Nonalcoholic Fatty LiverNCT05792423
Conditionally Increased Output (CIO) Enhanced Ultrasound System
A study testing GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings in people with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Fatty Liver
- What is being tested?
- GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2023to 31 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-65
- BMI 18.5-39.9
- Able to undergo abdominal ultrasound
- Able to undergo repeated blood sampling
- Stable medication and supplement list and dosing for 30 days preceding enrollment
- Willing to participate
Who cannot join
- Excess alcohol consumption: > 7 units/week (F) or > 14 units/week (M)
- Current diagnosis of drug induced liver injury
- Prior liver transplantation recipient
- Receiving drug/placebo in treatment trial now or within 30 days
- Received systemic chemotherapy within past 30 days.
- Confirmed or suspected pregnancy
Show all 12Show fewer
- Pacemaker, nerve stimulator, or other implanted electronic device
- Plans to alter medication or supplement list or dosage during the study period
- Active or recent (within 30 days) acute illness
- Recent ultrasound contrast administration
- Recent alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) greater than the laboratory upper limit of normal.
- Other factors that the PI considers likely to compromise study endpoints or subject safety
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: Improving the Performance of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in Obese Fatty Liver Disease Patients by Developing a Conditionally Increased Output (CIO) Enhanced Ultrasound System
This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. LFTs will be collected prior to SWE imaging using CIO, as well up to 7 days post-imaging. Secondarily, this study aims to understand the degree to which SWE imaging results have improved with the use of COI.
Read the detailed description
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the United States, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 30%. NAFLD is a disease with a spectrum that can be categorized as 1) simple steatosis/non-alcoholic fatty liver, defined as excess liver fat without inflammation, and 2) non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in which excess liver fat is associated with inflammation, fibrosis, and healing, ultimately culminating in cirrhosis. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can progress to conditions associated with high morbidity and mortality such as portal hypertension, cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. NASH is currently the second most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States, and is expected to become the leading cause in the near future.
Liver biopsy is currently accepted as the gold-standard method to detect liver fibrosis, though it is an invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Alternatively, imaging is useful for NAFLD diagnosis, disease management, and monitoring treatment response. Several imaging methods are used for these purposes, including ultrasound, MRI, and CT based techniques. Ultrasound (US) is preferred by many physicians because it is a low-cost technique that is widely available. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an ultrasound-based technique that is commonly used for liver fibrosis staging. When performing ultrasound imaging, it is known that several patient-related factors may influence the quality of the image.
In NAFLD patients, several factors including high skin-to-liver capsule distance (SCD) may change the attenuation and aberration of the acoustic waves, change the quality of the image, and make diagnosis harder for radiologists. SCD is the distance between skin and Glisson's capsule, when assessed with standard B-mode ultrasound imaging. In patients with high SCD, and particularly in patients with abdominal obesity, the shear wave elasticity elastogram box may not fill properly, which may cause unreliable SWE measurements. Technical failure and unreliable SWE measurements have been previously reported.
The current FDA guidelines recommend the use of a maximum derated spatial peak temporal average intensity (ISPTA) of ≤ 720 mW/cm2, and either the maximum MI should be ≤ 1.9 or the maximum derated spatial peak pulse average intensity (ISPPA) should be ≤ 190 W/cm2. In addition, clinical justification is required if the TI exceeds 6. Several diagnostic modes that are clinically used and FDA approved use acoustic output values that approach these maximum guidelines. These diagnostic modes include acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) based techniques, harmonic imaging techniques, and Doppler based techniques. In the past decade, the AIUM has published reports on the benefits and limitations of both the TI and MI, including recommendations that transient increases may be warranted if there were associated clinical benefit.
Using the acoustic and thermal limits in current FDA guidelines, it is not always possible to get reliable SWE measurements. Therefore, conditionally increasing the acoustic pressure of a SWE system may help clinicians to obtain reliable and accurate SWE results from patients with abdominal obesity, potentially minimizing the need for liver biopsy.
This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of SWE with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. LFTs will be collected prior to SWE imaging using CIO, as well up to 7 days post-imaging. Secondarily, this study aims to understand the degree to which SWE imaging results have improved with the use of COI.
- Being tested
- GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings
- Medical subject headings
- Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Fatty Liver
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settingsDevice
We will perform liver stiffness measurements with standard settings and an increased acoustic output enhanced ultrasound system. Pre and post ultrasound LFTs will be collected to monitor unexpected liver tissue damage.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 24 healthy adult volunteers | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging
AST value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging
ALT value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging
ALP value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Mean Difference in IQR/Median Ratio Between Standard and CIO SWE
IQR/median is a commonly accepted variability analysis tool for SWE. We are hoping to understand the variability difference between these two ultrasound modes in this safety study.
Measured: Single visit (1day)
Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging
AST value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging
AST value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging
ALT value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging
ALT value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging
ALP value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging
ALP value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2023
- Study start30 Jun 2023
- Primary completion31 May 2024
- Study completion31 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Nonalcoholic Fatty LiverStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GE Healthcare
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anthony Samir, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05792423
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022P003180
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 23 May 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving the Performance of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in Obese Fatty Liver Disease Patients by Developing a Conditionally Increased Output (CIO) Enhanced Ultrasound System
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05792423
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022P003180
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GE Healthcare
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. LFTs will be collected prior to SWE imaging using CIO, as well up to 7 days post-imaging. Secondarily, this study aims to understand the degree to which SWE imaging results have improved with the use of COI.
Detailed description
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the United States, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 30%. NAFLD is a disease with a spectrum that can be categorized as 1) simple steatosis/non-alcoholic fatty liver, defined as excess liver fat without inflammation, and 2) non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in which excess liver fat is associated with inflammation, fibrosis, and healing, ultimately culminating in cirrhosis. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can progress to conditions associated with high morbidity and mortality such as portal hypertension, cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. NASH is currently the second most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States, and is expected to become the leading cause in the near future.
Liver biopsy is currently accepted as the gold-standard method to detect liver fibrosis, though it is an invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Alternatively, imaging is useful for NAFLD diagnosis, disease management, and monitoring treatment response. Several imaging methods are used for these purposes, including ultrasound, MRI, and CT based techniques. Ultrasound (US) is preferred by many physicians because it is a low-cost technique that is widely available. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an ultrasound-based technique that is commonly used for liver fibrosis staging. When performing ultrasound imaging, it is known that several patient-related factors may influence the quality of the image.
In NAFLD patients, several factors including high skin-to-liver capsule distance (SCD) may change the attenuation and aberration of the acoustic waves, change the quality of the image, and make diagnosis harder for radiologists. SCD is the distance between skin and Glisson's capsule, when assessed with standard B-mode ultrasound imaging. In patients with high SCD, and particularly in patients with abdominal obesity, the shear wave elasticity elastogram box may not fill properly, which may cause unreliable SWE measurements. Technical failure and unreliable SWE measurements have been previously reported.
The current FDA guidelines recommend the use of a maximum derated spatial peak temporal average intensity (ISPTA) of ≤ 720 mW/cm2, and either the maximum MI should be ≤ 1.9 or the maximum derated spatial peak pulse average intensity (ISPPA) should be ≤ 190 W/cm2. In addition, clinical justification is required if the TI exceeds 6. Several diagnostic modes that are clinically used and FDA approved use acoustic output values that approach these maximum guidelines. These diagnostic modes include acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) based techniques, harmonic imaging techniques, and Doppler based techniques. In the past decade, the AIUM has published reports on the benefits and limitations of both the TI and MI, including recommendations that transient increases may be warranted if there were associated clinical benefit.
Using the acoustic and thermal limits in current FDA guidelines, it is not always possible to get reliable SWE measurements. Therefore, conditionally increasing the acoustic pressure of a SWE system may help clinicians to obtain reliable and accurate SWE results from patients with abdominal obesity, potentially minimizing the need for liver biopsy.
This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of SWE with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. LFTs will be collected prior to SWE imaging using CIO, as well up to 7 days post-imaging. Secondarily, this study aims to understand the degree to which SWE imaging results have improved with the use of COI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 24 healthy adult volunteers | Experimental | Device: GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18-65
- BMI 18.5-39.9
- Able to undergo abdominal ultrasound
- Able to undergo repeated blood sampling
- Stable medication and supplement list and dosing for 30 days preceding enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Excess alcohol consumption: > 7 units/week (F) or > 14 units/week (M)
- Current diagnosis of drug induced liver injury
- Prior liver transplantation recipient
- Receiving drug/placebo in treatment trial now or within 30 days
- Received systemic chemotherapy within past 30 days.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settingsWe will perform liver stiffness measurements with standard settings and an increased acoustic output enhanced ultrasound system. Pre and post ultrasound LFTs will be collected to monitor unexpected liver tissue damage. | Device | 24 healthy adult volunteers |
Primary outcome
Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
AST value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
ALT value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
ALP value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.
7 secondary outcomes
Mean Difference in IQR/Median Ratio Between Standard and CIO SWE
Time frame: Single visit (1day)
Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging
Time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Rupatadine in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients.
NAFLD (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Qurse Revand for MASLD: A Randomized Controlled Safety and Efficacy Trial
MASLD (Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Roflumilast in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients
NAFLD (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Non-Invasive MASLD Diagnosis & T2D Remission Biomarkers
MASLD, T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
RecruitingPhase 2
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, the HEpatic Response to Oral Glucose, and the Effect of Semaglutide (NAFLD HEROES)
Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis, Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings in people with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging (time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2025.