue to fever on these agents, the optimal method of antimicrobial revision has yet to be determined.
Detailed description
In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial, the primary objective is to compare the clinical efficacy of two approaches to antimicrobial revision among patients with persistent febrile neutropenia. Neutropenic patients on cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam who continue to fever for greater than 96 hours will be randomized to receive either meropenem or micafungin dosed according to local guidelines. The primary outcome is a global success rate including a composite of defervescence within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation, absence of signs or symptoms of infection, and no modification to antimicrobial regimen after initiation of meropenem or micafungin. The secondary outcomes to be collected include in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice, hospital length of stay, time to defervescence, days of therapy of meropenem or micafungin, rate of Clostridioides difficile infection on meropenem or micafungin, and cause of any proven breakthrough infection while on meropenem or micafungin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, open-label, single center trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem Arm | Active comparator | Drug: MeropenemPatients who meet inclusion criteria may be randomized to meropenem (routine standard of care) dose according to local dosing guidelines to include the use of extended-infusions and adjustments to account for renal function. Duration will be managed by the primary team. |
| Micafungin Arm | Active comparator | Drug: MicafunginPatients who meet inclusion criteria may be randomized to micafungin dosed as 150mg intravenously every 24 hours according to local dosing guidelines. Duration will be managed by the primary team. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of hematologic malignancy
- Receiving chemotherapy as treatment of hematologic malignancy
- Neutropenia defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤ 500 cells/mm3 or an ANC ≤ 1000 cells/mm3 with a predicted decline to < 500 cells/mm3 within 48 hours
- Prescribed cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam as initial treatment for febrile neutropenia
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Clinically or microbiologically confirmed infection at time of enrollment, For example, a positive culture or rapid diagnostic test, positive imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) or biomarker, such as galactomannan, that is consistent with infection
- History of infection with organism known to be resistant to meropenem or micafungin
- Documented allergy to carbapenems or echinocandins
- Concomitant use of valproic acid
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MeropenemAlso: MerremCarbapenem antibiotic | Drug | Meropenem Arm |
| MicafunginAlso: MycamineEchinocandin antifungal | Drug | Micafungin Arm |
Primary outcome
Global Success Rate
Time frame: Hour 72
Percentage of study candidates who meet all of the following criteria: * Defervescence, as defined by a temperature < 38°C (100.4°F) sustained for at least 24 consecutive hours, within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation * Absence of signs or symptoms of infection within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation including but not limited to hypotension, erythema at catheter sites or cellulitis, positive imaging concerning for infection (e.g., pneumonia, osteomyelitis, abscesses etc.), positive cultures or rapid diagnostic tests, positive biomarkers (e.g. galactomannan), dysuria, hypothermia (≤ 35°C or ≤ 95°F) etc. * No modification to antimicrobial regimen after initiation of meropenem or micafungin unless the antibiotic modification is considered de-escalation (e.g. discontinuation of vancomycin)
6 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects In-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice
Time frame: From hospital admission to death/discharge to hospice, up to 4 days
Hospital length of stay (days)
Time frame: From hospital admission to discharge, up to 4 days
Time to defervescence (hours)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Days of therapy of meropenem or micafungin
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Rate of Clostridioides difficile infection on meropenem or micafungin
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Collection of Causes of any proven breakthrough infection while on meropenem or micafungin
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 days
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- BackgroundNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Prevention and Treatment of Cancer-Related Infections Version 1.2022. Accessed July 12, 2022. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=3&id=1457
- Background: PubMed 21258094Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad II, Rolston KV, Young JA, Wingard JR; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 15;52(4):e56-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir073.
- Background: PubMed 24323983Averbuch D, Orasch C, Cordonnier C, Livermore DM, Mikulska M, Viscoli C, Gyssens IC, Kern WV, Klyasova G, Marchetti O, Engelhard D, Akova M; ECIL4, a joint venture of EBMT, EORTC, ICHS, ESGICH/ESCMID and ELN. European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Haematologica. 2013 Dec;98(12):1826-35. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091025.
- Background: PubMed 30629902Zimmer AJ, Freifeld AG. Optimal Management of Neutropenic Fever in Patients With Cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):19-24. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00269.
- Background: PubMed 15459300Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.
- Background: PubMed 26216048Oyake T, Kowata S, Murai K, Ito S, Akagi T, Kubo K, Sawada K, Ishida Y. Comparison of micafungin and voriconazole as empirical antifungal therapies in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Haematol. 2016 Jun;96(6):602-9. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12641. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
- Background: PubMed 20427546Oztoprak N, Piskin N, Aydemir H, Celebi G, Akduman D, Keskin AS, Gokmen A, Engin H, Ankarali H. Piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenem therapy with and without amikacin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: results of an open randomized trial at a university hospital. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;40(8):761-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq046. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 33663117Wang Y, Du Z, Chen Y, Liu Y, Yang Z. Meta-analysis: combination of meropenem vs ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 26;100(8):e24883. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024883.
- Background: PubMed 25239059Nakane T, Tamura K, Hino M, Tamaki T, Yoshida I, Fukushima T, Tatsumi Y, Nakagawa Y, Hatanaka K, Takahashi T, Akiyama N, Tanimoto M, Ohyashiki K, Urabe A, Masaoka T, Kanamaru A; Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. Cefozopran, meropenem, or imipenem-cilastatin compared with cefepime as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic adult patients: A multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Infect Chemother. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 22948387Nakagawa Y, Suzuki K, Ohta K, Hino M, Ohyashiki K, Kanamaru A, Tamura K, Urabe A, Masaoka T; Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. Prospective randomized study of cefepime, panipenem, or meropenem monotherapy for patients with hematological disorders and febrile neutropenia. J Infect Chemother. 2013 Feb;19(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0466-8. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
- BackgroundRatliff CM, Beardsley JR, Kennedy L, Ohl C, Johnson JW, Luther VP, William JC. Efficacy of doripenem compared with meropenem for treatment of febrile neutropenia among patients who became febrile while on cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam. Poster Presented at: Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting; October 21, 2011; Boston, MA. https://idsa.confex.com/idsa/2011/webprogram/Paper30902.html
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Febrile Neutropenia
RecruitingPhase 4
Adjustment of Antibiotic Dosage in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia and Augmented Renal Clearance
Febrile Neutropenia
Not yet recruiting
Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Utility and Implementation of Point-of-Care Absolute Neutrophil Count in Suspected Neutropenic Fever (DUCATIS) - Diagnostic Accuracy (S1)
Suspected Neutropenic Fever, Confirmed Neutropenic Fever
RecruitingObservational study
Mecapegfilgrastim for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Advanced Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia
Not yet recruiting
Impact of a Telemonitoring Device on the Occurever at Home in Children at Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia
Oncopediatrics, Febrile Neutropenia
Recruiting
Swiss 2024 Continous Fever Monitoring in Pediatric Oncology Patients
Pediatric Oncology Patients With Risk for Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Williamson, PharmD principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Meropenem and Micafungin in people with Febrile Neutropenia, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Global Success Rate (time frame: Hour 72). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05784844, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.