AzTrials
AzTrials

Nonalcoholic Fatty LiverNCT05792423

Conditionally Increased Output (CIO) Enhanced Ultrasound System

A study testing GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings in people with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 Jun 2023to 31 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65
  • BMI 18.5-39.9
  • Able to undergo abdominal ultrasound
  • Able to undergo repeated blood sampling
  • Stable medication and supplement list and dosing for 30 days preceding enrollment
  • Willing to participate

Who cannot join

  • Excess alcohol consumption: > 7 units/week (F) or > 14 units/week (M)
  • Current diagnosis of drug induced liver injury
  • Prior liver transplantation recipient
  • Receiving drug/placebo in treatment trial now or within 30 days
  • Received systemic chemotherapy within past 30 days.
  • Confirmed or suspected pregnancy
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Pacemaker, nerve stimulator, or other implanted electronic device
  • Plans to alter medication or supplement list or dosage during the study period
  • Active or recent (within 30 days) acute illness
  • Recent ultrasound contrast administration
  • Recent alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) greater than the laboratory upper limit of normal.
  • Other factors that the PI considers likely to compromise study endpoints or subject safety

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Improving the Performance of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in Obese Fatty Liver Disease Patients by Developing a Conditionally Increased Output (CIO) Enhanced Ultrasound System

This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. LFTs will be collected prior to SWE imaging using CIO, as well up to 7 days post-imaging. Secondarily, this study aims to understand the degree to which SWE imaging results have improved with the use of COI.

Read the detailed description

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the United States, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 30%. NAFLD is a disease with a spectrum that can be categorized as 1) simple steatosis/non-alcoholic fatty liver, defined as excess liver fat without inflammation, and 2) non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in which excess liver fat is associated with inflammation, fibrosis, and healing, ultimately culminating in cirrhosis. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can progress to conditions associated with high morbidity and mortality such as portal hypertension, cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. NASH is currently the second most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States, and is expected to become the leading cause in the near future.

Liver biopsy is currently accepted as the gold-standard method to detect liver fibrosis, though it is an invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Alternatively, imaging is useful for NAFLD diagnosis, disease management, and monitoring treatment response. Several imaging methods are used for these purposes, including ultrasound, MRI, and CT based techniques. Ultrasound (US) is preferred by many physicians because it is a low-cost technique that is widely available. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an ultrasound-based technique that is commonly used for liver fibrosis staging. When performing ultrasound imaging, it is known that several patient-related factors may influence the quality of the image.

In NAFLD patients, several factors including high skin-to-liver capsule distance (SCD) may change the attenuation and aberration of the acoustic waves, change the quality of the image, and make diagnosis harder for radiologists. SCD is the distance between skin and Glisson's capsule, when assessed with standard B-mode ultrasound imaging. In patients with high SCD, and particularly in patients with abdominal obesity, the shear wave elasticity elastogram box may not fill properly, which may cause unreliable SWE measurements. Technical failure and unreliable SWE measurements have been previously reported.

The current FDA guidelines recommend the use of a maximum derated spatial peak temporal average intensity (ISPTA) of ≤ 720 mW/cm2, and either the maximum MI should be ≤ 1.9 or the maximum derated spatial peak pulse average intensity (ISPPA) should be ≤ 190 W/cm2. In addition, clinical justification is required if the TI exceeds 6. Several diagnostic modes that are clinically used and FDA approved use acoustic output values that approach these maximum guidelines. These diagnostic modes include acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) based techniques, harmonic imaging techniques, and Doppler based techniques. In the past decade, the AIUM has published reports on the benefits and limitations of both the TI and MI, including recommendations that transient increases may be warranted if there were associated clinical benefit.

Using the acoustic and thermal limits in current FDA guidelines, it is not always possible to get reliable SWE measurements. Therefore, conditionally increasing the acoustic pressure of a SWE system may help clinicians to obtain reliable and accurate SWE results from patients with abdominal obesity, potentially minimizing the need for liver biopsy.

This study aims to assess possible bioeffects that may be caused by the use of SWE with conditionally increased acoustic output pressure (CIO). Bioeffects will be monitored by of a series of liver function tests (LFTs) with results graded according to the NCI scale for drug hepatoxicity. LFTs will be collected prior to SWE imaging using CIO, as well up to 7 days post-imaging. Secondarily, this study aims to understand the degree to which SWE imaging results have improved with the use of COI.

Being tested
GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings
Medical subject headings
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Fatty Liver

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settingsDevice

    We will perform liver stiffness measurements with standard settings and an increased acoustic output enhanced ultrasound system. Pre and post ultrasound LFTs will be collected to monitor unexpected liver tissue damage.

Study groups in NCT05792423
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
24 healthy adult volunteersExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging

    AST value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

  2. Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging

    ALT value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

  3. Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging

    ALP value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Mean Difference in IQR/Median Ratio Between Standard and CIO SWE

    IQR/median is a commonly accepted variability analysis tool for SWE. We are hoping to understand the variability difference between these two ultrasound modes in this safety study.

    Measured: Single visit (1day)

  2. Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging

    AST value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

  3. Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging

    AST value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

  4. Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging

    ALT value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

  5. Mean Difference in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging

    ALT value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

  6. Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day1 Post-imaging

    ALP value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 1 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

  7. Mean Difference in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day2 Post-imaging

    ALP value difference between pre and post imaging will be collected to monitor potential liver injury effect of the CIO enhanced liver stiffness measurement method in this safety study.

    Measured: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 2 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Mar 2023
  2. Study start30 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completion31 May 2024
  4. Study completion31 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05792423
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022P003180
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
4 Jan 2023
Last updated
23 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing GE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings in people with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Difference in Aspartate Transaminase (AST) Value in U/L Unit Between Pre-imaging and day7 Post-imaging (time frame: Pre-ultrasound imaging and 7 day after the ultrasound imaging (within 2 weeks timeframe)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in